DNA hypomethylation of interleukin 8 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Koo Han Yoo
    • Yong-Koo Park
    • Sung-Goo Chang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 24, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.992
  • Pages: 39-42
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

DNA hypomethylation is associated with carcinogenesis due to its involvement in cancer initiation and progression. In this study we analyzed the hypomethylation status of candidate genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) using a large-scale, high-throughput DNA methylation profiling technique. Results revealed that hypomethylated interleukin 8 (IL8) gene was the most prominent of the candidate genes, with a beta value difference of 0.406 (cancer tissue mean beta value, 0.346; normal tissue mean beta value, 0.752). Validation results using sequencing analysis demonstrated that the methylation rate was 2.4% in cancer tissue and 14.7% in normal tissue, whilst the non-methylation rate was 82.9% in cancer tissue and 52.9% in normal tissue. However, the hypomethylation status of IL8 had no significant relationship with Fuhrman's nuclear grade, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage or survival (P>0.05). We revealed that the IL8 gene is maximally hypomethylated in cancer tissue compared to normal tissue.

Introduction

Interleukin 8 (IL8) is produced by macrophages, neutrophils, endothelial cells and cancer cells. It is a proinflammatory chemokine associated with the promotion of neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation (1). This chemokine activates intracellular signaling pathways using G protein-coupled receptors (1). A number of chemokines, such as IL8, promote and regulate neoplastic progression, including angiogenesis and metastasis (2). IL8 is a potent angiogenic factor and controls the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in endothelial cells (3). Overexpression of VEGF is closely associated with the progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) (4).

Hypomethylation of genomic DNA has been associated with increased rates of genomic instability (5). Hypomethylation of CpG dinucleotides in genomic DNA is known as one of the somatic epigenetic alterations identified in human cancers (5). DNA hypomethylation is postulated to affect carcinogenesis due to its involvement in cancer initiation and progression (6). In this study, we analyzed the hypomethylation status of candidate genes, including IL8, in CCRCC using a large-scale, high-throughput DNA methylation profiling technique. The correlation between the hypomethylation status of the candidate gene (IL8) and clinicopathological parameters was examined.

Material and methods

Tissue specimens consisted of 46 cancer tissues and 46 matched adjacent normal tissues from CCRCC patients who had undergone nephrectomy at Kyung Hee University Hospital between 1999 and 2005. The study was approved by the institutional review board at Kyung Hee University Medical Center. Preparation of DNA samples and DNA extraction were implemented as previously described (7). Bisulfite conversion of all DNA samples was performed with EZ-96 DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA). The methylcytosine content was quantified using a GoldenGate Methylation Cancer Panel I microarray (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) (8). Following the bisulfite conversion and methylation chip assay, technical replicates were prepared for each sample using the same converted DNA. Beta values for matching normal and cancer clinical samples were compared; differential methylation was readily detected (8). The methylation status of CpG sites was examined by bisulfite sequencing according to the protocol employed by Herman et al(9). The methylation status of the 1505 CpG sites was measured using a data matrix of beta values. An additional filter based on a Student’s t-test was applied. This required a maximal difference in beta value between the two groups (10). The hypomethylation status and clinicopathological characteristics of CCRCC patients were analyzed.

Results

We identified one marker (IL8) out of 807 cancer-related candidate genes (Fig. 1). Results revealed that the mean beta value difference of IL8 was 0.406 (cancer tissue mean beta value, 0.346; normal tissue mean beta value, 0.752). Of the 46 CCRCC patients, two groups were defined according to their beta value difference; weak hypomethylation (a difference smaller than the mean value) and strong hypomethylation (a difference greater than the mean value). Table I indicates that the hypomethylation status of IL8 had no significant correlation with either Fuhrman’s nuclear grade or tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage (P>0.05).

Table I

Baseline characteristic of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) patients.

Table I

Baseline characteristic of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) patients.

Weak hypomethylation (n=23)Strong hypomethylation (n=23)P-value
Age61.30±11.16662.74±10.6180.502
Gender0.738
  Male1816
  Female57
Fuhrman’s nuclear grade
  I22
  II117
  III79
  IV350.316
TNM stage
  T11615
  T244
  T334
  T4000.695
  N02222
  N1111.000
  M02119
  M1240.386

We examined the methylation status of the CpG site by bisulfite sequencing. Fig. 2 reveals the hypomethylation results of IL8 using bisulfite sequencing. Validation results using sequencing analysis demonstrated that the methylation rate was 2.4% in cancer tissue and 14.7% in normal tissue, whilst the non-nmethylation rate was 82.9% in cancer tissue and 52.9% in normal tissue. The overall survival time of CCRCC patients was analyzed according to either a weak or strong hypomethylation status of IL8 (Fig. 3). There was no statistical influence of IL8 hypomethylation status on survival, as demonstrated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve (P=0.693).

Discussion

In this study, beta value differences of cancer and normal tissue were not associated with clinicopathological status. However, DNA hypomethylation of IL8 was widely detected in cancer compared to normal kidney tissue. Alteration of genomic DNA methylation, such as hyper- and hypomethylation, affects human tumorigenesis (5). Hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands is capable of inactivating important tumor-suppressor genes (11). Hypomethylation of genomic DNA has been associated with increased rates of genomic instability (6,12).

