Open Access

Determination of FABP4, RBP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex in the serum of women with breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Dimitris Tsakogiannis
    • Eleni Kalogera
    • Flora Zagouri
    • Eleni Zografos
    • Dimitris Balalis
    • Garyfalia Bletsa
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 4, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12346
  • Article Number: 85
  • Copyright: © Tsakogiannis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in females and is the leading cause of cancer‑associated death among women, worldwide. The present study aimed to measure the serum levels of fatty acid‑binding protein 4 (FABP4), retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) and the MMP‑9/neutrophil gelatinase‑associated lipocalin (NGAL) complex in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Serum levels of the examined proteins were determined in the peripheral blood of patients via ELISA. Furthermore, whether the concentration of each protein was associated with breast cancer growth, molecular subtype, BMI, postmenopausal status, diabetes and the social background of patients was assessed. Women with invasive breast cancer demonstrated significantly higher levels of FABP4 (P=0.008). Additionally, considerably elevated FABP4 levels were demonstrated specifically in Luminal breast cancer cases (P<0.01). No significant association was recorded between RBP4 and breast cancer development. In addition, significantly lower levels of the MMP‑9/NGAL complex were recorded in triple negative/HER‑2 cases (P<0.05). BMI values appeared to influence the aforementioned associations, while significantly high serum levels of FABP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex were found in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer and a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (P<0.05). In addition, high levels of FABP4 were significantly associated with breast cancer patients with diabetes (P=0.05). However, no association was identified between RBP4, the MMP‑9/NGAL complex and diabetes. In conclusion, FABP4 can be regarded as a biomarker of breast cancer growth, while both FABP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex may provide considerable information regarding the development of specific breast cancer subtypes. FABP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex may also be able to predict the development of breast cancer in postmenopausal patients with obesity.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most frequent developing malignancy among women with high mortality rates, worldwide (1,2). Epidemiological data revealed that in 2018 more than 2 million women were diagnosed with breast cancer, accounting for more than 600.000 cancer-associated deaths (24). Since 1980, the global prevalence of breast cancer provides a consistently positive trend and it has been anticipated that the tendency for the number of incidences to rise will continue in the following years (24). Although the 60% of deaths occur in developing countries, the breast cancer mortality rate has been reduced in most developed countries due to the establishment of novel methodologies in screening, diagnosis and cancer therapy (5,6).

Over the last years, several studies have focused on the analysis of numerous biomarkers, in order to improve the early prognosis, diagnosis and the proper breast cancer treatment (79). In particular, the effect of fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) on breast disease gained increased popularity, since high levels of the corresponding protein have been observed in plasma of breast cancer patients, while exogenous FABP4 significantly stimulates the proliferation of breast cancer cells (1012). FABP4 is a member of fatty acid-binding proteins family (FABPs) which is implicated in the intracellular transportation of fatty acids in several cellular organelles (12). FABP4 is constantly expressed in macrophage and adipocyte, while it is involved in numerous cellular functions, including fatty acid uptake and storage as well as in regulation of gene expression, cell proliferation and differentiation (12,13). In macrophages FABP4 regulates inflammatory responses via activation of the NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) and JNK pathways (c-Jun N-terminal kinase), while in adipocytes FABP4 stimulates lipolysis and constraints lipogenesis through interaction with HSL (hormone-sensitive lipase) and PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma) (1416). In regard to breast cancer development FABP4 is highly expressed in a small subgroup of tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). FABP4-positive TAM subgroup in turn assembles in the late stage of mammary tumor, stimulating tumor growth, (17). An alternative pathway implicates adipocytes in cases of obesity. In particular, during obesity adipocytes release FABP4 which triggers oncogenic signaling factors, including IL-6, STAT3 and ALDH1 in breast mammary tumor cells, leading to tumor progression (14,1618).

Recent analyses have focused on the implication of retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) in breast cancer development, as well. RBP4 is an adipokine and member of the lipocalin family of proteins (19,20). Lipocalin protein family consist of a heterogeneous group of extracellular proteins, expressed in liver and adipose tissue and they facilitate the transferring of small hydrophobic molecules, including hormones, prostaglandins, arachidonic acids and retinoids, while it is the major transporter for retinol acid (Vitamin A) (20,21). RBP4 along with retinol acid (Vitamin A) stimulate STRA6 that in turn recruit and activate Janus kinase and the transcriptional factors STAT3 or STAT5 (22). Alternatively, RBP4 alone can activate pro-inflammatory responses through JNK1, JNK2 or Toll-like receptors (23). The expression of RBP4 is associated with insulin resistance as well as with cardiovascular risk markers, including body mass index [BMI; calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m2)], waist to hip ratio and the levels of triglyceride in serum (21). Furthermore, RBP4 is correlated with numerous types of cancer, such as prostate cancer, colon adenoma, ovarian cancer and oral cancer (2426), but its association with breast cancer growth remains rather vague (27,28).

Finally, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a member of the lipocalin family and it has been related with breast disease, as well (20,29). NGAL is a fundamental component of cytoplasmic granules of human neutrophils and it contributes to the chelation of bacterial siderophores, thus inhibiting iron availability and consequently it prevents bacteria to establish infection (30,31). Moreover, NGAL act as siderocalin and with sideropores and ferrous iron (Fe++) contribute to iron uptake that is necessary in regulating the iron-dependent growth pathways (32). Cancer cells have increased need for intracellular iron, while iron uptake is pivotal in regulating cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis (32,33). NGAL expression is regarded as a considerable diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in several diseases, including inflammation and tumor growth (29,31,34). It is noteworthy that NGAL generates a complex with metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) that constraints MMP-9 autodegradation and subsequently leads to increased activity of MMP-9 (31,3436). Previous studies have suggested that MMP-9/NGAL complex augments cancer growth, including breast cancer (29,31,3436). MMP-9 is found in gelatinase granules and contribute to cancer progression, invasion and metastasis in numerous neoplastic diseases (29,37,38). Notably, a previous analysis in Greek population demonstrated that high levels of MMP-9, NGAL as well as increased levels of MMP-9/NGAL complex are associated with breast disease (26).

Nowadays, no further analyses have been conducted in order to better evaluate the influence of MMP-9/NGAL complex on the development of breast malignancy, while little is known concerning the impact of FABP4 and RBP4 on patients' susceptibility to the development of breast cancer in Greek women. Towards this end, the present study focused on the relationship of serum levels of FABP4, RBP4, MMP-9/NGAL complex with the growth of breast cancer in the Greek population. Moreover, we examined the association of FABP4, RBP4, MMP-9/NGAL complex with the different breast cancer molecular subtypes, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, menopausal status and the social background of patients. Our goal was to elucidate whether the examined proteins are implicated in breast cancer development as well as to further investigate whether additional factors may influence this association, providing valuable information concerning the prognosis and diagnosis of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Breast samples

In the present analysis a total of 73 women were examined. In particular, 53 women were diagnosed with breast cancer and they were further classified into different molecular types according to their immunehistochemistry (IHC) profile concerning ER (estrogen receptor), PR (progesterone receptor), HER-2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) and ki67 (39,40). As a result, patients were characterized as Luminal A (n=22), Luminal B (n=8), Triple Negative-TN: ER negative, PR negative, HER-2 negative (n=15) and HER-2 positive: ER negative, PR negative, HER-2 positive (n=8). According to histopathological criteria all breast cancer cases were characterized as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Moreover, the control group comprised 20 healthy women. The mean age of the examined patients and controls was 62.8±14.12 and 58.7±7.9 years, respectively, while the mean age in Luminal 64±12 years old and the mean age in TN/HER-2 group was 61±14.12 years old. In addition, 44 patients were postmenopausal and 9 were premenopausal, while 45 breast cancer patients were diagnosed with diabetes, as well. Finally, the mean BMI value of breast cancer cases was 28.1±6 kg/m2, while the mean BMI value of healthy women was 27.7±4.2 kg/m2. Clinical samples were collected from Anticancer Oncology Hospital of Athens ‘Saint Savvas’ between May 2017 and July 2018. All patients signed an informed consent form, while the study was approved from the Research Committee of the Hospital.

Sample preparation

Venus blood was collected from patients and controls between 12:00 a.m. and 14:00 p.m. Sampling was performed directly into serum vacuum tubes with clot activator, while prior to centrifugation, tubes remained at room temperature for 20–30 min to enable blood clotting. Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 15 min at 8°C, the serum was isolated and divided into aliquots parts, while all serums were stored at −80°C for further use.

ELISA assay for the measurement of serum levels of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex

The evaluation of serum levels of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the examined clinical samples was conducted for each individual protein in duplicates through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using the respective Human FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL Quantikine® ELISA kit (R&D Systems), according to the manufacturers instruction. Finally, the acquired fluorescence data were analyzed using Multiscan™ FC Microplate Photometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented with mean, standard deviation and median, while statistical analysis was conducted considering whether they followed a normal distribution or not, respectively. Normality was examined through D'Agostino - Pearson, Shapiro-Wilk or Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. In particular, FABP4 data follow a non normal distribution, whereas RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex data follow a normal distribution. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney non-parametric test were used to examine the association of the respective proteins with breast cancer development, BMI, menopausal status, diabetes and social background of patients. One way Anova was used for statistical analysis of the expression of RBP4, MMP-9/NGAL in Luminal, TN/HER-2 cancers and controls, followed by the Tukey post hoc test for pair-wise comparison, while Kruskal-Wallis non parametric test was performed for statistical analysis of the expression of FABP4 in the respective breast cancer molecular subtypes, followed by the Dunn multiple comparison post hoc test. P values were regarded as statistically significant at the 0.05 cut off level. All analyses were carried out with the GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Results

FABP4, RBP4, MMP9/NGAL complex and breast cancer

In the present analysis the serum levels of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL complex were measured in a total of 73 women, 53 of which have been diagnosed with breast cancer, while 20 cases were used as control group. The differences that occur at protein levels between patients and controls were evaluated, in order to investigate whether the concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL complex are related with breast cancer in the studied population. The mean and median serum concentrations of the respective proteins are presented in Table I. According to our results it was demonstrated that the median concentration of FABP4 in breast cancer cases was significantly higher than that of healthy women (median concentration; 27,740 pg/ml vs. 22,115 pg/ml, P=0.0078) (Tables I and II, Fig. 1). However, no considerable association was recorded between cancer cases and controls, regarding the serum levels of RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL complex, respectively (Tables I and II; Fig. 1).

Table I.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of the examined patients.

Table I.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of the examined patients.

GroupFABP4 (pg/ml), mean ± SDFABP4 (ng/ml), medianRBP4 (pg/ml), mean ± SDRBP4 (ng/ml), medianMMP-9/NGAL(pg/ml), mean ± SDMMP-9/NGAL (ng/ml), median
Breast cancer (n=53)38,324±3,25027,74027,368±1,27426,65041.26±3.2437.89
Control (n=20)23,193±1,46222,11530,138±1,76527,70547.96±7.5640.23
Luminal (n=30)45,298±4,65937,10526,755±1,27826,60550.97±4.1953.21
TN/HER-2 (n=23)29,227±3,68425,04028,167±2,44527,20028.59±3.7824.48
Control (n=20)23,193±1,46222,11530,138±1,76527,70547.96±7.5640.23

[i] FABP4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; TN, triple negative.

Table II.

P-values were calculated to estimate the differences in protein levels between patients with breast cancer and controls, and among different breast cancer subtypes.

Table II.

P-values were calculated to estimate the differences in protein levels between patients with breast cancer and controls, and among different breast cancer subtypes.

P-values

GroupsFABP4RBP4MMP-9/NGAL
Breast cancer vs. control0.0080.2600.420
Luminal vs. control<0.0010.1300.700
TN/HER-2 vs. control0.4200.3200.030
Luminal vs. TN/HER-20.0070.600<0.001

[i] FABP4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; TN, triple negative.

FABP4, RBP4, MMP9/NGAL complex and molecular subtypes

The relationship of the corresponding proteins with the development of breast disease was further examined considering the molecular classification of breast cancer into different molecular subtypes (34,35). Hence, the examined cases were classified into two major groups, containing the Luminal cohort (Luminal A and Luminal B) and TN/HER-2 group (HER-2 positive and Triple Negative). In regard to FABP4 serum levels, it was demonstrated that the median concentration of the respective protein in Luminal cases was considerably higher than that of healthy women (median concentration; 37,105 pg/ml vs. 22,115 pg/ml, P=0.0002), while high levels of FABP4 were recorded in Luminal group when compared with that of TN/HER-2 group (median concentration; 37,105 pg/ml vs. 25,040 pg/ml, P=0.0073) (Tables I and II; Fig. 2). Although the median concentration of FABP4 in TN/HER-2 cluster was found to be increased compared to healthy women, the difference was not considered as statistically significant (P=ns). In addition, no significant association was recorded between the groups of breast cancer cases and the serum levels of RBP4 protein (Tables I and II, Fig. 2).

