Ursolic acid isolated from Isodon excisoides induces apoptosis and inhibits invasion of GBC‑SD gallbladder carcinoma cells

  • Authors:
    • Huiping Chen
    • Xiujuan Wu
    • Yitao Duan
    • Dexian Zhi
    • Min Zou
    • Zhihong Zhao
    • Xiaojun Zhang
    • Xiaoang Yang
    • Jianying Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 27, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10397
  • Pages: 1467-1474
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a relatively rare but terminal malignancy, and drug/chemical development is an important aspect of prevention and treatment of GBC. Ursolic acid (UA), a pentacyclic triterpenoid, has been reported to exhibit various pharmaceutical effects. In the present study, the antiproliferative and anti‑invasive effects of UA and the associated mechanisms in GBC were examined. UA was isolated from Isodon excisoides. The GBC cells (GBC‑SD and NOZ) were treated with UA and subjected to a Cell Counting Kit‑8 assay. The GBC‑SD cells were subsequently selected for an Annexin V‑FITC/propidium iodide assay, Transwell chamber assay, RT2 profiler polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array and western blot analysis. The results indicated that UA inhibited the proliferation and invasion and induced the apoptosis of GBC‑SD cells in a dose‑dependent manner. Furthermore, the PCR arrays demonstrated that there were 24 differentially expressed genes between the UA‑treated and untreated groups. These differentially expressed genes suggested that UA induced the apoptosis of GBC‑SD cells through activation of the cell extrinsic pathway. According to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of these differentially expressed genes, the suppression of nuclear factor (NF)‑κB and protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathways was further validated. In summary, UA induces the apoptosis and inhibits the invasion of GBC‑SD cells, which may be associated with the suppression of NF‑κB and Akt signaling pathways. These results may offer a potential therapeutic strategy for the chemoprevention or chemotherapy of GBC in humans.

Introduction

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tract and one of the common malignant tumor types of the gastrointestinal tract (1). GBC is infrequent in the majority of developed countries, but common in certain specific geographical regions of developing countries, including northern India, South Karachi in Pakistan and eastern Europe (2). GBC is characterized by late diagnosis, metastasis and recurrence which occur readily, and poor prognosis and survival rates (24). Surgery is considered the only curative therapy for GBC. However, at diagnosis, <20% of patients are suitable candidates for surgical treatment (4). GBC should be treated with systemic chemotherapy, and drug/chemical development is important for the prevention and treatment of GBC.

Antitumor promotion with phytochemicals is currently regarded as an efficient and reliable strategy for cancer chemoprevention and therapy. The genus Isodon (formerly Rabdosia) comprising ~150 species of undershrubs, subundershrubs and perennial herbs, is found throughout the world, primarily in tropical and subtropical Asia (5). Several Isodon species are widely used in popular Chinese folk medicine for the treatment of bacterial infections, inflammation, cancer and hepatotoxicity (5). A large number of secondary metabolites with diverse biological activities have been isolated from this species. These chemical constituents include diterpenoids, triterpenoids and flavonoids (68). In the present study, ursolic acid (UA; Fig. 1A), a pentacyclic triterpenoid, was isolated from Isodon excisoides. UA has been reported to exhibit various pharmaceutical effects, including anticancer, antiangiogenic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, antihyperlipidemic and hypoglycemic activities, among others (9,10). The anticancer effects of UA are mediated by suppression of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt), nuclear factor (NF)-κB and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathways with their regulated gene products, including cyclin D1, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, survivin, myeloid cell leukemia-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (11). In addition, He et al (12) reported that there were 611 proteins possibly interacting with UA and >49 functional clusters responding to UA. Numerous studies have suggested that UA is a promising sensitizer for cancer therapy (11). Previous evidence has revealed that UA inhibits the growth of GBC cells through inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (13). However, the anti-invasive effect of UA and the associated mechanism in GBC remain to be fully elucidated. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the antiproliferative and anti-invasive effects of purified UA in the GBC-SD human GBC cell line in vitro. The results will assist in expanding current understanding of the anticancer effect and mechanism of UA. Furthermore, the results may contribute to the development of UA as a potent anticancer agent for GBC.

