Genetic alterations and epigenetic alterations of cancer‑associated fibroblasts (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 30, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5451
- Pages: 3-12
-
Copyright: © Du et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
It is widely recognized that the accumulation of various harmful genetic alterations in normal cells may induce malignant cancer cells (1). Genetic mutation is one genetic alteration, but not all genetic mutations are harmful. Genetic mutation promotes biological evolution and results in biodiversity (2,3). Genetic alterations include genetic mutation, gene copy number variation (CNV), loss of heterozygosity (LOH), allelic imbalance (AI) and microsatellite instability (MSI). Epigenetic alterations, represented by post-transcriptional control and DNA methylation, have been the focus of recent studies.
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are one major type of component in the tumor microenvironment (4). CAFs differ phenotypically and functionally from normal fibroblasts (NFs) (5). CAFs provide cancer cells with nutrition and promote the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of cells (6–9). CAFs maintain their phenotype for numerous passages during culture in vitro without exposure to cancer cells, while NFs cannot be infinitely proliferous like cancer cells (10). Therefore, it has been demonstrated that genetic or epigenetic alterations may be responsible for the special features of CAFs (Fig. 1) (10). Due to the critical role of CAFs during cancer progression, the genetic characterization of CAFs aids in the investigation of cancer therapy. The present review summarizes the current knowledge regarding 7 possible genetic and epigenetic alterations in CAFs.
Differential expressions of certain special genes in CAFs
CAFs are different from NFs, and their unique phenotypes and functions are partly determined by differences in gene expression. The differences between CAFs and NFs in gene expression have been extensively compared; in one study, 31 genes in breast CAFs, which were identified using Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 and an empirical Bayesian model, were different from those in NFs (11). Of the 31 genes, the 21 upregulated genes were primarily associated with cell paracrine and intracellular signaling, transcription regulation and cell adhesion and migration, and their transcriptional products included transforming growth factor-β2 (TGF-β2), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 and transcriptional factor AP-2α/γ (11). By contrast, the 10 downregulated genes were primarily associated with epithelial membrane proteins (11). Genes mainly involved in coding adhesion molecules and growth factors have also been found to be upregulated in other types of CAFs, including colon (12) and pancreatic (13). The prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 gene (PTGS2), which encodes cyclooxygenase-2, was found to upregulate the expression of TGF-β2 (14). These results are consistent with another study concerning the gene expression profiling of breast CAFs, which were detected using a complementary DNA microarray (15).
A study on the gene signature of CAFs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) revealed similar results to those observed in breast CAFs (16). In total, there were 46 genes differently expressed in CAFs compared with NFs, and the upregulated genes were enriched in cell signal transduction, cell adhesion, cell response to stress and angiogenesis (16). In total, of 6/46 genes were also associated with the TGF-β signaling pathway (16). TGF-β is a multifunctional signaling factor (17–19), which is involved in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (20,21). This may be one origin of CAFs (5). Cellular tumor antigen 53 (p53) signal transduction and genes associated with cell apoptosis and death were downregulated in colon CAFs (22). In addition, the gene expression profiling of CAFs may be prognostically significant for patients with NSCLC or colorectal cancer (CRC) (16,22).
The differences in gene expression between CAFs and NFs are in keeping with the special function of CAFs in promoting cancer progression. CAFs promote the growth of cancer cells by providing nutrition to tumor cells (23,24), and facilitate the invasion and metastasis of tumor cells by secreting matrix metalloprotease to resolve the matrix surrounding cancer cells (16,25–28). Additionally, CAFs activate tumor angiogenesis (29–31).
CAFs have a gene expression signature different from NFs, and upregulated genes are primarily associated with angiogenesis, EMT, cell adhesion and cell interactions (32,33). The gene expression profiles of CAFs are different among various tumors, despite certain general features. In the 3 subtypes of breast tumor, which are differentiated according to 3 receptors, estrogen, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and progesterone, the gene expression profiles of CAFs are even subtype-specific (34), which may be used to distinguish the 3 subtypes (32). Cancer stage also affects the gene expression profiling of CAFs in breast cancer (35).
Karyotype analysis in CAFs
A karyotype, which is defined as the chromosomal composition in an individual cell, reflects the number and structure of chromosomes. Humans are diploid with 46 chromosomes; however, cancer cells are usually polyploidy or aneuploidy with a larger nuclei-cytoplasm ratio compared with normal cells. Polyploidy helps cancer cells to resist adverse factors, and tetraploid cell lines are more viable than diploid cell lines (36). Whether or not CAFs have various chromosome karyotypes in a way that is similar to cancer cells remains controversial. No clear differences have been identified in the chromosome karyotype of CAFs in oral carcinoma (37). By contrast, CAFs from 2 types of tumors, namely melanoma and prostate cancer (xenograft or spontaneous), are characterized by aneuploid karyotypes, which are caused by the attenuated activation of p53 in CAFs (38). Common reasons that account for the conflicting results observed include the heterogeneity of CAFs and the various anatomical locations. Furthermore, the largest difference between the two aforementioned studies is the time in cell culturing; the study that identified positive karyotype alterations had cultured CAFs for ≥20 weeks prior to testing (38). Since survival advantage in the tumor microenvironment, caused by selection pressures, is the reason for the alteration of karyotypes, a long-term culture is more likely to obtain CAFs with altered karyotypes.
Senescence that is activated by signals in CAFs, including growth-regulated oncogene-1 and the TGF-β/connective tissue growth factor pathway, may fuel and promote the growth of cancer cells (39,40). Polyploidy is one of the three steps leading to the immortality of cancer cells, and cells with normal karyotypes cannot avoid senescence (41). Consequently, whether the absence of chromosome karyotype may cause CAF senescence and whether the senescent CAFs then promote tumor growth remains unclear.
DNA CNVs in CAFs
CNVs are particularly common in tumors and can contribute to tumor progression (42). The multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique has previously demonstrated the presence of gene dosage alterations in ovarian cancer CAFs, and CNV was identified in 61% of genes (43). Amplifications and deletions were detected in CAFs in colorectal and breast carcinomas, and the presence of 17 CNVs was confirmed by representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis (44). Ephrin type receptor (Eph) A4, EphA2 and EphB2 were also identified in these alterations, and EphA4 may be directly associated with tumor angiogenesis and progression; thus Ephs may be attractive drug targets for cancer therapy (45,46). By contrast, CNVs were not identified in 95% of 98 patients, including 484 frozen specimens (47), and this study suggested that previous studies exhibiting a high frequency of CNVs are not entirely believable, since formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens have been used and, thus, the high number of CNVs may reflect an FFPE-related artifact. Finally, the authors of the aforementioned study concluded that the tumor microenvironment is genomically stable (47). The present authors hypothesize that genetic statuses are different among various types of tumor. However, CNVs in colorectal and breast carcinomas have been detected without using FFPE specimens (44). Thus, investigations using more specific and accurate methods are required.
LOH and AI
Numerous forms of genetic alterations, including MSI, LOH, AI and CNV, have been observed in benign and malignant epithelial neoplasms. The LOH-induced tumor suppressor gene (TSG) mutation is common among cancer epithelial cells (48–50). Whether or not LOH and AI are present in CAFs has been the focus of studies in recent years.
Several types of cancer, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), breast cancer, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer and CRC, and their associated stromata have been investigated since 2000. LOH or AI was revealed in all these cancer stromata. The LOH of the p53 and BRCA1 genes in chromosome 17 was identified in ulcerative colitis (UC)-associated carcinogenesis (51) and CRC (52). The LOH in stromal cells is associated with the colitis-associated carcinogenesis, and the frequency is increased compared with cancer cells (51). In CAFs of HNSCC, LOH is identified in the tumor protein 53 (TP53) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) genes (two important tumor-suppressing genes) and the frequency is associated with tumor size and lymph node metastasis (53). LOH in TP53 is also observed in bladder cancer CAFs (54). The frequency of LOH in chromosome 3p21.3, a region that harbors 3 hyaluronidase genes potentially encoding the hyaluronidase tumor suppressor, in the stromal cells of ovarian cancer is similar to the frequency in cancer cells (55). However, LOH in these genes does not affect the accumulation of hyaluronidase or tumor progress (55). Breast cancer is most commonly used in the detection of LOH and AI, and numerous studies focus on TP53 and PTEN (56). The LOHs of TP53 and PTEN have been identified in hereditary and sporadic breast cancers: Hereditary patients are more prone to TP53 mutation; however, it is only in sporadic breast cancer that LOHs of TP53 and PTEN are associated with cancer lymph node metastasis, tumor grade and type of estrogen receptor (57,58). The frequency of LOH is high in sporadic breast cancer, and LOH at certain loci is noted only in stromal cells; these loci primarily code TSGs (51,53). LOH and AI of certain genes occur in tumor and stromal cells, while some occur only in tumor or stromal cells (53,56). The occurrence of LOH in the cancer epithelium or stromal cells is not completely random; certain unique loci may contain an increased frequency of LOH compared with other loci, whilst several loci may act as trigger points, at which a LOH may result in a LOH at another locus (59,60). p53 mutations in CAFs also affect the CAF in question. LOH or complete loss of p53 in CAFs leads to the accumulation of stroma in cancer tissues, an increased proliferation of mesenchymal cells and a mesenchymal response (61). p53 status is involved in clinical treatment, since a LOH of p53 in CAFs weakens the response of cancer cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (38,62). Recently, the acquired resistance to targeted chemotherapy of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, including epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has attracted more attention, and EMT may be one major reason (63,64). Since EMT may be one origin of CAFs (5), the present study hypothesizes that the p53 status or LOH of p53 in CAFs of pulmonary adenocarcinoma may play a role in the resistance against EGFR-TKI. p53 status in cancer cells has been shown to be associated with tumor angiogenesis (65–68). Regarding the reason for the multifunctionality of CAFs, altered p53 signal transduction in CAFs may also be associated with angiogenesis.
Overall, the present review concludes that genetic alterations in cancer and stromal cells may occur independently, at least in breast cancer. In addition, interactions and cross-talk exist between tumor epithelia and supportive stromal cells. Stromal cells should be recognized as an equal and independent interactive component, rather than a response or an accessory to the carcinoma.
MSI
MSI represents a defective mismatch repair and is one feature of tumors (69). MSI occurs not only in cancer epithelial cells, but also in CAFs. MSI occurs in 41% of CRC CAFs vs. 34% of cancer cells (70). MSI in cancer cells is positively correlated with differentiation and Duke's stage; however, in CAFs, MSI is more frequent in samples with Duke's stage A (55%) and well-differentiated CRCs (54%) (70). In addition, MSI occurs in UC-associated CRC CAFs, since MSI in CAFs is associated with TSGs, including p53 (71). Furthermore, TSG instability is more important at the early stage of UC-associated oncogenesis (72). MSI also occurs at the early stage of esophageal cancer CAFs, but the frequency is increased in squamous cell carcinoma compared with in Barrett's adenocarcinoma (73).
With the exception of MSI in the nuclei of CAFs, MSI in DNA occurs in the cytoplasmic mitochondria (Mt) of CRC CAFs. The Mt genome contains 16,569 nucleotides that encode 2 ribosomal RNAs and 22 transfer RNAs, the production of which is critical for oxidative phosphorylation (74). MtMSI has already been reported in several types of cancer cells (75–77). MtMSI in CAFs is primarily detected in the D-loop of MtDNA, which contains transcription and replication regulatory elements (78). Different from nuclear MSI, MtMSI in CRC CAFs is not related to Duke's stage, or to nuclear MSI of CAFs or cancer cells. MtMSI may work only in the development, but not progression, of tumorigenesis (79).
Epigenetic alterations
Background
An epigenetic alteration is a local and global gene expression regulation, which is achieved primarily through DNA modification and nucleosome rearrangement rather than changes in DNA base pairs (80). The initiation and progression of cancer may be accompanied by genetic alterations and epigenetic regulations (81). Epigenetic alterations are divided into several subtypes, including post-transcriptional control, DNA (promoter) methylation, long-range epigenetic regulation, local nucleosome remodeling, deposition of histone proteins and covalent modification of canonical core histones (82). Certain subtypes associated with CAFs have already been confirmed.
Post-transcriptional control
Post-transcriptional control is a key process in gene expression, and its major tool is microRNA (miRNA). miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs of 19–25 nucleotides. miRNA is involved in numerous cellular progresses, including development, differentiation, cell response to stress, cell proliferation and apoptosis (83,84). miRNA acts as an oncogene and tumor suppressor through various target genes (85). The functions of miRNA have been widely investigated in various types of cancer cells (86).
The most relevant studies focus on tumor microenvironment and miRNA in CAFs (Table I). Recent studies on breast cancer have revealed various miRNA statuses in CAFs. CAF cell lines from 6 patients and paired NFs have been analyzed using miRNA microarrays to identify 11 dysregulated miRNAs (87). In total, 3/11 miRNAs (miRs), including miR-221-5p, −221-3p and −31-3p, were found to be upregulated, and the remaining 8 miRNAs, including miR-26b, −101, −141, −200b, −200c, −205, −342-3p and -let-7g were found to be downregulated (87). These 11 miRNAs target interleukin-6 (IL-6), TGF-β and hepatocyte growth factor signaling pathways, which affect cell proliferation, differentiation, secretion, migration, intercellular adhesion and interaction with other compartments in tumors (87). miR-320 and −21 are also different, since miR-320 is regulated by PTEN and its target gene is ETS proto-oncogene 2 (ETS2). The downregulation of miR-320 with the upregulation of ETS2 in PTEN-knocked-out CAFs promotes angiogenesis and cancer cell invasion (87). The PTEN-miR-320-ETS2 complex, which distinguishes between normal and tumor stroma, is associated with the recurrence of breast cancer (88). miR-21 in CAFs is associated with Ki-67, and its high expression results in the increased proliferation of tumor cells (89,90). The roles of miR-21 are different among various CAFs. In stage II CRC, CAFs with a high expression of miR-21 predicts poor disease-free survival (91). During the process between precancerous adenoma and advanced CRC, the frequency and extent of miR-21 expression are increased (91). In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, miR-21 in CAFs affects the migration and invasion of cancer cells and may be involved in the activation of NFs to CAFs through tropomyosin (TPM) 1, TPM3 and TGF-β pathways (18,20,92).
