Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer

Ye,Zhongrui; Zhang,Bo; Chen,Yu; Lin,Jiang

doi:10.3892/ol.2019.10394

Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer

Authors:
- Zhongrui Ye
- Bo Zhang
- Yu Chen
- Jiang Lin
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang 317000, P.R. China
Published online on: May 22, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10394
Pages: 1311-1317
Copyright: © Ye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Clinical efficacy of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was compared. A total of 156 patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from July 2015 to January 2017 were selected as subjects. They were randomly divided into group A (n=74) and group B (n=82), in which group A was treated with single utility port VATS and group B was treated with three-port VATS. Perioperative indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, removal of drainage tube, lymph node dissection, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, postoperative pain and postoperative quality of life were observed. Expression levels of CRP and IL-6 in serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). There was no significant difference in the operation time, postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube removal time and lymph node dissection between groups A and B (P>0.05). Blood loss and hospitalization time in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). VAS scores at 1-3 days after operation in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). Levels of serum CRP and IL-6 at 1-7 days after operation in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). Incidence of complication in group A was not significantly different from that in group B (P>0.05). Overall quality of life scores of group A and B were significantly lower than the preoperative scores (P<0.001). Overall status score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P<0.001). Clinical efficacies of single utility port VATS and three-port VATS were similar. Single utility port VATS can reduce trauma during surgery, reduce stress response, relieve postoperative pain, and facilitate the recovery of postoperative quality of life.

View Figures

View References

1	Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H and Zhang S: Epidemiology of lung cancer in China. Thorac Cancer. 6:209–215. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Bhaumik S, Ahmad F and Das BR: Molecular binary classification of NSCLC: miR-375 is a potential biomarker to differentiate SQCC from ADCC in Indian NSCLC patients. Appl Cancer Res. 37:282017. View Article : Google Scholar
3	Higuchi M, Yaginuma H, Yonechi A, Kanno R, Ohishi A, Suzuki H and Gotoh M: Long-term outcomes after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy versus lobectomy via open thoracotomy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg. 9:882014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Paul S, Sedrakyan A, Chiu YL, Nasar A, Port JL, Lee PC, Stiles BM and Altorki NK: Outcomes after lobectomy using thoracoscopy vs thoracotomy: A comparative effectiveness analysis utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 43:813–817. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Yang HX, Woo KM, Sima CS, Bains MS, Adusumilli PS, Huang J, Finley DJ, Rizk NP, Rusch VW, Jones DR, et al: Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: Comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy. Ann Surg. 265:431–437. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Ng CSH, Gonzalez-Rivas D, D'Amico TA and Rocco G: Uniportal VATS - a new era in lung cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis. 7:1489–1491. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
7	Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R and Mosquera VX: Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 13:539–541. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Anile M, Diso D, De Giacomo T, Rendina EA and Venuta F: Uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 96:7452013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Abouarab AA, Rahouma M, Kamel M, Ghaly G and Mohamed A: Single versus multi-incisional video-assisted thoracic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 28:174–185. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Reck M, Popat S, Reinmuth N, De Ruysscher D, Kerr KM and Peters S; ESMO Guidelines Working Group, : Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 25 (Suppl 3):iii27–iii39. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Hanna NH, Dahlberg SE, Kolesar JM, Aggarwal C, Hirsch FR, Ramalingam SS and Schiller JH: Three-arm, randomized, phase 2 study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with cetuximab, cixutumumab, or both for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who will not receive bevacizumab-based therapy: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study (E4508). Cancer. 121:2253–2261. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Miyagi M, et al: Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: Oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 26:671–678. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Sapan HB, Paturusi I, Jusuf I, Patellongi I, Massi MN, Pusponegoro AD, Arief SK, Labeda I, Islam AA, Rendy L, et al: Pattern of cytokine (IL-6 and IL-10) level as inflammation and anti-inflammation mediator of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in polytrauma. Int J Burns Trauma. 6:37–43. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
14	Ferrell B, Sun V, Hurria A, Cristea M, Raz DJ, Kim JY, Reckamp K, Williams AC, Borneman T, Uman G, et al: Interdisciplinary palliative care for patients with lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. 50:758–767. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar
15	Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C and Licht PB: Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 17:836–844. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Hao Z, Cai Y, Fu S, Zhang N and Fu X: Comparison study of post-operative pain and short-term quality of life between uniportal and three portal video-assisted thoracic surgery for radical lung cancer resection. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 19:122–128. 2016.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI
17	Hirai K, Takeuchi S and Usuda J: Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective comparative study of perioperative clinical outcomes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 49 (Suppl 1):i37–i41. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
18	Wang BY, Liu CY, Hsu PK, Shih CS and Liu CC: Single-incision versus multiple-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy: A propensity-matched analysis. Ann Surg. 261:793–799. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, Xi Y, Tan L and Wang Q: Single-versus multiple-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a propensity-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 49 (Suppl 1):i48–i53. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
20	Zhu Y, Liang M, Wu W, Zheng J, Zheng W, Guo Z, Zheng B, Xu G and Chen C: Preliminary results of single-port versus triple-port complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Transl Med. 3:922015.PubMed/NCBI
21	Wang W, Yin W, Shao W, Jiang G, Wang Q, Liu L, Liu D, Wang Z, Zhu Z, Chen H, et al: Comparative study of systematic thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy and conventional thoracotomy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 6:45–51. 2014.PubMed/NCBI
22	Finley R, Mayo J, Donagh C, Leo J, Grant K, Lam S and English J: P1. 16–34 The impact of pathology, staging and operative resection on survival and CT evidence of recurrence of early NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 13:S640–S641. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar
23	Chang JM, Kam KH, Yen YT, Huang WL, Chen W, Tseng YL, Wu MH, Lai WW and Gonzalez-Rivas D: From biportal to uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection: A single-institute experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 95:e50972016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Leung KL, Lai PBS, Ho RLK, Meng WC, Yiu RY, Lee JF and Lau WY: Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 231:506–511. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Fretland AA, Sokolov A, Postriganova N, Kazaryan AM, Pischke SE, Nilsson PH, Rognes IN, Bjornbeth BA, Fagerland MW, Mollnes TE, et al: Inflammatory response after laparoscopic versus open resection of colorectal liver metastases: Data from the Oslo-CoMet Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 94:e17862015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Dai F, Meng S, Mei L, Guan C and Ma Z: Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched comparative analysis. J Thorac Dis. 8:2872–2878. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Mier JM, Chavarin A, Izquierdo-Vidal C, Fibla JJ and Molins L: A prospective study comparing three-port video-assisted thoracoscopy with the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port and instruments for the video thoracoscopic approach: A pilot study. Surg Endosc. 27:2557–2560. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28	Quinten C, Martinelli F, Coens C, Sprangers MA, Ringash J, Gotay C, Bjordal K, Greimel E, Reeve BB, Maringwa J, et al Patient Reported Outcomes and Behavioral Evidence (PROBE) the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Clinical Groups, : A global analysis of multitrial data investigating quality of life and symptoms as prognostic factors for survival in different tumor sites. Cancer. 120:302–311. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Möller A and Sartipy U: Predictors of postoperative quality of life after surgery for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 7:406–411. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI