Open Access

Identification of key biomarkers and potential molecular mechanisms in lung cancer by bioinformatics analysis

  • Authors:
    • Zhenhua Li
    • Meixiang Sang
    • Ziqiang Tian
    • Zhao Liu
    • Jian Lv
    • Fan Zhang
    • Baoen Shan
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 4, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10796
  • Pages: 4429-4440
  • Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Lung cancer is one of the most widespread neoplasms worldwide. To identify the key biomarkers in its carcinogenesis and development, the mRNA microarray datasets GSE102287, GSE89047, GSE67061 and GSE74706 were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. GEO2R was used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in lung cancer. The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery was used to analyze the functions and pathways of the DEGs, while the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins and Cytoscape were used to obtain the protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network. Kaplan Meier curves were used to analyze the effect of the hub genes on overall survival (OS). Module analysis was completed using Molecular Complex Detection in Cytoscape, and one co‑expression network of these significant genes was obtained with cBioPortal. A total of 552 DEGs were identified among the four microarray datasets, which were mainly enriched in ‘cell proliferation’, ‘cell growth’, ‘cell division’, ‘angiogenesis’ and ‘mitotic nuclear division’. A PPI network, composed of 44 nodes and 886 edges, was constructed, and its significant module had 16 hub genes in the whole network: Opa interacting protein 5, exonuclease 1, PCNA clamp‑associated factor, checkpoint kinase 1, hyaluronan‑mediated motility receptor, maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase, non‑SMC condensin I complex subunit G, centromere protein F, BUB1 mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase, cyclin A2, thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13, TPX2 microtubule nucleation factor, nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1, kinesin family member 20A, aurora kinase A and centrosomal protein 55. Survival analysis of these hub genes revealed that they were markedly associated with poor OS in patients with lung cancer. In summary, the hub genes and DEGs delineated in the research may aid the identification of potential targets for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in lung cancer.

Introduction

Lung cancer, one of the most common malignant tumors, is the leading cause of cancer-associated morbidity in the population worldwide; it is the most common cancer among males and the fourth most common tumor in women (1). Lung cancer is divided into different pathological subtypes, including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (1). The occurrence, development and metastasis of lung cancer include a number of orchestrated steps, including DNA mutations and injury (2). Despite an increased understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of the disease and the implementation of novel therapeutic strategies, the 5-year survival rate remains low. The study of the molecular mechanism of cancer guides the classification and treatment of lung cancer, and promotes the rapid progress of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The large-scale research and clinical trials of these new therapies provide prospects for the individualized treatment of lung cancer.

Much progress has been made with lung cancer biomarkers over the last decade, and biomarkers have been widely applied in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis evaluation of lung cancer, with further biomarkers now being studied. For example, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) was initially identified to be abnormally downregulated in lung cancer and a fusion of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) and ALK genes was found in 3.7–7% of non-SCLC (NSCLC) (3). Due to ALK fusion, 57–74% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma respond well to ALK inhibitors such as crizotinib (3). The study revealed that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and response rates of patients who received crizotinib were significantly improved compared with those of patients treated with chemotherapy (4). The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a tyrosine kinase receptor, was overexpressed in 62% of patients with NSCLC (5). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been the standard treatment of patients with EGFR mutations due to their high response rate (55–78%) and PFS rate (1). Therefore, the discovery of new diagnostic and therapeutic targets is of great significance for the early diagnosis, drug development and targeted therapy of lung cancer.

Bioinformatics analysis has been commonly applied in cancer research to identify genetic changes associated with cancer. Previous studies have performed bioinformatics analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in various types of cancer, as well as to determine their roles in biological processes, molecular functions and different pathways (6,7). Accordingly, the present study analyzed data generated by microarray technology to explore the potential pathogenesis of lung cancer. Specifically, given the high number false-positives associated with the analysis of a single microarray, four public mRNA datasets were screened in the present study to identify DEGs between lung cancer and adjacent non-cancerous tissue samples. Subsequently, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were performed, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was used to assist in demonstrating the molecular pathogenesis underlying the carcinogenesis and development of lung cancer. A total of 552 DEGs and 16 hub genes were identified and they may serve as candidate biomarkers in lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Public mRNA datasets

Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) is an open platform to store genetic data (8). Four gene expression profiles (GSE102287, GSE89047, GSE67061 and GSE74706) were acquired from the GEO The GSE102287 dataset contained 32 cancer samples and 34 normal samples (9). The GSE89047 dataset consisted of 8 cancer samples and 8 normal samples. The GSE67061 contained 56 cancer samples and 17 normal samples. The GSE74706 contained 18 cancer samples and 18 normal samples (10). The datasets consisted of a number of pathological subtypes of lung cancer, including NSCLC and lung squamous cell carcinoma. In the current study, in order to be more representative, a specific pathological type was not specified when selecting datasets.

Identification of DEGs

GEO2R (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r) is an interactive online tool to identify DEGs from GEO series (11). GEO2R was applied to distinguish DEGs between normal and lung cancer tissue samples. Duplicate and absent probe sets were removed. The cut-off criteria for the identification of DEGs were |log2 fold-change|>1 and adjusted P<0.05.

Functional annotation for DEGs with KEGG and GO analysis

The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; www.david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov) provides typical batch annotation and GO (www.geneontology.org) analysis to highlight the most relevant GO terms associated with a given gene list (12). GO covers three aspects of biology, including biological process, molecular function and cellular component. KEGG (version 90.0; www.kegg.jp), is one of the most commonly used biological information databases in the world (13). Following KEGG and GO analysis in DAVID, functional annotation for DEGs was performed. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Construction of the PPI network and identification of a significant module

The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (version 11.0; string.embl.de) (14), an online open tool, was applied to construct a PPI network, and Cytoscape (version 3.7.1) (15) was used to present the network. Using a confidence cutoff of >0.4, a node score cutoff of 0.2, a degree cutoff of 10, a maximum depth of 100 and a k-core of 2, the significant modules in the aforementioned PPI network were identified using the Molecular Complex Detection tool (version 1.5.1) (16). Subsequently, functional annotation for the genes in this module were performed using KEGG and GO analysis in DAVID.

Analysis and identification of hub genes

Hub genes with ≥43 degrees were selected. cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org) integrates The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; portal.gdc.cancer.gov), the International Cancer Genome Consortium (icgc.org) and other cancer genome database data to provide online visualization tools. Based on the hub genes screened, a gene co-expression network was constructed and cBioportal was used to search for genes with a similar expression pattern to the hub genes in lung cancer and to investigate the interaction between genes (17). Furthermore, hub genes were analyzed with the biological process analysis, and were visualized using the BiNGO tool in Cytoscape (version 3.7.1) (18). The Kaplan-Meier plotter (kmplot.com/analysis) and the log rank test were used to plot and compared survival curves, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier plotter is an online tool that integrates gene expression data and clinical data from TCGA, GEO and the European Genome-Phenome Archive databases (www.ebi.ac.uk/ega/home). According to the different quantile expression levels of the proposed biomarkers, patients were divided into two groups to analyze the prognostic value of specific genes (19).

Results

Screening of DEGs in lung cancer

The analysis of the GSE67061, GSE74706, GSE89047 and GSE102287 datasets revealed 5,553, 5,562, 4,028 and 4,703 DEGs, respectively (Fig. 1A). Venn diagram analysis revealed that 552 DEGs (389 downregulated and 163 upregulated genes) were present in the four datasets (Fig. 1B; Table SI).

Functional annotation for DEGs using KEGG and GO analysis

The results of GO analysis revealed that the biological processes were primarily enriched in ‘cell proliferation’, ‘cell growth’, ‘cell division’, ‘cell adhesion’, ‘angiogenesis’, ‘mitotic nuclear division’, ‘mitotic cytokinesis’, ‘leukocyte migration’, ‘GTPase activity’ and ‘epithelial cell proliferation’. Variations in molecular function were enriched in ‘calcium ion binding’, ‘heparin binding’, ‘PDZ domain binding’, ‘integrin binding’, ‘GTPase activator activity’, ‘growth factor binding’, ‘collagen binding’, ‘carbohydrate binding’, ‘scavenger receptor activity’ and ‘protein kinase binding’. Changes in cellular component were mainly enriched in ‘extracellular matrix’, ‘extracellular region’, ‘extracellular space’, ‘sarcolemma’, ‘cell cortex’, ‘spindle pole’, ‘midbody’, ‘microtubule cytoskeleton’, ‘spindle’ and ‘collagen trimer’. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that DEGs were mainly enriched in ‘cell cycle’, ‘oocyte meiosis’, ‘hypertrophic cardiomyopathy’, ‘vascular smooth muscle contraction’, ‘dilated cardiomyopathy’, ‘pathways in cancer’, ‘cell adhesion molecules’, ‘fanconi anemia pathway’, ‘renin-angiotensin system’ and ‘leukocyte transendothelial migration’ (Fig. 2).

Construction of the PPI network and identification of a significant module

A PPI network was constructed and a significant module with 44 nodes and 886 edges was identified (Fig. 3; Table SII). KEGG pathway and GO analysis of the DEGs involved in this module were analyzed using DAVID. Results revealed that genes in this module were significantly enriched in ‘cell division’, ‘cell cycle’ and ‘mitotic nuclear division’ (Table I).

Table I.

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes in the most significant module.

Table I.

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes in the most significant module.

CategoryTermCount in gene setP-value
GOTERM_BPMitotic nuclear division19<0.001
GOTERM_BPCell division18<0.001
GOTERM_BPG2/M transition of mitotic cell cycle11<0.001
GOTERM_BPMitotic cytokinesis5<0.001
GOTERM_MFProtein binding39<0.001
GOTERM_MFProtein serine/threonine kinase activity8<0.001
GOTERM_MFProtein kinase binding8<0.001
GOTERM_CCNucleoplasm29<0.001
GOTERM_CCSpindle9<0.001
GOTERM_CCMidbody9<0.001
KEGG_PATHWAYCell cycle10<0.001
KEGG_PATHWAYp53 signaling pathway4<0.001
KEGG_PATHWAYFoxO signaling pathway40.006

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; BP, biological process; MF, molecular function; CC, cellular component.

Hub gene selection and analysis

Hub genes with ≥43 degrees were selected and a total of 16 genes were identified as previously described (20): Opa interacting protein 5 (OIP5), exonuclease 1 (EXO1), PCNA clamp-associated factor (KIAA0101), checkpoint kinase 1 (CHEK1), hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor (HMMR), maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK), non-SMC condensin I complex subunit G (NCAPG), centromere protein F (CENPF), BUB1 mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase (BUB1), cyclin A2 (CCNA2), thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13 (TRIP13), TPX2 microtubule nucleation factor (TPX2), nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1 (NUSAP1), kinesin family member 20A (KIF20A), aurora kinase A (AURKA) and centrosomal protein 55 (CEP55; Table II). A co-expression network of these genes was obtained using cBioPortal (Fig. 4). The biological process analysis for these genes is presented in Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to perform the overall survival analysis. Patients with lung cancer with a high expression level of OIP5, EXO1, KIAA0101, CHEK1, HMMR, MELK, NCAPG, CENPF, BUB1, CCNA2, TRIP13, TPX2, NUSAP1, KIF20A, AURKA and CEP55 exhibited a worse 5-year overall survival time compared with patients with low expression (Figs. 6 and 7).

Table II.

Functional roles of 16 hub genes with ≥43 degrees of interaction.

Table II.

Functional roles of 16 hub genes with ≥43 degrees of interaction.

Gene symbolGene nameFunction
OIP5Opa interacting protein 5Required for recruitment of centromere protein A to centromeres and normal chromosome segregation during mitosis. Expression of this gene is upregulated in several types of cancer, making it a putative therapeutic target.
EXO1Exonuclease 1Encodes a protein with 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity, as well as an RNase H activity.
KIAA0101PCNA clamp-associated factorPCNA-binding protein that acts as a regulator of DNA repair during DNA replication. Also acts as a regulator of centrosome number.
CHEK1Checkpoint kinase 1Required for checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage or the presence of unreplicated DNA.
HMMRHyaluronan-mediated motility receptorEncodes a protein involved in cell motility.
MELKMaternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase Serine/threonine-protein kinase involved in various processes, such as cell cycle regulation, self-renewal of stem cells, apoptosis and splicing regulation.
NCAPGNon-SMC condensin I complex subunit GEncodes a subunit of the condensin complex, which is responsible for the condensation and stabilization of chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis.
CENPFCentromere protein FEncodes a protein that associates with the centromere-kinetochore complex.
BUB1BUB1 mitotic checkpointEncodes a serine/threonine-protein kinase that serves a central role in
serine/threonine kinasemitosis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with aneuploidy and several forms of cancer.
CCNA2Cyclin A2Encodes a protein that binds and activates cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and promotes transition through G1/S and G2/M.
TRIP13Thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13Encodes a protein that interacts with thyroid hormone receptors, which may serve a role in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
TPX2Targeting protein for Xklp2Spindle assembly factor required for normal assembly of mitotic spindles.
NUSAP1Nucleolar and spindle-associated protein 1 Nucleolar-spindle-associated protein that serves a role in spindle microtubule organization.
KIF20AKinesin family member 20AMitotic kinesin required for chromosome passenger complex-mediated cytokinesis.
AURKAAurora kinase AEncodes a cell cycle-regulated kinase involved in microtubule formation and/or stabilization at the spindle pole during chromosome segregation.
CEP55Centrosomal protein 55Serves a role in mitotic exit and cytokinesis.

Discussion

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, both in terms of incidence and mortality (21,22). Despite significant advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, the prognosis of patients with lung cancer remains unsatisfactory. Therefore, there is a requirement for the identification of lung cancer biomarkers to serve as novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets. Bioinformatics analysis has been widely applied to investigate genetic alterations in the progression of diseases, and may enable the identification of novel therapeutic targets.

Previous studies have screened biomarkers associated with the different pathological subtypes of lung cancer (2326). Similarly, the present study screened potential biomarkers of lung cancer. However, the present study differs from the previous literature in a number of ways. In the current study, research data was derived from different datasets, which allows diversification of data results. Four datasets were selected to reduce the errors associated with a single dataset and differences of sequencing platforms, so as to improve the credibility of the results. The aim of the present study was to screen common biomarkers and drug targets in various pathological types of lung cancer using bioinformatics analysis. Finally, different results were achieved due to the different data sources and statistical methods used. However, certain biomarkers identified in the current study are consistent with previously published studies (2731).

In the present study, 552 common DEGs were identified in the four microarray datasets. GO enrichment analysis revealed that changes in the most significant module were mainly enriched in ‘cell division’, ‘mitotic nuclear division’ and ‘G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycle’, while changes in KEGG analysis were mainly enriched in the ‘cell cycle’ and ‘p53 signaling pathway’. Previous studies demonstrated that dysregulation of the cell cycle is associated with carcinogenesis and the progression of tumors (32,33). In the current study, a PPI network consisting of 44 nodes and 886 edges was constructed. The 16 genes with the highest degrees in the PPI network included OIP5, EXO1, KIAA0101, CHEK1, HMMR, MELK, NCAPG, CENPF, BUB1, CCNA2, TRIP13, TPX2, NUSAP1, KIF20A, AURKA and CEP55. Subsequently, survival analysis of these genes revealed that they were significantly associated with a worse 5-year overall survival time of patients with lung cancer.

The mechanism of lung cancer is driven by specific genetic and epigenetic changes (34). In certain types of cancer, such as gastric colorectal cancer, the expression of OIP5 is upregulated and may be associated with the occurrence of cancer (35,36). However, its function in lung cancer remains unknown. EXO1 is a nuclease that modulates DNA recombination, maintains genomic stability and mediates cell cycle arrest. Several reports have indicated that functional polymorphisms of EXO1 may be associated with the occurrence of lung cancer, and it may serve as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer (37,38). KIAA0101 is involved in cell cycle regulation and DNA repair and is expressed at high levels in several types of cancer, including gastric and lung cancer (27,39,40). Previous studies reported that high expression levels of KIAA0101 and CHEK1 in lung cancer are associated with a poor prognosis (27,41).

Man et al (28) revealed that HMMR, the receptor for hyaluronic acid, was upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma samples compared with healthy adjacent non-cancerous tissues. MELK is expressed in several types of human cancer (42,43), including SCLC. Inoue et al (42) reported that inhibition of MELK may be a therapeutic strategy for SCLC. Zhang et al (44) reported that NCAPG may be implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and migration, and may provide a promising novel therapeutic target for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the clinical significance of NCAPG in lung cancer remains unknown.

Previous studies reported that CENPF serves a role in the tumorigenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma and prostate cancer (45,46); however, its role in lung cancer requires further investigation. A number of studies demonstrated that BUB1 serves important roles in breast and endometrial cancer (4749). However, Haruki et al (4749) reported that the BUB gene family members, including BUB1, are not commonly associated with mitotic checkpoint defects in lung cancer. The potential association between BUB1 and lung cancer requires further investigation. Kim et al (29) reported that a functional single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter region of CCNA2 was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. TRIP13 is an ATPase that serves a key role in mitotic checkpoint complex inactivation and is associated with the progression of lung adenocarcinoma (30). Li et al (30) demonstrated that increased TRIP13 expression promoted lung adenocarcinoma progression and may serve as a potential therapeutic target or biomarker for the disease.

Yang et al (50,51) revealed that TPX2 was associated with lung squamous carcinoma cell radioresistance and may serve as a therapeutic target to enhance cell radiosensitivity in lung squamous carcinoma. Furthermore, Schneider et al (50,51) demonstrated that the expression of the TPX2, mitosis-associated gene, was associated with the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. Previous studies reported that overexpression of NUSAP1 was associated with a poor prognosis in prostate cancer, hepatocellular and oral squamous cell carcinoma (52,53); however; little is known about the association of NUSAP1 with lung cancer. Zhao et al (54) demonstrated that KIF20A may confer a malignant phenotype in lung adenocarcinoma by regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis. AURKA, an oncogene, encodes a serine-threonine kinase that regulates mitotic processes in mammalian cells and serves as a potential therapeutic target of NSCLC (55,56). Lo et al (55,56) reported that AURKA upregulation is restricted to specific subtypes and poorly differentiated tumors in NSCLC. Ma et al (31) revealed that CEP55 was upregulated in lung cancer cells and was associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer, and that it may serve as a prognostic biomarker for the disease.

The current study is only a preliminary report, and heterogeneous results due to the limitations of the source and quantity of samples may have occurred. Furthermore, statistical differences may not translate to the expected clinical significance. In order to be more representative, a specific pathological type of lung cancer was not selected in the current study. However, this may lead to poor specificity in lung cancer subtypes. The 16 hub genes identified revealed clinical significance in the validation of survival analysis. However, further validation in the subsequent basic and clinical trial studies is required. In addition to DEGs, further studies investigating differentially expressed microRNAs and their association with genes, particularly DEGs, are required.

In summary, the current study identified DEGs that may be involved in the carcinogenesis or progression of lung cancer. A total of 552 DEGs and 16 hub genes were identified, and these may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets for lung cancer. The results suggested that data mining and integration may be a promising tool for the identification of biomarkers in malignant tumors. As tumor biomarkers only have meaning if they are integrated with clinical data, further experiments should be conducted to verify the results obtained in the current study.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO repository (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo).

Authors' contributions

ZHL and BES designed the overall research. ZL, JL and FZ collected the data. ZHL, MXS, ZQT, ZL and BES contributed to data analysis and visualization. JL and FZ drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

DEGs

differentially expressed genes

PPI

protein-protein interaction

GO

Gene Ontology

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

GEO

Gene Expression Omnibus

DAVID

Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery

References

1 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Nana-Sinkam SP and Powell CA: Molecular biology of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 143:e30S–e39S. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, Felip E, Cappuzzo F, Paolini J, Usari T, et al: First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 371:2167–2177. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Mok TS: Personalized medicine in lung cancer: What we need to know. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 8:661–668. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J and Haber DA: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 7:169–181. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Shao Y, Liang B, Long F and Jiang SJ: Diagnostic microRNA biomarker discovery for non-small-cell lung cancer adenocarcinoma by integrative bioinformatics analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017:25630852017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Wang LQ, Zhao LH and Qiao YZ: Identification of potential therapeutic targets for lung cancer by bioinformatics analysis. Mol Med Rep. 13:1975–1982. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Edgar R, Domrachev M and Lash AE: Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:207–210. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Mitchell KA, Zingone A, Toulabi L, Boeckelman J and Ryan BM: Comparative transcriptome profiling reveals coding and noncoding RNA differences in NSCLC from African Americans and European Americans. Clin Cancer Res. 23:7412–7425. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Marwitz S, Depner S, Dvornikov D, Merkle R, Szczygieł M, Müller-Decker K, Lucarelli P, Wäsch M, Mairbäurl H, Rabe KF, et al: Downregulation of the TGFβ pseudoreceptor BAMBI in non-small cell lung cancer enhances TGFβ signaling and invasion. Cancer Res. 76:3785–3801. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, et al: NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets-update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D991–D995. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Huang DW, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Collins JR, Alvord WG, Roayaei J, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC and Lempicki RA: The DAVID Gene Functional Classification Tool: A novel biological module-centric algorithm to functionally analyze large gene lists. Genome Biol. 8:R1832007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kanehisa M: The KEGG database. Novartis Found Symp. 247:91–103. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Roth A, Santos A, Tsafou KP, et al: STRING v10: Protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:D447–D452. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B and Ideker T: Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13:2498–2504. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Bader GD and Hogue CW: An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 4:22003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, Jacobsen A, Byrne CJ, Heuer ML, Larsson E, et al: The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2:401–404. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Maere S, Heymans K and Kuiper M: BiNGO: A Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics. 21:3448–3449. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Nagy Á, Lánczky A, Menyhárt O and Győrffy B: Validation of miRNA prognostic power in hepatocellular carcinoma using expression data of independent datasets. Sci Rep. 8:92272018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Li T, Gao X, Han L, Yu J and Li H: Identification of hub genes with prognostic values in gastric cancer by bioinformatics analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 16:1142018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Bunn PA Jr: Karnofsky award 2016: A lung cancer journey, 1973 to 2016. J Clin Oncol. 35:243–252. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Hirsch FR, Scagliotti GV, Mulshine JL, Kwon R, Curran WJ Jr, Wu YL and Paz-Ares L: Lung cancer: Current therapies and new targeted treatments. Lancet. 389:299–311. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Mendell JT: MicroRNAs: Critical regulators of development, cellular physiology and malignancy. Cell Cycle. 4:1179–1184. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Xiao Y, Feng M, Ran H, Han X and Li X: Identification of key differentially expressed genes associated with non-small cell lung cancer by bioinformatics analyses. Mol Med Rep. 17:6379–6386. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Wen P, Chidanguro T, Shi Z, Gu H, Wang N, Wang T, Li Y and Gao J: Identification of candidate biomarkers and pathways associated with SCLC by bioinformatics analysis. Mol Med Rep. 18:1538–1550. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Tang Q, Zhang H, Kong M, Mao X and Cao X: Hub genes and key pathways of non-small lung cancer identified using bioinformatics. Oncol Lett. 16:2344–2354. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Kato T, Daigo Y, Aragaki M, Ishikawa K, Sato M and Kaji M: Overexpression of KIAA0101 predicts poor prognosis in primary lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 75:110–118. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Man Y, Cao J, Jin S, Xu G, Pan B, Shang L, Che D, Yu Q and Yu Y: Newly identified biomarkers for detecting circulating tumor cells in lung adenocarcinoma. Tohoku J Exp Med. 234:29–40. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kim DH, Park SE, Kim M, Ji YI, Kang MY, Jung EH, Ko E, Kim Y, Kim S, Shim YM and Park J: A functional single nucleotide polymorphism at the promoter region of cyclin A2 is associated with increased risk of colon, liver, and lung cancers. Cancer. 117:4080–4091. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Li W, Zhang G, Li X, Wang X, Li Q, Hong L, Shen Y, Zhao C, Gong X, Chen Y and Zhou J: Thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13 (TRIP13) overexpression associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 499:416–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Ma XP, Zhang W, Wu BQ and Qin J: Correlations between mRNA levels of centrosomal protein 55 (CEP55) and clinical features of patients with lung cancer. Med Sci Monit. 24:3093–3097. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Chiang IT, Wang WS, Liu HC, Yang ST, Tang NY and Chung JG: Curcumin alters gene expression-associated DNA damage, cell cycle, cell survival and cell migration and invasion in NCI-H460 human lung cancer cells in vitro. Oncol Rep. 34:1853–1874. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Wan J, Zou S, Hu M, Zhu R, Xu J, Jiao Y and Fan S: Thoc1 inhibits cell growth via induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 9:2321–2327. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Wen J, Fu J, Zhang W and Guo M: Genetic and epigenetic changes in lung carcinoma and their clinical implications. Mod Pathol. 24:932–943. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Chun HK, Chung KS, Kim HC, Kang JE, Kang MA, Kim JT, Choi EH, Jung KE, Kim MH, Song EY, et al: OIP5 is a highly expressed potential therapeutic target for colorectal and gastric cancers. BMB Rep. 43:349–354. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Gong M, Xu Y, Dong W, Guo G, Ni W, Wang Y, Wang Y and An R: Expression of Opa interacting protein 5 (OIP5) is associated with tumor stage and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Acta Histochem. 115:810–815. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Tang J, Tang S, Liu J, Wu Q, Wan L and Xu Q: Genetic risk of lung cancer associated with a single nucleotide polymorphism from EXO1: A meta analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 8:11132–11138. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Hsu NY, Wang HC, Wang CH, Chiu CF, Tseng HC, Liang SY, Tsai CW, Lin CC and Bau DT: Lung cancer susceptibility and genetic polymorphisms of Exo1 gene in Taiwan. Anticancer Res. 29:725–730. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Zhu K, Diao D, Dang C, Shi L, Wang J, Yan R, Yuan D and Li K: Elevated KIAA0101 expression is a marker of recurrence in human gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 104:353–359. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Fan S and Li X, Tie L, Pan Y and Li X: KIAA0101 is associated with human renal cell carcinoma proliferation and migration induced by erythropoietin. Oncotarget. 7:13520–13537. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

41 

Liu B, Qu J, Xu F, Guo Y, Wang Y, Yu H and Qian B: MiR-195 suppresses non-small cell lung cancer by targeting CHEK1. Oncotarget. 6:9445–9456. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

42 

Inoue H, Kato T, Olugbile S, Tamura K, Chung S, Miyamoto T, Matsuo Y, Salgia R, Nakamura Y and Park JH: Effective growth-suppressive activity of maternal embryonic leucine-zipper kinase (MELK) inhibitor against small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 7:13621–13633. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Pitner MK, Taliaferro JM, Dalby KN and Bartholomeusz C: MELK: A potential novel therapeutic target for TNBC and other aggressive malignancies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 21:849–859. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Zhang Q, Su R, Shan C, Gao C and Wu P: Non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G (NCAPG) is a novel mitotic gene required for hepatocellular cancer cell proliferation and migration. Oncol Res. 26:269–276. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Kim HE, Kim DG, Lee KJ, Son JG, Song MY, Park YM, Kim JJ, Cho SW, Chi SG, Cheong HS, et al: Frequent amplification of CENPF, GMNN and CDK13 genes in hepatocellular carcinomas. PLoS One. 7:e432232012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Aytes A, Mitrofanova A, Lefebvre C, Alvarez MJ, Castillo-Martin M, Zheng T, Eastham JA, Gopalan A, Pienta KJ, Shen MM, et al: Cross-species regulatory network analysis identifies a synergistic interaction between FOXM1 and CENPF that drives prostate cancer malignancy. Cancer Cell. 25:638–651. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Takagi K, Miki Y, Shibahara Y, Nakamura Y, Ebata A, Watanabe M, Ishida T, Sasano H and Suzuki T: BUB1 immunolocalization in breast carcinoma: Its nuclear localization as a potent prognostic factor of the patients. Horm Cancer. 4:92–102. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Li L, Xu DB, Zhao XL and Hao TY: Combination analysis of Bub1 and Mad2 expression in endometrial cancer: Act as a prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 288:155–165. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Haruki N, Saito H, Harano T, Nomoto S and Takahashi T, Osada H, Fujii Y and Takahashi T: Molecular analysis of the mitotic checkpoint genes BUB1, BUBR1 and BUB3 in human lung cancers. Cancer Lett. 162:201–205. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Yang J, Gao F, Xu X, Wang Y and Zhu S: Targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 knockdown enhances radiation sensitivity of human lung squamous carcinoma cell. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 44:1060–1068. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Schneider MA, Christopoulos P, Muley T, Warth A, Klingmueller U, Thomas M, Herth FJ, Dienemann H, Mueller NS, Theis F and Meister M: AURKA, DLGAP5, TPX2, KIF11 and CKAP5: Five specific mitosis-associated genes correlate with poor prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients. Int J Oncol. 50:365–372. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Zhang M, Yang D, Liu X, Liu Y, Liang J, He H, Zhong K, Lin L, Tao G, Zhang C and Zhou J: Expression of Nusap1 in the surgical margins of hepatocellular carcinoma and its association with early recurrence. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 33:937–938, inside back cover. 2013.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

53 

Gordon CA, Gulzar ZG and Brooks JD: NUSAP1 expression is upregulated by loss of RB1 in prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 75:517–526. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Zhao X, Zhou LL, Li X, Ni J, Chen P, Ma R, Wu J and Feng J: Overexpression of KIF20A confers malignant phenotype of lung adenocarcinoma by promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis. Cancer Med. 7:4678–4689. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Ma ZL, Zhang BJ, Wang DT, Li X, Wei JL, Zhao BT, Jin Y, Li YL and Jin YX: Tanshinones suppress AURKA through up-regulation of miR-32 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 6:20111–20120. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

56 

Lo Iacono M, Monica V, Saviozzi S, Ceppi P, Bracco E, Papotti M and Scagliotti GV: Aurora Kinase A expression is associated with lung cancer histological-subtypes and with tumor de-differentiation. J Transl Med. 9:1002011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2019
Volume 18 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li Z, Sang M, Tian Z, Liu Z, Lv J, Zhang F and Shan B: Identification of key biomarkers and potential molecular mechanisms in lung cancer by bioinformatics analysis. Oncol Lett 18: 4429-4440, 2019.
APA
Li, Z., Sang, M., Tian, Z., Liu, Z., Lv, J., Zhang, F., & Shan, B. (2019). Identification of key biomarkers and potential molecular mechanisms in lung cancer by bioinformatics analysis. Oncology Letters, 18, 4429-4440. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10796
MLA
Li, Z., Sang, M., Tian, Z., Liu, Z., Lv, J., Zhang, F., Shan, B."Identification of key biomarkers and potential molecular mechanisms in lung cancer by bioinformatics analysis". Oncology Letters 18.5 (2019): 4429-4440.
Chicago
Li, Z., Sang, M., Tian, Z., Liu, Z., Lv, J., Zhang, F., Shan, B."Identification of key biomarkers and potential molecular mechanisms in lung cancer by bioinformatics analysis". Oncology Letters 18, no. 5 (2019): 4429-4440. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10796