Two other studies looking at CAFs in endometrial cancer have identified 12 miRNAs with various expressions (87). Among 12 miRNAs analyzed, miR-31 is the most downregulated (93), the target of which is the SATB2 homeobox gene. Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a matrix attachment region-binding protein that codes cell type-specific transcriptional factor involved in regulating transcription in large chromatin domains (93). The upregulated expression of SATB2 in breast cancer is associated with increased tumor grade (94). SATB2 is highly expressed in breast cancer CAFs, which results in the increased capacity for promoting the migration of cancer cells and invasion of CAFs (93). The introduction of SATB2 into NFs could stimulate the expression of genes involved in the scattering, migration and invasion of cells (95). miR-148a is another reduced miRNA in breast cancer, and by acting with its target Wnt family member 10B (WNT10B), miR-148a promotes the migration of cancer cells without affecting growth rate (96). WNT10B may also be involved in the activation of CAFs (97).
miRNAs are also detected in other types of CAFs. Of the 4 miRNAs investigated in bladder cancer CAFs, 2 miRNAs (miR-16 and −320) are upregulated and 2 miRNAs are downregulated (98). Certain studies suggested that miR-16 may pro-apoptotically act as a tumor suppressor and miR-320 may be associated with DNA promoter methylation in cancer cells (99,100). On the contrary, the expression of miR-143 and miR-145 is reduced in CAFs, and both are involved in tumor suppression (101). Ovarian CAFs contain 2 downregulated miRNAs (miR-31 and −214) and 1 upregulated miRNA (miR-155) compared with NFs. Mimicking the miRNA status using miRNA suppressors and transforming miRNAs could induce functional conversions from NFs to CAFs, while the reverse experiment can result in the conversion from CAFs to NFs (102). Notably, the upregulation of miR-214 is directly associated with chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5, a chemokine that is abundant in the serum and promotes the invasion and migration of cancer stem cells, and these actions are similar to CAFs in ovarian cancer (103). However, miR-143 expression is upregulated in the CAFs of scirrhous gastric cancer rather than in the non-scirrhous types 40 (104). miR-143 enhances the expression of collagen type III through activating the TGF-β/SMAD pathway 40 (104). The increased expression of miR-143 is associated with poor cancer-specific mortality, thus miR-143 may act as an independent prognostic factor (104). Two miRNAs (miR-15 and −16) with lower expressions have been indicated in the CAFs of prostate cancer, and the downregulation of each reduces the post-transcriptional repression of fibroblast growth factor-2/fibroblast growth factor receptor-1, which in turn promotes the growth and progression of cancer cells (105) Therefore, the decreased expressions of miR-15 and −16 also promote the growth of cancer cells. Oncogenes, such as B cell lymphoma 2 and Wnt, and angiogenesis-related genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor and IL-6 (29), are involved in the target genes of these two miRNAs (105).
miR-186 in CAFs is involved in glycolysis, and combined with the 3′-untranslated region of its target gene glucose transporter 1 (Glut 1), it is active in regulating the uptake of glucose and production of lactate (106). The roles of CAFs in cancer glucose and energy metabolism are recognized using a novel method named the ‘reverse Warburg effect’ (23,107,108). Caveolin-1 is a key pathway in the CAF metabolism conversion (109,110). Whether or not miR-186 and Glut 1 are associated with the caveolin-1 pathway requires further research.
DNA methylation
DNA methylation is one epigenetic change and is mainly divided into two subtypes, hypermethylation and hypomethylation (80). DNA promoter hypermethylation could result in the silence of TSGs, while hypomethylation of oncogenes causes its activation or overexpression (111,112). Thus, the two subtypes are critical for tumorigenesis. DNA methylation in CAFs has been widely investigated.
Tumor stroma is important for cancer progression. In CRC, the components rich in connective tissues were found to have an accumulation of chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan. The relevant gene coding this proteoglycan contains a 3-fold decrease of hypomethylation and this change only occurs in the CAFs of tumor stroma, rather than in cancer cells (113,114). The same hypomethylation is absent in the stroma of UC, indicating that chronic inflammation is not powerful enough to change cytosine methylation (115).
In prostate cancer, promoter hypermethylation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A, hypermethylated in cancer 1 protein, tumor suppressor candidate 3 and glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is extremely abundant in cancer epithelial cells and CAFs (116). The GSTP1 promoter is methylated in >90% of prostate cancers. Though GSTP1 may not suppress cancer cell growth and is not considered to be a TSG, it may be a caretaker gene and its aberrant silencing in CAFs may create a tumorigenic microenvironment (117). Promoter hypermethylation could also be responsible for the inactivation of another candidate TSG, the opioid binding protein/cell adhesion molecule-like gene, in invasive cervical cancer CAFs (118). In addition to hypermethylation, DNA promoter hypomethylation may also exist in CAFs. Activation of long interspersed nucleotide element-1 in tumorigenesis-related CRC is due to its hypomethylated promoter (119). Gene methylation profiles are associated with the status of receptors. In HER2/neu-positive breast cancer CAFs, 3 corresponding genes, including progesterone receptor, type IV 17-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and H-cadherin, are downregulated (120). These genes are methylated in breast cancer, but are only slightly or not methylated in non-neoplastic breast cancers (120). Gene methylation is a dynamic process in esophageal squamous cancer and cervical cancer; thus, the level of methylation changes with the progression of cancer (121,122). Apart from locally methylated DNA, global gene hypomethylation was confirmed in CAFs of gastric cancer (123). Most importantly, global methylation of CAFs occurs as early as the dysplastic stage, which could potentially provide a novel strategy for early diagnosis.
Mechanistically, several possible reasons may explain the aberrant methylation in CAFs. The field effect could be a cause of methylation in certain CAFs, as this effect induces the spread of methylation among various types of cells (124,125); for example, Septin 9 gene hypermethylation in CAFs occurs later than in CRC epithelial cells, which may reflect the spread of Septin 9 hypermethylation from CRC epithelial cells to CAFs. CAF methylation possibly occurs through field effects from cancer cells (126). In addition, abnormal cell proliferation, a local decrease of methyl donors under certain premalignant conditions, or both of these factors may result in hypomethylation (123,126). As for DNA promoter hypermethylation in cancer cells, 3 possible mechanisms have been put forward, including the infidelity of maintenance DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase (DNMT)1, the de novo methylating enzymes, DNMT3a and DNMT3b, and the faulty repair mechanism of aberrantly methylated DNA (127). Whether or not these 3 mechanisms are accurate and suitable for CAFs should be validated through additional studies.