Materials and methods

Plant material, cells and reagents

The aerial parts of I. excisoides were collected from Luanchuan County in Henan Province, China in July 2014 and authenticated by Professor Jicheng Li of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China). A voucher specimen (no. 20140706167LY) was deposited in the herbarium of the College of Pharmacy, Zhengzhou University. The human GBC cell lines GBC-SD (cat. no. CC2502) and NOZ (cat. no. CC2501), which exhibit correct short tandem repeat profiles, were originally purchased from Guangzhou Cellcook Biotech Co., Ltd (Guangzhou, China) and stored in the Henan Key Laboratory for Pharmacology of Liver Diseases (Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China). The reagents used included RPMI-1640 medium (cat. no. SH30809.01) and high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; cat. no. SH30022.01; Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA), fetal bovine serum (FBS; cat. no. 900-108; Gemini Bio Products, West Sacramento, CA, USA), Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; cat. no. CK04; Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc., Shanghai, China), Annexin V-FITC/Propidium iodide (PI) Apoptosis Detection kit (cat. no. 70-AP101-60; Multi Sciences Biotech Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China), Transwell chambers with polycarbonate filters (8-µm pore size; cat. no. 3422; Corning, Inc., Corning, NY, USA), Matrigel (cat. no. 356234; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), TRIzol reagent (cat. no. 15596-026; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), PrimeScript™ RT Reagent kit (cat. no. DRR037A; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China), RT2 Profiler ‘human apoptosis’ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) arrays (cat. no. PAHS-012Z) and RT2 Profiler ‘human extracellular matrix and adhesion molecules’ PCR arrays (cat. no. PAHS-013Z; Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), EvaGreen 2X qPCR MasterMix-No Dye kit (cat. no. MasterMix-S; Applied Biological Materials, Richmond, BC, Canada), Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; cat. no. D8371), bovine serum albumin (BSA; cat. no. A8010), RIPA lysis buffer (cat. no. R0020; Solarbio Science and Technology, Beijing, China), phosphorylated (phosphor)-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) antibody (cat. no. 3033), NF-κB p65 antibody (cat. no. 3034), phospho-Akt (Ser473) antibody (cat. no. 9271), Akt antibody (cat. no. 9272; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA) and GAPDH monoclonal antibody (cat. no. 60004-1-lg; ProteinTech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade.

Extraction, isolation and purification of UA from I. excisoides

The dried and powdered aerial parts of I. excisoides (3 kg) were extracted with anhydrous ether (12 L). The extract was then filtered and evaporated in a rotatory evaporator under reduced pressure. The concentrated residue (89 g) was dissolved in methanol (3.6 L) and activated carbon (108 g) was added. The mixture was heated under reflux and further filtered and evaporated to produce a crude product (71 g). The crude product was then successively separated by silica gel chromatographic column and Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography, giving a compound (56 mg). This compound was identified as UA on the basis of its mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. UA (ursolic acid, C30H48O3): HR-EIMS m/z 456.3608 (456.3603 calcd. for C30H48O3); 1H-NMR (C5D5N, 400 MHz): δ 5.52 (1H, t, J=3.5 Hz, H-12), 3.48 (1H, dd, J=9.9, 5.4 Hz, H-3α), 2.68 (1H, d, J=11.4 Hz, H-18), 1.27, 1.05, 0.91, 1.08 and 1.25 (each 3H, s, H-23, H-24, H-25, H-26 and H-27), 0.97 (3H, d, J=6.0 Hz, H-29) and 1.03 (3H, d, J=6.3 Hz, H-30); 13C-NMR (C5D5N, 100 MHz): δ 39.1 (C-1), 28.1 (C-2), 78.1 (C-3), 39.4 (C-4), 55.8 (C-5), 18.8 (C-6), 33.6 (C-7), 40.0 (C-8), 48.1 (C-9), 37.3 (C-10), 25.0 (C-11), 125.6 (C-12), 139.4 (C-13), 42.5 (C-14), 28.7 (C-15), 23.9 (C-16), 48.1 (C-17), 53.6 (C-18), 39.5 (C-19), 39.5 (C-20), 31.1 (C-21), 37.3 (C-22), 28.8 (C-23), 16.6 (C-24), 15.7 (C-25), 17.6 (C-26), 23.7 (C-27), 180.2 (C-28), 17.5 (C-29) and 21.5 (C-30).