Suzuki et al demonstrated that genomic DNA hyper- and hypomethylation alterations in gastrointestinal cancer were distributed gradually and increased with cancer patient age (13). It was concluded that age-dependent accumulation of DNA demethylation precedes diploidy loss in gastrointestinal cancer. Cadieux et al demonstrated that hypomethylation of Sat2 sequences is associated with copy number alterations of the adjacent euchromatin in human glioblastomas (14). This implicated hypomethylation to be a predisposing factor for specific genetic alterations in glioblastoma. The analysis between DNA hypomethylation and prostate cancer was reported by Yegnasubramanian et al, who performed a tiered gene expression microarray and bisulfite genomic sequencing-based approach to identify the methylation status of prostate cancer (5). The authors demonstrated that a class of cancer testis antigen genes undergoes CpG island hypomethylation and overexpression in primary and metastatic prostate cancer. DNA hypomethylation patterns were heterogenous across different metastatic sites within the same patients.

IL8 is a proinflammatory cytokine for leukocytes and is involved in tumor growth, metastasis and survival of solid organ cancer (15,16). Certain studies have analyzed IL8 methylation status in human cancer (17,18). Dimberg et al revealed the protein expression of IL8 in plasma, tumor and paired normal tissue, and the methylation status of the IL8 gene in colorectal cancer (17). The authors demonstrated that a significantly higher level of IL8 was present in cancer tissue compared to normal tissue. IL8 hypomethylation was detected in 64% of the cancer tissue, whereas no hypomethylation was found in the paired normal tissue. De Larco et al analyzed the correlation between the metastatic potential of breast carcinoma cell lines and the ectopic expression of IL8 (18). The authors revealed that an aberrant methylation pattern may be responsible for the differences in IL8 between high and low metastatic cell lines. Two CpG sites of IL8 were fully methylated in the high metastatic cell lines. However, these cell lines produced large quantities of IL8. The authors suggested that there may be additional epigenetic control mechanisms that have not yet been fully appreciated or explored.

In summary, this study demonstrated that the IL8 gene was maximally hypomethylated in CCRCC cancer tissue compared to normal tissue. However, levels of DNA hypomethylation were not correlated with the clinicopathological status of the patient.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF), funded by the Korean government (MOST) (No. R13-2002-020-02001-0, 2007).

References

1 

Waugh DJ and Wilson C: The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 14:6735–6741. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Vandercappellen J, Van Damme J and Struyf S: The role of CXC chemokines and their receptors in cancer. Cancer Lett. 267:226–244. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Martin D, Galisteo R and Gutkind JS: CXCL8/IL8 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and the autocrine activation of VEGFR2 in endothelial cells by activating NFkappaB through the CBM (Carma3/Bcl10/Malt1) complex. J Biol Chem. 284:6038–6042. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Djordjevic G, Mozetic V, Mozetic DV, et al: Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 203:99–106. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Yegnasubramanian S, Haffner MC, Zhang Y, et al: DNA hypomethylation arises later in prostate cancer progression than CpG island hypermethylation and contributes to metastatic tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 68:8954–8967. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Karpf AR and Matsui S: Genetic disruption of cytosine DNA methyltransferase enzymes induces chromosomal instability in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 65:8635–8639. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Kim GY, Park JH, Kim YW, Jung WW, Unni KK and Park YK: Absence of amplification of HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) gene in Ewing’s sarcoma: a real-time polymerase chain reaction method. Pathol Res Pract. 200:663–667. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Bibikova M, Lin Z, Zhou L, et al: High-throughput DNA methylation profiling using universal bead arrays. Genome Res. 16:383–393. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Herman JG, Graff JR, Myöhänen S, Nelkin BD and Baylin SB: Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:9821–9826. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Yoo KH, Park YK, Kim HS, Jung WW and Chang SG: Epigenetic inactivation of HOXA5 and MSH2 gene in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Pathol Int. 60:661–666. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Jones PA and Laird PW: Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat Genet. 21:163–167. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Eden A, Gaudet F, Waghmare A and Jaenisch R: Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation. Science. 300:4552003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Suzuki K, Suzuki I, Leodolter A, et al: Global DNA demethylation in gastrointestinal cancer is age dependent and precedes genomic damage. Cancer Cell. 9:199–207. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Cadieux B, Ching TT, VandenBerg SR and Costello JF: Genome-wide hypomethylation in human glioblastomas associated with specific copy number alteration, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase allele status, and increased proliferation. Cancer Res. 66:8469–8476. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Xie K: Interleukin-8 and human cancer biology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 12:375–391. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Strieter RM, Belperio JA, Phillips RJ and Keane MP: CXC chemokines in angiogenesis of cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 14:195–200. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Dimberg J, Ström K, Löfgren S, Zar N, Lindh M and Matussek A: DNA promoter methylation status and protein expression of interleukin-8 in human colorectal adenocarcinomas. Int J Colorectal Dis. 27:709–714. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

De Larco JE, Wuertz BR, Yee D, Rickert BL and Furcht LT: Atypical methylation of the interleukin-8 gene correlates strongly with the metastatic potential of breast carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:13988–13993. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January 2013
Volume 5 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yoo KH, Park Y and Chang S: DNA hypomethylation of interleukin 8 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett 5: 39-42, 2013
APA
Yoo, K.H., Park, Y., & Chang, S. (2013). DNA hypomethylation of interleukin 8 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 5, 39-42. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.992
MLA
Yoo, K. H., Park, Y., Chang, S."DNA hypomethylation of interleukin 8 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma". Oncology Letters 5.1 (2013): 39-42.
Chicago
Yoo, K. H., Park, Y., Chang, S."DNA hypomethylation of interleukin 8 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma". Oncology Letters 5, no. 1 (2013): 39-42. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.992