The clinical and prognostic implications of pluripotent stem cell gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Xin Yin
    • Yi-Wei Li
    • Jian-Jun Jin
    • Yin Zhou
    • Zheng-Gang Ren
    • Shuang-Jian Qiu
    • Bo-Heng Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 23, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1151
  • Pages: 1155-1162
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Recently, growing evidence has demonstrated that aberrant expression of pluripotent stem cell-related genes may confer primitive and aggressive traits and be associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in certain solid cancers. However, the role of pluripotent stem cell gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unexplored. We evaluated the expression of the pluri­potent stem cell genes Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4, as well as that of the c-Myc, Nanog and Lin28 genes in HCC samples and corresponding adjacent non-tumor liver samples obtained from 57 patients using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). The results revealed that six pluripotent stem cell gene expression levels were upregulated in the tumor tissues compared with the corresponding adjacent non-tumor liver tissues. In HCC tissues, aberrant expression of Sox2 and Lin28 was associated with a large tumor size (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively), while increased expression levels of c-Myc (P=0.01) were correlated with vascular invasion. Moreover, high Klf4 expression levels were associated with aggressive tumor behaviors in terms of vascular invasion (P=0.02) and poor tumor differentiation (P=0.03). Survival analysis revealed that Klf4 expression was independently associated with overall survival [OS; hazard ratio (HR), 8.61; 95% confidential interval (CI), 2.7-27.5; P<0.001] and recurrence‑free survival (RFS; HR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.3-11.6; P=0.01). In conclusion, pluripotent stem cell genes are associated with HCC progression and a poor prognosis. The development of therapeutic strategies, including adjuvant therapy, that take cancer stem cell (CSC)-related markers into consideration is likely to be a key factor in further improvements of the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing curative liver resection.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive types of cancer worldwide. Its highly invasive and metastatic phenotypes are the key reasons for treatment failure and a poor prognosis. Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, a high failure rate and a low median survival rate are currently observed in patients following multimodality therapies with recurrent, intractable HCC. To improve patient survival, it is important to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms that control the tumor-initiating and metastatic properties of HCC.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), also defined as tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TISCs), are a subpopulation of neoplastic cells that possess characteristics of normal stem cells, most notably the ability to self-renew and to differentiate into heterogeneous non-tumorigenic cancer cells that comprise the bulk of the tumor. There has been abundant evidence that supports the existence of cancer stem cells in HCC (1). Under the CSC hypothesis, factors contributing to a poor prognosis, including resistance to conventional therapies, tumor recurrence and metastasis, may be associated with a small subset of highly tumorigenic stem-like cells (2). However, despite growing evidence for the existence of tumor-initiating cells, the stem cell properties of tumor-initiating cells remain largely unresolved (3,4). Studies have suggested that CSCs have common molecular signatures that are similar to those of pluripotent embryonic stem cells (5,6). The core transcription factors of this stem cell-like signature, including Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc, Nanog and Lin28, have been used to successfully reprogram differentiated somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells (7,8). Studies have also revealed that the expression of stem cell-related genes may help to distinguish tumors associated with distinct clinical outcomes in certain solid types of cancer, such as medulloblastoma and colorectal cancer (9,10). However, thus far, a possible correlation between pluripotent stem cell genes and the prognosis has not been established in HCC. Our study aimed to evaluate the expression profiles of the pluripotent stem cell genes (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc, Nanog and Lin28) using quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and to determine its possible prognostic significance in HCC.

Materials and methods

Patients and sample collection

A total of 57 pairs of HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor liver tissues were obtained from patients who underwent curative liver resection consecutively in a single group at the Department of Hepatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January, 2006 to December, 2007. Tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately following resection and were stored at −80°C until RNA extraction was performed. Patient selection was according to the following inclusion criteria: i) confirmed pathological diagnosis of HCC; ii) without anticancer treatments and distant metastases prior to surgery; iii) undergoing curative liver resection for HCC, defined as macroscopically complete removal of the tumor as described previously by Sun et al(11); and iv) availability of fresh tissue specimens and their complete clinical data. The patients included 48 males (84.2%) and 9 females (15.8%), with a median age of 49 years (range, 33–67 years). Fifty-four patients (94.7%) were positive for hepatitis B virus. Tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 14.0 cm, with a median size of 6.0 cm. All tumors were histologically diagnosed as HCC with Edmondson grade I in 2 cases, grade II in 47 cases and grade III in 8 cases. The tumor stages were classified according to the 7th edition tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of the International Union Against Cancer. Twenty-four cases were classified as stage I, 25 as stage II and 8 as stage III. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Informed consent was obtained from all patients participating in the present study.

Real-time quantitative PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor liver tissues using TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA (2 μg) was reverse transcribed using the Primescript RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Inc.; Tokyo, Japan). Expression levels of Oct4 (NM_203289), Sox2 (NM_003106) and Klf4 (NM_004235), as well as the c-Myc (NM_002467), Nanog (NM_002467) and Lin28 (NM_024674) genes were evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR. Real-time PCR for quantification was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio, Inc.). The reactions were performed in triplicate. The expression levels of target genes were normalized to the expression level of GAPDH (NM_002046), a housekeeping gene control. Primer sequences of target genes and GAPDH were as follows: forward: 5’-GAGAAGGATGTGGTCCGAGTGTG-3’ and reverse: 5’-GGCAGATGGTCGTTTGGCTGAATA-3’ for human Oct4; forward: 5’-CGCCCCCAGCAGACTTCACA-3’ and reverse: 5’-CTCCTCTTTTGCACCCCTCCCATTT-3’ for human Sox2; forward: 5’-AGAGGAGCCCAAGCCAAAGAG-3’ and reverse: 5’-CGAATTTCCATCCACAGCCGTC-3’ for human Klf4; forward: 5’-CAGAGTGCATCGACCCCTCG-3’ and reverse: 5’-TTCCTCCTCAGAGTCGCTGC-3’ for human c-Myc; forward: 5’-TGAACCTCAGCTACAAACAGGTG-3’ and reverse: 5’-AACTGCATGCAGGACTGCAGAG-3’ for human Nanog; forward: 5’-CTCCGTGTCCAACCAGCAG-3’ and reverse: 5’-CACGTTGAACCACTTACAGATGC-3’ for human Lin28; forward: 5’-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACA-3’ and reverse: 5’-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3’ for human GAPDH. The relative genomic expression was calculated by 2−ΔΔCt, as previously described by Schmittgen and Livak (12).

Follow-up

Patients were followed up until December, 2011 and the median follow-up period was 22 months (range, 5–58 months). Follow-up procedures were performed according to a uniform guideline previously established in our institute (13). Briefly, patients were monitored by abdominal ultrasonography, serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and chest radiography with an interval of 2–4 months following discharge. When a recurrence was suspected, computed tomography (CT) scanning or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed immediately. Treatment modalities following relapse were administered according to a uniform guideline by Sun et al(14). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval between the date of surgery and the date of mortality or the last observation time. For surviving patients, the data were censored at the last follow-up. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time interval between the date of surgery and the date of diagnosis of any type of tumor relapse (intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic metastasis).

X-tile analysis

As there are no established cut-off points available for pluripotent stem cell gene expression in HCC, X-tile analysis (X-tile software, version 3.6.1; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven, CT, USA) was performed to generate an optimal cut-off point for categorization of the stem cell gene expression levels. The X-tile program split the cohort randomly into a matched training and validation set as a method for selecting an optimal cut-off point. It calculated a P-value for every possible division of the cohort expression data. A two-dimensional graph with its corresponding survival curves was plotted, where each colored pixel was proportional to its χ2 value. The program automatically calculated the maximum χ2 value, which served as a cut-off point that predicted the prognosis (15).

Statistical analysis

Numerical data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or as median (range). Quantitative data were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Categorical data were analyzed by the χ2 or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. A Spearman’s correlation test was applied to analyze the correlations. OS and RFS curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between curves were assessed by the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were estimated by the Cox proportional hazards stepwise regression model. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 13.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA) was the software used for assessment. A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Pluripotent stem cell gene expression in HCC tissues

The expression of six pluripotent genes was evaluated in 57 HCC patients through qPCR analysis. The results revealed that the expression levels of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc and Nanog in HCC specimens were signifcantly higher than those in the corresponding adjacent non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1). Analysing all possible combinations of transcription factors demonstrated that a significant correlation was only achieved between Oct4 and Nanog (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.44; P<0.001), suggesting a possible functional link between Oct4 and Nanog in HCC cases.

Selection of optimal cut-off values

To assess the statistical significance and to avoid the problems of multiple cut-off point selection, the X-tile program was employed to determine the cut-off values for the expression of six pluripotent genes. According to the X-tile program, the patient cohort was divided into low expression and high expression populations based on a cut-off point of 4.0 for Oct4 (Pmin=0.02), 4.3 for Sox2 (Pmin=0.05), 5.7 for Klf4 (Pmin<0.001), 4.7 for Nanog (Pmin=0.01) 7.3 for c-Myc (Pmin=0.26) and 4.2 for Lin28 (Pmin=0.38) (Figs. 2 and 3).

Correlation of pluripotent stem cell gene expression with clinicopathologic features

As shown in Table I, the expression levels of the Sox2 and Lin28 genes were significantly correlated with tumor size. The mean Sox2 and Lin28 expression levels in the 28 cases with a large tumor size (>5 cm) were 3.79±0.29 and 4.66±0.40, respectively; whereas in the 29 cases with a small tumor size, the levels were 2.79±0.29 and 3.55±0.31 (P=0.02 and 0.03), respectively. With respect to vascular invasion, marked increases in Klf4 (P=0.02) and c-Myc (P=0.01) levels were detected in HCC patients with vascular invasion. With regard to tumor differentiation, a significant correlation was identified between Klf4 expression and poor tumor differentiation (P=0.03). However, no statistical difference was identified in the expression of pluripotent genes when compared with other clinicopathological factors, including age, gender, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), AFP, liver cirrhosis, tumor number, tumor encapsulation and TNM stage.

Table I

Correlation between pluripotent stem cell gene expression and clinicopathological variables in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Table I

Correlation between pluripotent stem cell gene expression and clinicopathological variables in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Oct4Sox2Klf4c-MycNanogLin28






VariablesHigh n=19Low n=38P-valueHigh n=13Lo n=44P-valueHigh n=7Low n=50P-valueHigh n=21Low n=36P-valueHigh n=13Low n=44P-valueHigh n=28Low n=29P-value
Gender
  Male16321.09390.094440.0419290.3210380.4121270.06
  Female364536273672
Age (years)
  ≤508230.193280.013280.5113180.385260.1912190.09
  >50111510164228188181610
HBsAg
  Positive121.0120.66030.51030.17030.33210.53
  Negative18361242747213313412628
Liver cirrhosis
  Presence241.0330.09240.10150.28150.71330.96
  Absence17341041546203112392526
AFP (μg/l)
  Positive >206121.02160.151170.297110.834140.94990.93
  Negative <201326112863314259302019
Tumor number
  Single12300.208340.265370.8914280.3610320.7621210.83
  Multiple785102137831278
Tumor sizea (cm)
  <510180.714240.024240.6511170.717210.7010150.03
  >592092032610196231811
Vascular invasion
  Yes6100.175110.344120.021060.016100.10790.60
  No132883333811307342120
Tumor encapsulation
  Complete11160.265220.345220.1713140.099180.0713140.90
  Incomplete8228222288224261515
Differentiation
  I–II14350.1211380.875440.0318310.9710390.2624250.96
  III–IV532626353544
TNM stage
  I8160.854200.623210.499150.215190.5610140.341
  II9167184217185201510
  III262608533535

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-ol-05-04-1155'] } Data are given as the median.

a Diameter of multiple tumors was calculated as the sum of the size of every single tumor. HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; AFP, α-fetoprotein.