Cell culture and UA treatment

The GBC-SD and NOZ cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 or high-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere, and routinely passaged at 2–3-day intervals. UA was dissolved in DMSO to a 50 mM stock concentration. The final DMSO concentration was accounted for ≤0.1% (v/v). DMSO (0.05%)-treated cells were used as a vehicle control.

Cell viability assay

A CCK-8 assay was performed to evaluate the effect of UA on cell viability. A total of 1.2×104 cells/well were seeded in 96-well plates overnight and then treated with varying concentrations of UA (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 45 and 50 µM). The cells were incubated for either 24 or 48 h at 37°C in a humidified incubator, following which 10 µl CCK-8 solution was added into each well and incubated for a further 1 h. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm in each well using a microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The results are presented as the mean values of three independent experiments performed over multiple days. Cell viability was calculated using the following formula: Cell viability (%)=[optical density (OD) of the experiment samples/OD of the control] × 100%. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of UA against the GBC-SD or NOZ cells was calculated using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Apoptosis assays

Cell apoptosis was detected using an Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection kit. In brief, the cells from the UA-treated (10, 30 and 50 µM) and untreated groups were seeded in 6-well plates (1×106 cells/well) and cultured for 24 h. The cells were collected, washed with ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in binding buffer at a cell density of 1×106 cells/ml. The cells were stained with 5 µl Annexin V-FITC and 10 µl PI (20 µg/ml) and then incubated in the dark at 25°C for 15 min. Apoptotic cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (CytoFlex; Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). The percentage of apoptotic cells was analyzed using FlowJo software (version 9.8.3, FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA). The experiments were repeated three times.

Cell invasion assay

A cell invasion assay was performed using 8-µm pore size Transwell chambers. The upper side of the Transwell filter inserts was coated with 80 µl diluted (1:8 in serum-free medium) Matrigel in 24-well plates. The GBC-SD cells at a density of 1×105 cells/well were suspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium and added to the upper chambers containing various concentrations of UA (10, 30 and 50 µM). The lower chambers were filled with 500 µl RPMI-1640 medium containing 20% FBS. After 24 h, the non-invaded cells were removed, and the invasive cells were fixed with 95% ethanol, stained with 0.1% crystal violet and images were captured (magnification, ×100) with a light microscope (XDS-1B inverted biological microscope, Chongqing Optical & Electrical Instrument Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China). The assay was repeated in three independent experiments.

RT2 profiler PCR arrays for apoptosis and invasion

In brief, cells from the UA-treated (50 µM) and untreated groups were seeded in 6-well plates (1×106 cells/well) and cultured for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from each experimental group using TRIzol reagent and quantified by spectrophotometry. Subsequently, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed with the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent kit, according to the manufacturer's protocol. RT2 Profiler ‘human apoptosis’ PCR arrays and RT2 Profiler ‘human extracellular matrix and adhesion molecules’ PCR arrays were performed in duplicate according to the manufacturer's protocol. The PCR was performed as follows: 10 min at 95°C and 40 cycles (15 sec at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C). The specificity of the SYBR Green assay was confirmed by melting curve analysis. Relative fold changes in mRNA levels were calculated following normalization to housekeeping control gene targets using the comparative Cq method (14).