Clinical significance, controversies and future outlook
Perspective on the clinical significance. Clinical trials have already used miRNAs as drug targets or biomarkers for the stratification of patients, prognosis and drug efficacy (128). miR-21 is upregulated in the CAFs of several cancer types and is selected as a diagnostic and prognostic marker. mir-21 is associated with the Duke's stage of CRC. Highly expressed stromal miR-21 predicts a poor recurrence-free survival (129). Combined with other miRNAs, plasma miR-21 could be a novel method for early cancer diagnosis. However, miR-143 usually shows a decreased expression and is considered as a cancer suppressor (104,130,131). Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (ERBB3), one of the four members of the ERBB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, is targeted by miR-143, which in turn prevents breast cancer cells from proliferation and invasion. EGFR-TKI drugs have a special effect in targeting cancer cells, but patients have to endure drug-resistance for several months after administration of the drugs. miR-143 could potentially be a novel pathway for targeted drugs as it can inhibit cancer cell invasion through an EGFR signalling pathway (132,133). With regard to upregulated miR-221, a drug called 2′-O-methylphosphorothioate-modified anti-miRNA-221 has already demonstrated an antitumor effect in mouse models (134). The in vivo administration of tumor suppressor microRNA or inhibitors of tumor-promoting microRNA that target CAFs may be an emerging tumor treatment; this may be more effective compared with existing techniques, considering that CAFs have a relatively steady phenotype compared with cancer cells (134).
DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and DNA methyltransferase maybe be useful for combating CAFs possessing the corresponding hypermethylation and hypomethylation. The drugs, 5-azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, which have already been used for treatment of acute and chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, have been investigated in the treatment other tumors; however, they are less effective in the treatment of solid tumors and have associated side effects (135).
Controversies and further outlook
Whether or not CAFs have somatic or genetic alterations remains controversial, despite certain alterations that have already been found. Studies that found a positive somatic alteration in CAFs, without exception, have extracted DNA from archival tissues. In other studies (10,47,136,137), CAFs were isolated from fresh frozen tissues or flow cytometry; no somatic genetic alterations were found, while CAFs from FFPE show a high frequency of LOH and AI. This pattern indicates that FFPE tissues could result in highly fragmented DNA and RNA molecules, which are not suitable for large-scale genetic analysis. PCR amplification then exacerbates the artificial false positive result (138–143). Thus, certain studies refute genetic alterations and instead attribute the results to epigenetic alterations More reliable and accurate methods should be found to solve these controversies.
CAFs retain diploid rather than polyploid cancer cells, which may account for the senescence of CAFs. Since telomerase is closely linked with cell senescence, particularly in cancer cells, the activity and status of telomerase in CAFs may be worth additional studies, though certain studies have already been performed (144–146).
Conclusion
CAFs, which are phenotypically and functionally different from NFs due to numerous potential genetic alterations and epigenetic changes, are critical for tumor progression and have attracted increasing numbers of studies in recent years (Fig. 1). With the potential genetic and epigenetic alterations changes found in CAFs, the underlying mechanisms regarding the features of CAFs are gradually revealed. With the exception of genetic and epigenetic alterations, other relevant changes may also explain the differential expressions of genes in CAFs, and certain special genetic or epigenetic alterations may be confirmed in the future. Further investigation into the detailed genetic and epigenetic alterations of CAFs in the tumor microenvironment increases the understanding of CAFs and provides novel approaches for clinical application.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, China (grant no. 81071929), which awarded the grant to Professor Guowei Che.
References
|
Lengauer C, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B: Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 396:643–649. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Crispo E, Moore JS, Lee-Yaw JA, Gray SM and Haller BC: Broken barriers: Human-induced changes to gene flow and introgression in animals: An examination of the ways in which humans increase genetic exchange among populations and species and the consequences for biodiversity. Bioessays. 33:508–518. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Verde C, di Prisco G and Convey P: Molecular and genetic advances to understanding evolution and biodiversity in the polar regions. Mar Genomics. 8:1–2. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jia CC, Wang TT, Liu W, Fu BS, Hua X, Wang GY, Li TJ, Li X, Wu XY, Tai Y, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblasts from hepatocellular carcinoma promote malignant cell proliferation by HGF secretion. PLoS One. 8:e632432013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xing F, Saidou J and Watabe K: Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in tumor microenvironment. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 15:166–179. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Franco OE, Shaw AK, Strand DW and Hayward SW: Cancer associated fibroblasts in cancer pathogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 21:33–39. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Castello-Cros R, Bonnuccelli G, Molchansky A, Capozza F, Witkiewicz AK, Birbe RC, Howell A, Pestell RG, Whitaker-Menezes D, Sotgia F and Lisanti MP: Matrix remodeling stimulates stromal autophagy, ‘fueling’ cancer cell mitochondrial metabolism and metastasis. Cell Cycle. 10:2021–2034. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Balliet RM, Capparelli C, Guido C, Pestell TG, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Lin Z, Whitaker-Menezes D, Chiavarina B, Pestell RG, Howell A, et al: Mitochondrial oxidative stress in cancer-associated fibroblasts drives lactate production, promoting breast cancer tumor growth: Understanding the aging and cancer connection. Cell Cycle. 10:4065–4073. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bonuccelli G, Tsirigos A, Whitaker-Menezes D, Pavlides S, Pestell RG, Chiavarina B, Frank PG, Flomenberg N, Howell A, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, et al: Ketones and lactate ‘fuel’ tumor growth and metastasis: Evidence that epithelial cancer cells use oxidative mitochondrial metabolism. Cell Cycle. 9:3506–3514. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qiu W, Hu M, Sridhar A, Opeskin K, Fox S, Shipitsin M, Trivett M, Thompson ER, Ramakrishna M, Gorringe KL, et al: No evidence of clonal somatic genetic alterations in cancer-associated fibroblasts from human breast and ovarian carcinomas. Nat Genet. 40:650–655. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bauer M, Su G, Casper C, He R, Rehrauer W and Friedl A: Heterogeneity of gene expression in stromal fibroblasts of human breast carcinomas and normal breast. Oncogene. 29:1732–1740. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nakagawa H, Liyanarachchi S, Davuluri RV, Auer H, Martin EW Jr, de la Chapelle A and Frankel WL: Role of cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts in metastatic colon cancer to the liver and their expression profiles. Oncogene. 23:7366–7377. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sato N, Maehara N and Goggins M: Gene expression profiling of tumor-stromal interactions between pancreatic cancer cells and stromal fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 64:6950–6956. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yamada C, Aikawa T, Okuno E, Miyagawa K, Amano K, Takahata S, Kimata M, Okura M, Iida S and Kogo M: TGF-β in jaw tumor fluids induces RANKL expression in stromal fibroblasts. Int J Oncol. 49:499–508. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Singer CF, Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Fink-Retter A, Haas C, Hudelist G, Czerwenka K and Kubista E: Differential gene expression profile in breast cancer-derived stromal fibroblasts. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 110:273–281. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Navab R, Strumpf D, Bandarchi B, Zhu CQ, Pintilie M, Ramnarine VR, Ibrahimov E, Radulovich N, Leung L, Barczyk M, et al: Prognostic gene-expression signature of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:7160–7165. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Grivennikov SI, Greten FR and Karin M: Immunity, inflammation and cancer. Cell. 140:883–899. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Derynck R, Akhurst RJ and Balmain A: TGF-beta signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Nat Genet. 29:117–129. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wakefield LM and Roberts AB: TGF-beta signaling: Positive and negative effects on tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 12:22–29. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zavadil J and Böttinger EP: TGF-beta and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Oncogene. 24:5764–5774. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Katsuno Y, Lamouille S and Derynck R: TGF-β signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer progression. Curr Opin Oncol. 25:76–84. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Herrera M, Islam AB, Herrera A, Martín P, García V, Silva J, Garcia JM, Salas C, Casal I, de Herreros AG, et al: Functional heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblasts from human colon tumors shows specific prognostic gene expression signature. Clin Cancer Res. 19:5914–5926. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Migneco G, Whitaker-Menezes D, Chiavarina B, Castello-Cros R, Pavlides S, Pestell RG, Fatatis A, Flomenberg N, Tsirigos A, Howell A, et al: Glycolytic cancer associated fibroblasts promote breast cancer tumor growth, without a measurable increase in angiogenesis: Evidence for stromal-epithelial metabolic coupling. Cell Cycle. 9:2412–2422. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Leiherer A, Geiger K, Muendlein A and Drexel H: Hypoxia induces a HIF-1α dependent signalling cascade to make a complex metabolic switch in SGBS-adipocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 383:21–31. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hu C, Wang Z, Zhai L, Yang M, Shan L, Chai C, Liu M and Wang L: Effects of cancer-associated fibroblasts on the migration and invasion abilities of SGC-7901 gastric cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 5:609–612. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim SH, Choe C, Shin YS, Jeon MJ, Choi SJ, Lee J, Bae GY, Cha HJ and Kim J: Human lung cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance motility of non-small cell lung cancer cells in co-culture. Anticancer Res. 33:2001–2009. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cao M, Seike M, Soeno C, Mizutani H, Kitamura K, Minegishi Y, Noro R, Yoshimura A, Cai L and Gemma A: MiR-23a regulates TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting E-cadherin in lung cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 41:869–875. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schveigert D, Cicenas S, Bruzas S, Samalavicius NE, Gudleviciene Z and Didziapetriene J: The value of MMP-9 for breast and non-small cell lung cancer patients' survival. Adv Med Sci. 58:73–82. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nagasaki T, Hara M, Nakanishi H, Takahashi H, Sato M and Takeyama H: Interleukin-6 released by colon cancer-associated fibroblasts is critical for tumour angiogenesis: Anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody suppressed angiogenesis and inhibited tumour-stroma interaction. Br J Cancer. 110:469–478. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Ansari MM, Hendrayani SF, Tulbah A, Al-Tweigeri T, Shehata AI and Aboussekhra A: P16INK4A represses breast stromal fibroblasts migration/invasion and their VEGF-A-dependent promotion of angiogenesis through Akt inhibition. Neoplasia. 14:1269–1277. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Delaunay T, Naeem R, Carey VJ, Richardson AL and Weinberg RA: Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell. 121:335–348. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Finak G, Bertos N, Pepin F, Sadekova S, Souleimanova M, Zhao H, Chen H, Omeroglu G, Meterissian S, Omeroglu A, et al: Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nat Med. 14:518–527. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sadlonova A, Bowe DB, Novak Z, Mukherjee S, Duncan VE, Page GP and Frost AR: Identification of molecular distinctions between normal breast-associated fibroblasts and breast cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Microenviron. 2:9–21. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tchou J, Kossenkov AV, Chang L, Satija C, Herlyn M, Showe LC and Puré E: Human breast cancer associated fibroblasts exhibit subtype specific gene expression profiles. BMC Med Genomics. 5:392012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma XJ, Dahiya S, Richardson E, Erlander M and Sgroi DC: Gene expression profiling of the tumor microenvironment during breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res. 11:R72009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park SU, Choi ES, Jang YS, Hong SH, Kim IH and Chang DK: Effects of chromosomal polyploidy on survival of colon cancer cells. Korean J Gastroenterol. 57:150–157. 2011.(In Korean). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng XH, Liu Y, Zhou HM, Chen QM and Li BQ: Analysis of chromosome karyotype of oral carcinoma-associated Fibroblasts. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 23:159–160. 2005.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dudley AC, Shih SC, Cliffe AR, Hida K and Klagsbrun M: Attenuated p53 activation in tumour-associated stromal cells accompanies decreased sensitivity to etoposide and vincristine. Br J Cancer. 99:118–125. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang G, Rosen DG, Zhang Z, Bast RC Jr, Mills GB, Colacino JA, Mercado-Uribe I and Liu J: The chemokine growth-regulated oncogene 1 (Gro-1) links RAS signaling to the senescence of stromal fibroblasts and ovarian tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:16472–16477. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Capparelli C, Whitaker-Menezes D, Guido C, Balliet R, Pestell TG, Howell A, Sneddon S, Pestell RG, Martinez-Outschoorn U, Lisanti MP and Sotgia F: CTGF drives autophagy, glycolysis and senescence in cancer-associated fibroblasts via HIF1 activation, metabolically promoting tumor growth. Cell Cycle. 11:2272–2284. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Erenpreisa J and Cragg MS: Three steps to the immortality of cancer cells: Senescence, polyploidy and self-renewal. Cancer Cell Int. 13:922013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bowcock AM: Invited review DNA copy number changes as diagnostic tools for lung cancer. Thorax. 69:495–496. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tuhkanen H, Anttila M, Kosma VM, Heinonen S, Juhola M, Helisalmi S, Kataja V and Mannermaa A: Frequent gene dosage alterations in stromal cells of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 119:1345–1353. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pelham RJ, Rodgers L, Hall I, Lucito R, Nguyen KC, Navin N, Hicks J, Mu D, Powers S, Wigler M and Botstein D: Identification of alterations in DNA copy number in host stromal cells during tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:19848–19853. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Carles-Kinch K, Kilpatrick KE, Stewart JC and Kinch MS: Antibody targeting of the EphA2 tyrosine kinase inhibits malignant cell behavior. Cancer Res. 62:2840–2847. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mao W, Luis E, Ross S, Silva J, Tan C, Crowley C, Chui C, Franz G, Senter P, Koeppen H and Polakis P: EphB2 as a therapeutic antibody drug target for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 64:781–788. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rummel S, Valente AL, Kane JL, Shriver CD and Ellsworth RE: Genomic (in)stability of the breast tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer Res. 10:1526–1531. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rohrbach H, Haas CJ, Baretton GB, Hirschmann A, Diebold J, Behrendt RP and Löhrs U: Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in prostatic carcinomas: Comparison of primary tumors and of corresponding recurrences after androgen-deprivation therapy and lymph-node metastases. Prostate. 40:20–27. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Smith HS, Lu Y, Deng G, Martinez O, Krams S, Ljung BM, Thor A and Lagios M: Molecular aspects of early stages of breast cancer progression. J Cell Biochem Suppl 17G. 144–152. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Agapova LS, Ivanov AV, Sablina AA, Kopnin PB, Sokova OI, Chumakov PM and Kopnin BP: P53-dependent effects of RAS oncogene on chromosome stability and cell cycle checkpoints. Oncogene. 18:3135–3142. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Matsumoto N, Yoshida T and Okayasu I: High epithelial and stromal genetic instability of chromosome 17 in ulcerative colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 63:6158–6161. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wernert N, Löcherbach C, Wellmann A, Behrens P and Hügel A: Presence of genetic alterations in microdissected stroma of human colon and breast cancers. Anticancer Res. 21:2259–2264. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Moinfar F, Man YG, Arnould L, Bratthauer GL, Ratschek M and Tavassoli FA: Concurrent and independent genetic alterations in the stromal and epithelial cells of mammary carcinoma: Implications for tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 60:2562–2566. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Paterson RF, Ulbright TM, MacLennan GT, Zhang S, Pan CX, Sweeney CJ, Moore CR, Foster RS, Koch MO, Eble JN and Cheng L: Molecular genetic alterations in the laser-capture-microdissected stroma adjacent to bladder carcinoma. Cancer. 98:1830–1836. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tuhkanen H, Anttila M, Kosma VM, Ylä-Herttuala S, Heinonen S, Kuronen A, Juhola M, Tammi R, Tammi M and Mannermaa A: Genetic alterations in the peritumoral stromal cells of malignant and borderline epithelial ovarian tumors as indicated by allelic imbalance on chromosome 3p. Int J Cancer. 109:247–252. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kurose K, Gilley K, Matsumoto S, Watson PH, Zhou XP and Eng C: Frequent somatic mutations in PTEN and TP53 are mutually exclusive in the stroma of breast carcinomas. Nat Genet. 32:355–357. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Patocs A, Zhang L, Xu Y, Weber F, Caldes T, Mutter GL, Platzer P and Eng C: Breast-cancer stromal cells with TP53 mutations and nodal metastases. N Engl J Med. 357:2543–2551. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fukino K, Shen L, Patocs A, Mutter GL and Eng C: Genomic instability within tumor stroma and clinicopathological characteristics of sporadic primary invasive breast carcinoma. JAMA. 297:2103–2111. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fukino K, Shen L, Matsumoto S, Morrison CD, Mutter GL and Eng C: Combined total genome loss of heterozygosity scan of breast cancer stroma and epithelium reveals multiplicity of stromal targets. Cancer Res. 64:7231–7236. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kurose K, Hoshaw-Woodard S, Adeyinka A, Lemeshow S, Watson PH and Eng C: Genetic model of multi-step breast carcinogenesis involving the epithelium and stroma: Clues to tumour-microenvironment interactions. Hum Mol Genet. 10:1907–1913. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hill R, Song Y, Cardiff RD and Van Dyke T: Selective evolution of stromal mesenchyme with p53 loss in response to epithelial tumorigenesis. Cell. 123:1001–1011. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hawsawi NM, Ghebeh H, Hendrayani SF, Tulbah A, Al-Eid M, Al-Tweigeri T, Ajarim D, Alaiya A, Dermime S and Aboussekhra A: Breast carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and their counterparts display neoplastic-specific changes. Cancer Res. 68:2717–2725. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chung JH, Rho JK, Xu X, Lee JS, Yoon HI, Lee CT, Choi YJ, Kim HR, Kim CH and Lee JC: Clinical and molecular evidences of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Lung Cancer. 73:176–182. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shang Y, Cai X and Fan D: Roles of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer drug resistance. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 13:915–929. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schmid JO, Dong M, Haubeiss S, Friedel G, Bode S, Grabner A, Ott G, Mürdter TE, Oren M, Aulitzky WE and van der Kuip H: Cancer cells cue the p53 response of cancer-associated fibroblasts to cisplatin. Cancer Res. 72:5824–5832. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Assadian S, El-Assaad W, Wang XQ, Gannon PO, Barrès V, Latour M, Mes-Masson AM, Saad F, Sado Y, Dostie J and Teodoro JG: P53 inhibits angiogenesis by inducing the production of Arresten. Cancer Res. 72:1270–1279. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ghahremani M Farhang, Goossens S, Nittner D, Bisteau X, Bartunkova S, Zwolinska A, Hulpiau P, Haigh K, Haenebalcke L, Drogat B, et al: P53 promotes VEGF expression and angiogenesis in the absence of an intact p21-Rb pathway. Cell Death Differ. 20:888–897. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Teodoro JG, Parker AE, Zhu X and Green MR: P53-mediated inhibition of angiogenesis through up-regulation of a collagen prolyl hydroxylase. Science. 313:968–971. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Heinimann K: Toward a molecular classification of colorectal cancer: The role of microsatellite instability status. Front Oncol. 3:2722013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Matsumoto N, Yoshida T, Yamashita K, Numata Y and Okayasu I: Possible alternative carcinogenesis pathway featuring microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer stroma. Br J Cancer. 89:707–712. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yagishita H, Yoshida T, Ishiguro K, Numata Y and Okayasu I: Epithelial and stromal genetic instability linked to tumor suppressor genes in ulcerative colitis-associated tumorigenesis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 43:559–566. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu X, Goldblum JR, Zhao Z, Landau M, Heald B, Pai R and Lin J: Distinct clinicohistologic features of inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal adenocarcinoma: in comparison with sporadic microsatellite-stable and Lynch syndrome-related colorectal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 36:1228–1233. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shiraishi H, Mikami T, Yoshida T, Tanabe S, Kobayashi N, Watanabe M and Okayasu I: Early genetic instability of both epithelial and stromal cells in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, contrasted with Barrett's adenocarcinomas. J Gastroenterol. 41:1186–1196. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chomyn A and Attardi G: MtDNA mutations in aging and apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 304:519–529. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu VW, Shi HH, Cheung AN, Chiu PM, Leung TW, Nagley P, Wong LC and Ngan HY: High incidence of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res. 61:5998–6001. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Habano W, Sugai T, Nakamura SI, Uesugi N, Yoshida T and Sasou S: Microsatellite instability and mutation of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA in gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 118:835–841. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Habano W, Nakamura S and Sugai T: Microsatellite instability in the mitochondrial DNA of colorectal carcinomas: Evidence for mismatch repair systems in mitochondrial genome. Oncogene. 17:1931–1937. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Suzuki M, Toyooka S, Miyajima K, Iizasa T, Fujisawa T, Bekele NB and Gazdar AF: Alterations in the mitochondrial displacement loop in lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 9:5636–5641. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim HS, Lim HS, Lee SH, Lee JW, Nam SW, Park WS, Lee YS, Lee JY and Yoo NJ: Mitochondrial microsatellite instability of colorectal cancer stroma. Int J Cancer. 119:2607–2611. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dey P: Epigenetic changes in tumor microenvironment. Indian J Cancer. 48:507–512. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ting AH, McGarvey KM and Baylin SB: The cancer epigenome-components and functional correlates. Genes Dev. 20:3215–3231. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lund AH and van Lohuizen M: Epigenetics and cancer. Genes Dev. 18:2315–2335. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ambros V: The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 431:350–355. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism and function. Cell. 116:281–297. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen CZ: MicroRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. N Engl J Med. 353:1768–1771. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Di Leva G and Croce CM: Roles of small RNAs in tumor formation. Trends Mol Med. 16:257–267. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao L, Sun Y, Hou Y, Peng Q, Wang L, Luo H, Tang X, Zeng Z and Liu M: MiRNA expression analysis of cancer-associated fibroblasts and normal fibroblasts in breast cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 44:2051–2059. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bronisz A, Godlewski J, Wallace JA, Merchant AS, Nowicki MO, Mathsyaraja H, Srinivasan R, Trimboli AJ, Martin CK, Li F, et al: Reprogramming of the tumour microenvironment by stromal PTEN-regulated miR-320. Nat Cell Biol. 14:159–167. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rask L, Balslev E, Jørgensen S, Eriksen J, Flyger H, Møller S, Høgdall E, Litman T and Nielsen BS: High expression of miR-21 in tumor stroma correlates with increased cancer cell proliferation in human breast cancer. APMIS. 119:663–673. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pathmanathan N and Balleine RL: Ki67 and proliferation in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 66:512–516. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yamamichi N, Shimomura R, Inada K, Sakurai K, Haraguchi T, Ozaki Y, Fujita S, Mizutani T, Furukawa C, Fujishiro M, et al: Locked nucleic acid in situ hybridization analysis of miR-21 expression during colorectal cancer development. Clin Cancer Res. 15:4009–4016. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nouraee N, Roosbroeck K, Vasei M, Semnani S, Samaei NM, Naghshvar F, Omidi AA, Calin GA and Mowla SJ: Expression, tissue distribution and function of miR-21 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 8:e730092013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dobreva G, Dambacher J and Grosschedl R: SUMO modification of a novel MAR-binding protein, SATB2, modulates immunoglobulin mu gene expression. Genes Dev. 17:3048–3061. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Patani N, Jiang W, Mansel R, Newbold R and Mokbel K: The mRNA expression of SATB1 and SATB2 in human breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 9:182009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Aprelikova O, Yu X, Palla J, Wei BR, John S, Yi M, Stephens R, Simpson RM, Risinger JI, Jazaeri A and Niederhuber J: The role of miR-31 and its target gene SATB2 in cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cell Cycle. 9:4387–4398. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Aprelikova O, Palla J, Hibler B, Yu X, Greer YE, Yi M, Stephens R, Maxwell GL, Jazaeri A, Risinger JI, et al: Silencing of miR-148a in cancer-associated fibroblasts results in WNT10B-mediated stimulation of tumor cell motility. Oncogene. 32:3246–3253. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei J, Melichian D, Komura K, Hinchcliff M, Lam AP, Lafyatis R, Gottardi CJ, MacDougald OA and Varga J: Canonical Wnt signaling induces skin fibrosis and subcutaneous lipoatrophy: A novel mouse model for scleroderma? Arthritis Rheum. 63:1707–1717. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Enkelmann A, Heinzelmann J, von Eggeling F, Walter M, Berndt A, Wunderlich H and Junker K: Specific protein and miRNA patterns characterise tumour-associated fibroblasts in bladder cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 137:751–759. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schepeler T, Reinert JT, Ostenfeld MS, Christensen LL, Silahtaroglu AN, Dyrskjøt L, Wiuf C, Sørensen FJ, Kruhøffer M, Laurberg S, et al: Diagnostic and prognostic microRNAs in stage II colon cancer. Cancer Res. 68:6416–6424. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lee KH, Lotterman C, Karikari C, Omura N, Feldmann G, Habbe N, Goggins MG, Mendell JT and Maitra A: Epigenetic silencing of MicroRNA miR-107 regulates cyclin-dependent kinase 6 expression in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 9:293–301. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Tang S, Le SY, Lu R, Rader JS, Meyers C and Zheng ZM: Aberrant expression of oncogenic and tumor-suppressive microRNAs in cervical cancer is required for cancer cell growth. PLoS One. 3:e25572008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mitra AK, Zillhardt M, Hua Y, Tiwari P, Murmann AE, Peter ME and Lengyel E: MicroRNAs reprogram normal fibroblasts into cancer-associated fibroblasts in ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 2:1100–1108. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Long H, Xie R, Xiang T, Zhao Z, Lin S, Liang Z, Chen Z and Zhu B: Autocrine CCL5 signaling promotes invasion and migration of CD133+ovarian cancer stem-like cells via NF-κB-mediated MMP-9 upregulation. Stem Cells. 30:2309–2319. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Naito Y, Sakamoto N, Oue N, Yashiro M, Sentani K, Yanagihara K, Hirakawa K and Yasui W: MicroRNA-143 regulates collagen type III expression in stromal fibroblasts of scirrhous type gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 105:228–235. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Musumeci M, Coppola V, Addario A, Patrizii M, Maugeri-Saccà M, Memeo L, Colarossi C, Francescangeli F, Biffoni M, Collura D, et al: Control of tumor and microenvironment cross-talk by miR-15a and miR-16 in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 30:4231–4242. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun P, Hu JW, Xiong WJ and Mi J: MiR-186 regulates glycolysis through Glut1 during the formation of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 15:4245–4250. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pavlides S, Whitaker-Menezes D, Castello-Cros R, Flomenberg N, Witkiewicz AK, Frank PG, Casimiro MC, Wang C, Fortina P, Addya S, et al: The reverse Warburg effect: Aerobic glycolysis in cancer associated fibroblasts and the tumor stroma. Cell Cycle. 8:3984–4001. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sotgia F, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Pavlides S, Howell A, Pestell RG and Lisanti MP: Understanding the Warburg effect and the prognostic value of stromal caveolin-1 as a marker of a lethal tumor microenvironment. Breast Cancer Res. 13:2132011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sotgia F, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Howell A, Pestell RG, Pavlides S and Lisanti MP: Caveolin-1 and cancer metabolism in the tumor microenvironment: Markers, models, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Pathol. 7:423–467. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Razani B, Zhang XL, Bitzer M, von Gersdorff G, Böttinger EP and Lisanti MP: Caveolin-1 regulates transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta/SMAD signaling through an interaction with the TGF-beta type I receptor. J Biol Chem. 276:6727–6738. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jones PA and Baylin SB: The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 3:415–428. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wilson AS, Power BE and Molloy PL: DNA hypomethylation and human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1775:138–162. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Adany R, Heimer R, Caterson B, Sorrell JM and Iozzo RV: Altered expression of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan in the stroma of human colon carcinoma. Hypomethylation of PG-40 gene correlates with increased PG-40 content and mRNA levels. J Biol Chem. 265:11389–11396. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Adany R and Iozzo RV: Altered methylation of versican proteoglycan gene in human colon carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 171:1402–1413. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Adany R and Iozzo RV: Hypomethylation of the decorin proteoglycan gene in human colon cancer. Biochem J. 276:301–306. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kekeeva TV, Popova OP, Shegaĭ PV, Alekseev BIa, Adnreeva IuIu, Zaletaev DV and Nemtsova MV: Abberant methylation of p16, HIC1, N33 and GSTP1 genes in tumor epitelium and tumor-associated stromal cells of prostate cancer. Mol Biol (Mosk). 41:79–85. 2007.(In Russian). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rodriguez-Canales J, Hanson JC, Tangrea MA, Erickson HS, Albert PS, Wallis BS, Richardson AM, Pinto PA, Linehan WM, Gillespie JW, et al: Identification of a unique epigenetic sub-microenvironment in prostate cancer. J Pathol. 211:410–419. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ye F, Zhang SF, Xie X and Lu WG: OPCML gene promoter methylation and gene expression in tumor and stroma cells of invasive cervical carcinoma. Cancer Invest. 26:569–574. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Matsunoki A, Kawakami K, Kotake M, Kaneko M, Kitamura H, Ooi A, Watanabe G and Minamoto T: LINE-1 methylation shows little intra-patient heterogeneity in primary and synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 12:5742012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fiegl H, Millinger S, Goebel G, Müller-Holzner E, Marth C, Laird PW and Widschwendter M: Breast cancer DNA methylation profiles in cancer cells and tumor stroma: Association with HER-2/neu status in primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 66:29–33. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dawsey SP, Roth MJ, Adams L, Hu N, Wang QH, Taylor PR and Woodson K: COX-2 (PTGS2) gene methylation in epithelial, subepithelial lymphocyte and stromal tissue compartments in a spectrum of esophageal squamous neoplasia. Cancer Detect Prev. 32:135–139. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhuang J, Jones A, Lee SH, Ng E, Fiegl H, Zikan M, Cibula D, Sargent A, Salvesen HB, Jacobs IJ, et al: The dynamics and prognostic potential of DNA methylation changes at stem cell gene loci in women's cancer. PLoS Genet. 8:e10025172012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang L, Gonda TA, Gamble MV, Salas M, Seshan V, Tu S, Twaddell WS, Hegyi P, Lazar G, Steele I, et al: Global hypomethylation of genomic DNA in cancer-associated myofibroblasts. Cancer Res. 68:9900–9908. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wasserkort R, Kalmar A, Valcz G, Spisak S, Krispin M, Toth K, Tulassay Z, Sledziewski AZ and Molnar B: Aberrant septin 9 DNA methylation in colorectal cancer is restricted to a single CpG island. BMC Cancer. 13:3982013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hanson JA, Gillespie JW, Grover A, Tangrea MA, Chuaqui RF, Emmert-Buck MR, Tangrea JA, Libutti SK, Linehan WM and Woodson KG: Gene promoter methylation in prostate tumor-associated stromal cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 98:255–261. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim YI, Fawaz K, Knox T, Lee YM, Norton R, Arora S, Paiva L and Mason JB: Colonic mucosal concentrations of folate correlate well with blood measurements of folate status in persons with colorectal polyps. Am J Clin Nutr. 68:866–872. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Momparler RL: Cancer epigenetics. Oncogene. 22:6479–6483. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hayes J, Peruzzi PP and Lawler S: MicroRNAs in cancer: Biomarkers, functions and therapy. Trends Mol Med. 20:460–469. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nielsen BS, Jørgensen S, Fog JU, Søkilde R, Christensen IJ, Hansen U, Brünner N, Baker A, Møller S and Nielsen HJ: High levels of microRNA-21 in the stroma of colorectal cancers predict short disease-free survival in stage II colon cancer patients. Clin Exp Metastasis. 28:27–38. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dou L, Zheng D, Li J, Li Y, Gao L, Wang L and Yu L: Methylation-mediated repression of microRNA-143 enhances MLL-AF4 oncogene expression. Oncogene. 31:507–517. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu R, Liao J, Yang M, Sheng J, Yang H, Wang Y, Pan E, Guo W, Pu Y, Kim SJ and Yin L: The cluster of miR-143 and miR-145 affects the risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through co-regulating fascin homolog 1. PLoS One. 7:e339872013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhu H, Dougherty U, Robinson V, Mustafi R, Pekow J, Kupfer S, Li YC, Hart J, Goss K, Fichera A, et al: EGFR signals downregulate tumor suppressors miR-143 and miR-145 in Western diet-promoted murine colon cancer: role of G1 regulators. Mol Cancer Res. 9:960–975. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Q, Cai J, Wang J, Xiong C and Zhao J: MiR-143 inhibits EGFR-signaling-dependent osteosarcoma invasion. Tumour Biol. 35:12743–12748. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Baumgartner C, Shields DC, Deng HW and Beckmann JS: Application of Clinical Bioinformatics. Springer; Netherlands: pp. 1262016 | |
|
Anestopoulos I, Voulgaridou GP, Georgakilas AG, Franco R, Pappa A and Panayiotidis MI: Epigenetic therapy as a novel approach in hepatocellular carcinoma. Pharmacol Ther. 145:103–119. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Corver WE, Ter Haar NT, Fleuren GJ and Oosting J: Cervical carcinoma-associated fibroblasts are DNA diploid and do not show evidence for somatic genetic alterations. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 34:553–563. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Walter K, Omura N, Hong SM, Griffith M and Goggins M: Pancreatic cancer associated fibroblasts display normal allelotypes. Cancer Biol Ther. 7:882–888. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Erez N, Truitt M, Olson P, Arron ST and Hanahan D: Cancer-associated fibroblasts are activated in incipient neoplasia to orchestrate tumor-promoting inflammation in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner. Cancer Cell. 17:135–147. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Whitaker-Menezes D, Lin Z, Flomenberg N, Howell A, Pestell RG, Lisanti MP and Sotgia F: Cytokine production and inflammation drive autophagy in the tumor microenvironment: Role of stromal caveolin-1 as a key regulator. Cell Cycle. 10:1784–1793. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Servais C and Erez N: From sentinel cells to inflammatory culprits: Cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumour-related inflammation. J Pathol. 229:198–207. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shiels MS, Engels EA, Shi J, Landi MT, Albanes D, Chatterjee N, Chanock SJ, Caporaso NE and Chaturvedi AK: Genetic variation in innate immunity and inflammation pathways associated with lung cancer risk. Cancer. 118:5630–5636. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pavlides S, Tsirigos A, Vera I, Flomenberg N, Frank PG, Casimiro MC, Wang C, Fortina P, Addya S, Pestell RG, et al: Loss of stromal caveolin-1 leads to oxidative stress, mimics hypoxia and drives inflammation in the tumor microenvironment, conferring the ‘reverse Warburg effect’ a transcriptional informatics analysis with validation. Cell Cycle. 9:2201–2219. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lehmann U and Kreipe H: Real-time PCR analysis of DNA and RNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded biopsies. Methods. 25:409–418. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ale-Agha N, Dyballa-Rukes N, Jakob S, Altschmied J and Haendeler J: Cellular functions of the dual-targeted catalytic subunit of telomerase, telomerase reverse transcriptase-potential role in senescence and aging. Exp Gerontol. 56:189–193. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Urquidi V, Tarin D and Goodison S: Role of telomerase in cell senescence and oncogenesis. Annu Rev Med. 51:65–79. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shawi M and Autexier C: Telomerase, senescence and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev. 129:3–10. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |
