Open Access

Neurokinin-2 receptor polymorphism predicts lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients

  • Authors:
    • Weijia Fang
    • Caiyun Fu
    • Xiaogang Chen
    • Xiaozhou Mou
    • Fanlong Liu
    • Jiong Qian
    • Peng Zhao
    • Yulong Zheng
    • Yi Zheng
    • Jing Deng
    • Pingjiang Ye
    • Yifei Wang
    • Shusen Zheng
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 6, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3016
  • Pages: 2003-2006
  • Copyright: © Fang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

To analyze the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of two subtypes of neurokinin (NK) receptors, NK1R and NK2R (also known as TAC1R and TAC2R), in colorectal cancer (CRC), peripheral blood samples were collected from 199 CRC patients. Direct‑sequencing was performed to identify the NK1R rs10198644 and NK2R rs4644560 SNPs. Genotype results were correlated with clinical factors. The allele frequencies of NK1R rs10198644 GC, CC and GG were 52, 17 and 31%, respectively, while that of NK2R rs4644560 GC, CC, and GG were 36, 50 and 14%, respectively. Patients with NK2R rs4644560 GC exhibited more positive lymph nodes than those with CC (mean, 2.2 vs. 1.3; P=0.016). Further analysis highlighted that the number of positive lymph nodes was also increased in the NK2R rs4644560 GC/NK1R rs10198644 GG group compared with the NK2R rs4644560 GG/NK1R rs10198644 GG group (mean, 2.2 vs. 0.9; P=0.04). These data suggested that the NK2R rs4644560 GC polymorphism alone or combination with NK1R rs10198644 GG may be a promising prognostic marker of lymph node metastasis in CRC patients.

Introduction

Neurokinins (NKs) are small neuropeptides that are present in the tumor microenvironment and can act on different stages of carcinogenesis (1). Substance P (SP) and NK A (NKA) and B (NKB) are classical members of the NK family, which exert their biological effects by activating NK receptors denoted as NK1R, NK2R and NK3R (also known as TAC1R, TAC2R and TAC3R) (2). SP, the endogenous ligand for NK1R, activates responses correlated with tumor growth in several human cell lines bearing NK1R receptors (3). Moreover, NKA, the endogenous ligand for NK2R, is a good predictor of survival in patients with stage IV well-differentiated small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (4). Numerous tumors that express NKRs can misuse the NK-induced signaling of normal cells to promote the proliferation and survival of cancer cells, releasing cytokines and soluble mediators that favor tumor growth (5). However, the precise involvement and significance of NK in cancer pathologies remains to be fully defined.

NKRs belong to the family of seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors. NK1R and NK2R are dispersed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems, while NK3R is distributed mainly in the central nervous system (6). Human NK1R and NK2R are 407- and 398-amino acid proteins, respectively (7). NK2R is expressed in a variety of organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, while functional data suggest that NK2R could be significant in mediating the NK-evoked smooth muscle contraction of organs (8). The prevalence of the NK2R mRNA α isoform indicates that NK2R is significantly involved in regulating human colonic functions (9).

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third highest incidence of new cases and the third highest rate of cancer-associated mortality, with 142,280 and 50,830 cases, respectively, in 2013 (10). It is also estimated that the mortality rate for CRC has been gradually increasing in China (11). The occurrence and development of this deadly disease may vary among patients; this may be attributed to variations in genotype patterns. Recently, a population-based epidemiological study in a Chinese population found that the NK2R rs4644560 genotype appeared to be associated with a decreased risk of CRC when combined with NK1R rs10198644 (12). This finding indicates that these two subtypes of NKR gene may play an important role in CRC. The present study used blood samples collected from patients with CRC to clarify the potential association between the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of NK2R rs4644560/NK1Rrs 10198644 and a range of clinical factors important in CRC.

Materials and methods

Participants

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). Peripheral blood samples were collected from 199 patients with CRC following surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, between May and October 2013. All patients provided written informed consent.

Details of patient demographics and clinical information were recorded, including age, gender, alcohol consumption, tobacco exposure, primary tumor site, diagnostic stage, number of positive lymph nodes, differentiation grade and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. Lifestyle factors, including alcohol consumption and tobacco use, were defined as follows: An individual who consumed alcohol more than once per day for at least three months was considered as an alcohol drinker and an individual who had smoked more than one cigarette per day for over one year was considered as a tobacco user. Diagnostic stage was confirmed according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for CRC (13). Differentiation grade was defined as poor, moderate and well. An abnormal CEA level was defined as a level of >5 ng/ml.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Genotyping was performed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and direct-sequencing. Primers were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 software (PREMIER Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and synthesized by Genewiz Biotech (Beijing, China). The primer sequences used for amplification were as follows: NK1R forward, 5′-AAAGTTGGGATCTGCTTACACT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTTCTTTTCTCTCACTGTCCCA-3′; and NK2R forward, 5′-ATGCTGCTGTGTCATCTGCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TATCTTGCCCAGGTTGGTCT-3′. The PCR was performed with 50 ng of genomic DNA, 0.25 µM of each primer, 200 µM of each deoxyribonucleotide, 3 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 Units of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Dalian, China). The PCR amplification was performed as follows: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 9 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 45 sec, annealing at 58°C for 45 sec (decreasing by 0.2°C every cycle) and elongation at 72°C for 30 sec; then 34 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 45 sec, annealing at 55°C for 45 sec (decreasing by 0.2°C every cycle) and elongation at 72°C for 30 sec; and a final elongation at 72°C for 5 min.

The PCR products were purified using the SAP/EXO PCR kit (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). Two microliters of the purified amplicons were directly used for a sequencing reaction with the Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing mix v3.1 (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA). Dye purification was performed by alcohol/sodium acetate precipitation. Sequence analysis was performed on an ABI 3730×1 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the analysis of the final results. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. A two-tailed t-test (double samples heteroscedastic hypothesis) was used to clarify the association between the number of positive lymph nodes and tobacco exposure. Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the association between the number of positive lymph nodes and diagnostic stage. Bartlett's χ2 test was used to analyze the association between the number of positive lymph nodes and the genotypes of each NKR. The data was assessed for homogeneity of variance following logarithmic transformation.

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to further clarify the impact of different genotype combinations of NK2R and NK1R on the number of positive lymph nodes. Prior to the analysis, the genotypes of NK2R and NK1R were first mixed into nine groups (Fig. 1).

Results

A total of 199 patients with pathologically confirmed CRC were enrolled in the study following surgical resection. The median age of the patients was 61 years (range, 23–84 years), and the detailed patient characteristics are listed in Table I. The allele frequencies of NK1R rs10198644 GC, CC and GG were 52, 17 and 31%, respectively, while for NK2R rs4644560 GC, CC and GG, the frequencies were 36, 50 and 14%. A comprehensive analysis of all patient factors, including demographic, lifestyle and clinical factors, was performed in order to clarify their association with the genotypes of NK1R and NK2R, as well as the interaction between them. The positive outcomes are described below.

Table I.

Patient characteristics (n=199).

Table I.

Patient characteristics (n=199).

CharacteristicNumber (%)
Gender
  Male117 (59)
  Female82 (41)
Location of primary tumor
  Left colon34 (17)
  Right colon47 (24)
  Rectum118 (59)
Positive lymph nodes
  0–170 (35)
  2–394 (47)
  4–627 (14)
  ≥78 (4)
Alcohol drinker
  Yes48 (24)
  No151 (76)
Tobacco user
  Yes61 (31)
  No138 (69)

In total, there were 191 patients for whom information regarding positive lymph node numbers and tobacco exposure was available. Among these patients, 53 were in the tobacco group and 138 were in the non-tobacco group, and the mean number of positive lymph nodes was 3.2 and 2.0, respectively. The t-test showed that the tobacco group exhibited significantly more positive lymph nodes than the non-tobacco group (P=0.04; Table II).

Table II.

Association between tobacco use and the number of positive lymph nodes.

Table II.

Association between tobacco use and the number of positive lymph nodes.

ParameterTobaccoNon-tobaccoT-valueP-value (two-tailed)
Mean number of positive lymph nodes   3.22.02.100.04a
Square deviation16.53.1
Number of patients53138

a P<0.05.

In addition, among the 196 patients for whom information on stage and number of positive lymph nodes was available, Pearson's correlation found a positive correlation between the number of positive lymph nodes and the diagnostic stage of the tumor (r=0.48; P<0.001).

Finally, information pertaining to the number of positive lymph nodes and the NKR genotypes was available in 165 patients. Bartlett's χ2 analysis showed that NK2R rs4644560 GC was associated with significantly more positive lymph nodes than rs4644560 CC (mean, 2.2 vs. 1.3; P=0.016; Table III). Furthermore, the one-way ANOVA highlighted the interaction between NK2R rs4644560 and NK1R rs10198644, and showed that the number of positive lymph nodes was increased significantly in the rs4644560 GC/rs10198644 GG group compared with the rs4644560 GG/rs10198644 GG group (mean, 2.2 vs. 0.9; P=0.04), as shown in Fig. 1.

Table III.

Comparison of lymph nodes between the three genotypes of NK2R rs4644560.

Table III.

Comparison of lymph nodes between the three genotypes of NK2R rs4644560.

GenotypesNumber of patientsMean number of positive lymph nodes
GC632.2a
CC791.3a
GG231.6
F-value 4.27
P-value 0.016a

a P<0.05.

Discussion

Based on the identification of the role of NK pathway genes in the risk of CRC, the allele frequencies of SNPs in two selected subtypes of NK receptor, NK1R and NK2R, were investigated and their potential association with various clinical factors was analyzed. Notably, despite the limitation of the sample size, tobacco exposure, diagnostic stage and the selected NKR genotypes were all found to be significantly associated with the number of metastatic lymph nodes, which is well known to be one of the most important prognostic factors in CRC (14,15).

SNPs in receptor-encoded genes can affect a number of aspects of receptor function (16), and may also result in an increased susceptibility to disease or produce variable responses to therapeutic agents (17). There are several novel gene polymorphisms, including those for interleukin-10, SDF1α and embryonic ectoderm development, which have been proven to be associated with lymph node metastasis in CRC (18,19).

It is well known that lifestyle factors, such as cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, may contribute to the risk of cancer. In the present study, patients exposed to tobacco exhibited significantly more positive lymph nodes than those patients not exposed to tobacco; this result is consistent with the finding that tobacco exposure has a detrimental effect on CRC (20). In agreement with a previously published study (21), the present study also found that diagnostic stage was associated with the number of metastatic lymph nodes.

As aforementioned, metastatic lymph nodes may be associated with a variety of clinical factors, therefore, its potential correlation with NK receptor polymorphisms, and their mutual interactions, was worthy of investigation. A previous study has shown that the stimulation of NK2R leads to partial blunting of the enhanced stimulatory effects mediated by NK1R. By contrast, stimulatory hematopoietic cytokines upregulate NK1R expression and downregulate the constitutively expressed NK2R in bone marrow stroma (22). In the present study, the role of NK2R rs4644560 GC in predicting lymph node metastasis was clarified based on the finding that this heterozygote is associated with more positive lymph nodes than the homozygote (CC) of NK2R rs4644560. Notably, despite the complexity of information on clinical interactions, the interactive model of NK2R and NK1R was also found to be useful. NK2R rs4644560 GC was associated with more positive lymph nodes than the corresponding GG genotype when combined with NK1R rs10198644 GG. Further research should be performed to elucidate the potential mechanism underlying this interaction.

Little has been known with regard to the mechanism of NK2R in CRC carcinogenesis. One study, however, began to shed light on this area. The study found that activation of NK2R in afferent neurons led to the protein kinase C (PKC)-induced phosphorylation of a certain gene (23). PKCδ was known to negatively modulate the canonical Wnt pathway and cell proliferation in colon tumor cell lines (24). Moreover, the connection between NK2R and PKC was confirmed by another study, which showed that stimulation of NK2R was not only linked to PKC activation, but that it was also associated with the activation of a multidrug resistance protein transporter in vivo (25). Extensive reviews have also described the neuropeptide receptors as targets for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer (5). Based on the present findings, one novel therapeutic strategy for colon cancer in the future may be the inhibition of the potential signaling pathways associated with certain NK receptor genotypes.

Pending further research to clarify the potential mechanism of the malignant inclination of the NK2R rs4644560 GC genotype or its combination with NK1R rs10198644 GG, the present study indicates that these genotypes may act as a promising prognostic marker, which may predict lymph node metastasis in CRC patients.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Ping Fang from Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) for providing statistical technology support, and Aparna Rao (Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre) who provided so much assistance with perfecting the language of the manuscript and supplied useful suggestions and comments. This study was supported by the Major Scientific Project of Zhejiang Province (grant no. 2012C13014-2). The authors would also like to express their gratitude to the Consulting Project of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (grant no. 2012-XY-12-4), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81201557, 81201783, 81272679, 81372463 and 31000496), the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (grant no. LY13H160007) and the Zhejiang Medicines and Health Science and Technology Project (grant no. 201348801) for their support.

References

1 

Palma C: Tachykinins and their receptors in human malignancies. Curr Drug Targets. 7:1043–1052. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Severini C, Improta G, Falconieri-Erspamer G, et al: The tachykinin peptide family. Pharmacol Rev. 54:285–322. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Mayordomo C, García-Recio S, Ametller E, et al: Targeting of substance p induces cancer cell death and decreases the steady state of egfr and her2. J Cell Physiol. 227:1358–1366. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Diebold AE, Boudreaux JP, Wang YZ, et al: Neurokinin A levels predict survival in patients with stage iv well differentiated small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms. Surgery. 152:1172–1176. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Reubi JC: Peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Endocr Rev. 24:389–427. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Quartara L and Maggi CA: The tachykinin nk1 receptor. Part ii: Distribution and pathophysiological roles. Neuropeptides. 32:1–49. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Pennefather JN, Lecci A, Candenas ML, et al: Tachykinins and tachykinin receptors: a growing family. Life Sci. 74:1445–1463. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Lecci A, Santicioli P and Maggi CA: Pharmacology of transmission to gastrointestinal muscle. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2:630–641. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Jaafari N, Hua G, Adelaide J, et al: Expression of the tachykinin receptor mrnas in healthy human colon. Eur J Pharmacol. 599:121–125. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 63:11–30. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Wu M, Zhang SW, Han RQ, et al: Analysis on the mortality of colorectal and anal cancer in china during 2004–2005. Zhonghua yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 44:403–407. 2010.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

12 

Yu Y, Pan Y, Jin M, et al: Association of genetic variants in tachykinins pathway genes with colorectal cancer risk. Int J Colorectal Dis. 27:1429–1436. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Bekaii-Saab T, et al: Colon cancer, version 3.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 12:1028–1059. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zhang B, Lv M, Chen T, et al: The association between lymph node resection and postoperative survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 60:1922–1926. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Yuan Y, Li MD, Hu HG, et al: Prognostic and survival analysis of 837 Chinese colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol. 19:2650–2659. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Tang CM and Insel PA: Genetic variation in g-protein-coupled receptors - consequences for g-protein-coupled receptors as drug targets. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 9:1247–1265. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Castro FA, Försti A, Buch S, et al: Tlr-3 polymorphism is an independent prognostic marker for stage ii colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 47:1203–1210. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Chang SC, Lin PC, Yang SH, et al: Sdf-1alpha g801a polymorphism predicts lymph node metastasis in stage t3 colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 16:2323–2330. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Seo GS, Yu JI, Chae SC, et al: Eed gene polymorphism in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 28:274–279. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Araujo RF Jr, Lira GA, Guedes HG, et al: Lifestyle and family history influence cancer prognosis in Brazilian individuals. Pathol Res Pract. 209:753–757. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Noura S, Ohue M, Kano S, et al: Impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2:70–77. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Rameshwar P, Poddar A and Gascón P: Hematopoietic regulation mediated by interactions among the neurokinins and cytokines. Leuk Lymphoma. 28:1–10. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Sculptoreanu A, Aura Kullmann F and de Groat WC: Neurokinin 2 receptor-mediated activation of protein kinase c modulates capsaicin responses in drg neurons from adult rats. Eur J Neurosci. 27:3171–3181. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Hernández-Maqueda JG, Luna-Ulloa LB, Santoyo-Ramos P, et al: Protein kinase c delta negatively modulates canonical Wnt pathway and cell proliferation in colon tumor cell lines. PLoS One. 8:e585402013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Sun J, Usune S, Zhao Y, et al: Multidrug resistance protein transporter and ins(1,4,5)P3-sensitive Ca2+-signaling involved in adenosine triphosphate export via gq protein-coupled nk2-receptor stimulation with neurokinin a. J Pharmacol Sci. 114:92–98. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2015
Volume 9 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Fang W, Fu C, Chen X, Mou X, Liu F, Qian J, Zhao P, Zheng Y, Zheng Y, Deng J, Deng J, et al: Neurokinin-2 receptor polymorphism predicts lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. Oncol Lett 9: 2003-2006, 2015
APA
Fang, W., Fu, C., Chen, X., Mou, X., Liu, F., Qian, J. ... Zheng, S. (2015). Neurokinin-2 receptor polymorphism predicts lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. Oncology Letters, 9, 2003-2006. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3016
MLA
Fang, W., Fu, C., Chen, X., Mou, X., Liu, F., Qian, J., Zhao, P., Zheng, Y., Zheng, Y., Deng, J., Ye, P., Wang, Y., Zheng, S."Neurokinin-2 receptor polymorphism predicts lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients". Oncology Letters 9.5 (2015): 2003-2006.
Chicago
Fang, W., Fu, C., Chen, X., Mou, X., Liu, F., Qian, J., Zhao, P., Zheng, Y., Zheng, Y., Deng, J., Ye, P., Wang, Y., Zheng, S."Neurokinin-2 receptor polymorphism predicts lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients". Oncology Letters 9, no. 5 (2015): 2003-2006. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3016