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis

In order to investigate the signaling pathways that may be involved in the effects of UA on GBC-SD cells, KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) (15,16). Pathway terms with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Western blot analysis

Following treatment with UA (0, 10, 30 and 50 µM) for 6 h, the GBC-SD cells were washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer. Based on total protein concentrations calculated from the BCA assays, the total cell lysates (15 µg total protein) were separated via SDS-PAGE (8% gel) and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes in a standard transfer buffer. Following blocking with 1% BSA (blocking solution) for 1.5 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies to phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536; 1:1,000), NF-κB p65 (1:1,000), phospho-Akt (Ser473; 1:1,000), Akt (1:1,000) or GAPDH (1:5,000) overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed three times with TBST and then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5,000; cat. no. SA00001-1/SA00001-2; ProteinTech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. Following extensive washing in TBST, the protein signals were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) western blotting substrate (cat. no. B500014; ProteinTech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and an ECL system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Equal protein loading was assessed by normalizing against the expression of GAPDH. Quantification of protein bands densitometry was carried out using ImageJ software (version 1.8.0_112; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Structural determination of UA isolated from I. excisoides and cell viability assay

Consistent with previous results (17,18), UA was isolated from an Isodon species (I. excisoides). UA was identified by comparison of its HR-EIMS, 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra data with those previously reported for UA (19,20), and to an authentic sample (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt Germany). The proliferation inhibition effect of UA on GBC-SD and NOZ cells was determined using a CCK-8 assay. Within the dose range and time period measured, UA was able to inhibit cell proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 1B and C). Furthermore, the IC50 values of UA at the same exposure time for GBC-SD cells were marginally lower compared with those for NOZ cells. The IC50 values for GBC-SD cells at 24 and 48 h were 57.44 and 39.12 µM, respectively, and the values for NOZ cells were 61.58 and 41.81 µM, respectively. Therefore, GBC-SD cells were selected to further investigate the effect of UA on the invasive capacity of GBC cells. In addition, the IC50 value for GBC-SD cells at 48 h was lower than that reported in the literature (for example, the IC50 value for GBC-SD cells at 48 h was previously reported to be 47.6 µM) (13), which may derive from differences in experimental design and operation.

UA induces apoptosis of GBC-SD cells in a dose-dependent manner

The UA-induced apoptosis of GBC-SD cells was determined using an Annexin V-FITC/PI assay. As indicated in Fig. 1D and E, UA treatment increased the apoptosis of GBC-SD cells in a dose-dependent manner. The apoptotic rates of the cells were 11.98, 17.37 and 55.50% following treatment with 10, 30 and 50 µM UA, respectively, which were all increased compared with the apoptotic rate of GBC-SD cells cultured under normal conditions (9.96%). The apoptotic rates of GBC-SD cells in the middle (30 µM) and high (50 µM) dose groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). UA (10, 30 or 50 µM) treatment had no significant effect on the distribution of GBC-SD cells in the cell cycle (data not shown). These results indicate that UA inhibits GBC-SD cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis.

UA inhibits the invasion of GBC-SD cells in a dose-dependent manner

Cell invasion is a driving force in the process of tumor metastasis formation. Therefore, the effects of UA on invasion in GBC-SD cells was evaluated (Fig. 2A and B). The in vitro invasion assay indicated that UA at concentrations of 10–50 µM significantly reduced the rate of GBC-SD cell invasion when compared with the control group following cell treatment for 24 h (P<0.01). Furthermore, UA at concentrations of 10 and 30 µM did not significantly reduce the viability of GBC-SD cells following cell treatment for 24 h (Fig. 1B). These results suggested that the inhibition of GBC-SD cell invasion by UA did not result from a reduction of cell viability. These observations suggested that UA was able to regulate the invasive capacity of GBC-SD cells in a dose-dependent manner.

Effects of UA on GBC-SD cells are at least in part via NF-κB and Akt signaling pathways

As UA induced apoptosis and inhibited invasion in GBC-SD cells, the expression of 168 key genes involved in these two processes was subsequently evaluated with a PCR array. The cells were incubated with UA (50 µM) for 24 h, and 168 related genes (84 apoptosis-related genes and 84 adhesion/invasion-related genes) were analyzed, compared with untreated GBC-SD cells. Of these 168 genes, there were 24 with log2 fold change values of either >1.5 or ≥1.5, which were considered differentially expressed (Table I). Of these 24 genes, eight apoptosis-related genes were screened. Of these eight genes, three genes encoding pro-apoptotic members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family, including TNF (log2 fold change: 3.17), lymphotoxin-α (log2 fold change: 2.19) and CD27 (log2 fold change: 3.56) were enhanced in the UA-treated GBC-SD cells compared with the control groups (Table I). Therefore, these results suggested that UA induces apoptosis in GBC-SD cells through activation of the cell extrinsic pathway, which is initiated by members of the TNF superfamily (21,22). TNF is able to trigger either the formation of complex-I, driving the activation of NF-κB and an inflammatory response, or the formation of complex-II, which can trigger apoptosis (23). Of the 24 differentially expressed genes, a further 16 adhesion/invasion-related genes were screened out, including nine upregulated and seven downregulated genes. These upregulated and downregulated genes may have multiple effects on the invasion of GBC-SD cells. KEGG pathway analysis of the 24 differentially expressed genes was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (15,16). According to KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, the differentially expressed genes were significantly associated with NF-κB, TNF, PI3K-Akt and other signaling pathways (Table II). To determine whether UA regulates the NF-κB and Akt signaling pathways, the effect of UA on the expression and activation of proteins in these signaling pathways was detected by western blotting. As shown in Fig. 2C, the GBC-SD cells treated with UA exhibited a significant and dose-dependent reduction in total NF-κB p65 and Akt, and a marginal decrease in total p-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) and p-Akt (Ser473). Therefore, it was demonstrated that the effects of UA on GBC-SD cells were, at least in part, mediated through the NF-κB and Akt signaling pathways.

Table I.

Genes with >1.5-fold change in expression between GBC-SD cells treated with UA and the control group.

Table I.

Genes with >1.5-fold change in expression between GBC-SD cells treated with UA and the control group.

RT2 profiler PCR arraysGene symbolGenBank accession no.DescriptionLog2 fold changea
Human apoptosisNOL3NM_003946Nucleolar protein 3 (apoptosis repressor with CARD domain)−2.56
LTANM_000595Lymphotoxin α (TNF superfamily, member 1)2.19
TNFSF8NM_001244Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 8−1.87
BCL2L2NM_004050BCL2-like 2−1.80
BCL2A1NM_004049BCL2-related protein A12.50
BCL2L10NM_020396BCL2-like 10 (apoptosis facilitator)2.60
CD27NM_001242CD27 molecule3.56
TNFNM_000594Tumor necrosis factor3.17
HumanCOL11A1NM_080629Collagen, type XI, α1−2.90
extracellular matrixSELLNM_000655Selectin L−2.58
and adhesion moleculesMMP11NM_005940Matrix metallopeptidase 11−2.38
MMP9NM_004994Matrix metallopeptidase 9−2.03
MMP2NM_004530Matrix metallopeptidase 2−1.81
SPARCNM_003118Secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (osteonectin)−1.78
VCANNM_004385Versican−1.76
FN1NM_002026Fibronectin 11.56
ICAM1NM_000201Intercellular adhesion molecule 11.66
ITGA2NM_002203Integrin, α21.68
ITGA1NM_181501Integrin, α11.75
PECAM1NM_000442 Platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule2.16
HAS1NM_001523Hyaluronan synthase 12.22
KAL1NM_000216Kallmann syndrome 1 sequence2.26
MMP10NM_002425Matrix metallopeptidase 104.41
MMP1NM_002421Matrix metallopeptidase 14.79

a Values are presented as log2 fold change, and fold-change values were calculated as 2−ΔΔCq for genes in treated cells relative to control cells

Table II.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes.

Table II.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes.

TermaGenesP-value
hsa04064: NF-κB signaling pathwayICAM1, TNF, BCL2A1, LTA0.001
hsa05205: Proteoglycans in cancerTNF, MMP9, ITGA2, MMP2, FN10.001
hsa04512: ECM-receptor interactionITGA1, ITGA2, COL11A1, FN10.001
hsa04668: TNF signaling pathwayICAM1, TNF, MMP9, LTA0.002
hsa04670: Leukocyte transendothelial migrationICAM1, MMP9, PECAM1, MMP20.002
hsa04514: Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)ICAM1, SELL, PECAM1, VCAN0.004
hsa05219: Bladder cancerMMP9, MMP2, MMP10.004
hsa05144: MalariaICAM1, TNF, PECAM10.006
hsa05200: Pathways in cancerMMP9, ITGA2, MMP2, MMP1, FN10.011
hsa04510: Focal adhesionITGA1, ITGA2, COL11A1, FN10.011
hsa05410: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)TNF, ITGA1, ITGA20.014
hsa04060: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interactionTNF, CD27, LTA, TNFSF80.015
hsa05414: Dilated cardiomyopathyTNF, ITGA1, ITGA20.016
hsa04640: Hematopoietic cell lineageTNF, ITGA1, ITGA20.016
hsa05323: Rheumatoid arthritisICAM1, TNF, MMP10.017
hsa05146: AmoebiasisTNF, COL11A1, FN10.024
hsa04151: PI3K-Akt signaling pathwayITGA1, ITGA2, COL11A1, FN10.043

a Pathway terms with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Discussion

UA is a pentacyclic triterpenoid widely found in the plant kingdom. It has attracted attention in recent years due to it numerous activities and low toxicity (10). It exerts anticancer effects in various cancer cell lines (24), and inhibits the growth of GBC cells through inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (13). The present study identified that low doses of UA (10, 30 and 50 µM) did not affect cell cycle but induced cell apoptosis in GBC-SD cells. In addition, previous studies have reported that UA can cause cell death by autophagy or necrosis (25,26). These results indicate that UA inhibits GBC-SD cell proliferation primarily by inducing cell death via apoptosis, and possibly also via autophagy or necrosis. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have reported the anti-invasive effect of UA on GBC. It was identified in the present study that UA significantly reduced the rate of GBC-SD cell invasion. Furthermore, the effects of UA on GBC-SD cells were at least partly mediated via the suppression of NF-κB and Akt signaling pathways.

The anticancer mechanism of UA is complex and multifaceted. The results of the present study suggested that UA induced the apoptosis of GBC-SD cells through activation of the cell extrinsic pathway. However, a previous study demonstrated that activation of the mitochondrial-mediated apoptotic pathway is also involved in UA-induced GBC-SD cell apoptosis (13). Another study on gastrointestinal cancer demonstrated that UA modulates the expression of executioner caspase (C-3, C-8 and C-9) proteins involved in the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis (27). UA-induced apoptosis can be mediated by an increase in activated extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2, Janus kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (28). UA-induced GBC-SD cell apoptosis may also be involved in the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis. In addition, inhibition of the NF-κB and Akt signaling pathways by UA has been reported in other cell types (29,30), which is consistent with the present study. The pro-survival Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways are constitutively activated in several types of cancer, and contribute to cancer development and progression. The anticancer effects of certain dietary natural compounds are mediated by targeting the Akt and NF-κB pathways (31,32). The NF-κB pathway also has the ability to cross-talk with Akt pathways in various cancer types. The suppression of Akt may contribute to inhibiting downstream targets, including NF-κB p-65 and the mRNA levels of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 in GBC-SD cells (33). These two genes were downregulated in the present study (Table I) and are critical to tumor invasion. Certain clinical studies with a small number of patients have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of UA in cancer therapy (11). Future investigations are required to analyze the precise mechanisms of UA and to exploit its full potential for GBC chemotherapy.

In conclusion, UA was isolated from I. excisoides. The antiproliferative and anti-invasive effects of UA in GBC-SD cells were investigated and validated. Furthermore, UA was demonstrated to induce apoptosis and inhibit invasion in GBC-SD cells, which may be associated with the suppression of NF-κB and Akt signaling pathways. The effects of UA in GBC-SD cells suggest that UA may be a candidate agent for the chemoprevention and/or treatment of GBC progression.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Jicheng Li (Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China) for assistance with authenticating the plant material.

