Primary carcinoid tumor of the kidney with estrogen and progesterone receptor expression. A case report

Introduction

Carcinoid tumors are a group of neuroendocrine tumors that occur most frequently in the gastrointestinal tract as well as in other organs comprising argyrophil cells; ~85% these tumors occur in the digestive tract, with 10% occurring in the lung and 5% occurring in other organs such as the testis (1) and bladder (2). The clinical manifestations of carcinoid tumors may not be apparent, or limited to local symptoms. However, carcinoid syndromes often have obvious systemic symptoms, such as unexplained intermittent diarrhea, flushing, facial telangiectasia, paroxysmal asthma or psychiatric symptoms (3). The diagnosis of carcinoid tumor is dependent on biopsy, and surgical excision is the first treatment. Patients without carcinoid syndrome have a better prognosis (4).

Primary carcinoid tumor in the kidney is uncommon and the expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) has not been reported. Due to the rarity of this tumor, its clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and histogenesis have not been fully characterized. The current study reports an unusual case of a carcinoid tumor of the kidney with ER and PR expression in a 49-year-old female who presented with a 2-year history of hypertension. Abdominal computed tomography scans revealed a left horseshoe kidney. Clinicopathological characteristics of primary carcinoid tumors are also discussed by reviewing the literature. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Case report

Clinical data

A 49-year-old female with a history of hypertension for two years presented with a half-month history of painless gross hematuria. The patient was admitted to the Department of Urological Surgery in the Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital (Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China). No abnormal physical signs were found during a physical examination. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans and ultrasonic testing revealed left hydronephrosis, a horseshoe kidney and a space-occupying lesion in the left ureter, while the right kidney and other visceral organs were normal (Fig. 1A). The hematological findings, endocrine index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, blood biochemistry, electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels were within the normal ranges. The surgery was performed under general anesthesia and in a right lateral decubitus position at 70°. The left kidney, which presented with black coloration and a horseshoe appearance, was exposed and dissociated. An oval tumor, ~5×4×3.6 cm, was observed under the ureter. The boundaries of the mass were clear. The cross-section of the tumor was faint yellow, homogeneous and pliable in quality (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1. (A) Ultrasonic examination revealing left hydronephrosis and a space-occupying lesion in the left ureter. (B) Tumor positioned under the uterer, the with a volume of ~5×4×3.6 cm. The boundaries of the mass were clear and the section was faintly yellow.

Pathological findings

Microscopically, the tumor was located under the mucosa of the pelvis and showed aggressive growth. The neoplasm was composed of solid nests of cells, trabeculae, adenoid structures and anastomosing cords in a loose and myxoid background (Fig. 2A). The tumor cells, which were consistent in volume, exhibited centrally placed oval nuclei with inconspicuous nucleoli, and eosinophilic finely granular cytoplasm. The mitotic rate was <1 per 10 high-power fields (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2. (A) Tumor was located under the mucosa of the pelvis and the neoplasm was composed of solid nests of cells, trabeculae, adenoid structures and anastomosing cords in a loose and myxoid background (hematoxylin and eosin staining; magnification, x100). (B) Neoplastic cells were similar in size and exhibited centrally placed oval nuclei with eosinophilic finely granular cytoplasm, and a low mitotic rate (hematoxylin and eosin staining; magnification, x200).

Immunohistochemical findings

Immunohistochemical staining suggested that the neoplastic cells were positive for AE1/AE3, vimentin, synaptophysin (Syn; Fig. 3A), chromogranin A (CgA), ER (Fig. 3B) and PR (Fig. 3C), while being negative for epithelial membrane antigen, inhibin A, cluster of differentiation (CD)99, S-100 and CD10. The cells that were positive for Ki-67 were dispersive. All the primary antibodies used are listed in Table I. On the basis of histomorphology in light microscopy and the presence of immunohistochemical staining, a diagnosis of primary carcinoid tumor of the left kidney was made. The patient did not receive further treatment. The total follow-up period was 18 months after the surgery. Repeated CT scans and abdominal ultrasonography every 6 months revealed no recurrence or residual lesion.

Figure 3. Immunostaining of the tumor. The tumor cells were positive for (A) synaptophysin (magnification, x200), (B) estrogen receptor (magnification, x100) and (C) progesterone receptor (magnification, x100).

Table I. Antibodies employed in the immunohistochemistry applied for the case.

Table I.

Antibodies employed in the immunohistochemistry applied for the case.

Antibody	Clone	Source	Dilution
Anti-S100	4C49	Lab vision	1:150
Anti-cytokeratin	AE1/AE3	Dako	1:100
Anti-vimentin	SP20	Lab vision	1:100
Anti-Ki-67	MIB-1	Lab vision	1:100
Anti-CD99	O13	Dako	1:100
Anti-CD10	56C6	Lab vision	1:100
Anti-inhibin A	R11	Dako	1:100
Anti-EMA	E19	Dako	1:100
Anti-ER	1D5	Dako	1:100
Anti-PR	EP2	Dako	1:100
Anti-Syn	SP11	Dako	1:100
Anti-CgA	EP38	Dako	1:100

[i] Dako, Glostrup, Denmark. Lab vision corporation, Fremont, CA, USA. CD, cluster of differentiation; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; Syn, synaptophysin; CgA, chromogranin A.

Discussion

Carcinoid tumors of the kidney are rare. The pathogenesis of renal carcinoid tumors remains under debate (5–9). Certain previous studies have attributed the genesis of this tumor to congenital renal abnormalities, while other studies have suggested that the tumor cells are derived from multipotential primitive stem cells, which are induced to neuroendocrine differentiation (10–12). Notably, in the present case, the ER and PR sex hormone receptors were strongly expressed in the tumor cells. ER and PR expression has previously been detected not only in hormone target organs, such as the breast, ovaries and endometrium, but also in the digestive tract and pancreas (13,14). However, the expression of ER and PR in carcinoid tumors of the kidney has not been reported. The present results may not be of use in inferring the pathogenesis of the disease, as no relative literature has been found by review, however, we speculate that the ER and PR may be a potential therapeutic target in patients with this condition (13). Further study is required to investigate this association in the future.

Clinically, Hansel et al reported that 50% of 21 carcinoid tumor patients studied were younger than 50-years-old, and that the tumor showed no tendencies in gender and location. Bloody urine and pain in the lower back proved to be the most common clinical manifestations. Horseshoe kidneys was frequently present, while no other characteristics were known to distinguish renal cell carcinoma on imaging. Endocrine syndrome was not found in the blood examination (15). The current study reports the case of a 49-year-old female who presented with painless and gross hematuria. A horseshoe kidney on imaging was a contributory factor for the diagnosis.

Pathological examination remains the gold standard of diagnosis for renal carcinoid tumors (15,16). Under the microscope, the classic histological characteristics of renal carcinoid tumors are a band or ribbon-like pattern accompanied by solid nests of cells and adenoid structures within a loose stroma. Rosette structures are characteristic of these lesions, however, this was not found in the present case. Tumor cells are similar in size, with a granular eosinophilic cytoplasm. Round to oval nuclei are uniform, with rare mitotic events. Used together with histological features, neuroendocrine immunostaining would aid in distinguishing carcinoid tumors from other diagnoses, such as small cell carcinoma, pheochromocytoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor. With regard to the present case, a diagnosis of renal carcinoid tumor may have been regarded as presumptive based on the observation of typical morphological characteristics by light microscopy, as this is subject to validation by positive immunohistochemical staining of cytokeratin, vimentin and endocrine markers (CgA, Syn or CD56 protein).

No standard therapy focusing on renal carcinoid tumors has yet been proposed and surgical resection is currently the only treatment (17). Hormonotherapy may be a novel method aimed at patients with positive ER and PR expression. Necrosis, metastasis, an age of >50 years, a tumor diameter >4 cm and more karyokinesis are presumed to potentially indicate an ominous prognosis. However, no clear prognosis factors are generally accepted and further case accumulation is required (18,19).

In conclusion, the current study presents the clinical manifestations and pathological features of a case of renal carcinoid tumor expressing ER and PR. The expression of ER and PR in carcinoid tumors of the kidney is unusual, and these molecules may be a potential therapeutic targets in such patients.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Project of Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Shandong Province (grant no. 2009222).

References