Involvement of pluripotent stem cell gene expression in the prognosis of HCC

The OS and RFS rates for the whole study population were 76.9 and 66.9% at 1 year, 42.4 and 36.7% at 3 years, as well as 42.4 and 19.7% at 5 years, respectively. Upon univariate analysis, Oct4, Klf4 and Nanog mRNA expression were correlated with an unfavorable OS (Fig. 4A–C). High Klf4 expression was also correlated with poor RFS compared with low Klf4 expression (median, 9.0 vs. 15.5 months; P=0.009; Fig. 5C). The multivariate analysis revealed that Klf4 expression was independently correlated with OS (HR, 8.61; 95% CI, 2.7–27.5; P<0.001) and RFS (HR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.3–11.6; P=0.01). Additionally, vascular invasion and complete tumor encapsulation were also independent predictors for OS (P=0.006 and 0.04, respectively). Moreover, tumor number and TNM stage were observed to be independently correlated with RFS (P=0.04 and P=0.03, respectively).

Discussion

Although the number of HCC cases was limited in our study, the results were intriguing. We demonstrated that positive expression of Klf4 was significantly correlated with vascular invasion, poor tumor differentiation, short post-operative recurrence time and a poor prognosis.

Klf4, previously known as gut-enriched Krüppel-like factor (GKLF), is highly expressed in the post-mitotic cells of the gut and skin. Klf4 was first identified as a tumor suppressor, owing to frequent loss of Klf4 expression in gastric, colon, esophageal, bladder and lung cancer, as well as in pancreatic ductal carcinoma (1618). However, subsequent studies proposed the expression of Klf4 was upregulated in oral squamous carcinoma, primary breast ductal carcinoma and human skin squamous cell carcinoma, and correlated with carcinogenesis and tumor progression (1921). These studies suggested that Klf4 may function as either a tumor suppressor or an onco-gene, depending on the tumor type. To date, the role of Klf4 in HCC carcinogenesis and progression remains unclear. Our study indicated that the expression of Klf4 mRNA was significantly correlated with vascular invasion and poor tumor differentiation. Notably, positive expression of Klf4 mRNA was also correlated with tumor relapse and a poor prognosis in patients with HCC. It is difficult to explain the effects of Klf4 on HCC invasion and progression, and there is no direct evidence to indicate this clearly in vivo and in vitro. Further study is required to determine the precise role of KLF4 in HCC and in other human cancer types.

Sox2, along with Oct4 and Nanog, plays a crucial role in the maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency (22). Previous studies have demonstrated that Sox2 is also involved in promoting tumorigenesis, proliferation, and dedifferentiation of human lung squamous cell carcinoma (23) and breast cancer (24). Reduced Sox2 levels in glioblastoma tumor-initiating cells can cause proliferation to cease and a loss of tumorigenicity (25), while overexpression of Sox2 in pancreatic cancer is correlated with an invasive and metastatic phenotype (26). To elucidate the role of Sox2 in HCC, we investigated the correlation between Sox2 mRNA expression and clinicopathological variables associated with tumor progression. The results suggested that Sox2 mRNA is upregulated in HCC tissue, compared with in the adjacent non-tumor tissue and is correlated with a large tumor size. The survival analysis further indicated that patients with a high level of Sox2 had a short survival time (25 months) compared with those with a low level of Sox2 (17 months); however, the difference was not significant (P=0.05). These results suggested that the upregulation of Sox2 may play an important oncogenic role in HCC and represent an acquired malignant proliferative phenotypic feature of tumor cells.

Oct4, a transcription factor in the POU protein family, expressed in both embryonic and adult stem cells, has been proposed to be associated with the pluripotency, proliferative potential and self-renewal properties of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and germ cells (27). Nanog, a downstream target of Oct4 that contributes to cell fate determination of the pluripotent inner cell mass during embryonic development, is also specifically expressed in human embryonic pluripotent stem cells (28). The expression of Oct4 and Nanog is usually confined to pluripotent cells of the developing embryo. Studies have suggested that Oct4 and Nanog may participate in the tumorigenicity and tumor progression of various types of cancer, including breast cancer, glioma, human endometrial adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer (2933). Coexpression of Oct4 and Nanog has also been identified to be correlated with pancreatic carcinogenesis as well as with a poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients (34,35). In the present study, we found that Oct4 and Nanog expression levels were elevated in HCC tissue compared with the adjacent non-tumor liver tissue. Moreover, Oct4 mRNA expression was positively correlated with Nanog mRNA expression (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.44; P<0.001). Patients with a positive expression of Oct4 or Nanog had a relatively low survival rate (Fig. 3A and B). These results indicated that Oct4 and Nanog, the two master transcription factors, which are correlated with stem cell self-renewal and differentiation, may also be correlated with HCC carcinogenesis and the unfavorable prognosis of HCC patients following surgery.

The Myc transcription factor is one of the most important somatically mutated oncogenes in human cancer. There is increasing evidence to support the role of the c-Myc protooncogene in tumor onset and progression. The Myc protein is able to confer a selective advantage in cancer cells by promoting proliferation, cell survival, differentiation blockade, genetic instability and angiogenesis, all of which may indirectly contribute to metastasis (3638). Upregulating c-Myc expression drives cell growth and vasculogenesis, reduces cell adhesion and promotes metastasis (39). c-Myc also induces the production of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by tumor cells, leading to tumor vasculo genesis in pancreatic islet cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (38,40). In accordance with these studies, our data also demonstrated that an abnormal expression of c-Myc mRNA in HCC tissue was correlated with vascular invasion, which suggested an important role of c-Myc in HCC vasculogenesis.

The expression of Lin28 has been demonstrated to promote oncogenesis and participate in the tumor progression of cancer. Dangi-Garimella et al(41) proposed that upregulated Lin28 expression accelerated metastasis in breast cancer, as Lin28 repressed let-7 processing that in turn inhibited HMGA2, a chromatin remodeling protein that activated pro-invasive and pro-metastatic genes. Saiki et al(10) and Hamano et al(42) demonstrated that Lin28 expression was closely correlated with cancer progression in colorectal and oesophageal cancer. However, the current study did not yield definitive findings with respect to the potential role of Lin28 genes in HCC carcinogenesis, aggressiveness and a poor prognosis. The expression of Lin28 mRNA was slightly higher in HCC tissue than in the adjacent tumor tissue (P=0.18). No correlation was observed between Lin28 expression and HCC patient survival, post-operative recurrence or prognosis.

In summary, the results of our comprehensive analysis of six pluripotent stem cell genes in 57 HCC cases suggest that upregulated expression of pluripotency genes in HCC cells may be important in HCC carcinogenesis. Altered expression of Klf4, Sox2, Oct4, Nanog and c-Myc genes indicates the abundance of cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) in primary tumors that may be key resources for tumor progression and the poor prognosis of HCC. As there are no relevant therapeutic strategies to specifically target cells with a CSC-like phenotype in HCC, further investigations to establish the appropriate adjuvant strategies are required.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81201901) and the National Clinical Key Special Subject of China.

References

1 

Yang ZF, Ngai P, Ho DW, Yu WC, Ng MN, Lau CK, Li ML, Tam KH, Lam CT, Poon RT and Fan ST: Identification of local and circulating cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Hepatology. 47:919–928. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Pardal R, Clarke MF and Morrison SJ: Applying the principles of stem-cell biology to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:895–902. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Rossi DJ and Weissman IL: Pten, tumorigenesis, and stem cell self-renewal. Cell. 125:229–231. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Widschwendter M, Fiegl H, Egle D, Mueller-Holzner E, Spizzo G, Marth C, Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Young J, Jacobs I and Laird PW: Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer. Nat Genet. 39:157–158. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Ben-Porath I, Thomson MW, Carey VJ, Ge R, Bell GW, Regev A and Weinberg RA: An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat Genet. 40:499–507. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Wong DJ, Liu H, Ridky TW, Cassarino D, Segal E and Chang HY: Module map of stem cell genes guides creation of epithelial cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2:333–344. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Takahashi K and Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult firoblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 126:663–676. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II and Thomson JA: Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 318:1917–1920. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Rodini CO, Suzuki DE, Saba-Silva N, Cappellano A, de Souza JE, Cavalheiro S, Toledo SR and Okamoto OK: Expression analysis of stem cell-related genes reveal OCT4 as a predictor of poor clinical outcome in medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol. 106:71–79. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Saiki Y, Ishimaru S, Mimori K, Takatsuno Y, Nagahara M, Ishii H, Yamada K and Mori M: Comprehensive analysis of the clinical significance of inducing pluripotent stemness-related gene expression in colorectal cancer cells. Ann Surg Oncol. 16:2638–2644. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Sun HC, Zhang W, Qin LX, Zhang BH, Ye QH, Wang L, Ren N, Zhuang PY, Zhu XD, Fan J and Tang ZY: Positive serum hepatitis B e antigen is associated with higher risk of early recurrence and poorer survival in patients after curative resection of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 47:684–690. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Schmittgen TD and Livak KJ: Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 3:1101–1108. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Yang XR, Xu Y, Shi GM, Fan J, Zhou J, Ji Y, Sun HC, Qiu SJ, Yu B, Gao Q, He YZ, et al: Cytokeratin 10 and cytokeratin 19: predictive markers for poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative resection. Clin Cancer Res. 14:3850–3859. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Sun HC, Zhuang PY, Qin LX, Ye QH, Wang L, Ren N, Zhang JB, Qian YB, Lu L, Fan J and Tang ZY: Incidence and prognostic values of lymph node metastasis in operable hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluation of routine complete lymphadenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 96:37–45. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Raeside DE: Monte Carlo principles and applications. Phys Med Biol. 21:181–197. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Evans PM and Liu C: Roles of Krüpel-like factor 4 in normal homeostasis, cancer and stem cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 40:554–564. 2008.

17 

Zhou Y, Hofstetter WL, He Y, Hu W, Pataer A, Wang L, Wang J, Zhou Y, Yu L, Fang B and Swisher SG: KLF4 inhibition of lung cancer cell invasion by suppression of SPARC expression. Cancer Biol Ther. 9:507–513. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zammarchi F, Morelli M, Menicagli M, Di Cristofano C, Zavaglia K, Paolucci A, Campani D, Aretini P, Boggi U, Mosca F, Cavazzana A, et al: KLF4 is a novel candidate tumor suppressor gene in pancreatic ductal carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 178:361–372. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Pandya AY, Talley LI, Frost AR, Fitzgerald TJ, Trivedi V, Chakravarthy M, Chhieng DC, Grizzle WE, Engler JA, Krontiras H, Bland KI, LoBuglio AF, Lobo-Ruppert SM and Ruppert JM: Nuclear localization of KLF4 is associated with an aggressive phenotype in early-stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 10:2709–2719. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Foster KW, Liu Z, Nail CD, Li X, Fitzgerald TJ, Bailey SK, Frost AR, Louro ID, Townes TM, Paterson AJ, Kudlow JE, et al: Induction of KLF4 in basal keratinocytes blocks the proliferation-differentiation switch and initiates squamous epithelial dysplasia. Oncogene. 24:1491–1500. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Chen YJ, Wu CY, Chang CC, Ma CJ, Li MC and Chen CM: Nuclear Krüppel-like factor 4 expression is associated with human skin squamous cell carcinoma progression and metastasis. Cancer Biol Ther. 7:777–782. 2008.

22 

Fong H, Hohenstein KA and Donovan PJ: Regulation of self-renewal and pluripotency by Sox2 in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 26:1931–1938. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hussenet T, Dali S, Exinger J, Monga B, Jost B, Dembelé D, Martinet N, Thibault C, Huelsken J, Brambilla E and du Manoir S: Sox2 is an oncogene activated by recurrent 3q26.3 amplifications in human lung squamous cell carcinomas. PLoS One. 5:e89602010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Chen Y, Shi L, Zhang L, Li R, Liang J, Yu W, Sun L, Yang X, Wang Y, Zhang Y and Shang Y: The molecular mechanism governing the oncogenic potential of Sox2 in breast cancer. J Biol Chem. 283:17969–17978. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Gangemi RM, Griffero F, Marubbi D, Perera M, Capra MC, Malatesta P, Ravetti GL, Zona GL, Daga A and Corte G: Sox2 silencing in glioblastoma tumor-initiating cells causes stop of proliferation and loss of tumorigenicity. Stem Cells. 27:40–48. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Sanada Y, Yoshida K, Ohara M, Oeda M, Konishi K and Tsutani Y: Histopathologic evaluation of stepwise progression of pancreatic carcinoma with immunohistochemical analysis of gastric epithelial transcription factor Sox2: comparison of expression patterns between invasive components and cancerous or nonneoplastic intraductal components. Pancreas. 32:164–170. 2006.

27 

Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D, Chambers I, Schöler H and Smith A: Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell. 95:379–391. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, Tweedie S and Smith A: Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 113:643–655. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Chang CC: Recent translational research: stem cells as the roots of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 8:1032006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Du Z, Jia D, Liu S, Wang F, Li G, Zhang Y, Cao X, Ling EA and Hao A: Oct4 is expressed in human gliomas and promotes colony formation in glioma cells. Glia. 57:724–733. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zhou X, Zhou YP, Huang GR, Gong BL, Yang B, Zhang DX, Hu P and Xu SR: Expression of the stem cell marker, Nanog, in human endometrial adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 30:262–270. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Lin T, Ding YQ and Li JM: Overexpression of Nanog protein is associated with poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma. Med Oncol. 29:878–885. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Meng HM, Zheng P, Wang XY, Liu C, Sui HM, Wu SJ, Zhou J, Ding YQ and Li JM: Overexpression of Nanog predicts tumor progression and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 9:295–302. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Wen J, Park JY, Park KH, Chung HW, Bang S, Park SW and Song SY: Oct4 and Nanog expression is associated with early stages of pancreatic carcinogenesis. Pancreas. 39:622–626. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Chiou SH, Yu CC, Huang CY, Lin SC, Liu CJ, Tsai TH, Chou SH, Chien CS, Ku HH and Lo JF: Positive correlations of Oct-4 and Nanog in oral cancer stem-like cells and high-grade oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 14:4085–4095. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Grandori C, Cowley SM, James LP and Eisenman RN: The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 16:653–699. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Ma L, Young J, Prabhala H, Pan E, Mestdagh P, Muth D, Teruya-Feldstein J, Reinhardt F, Onder TT, Valastyan S, Westermann F, et al: miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 12:247–256. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Rapp UR, Korn C, Ceteci F, Karreman C, Luetkenhaus K, Serafin V, Zanucco E, Castro I and Potapenko T: MYC is a metastasis gene for non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 4:e60292009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Dominguez-Sola D, Ying CY, Grandori C, Ruggiero L, Chen B, Li M, Galloway DA, Gu W, Gautier J and Dalla-Favera R: Non-transcriptional control of DNA replication by c-Myc. Nature. 448:445–451. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Soucek L, Lawlor ER, Soto D, Shchors K, Swigart LB and Evan GI: Mast cells are required for angiogenesis and macroscopic expansion of Myc-induced pancreatic islet tumors. Nat Med. 13:1211–1218. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Dangi-Garimella S, Yun J, Eves EM, Newman M, Erkeland SJ, Hammond SM, Minn AJ and Rosner MR: Raf kinase inhibitory protein suppresses a metastasis signalling cascade involving LIN28 and let-7. EMBO J. 28:347–358. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Hamano R, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Sugimura K, Tanaka K, Kurokawa Y, Nakajima K, Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Mori M and Doki Y: High expression of Lin28 is associated with tumour aggressiveness and poor prognosis of patients in oesophagus cancer. Br J Cancer. 106:1415–1423. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April 2013
Volume 5 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yin X, Li Y, Jin J, Zhou Y, Ren Z, Qiu S and Zhang B: The clinical and prognostic implications of pluripotent stem cell gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett 5: 1155-1162, 2013
APA
Yin, X., Li, Y., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Ren, Z., Qiu, S., & Zhang, B. (2013). The clinical and prognostic implications of pluripotent stem cell gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 5, 1155-1162. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1151
MLA
Yin, X., Li, Y., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Ren, Z., Qiu, S., Zhang, B."The clinical and prognostic implications of pluripotent stem cell gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Letters 5.4 (2013): 1155-1162.
Chicago
Yin, X., Li, Y., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Ren, Z., Qiu, S., Zhang, B."The clinical and prognostic implications of pluripotent stem cell gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma". Oncology Letters 5, no. 4 (2013): 1155-1162. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1151