Funding

The present study was financially supported by the Medical Science and Technology Planning Project of Henan Province, China (grant no. 201702299), the Major Special Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province, China (grant no. 161100311400) and the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China (grant no. 182300410343).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

YD and JZ designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. HC and XW performed the majority of the experiments. DZ, MZ and ZZ were involved in chemical research and analyzed the data. XZ and XY were involved in data interpretation and assisted in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Zhu AX, Hong TS, Hezel AF and Kooby DA: Current management of gallbladder carcinoma. Oncologist. 15:168–181. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Sharma A, Sharma KL, Gupta A, Yadav A and Kumar A: Gallbladder cancer epidemiology, pathogenesis and molecular genetics: Recent update. World J Gastroenterol. 23:3978–3998. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Aloia TA, Járufe N, Javle M, Maithel SK, Roa JC, Adsay V, Coimbra FJ and Jarnagin WR: Gallbladder cancer: Expert consensus statement. HPB; Oxford: 17. pp. 681–690. 2015, PubMed/NCBI

4 

Kanthan R, Senger JL, Ahmed S and Kanthan SC: Gallbladder cancer in the 21st century. J Oncol 2015. 9674722015.

5 

Sun HD, Huang SX and Han QB: Diterpenoids from Isodon species and their biological activities. Nat Prod Rep. 23:673–698. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Wang F, Li XM and Liu JK: New terpenoids from Isodon sculponeata. Chem Pharm Bull; Tokyo: 57:pp. 525–527. 2009, PubMed/NCBI

7 

Jiao K, Li HY, Zhang P, Pi HF, Ruan HL and Wu JZ: Three new ursane-type triterpenoids from the aerial parts of Isodon excisoides. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 15:962–968. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Huang H, Sun H and Zhao S: Flavonoids from Isodon oresbius. Phytochemistry. 42:1247–1248. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Kashyap D, Tuli HS and Sharma AK: Ursolic acid (UA): A metabolite with promising therapeutic potential. Life Sci. 146:201–213. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

López-Hortas L, Pérez-Larrán P, González-Muñoz MJ, Falqué E and Domínguez H: Recent developments on the extraction and application of ursolic acid. A review. Food Res Int. 103:130–149. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Prasad S, Tyagi AK and Aggarwal BB: Chemosensitization by ursolic acid: A new avenue for cancer therapy. Role of nutraceuticals in cancer chemosensitization. Bharti AC and Aggarwal BB: Academic Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts: pp. 99–109. 2018, View Article : Google Scholar

12 

He W, Shi F, Zhou ZW, Li B, Zhang K, Zhang X, Ouyang C, Zhou SF and Zhu X: A bioinformatic and mechanistic study elicits the antifibrotic effect of ursolic acid through the attenuation of oxidative stress with the involvement of ERK, PI3K/Akt, and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in human hepatic stellate cells and rat liver. Drug Des Devel Ther. 9:3989–4104. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Weng H, Tan ZJ, Hu YP, Shu YJ, Bao RF, Jiang L, Wu XS, Li ML, Ding Q, Wang XA, et al: Ursolic acid induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of gallbladder carcinoma cells. Cancer Cell Int. 14:962014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Huang da W, Sherman BT and Lempicki RA: Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:1–13. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Huang da W, Sherman BT and Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protoc. 4:44–57. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Yang YC, Wei MC and Huang TC: Optimisation of an ultrasound-assisted extraction followed by RP-HPLC separation for the simultaneous determination of oleanolic acid, ursolic acid and oridonin content in Rabdosia rubescens. Phytochem Anal. 23:627–636. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Jiang B, Hou AJ, Li ML, Li SH, Han QB, Wang SJ, Lin ZW and Sun HD: Cytotoxic ent-kaurane diterpenoids from Isodon sculponeata. Planta Med. 68:921–925. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Ali MS, Ibrahim SA, Jalil S and Choudhary MI: Ursolic acid: A potent inhibitor of superoxides produced in the cellular system. Phytother Res. 21:558–561. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Seebacher W, Simic N, Weis R, Saf R and Kunert O: Complete assignments of 1H and 13C NMR resonances of oleanolic acid, 18α-oleanolic acid, ursolic acid and their 11-oxo derivatives. Magn Reson Chem. 41:636–638. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Fulda S and Debatin KM: Extrinsic versus intrinsic apoptosis pathways in anticancer chemotherapy. Oncogene. 25:4798–4811. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Savva CG, Totokotsopoulos S, Nicolaou KC, Neophytou CM and Constantinou AI: Selective activation of TNFR1 and NF-κB inhibition by a novel biyouyanagin analogue promotes apoptosis in acute leukemia cells. BMC Cancer. 16:2792016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Annibaldi A and Meier P: Checkpoints in TNF-induced cell death: Implications in inflammation and cancer. Trends Mol Med. 24:49–65. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Woźniak Ł, Skąpska S and Marszałek K: Ursolic acid-A pentacyclic triterpenoid with a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities. Molecules. 20:20614–20641. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Jung J, Seo J, Kim J and Kim JH: Ursolic acid causes cell death in PC-12 cells by inducing apoptosis and impairing autophagy. Anticancer Res. 38:847–853. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Lu CC, Huang BB, Liao PJ and Yen GC: Ursolic acid triggers nonprogrammed death (necrosis) in human glioblastoma multiforme DBTRG-05MG cells through MPT pore opening and ATP decline. Mol Nutr Food Res. 58:2146–2156. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Wang X, Zhang F, Yang L, Mei Y, Long H, Zhang X, Zhang J, Qimuge-Suyila and Su X: Ursolic acid inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011. 4193432011.

28 

Wu CC, Cheng CH, Lee YH, Chang IL, Chen HY, Hsieh CP and Chueh PJ: Ursolic acid triggers apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells via caspase activation and the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 64:4220–4226. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Meng Y, Lin ZM, Ge N, Zhang DL, Huang J and Kong F: Ursolic acid induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Am J Chin Med. 43:1471–1486. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Gai L, Cai N, Wang L, Xu X and Kong X: Ursolic acid induces apoptosis via Akt/NF-κB signaling suppression in T24 human bladder cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 7:1673–1677. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zhang L, Wen X, Li M, Li S and Zhao H: Targeting cancer stem cells and signaling pathways by resveratrol and pterostilbene. Biofactors. 44:61–68. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Wang L, Yue Z, Guo M, Fang L, Bai L, Li X, Tao Y, Wang S, Liu Q, Zhi D and Zhao H: Dietary flavonoid hyperoside induces apoptosis of activated human LX-2 hepatic stellate cell by suppressing canonical NF-κB signaling. Biomed Res Int 2016. 10685282016.

33 

Cui H, Yuan J, Du X, Wang M, Yue L and Liu J: Ethyl gallate suppresses proliferation and invasion in human breast cancer cells via Akt-NF-κB signaling. Oncol Rep. 33:1284–1290. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2019
Volume 18 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Chen H, Wu X, Duan Y, Zhi D, Zou M, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Yang X and Zhang J: Ursolic acid isolated from Isodon excisoides induces apoptosis and inhibits invasion of GBC‑SD gallbladder carcinoma cells. Oncol Lett 18: 1467-1474, 2019
APA
Chen, H., Wu, X., Duan, Y., Zhi, D., Zou, M., Zhao, Z. ... Zhang, J. (2019). Ursolic acid isolated from Isodon excisoides induces apoptosis and inhibits invasion of GBC‑SD gallbladder carcinoma cells. Oncology Letters, 18, 1467-1474. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10397
MLA
Chen, H., Wu, X., Duan, Y., Zhi, D., Zou, M., Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Yang, X., Zhang, J."Ursolic acid isolated from Isodon excisoides induces apoptosis and inhibits invasion of GBC‑SD gallbladder carcinoma cells". Oncology Letters 18.2 (2019): 1467-1474.
Chicago
Chen, H., Wu, X., Duan, Y., Zhi, D., Zou, M., Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Yang, X., Zhang, J."Ursolic acid isolated from Isodon excisoides induces apoptosis and inhibits invasion of GBC‑SD gallbladder carcinoma cells". Oncology Letters 18, no. 2 (2019): 1467-1474. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10397