Interestingly, differences in serum levels of MMP9/NGAL complex were found between breast cancer subtypes. In particular, slightly elevated levels of MMP9/NGAL complex were recorded in Luminal cohort compared to control group, but this association did not reach the limits of statistical significance (mean concentration-ng/ml; 50.97±4.191 vs. 47.96±7.566, P=ns) (Tables I and II). In contrast, the serum levels of MMP-9/NGAL complex were found to be substantially decreased in TN/HER-2 group. In particular, the mean concentration of MMP-9/NGAL complex in TN/HER-2 group was considerably lower than that of control group (mean concentration-ng/ml; 28.59±3.78 vs. 47.96±7.566, P=0.03) and Luminal cohort, as well (mean concentration-ng/ml; 28.59±3.78 vs. 50.97±4.191, P=0.0002) (Tables I and II; Fig. 2).

FABP4, RBP4, MMP9/NGAL complex and BMI

A stratified analysis according to body mass index (BMI) values was performed in order to evaluate whether the BMI in combination with serum levels of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL complex, may be used as valuable biomarkers for the development of breast disease. In particular, breast cancer cases and controls were classified into two groups, comprising specimens with BMI values ≥25 kg/m2 and specimens with BMI values <25 kg/m2 (Tables III and IV). Our results indicate that in clinical samples with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 the median concentration of FABP4 was significantly higher when compared with that of healthy women (median concentration 37,180 pg/ml vs. 24,445 pg/ml, P=0.0023) (Tables III and IV). In contrast, in samples with BMI <25 kg/m2 no significant alterations were detected in FABP4 levels between cancer and control cases. Moreover, no significant differences were recorded in RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL serum levels between cancer cases and controls, neither when BMI ≥25 kg/m2 nor when BMI <25 kg/m2. Merging outcomes derived from BMI clusters and the different cancer groups it was revealed that when BMI ≥25 kg/m2 the median concentration of FABP4 was significantly augmented in Luminal cases compared either to TN/HER-2 (median concentration 45,595 pg/ml vs. 22,960 pg/ml, P=0.018) or healthy women (median concentration 45,595 pg/ml vs. 24,445 pg/ml, P=0.0009) (Tables III and IV). However, no considerable changes in FABP4 levels were detected in cases with BMI lower than 25 kg/m2. In regard to RBP4 serum levels, no significant associations were identified between the concentration of the respective protein and BMI groups within the different molecular subtypes of breast disease (Tables III and IV). Finally, considering results derived from MMP9/NGAL complex, it was observed that in TN/HER-2 cases with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 the mean concentration of the respective complex was significantly lower than that of Luminal samples (mean concentration-ng/ml; 30.59±6.45 vs. 50.83±3.7, P=0.014) (Tables III and IV). Nevertheless, no further associations were found between the concentration of MMP9/NGAL complex and BMI cohorts within the divergent subtypes of breast malignancy (Tables III and IV).

Table III.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of patients separated according to BMI values.

Table III.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of patients separated according to BMI values.

A, BMI ≥25 kg/m2

Cancer subtypeFABP4 (pg/ml), mean ± SDFABP4 (pg/ml), medianRBP4 (pg/ml), mean ± SDRBP4 (pg/ml), medianMMP-9/NGAL (pg/ml), mean ± SDMMP-9/NGAL (pg/ml), median
Breast cancer (n=33)42,509±4,37837,18025,846±1,20325,90044.09±3,6545.11
Luminal (n=22)51,005±5,44245,59526,571±1,39126,09050.83±3.7553.21
TN/HER-2 (n=11)25,516±4,03822,96024,396±2,33223,05030.59±6.4431.69
Control (n=14)25,345±1,72824,44530,368±2,08127,88552.92±9.8840.23

B, BMI <25 kg/m2

Cancer subtypeFABP4 (pg/ml), mean ± SDFABP4 (pg/ml), medianRBP4 (pg/ml), mean ± SDRBP4 (pg/ml), medianMMP-9/NGAL (pg/ml), mean ± SDMMP-9/NGAL (pg/ml), median

Breast cancer (n=33)31,419±4,39626,05029,878±2,68628,87536.59±6.1325.5
Luminal (n=30)29,603±6,70128,55527,262±3,05831,560   51.36±12.5342.9
TN/HER-2 (n=23)32,629±6,02125,59531,623±4,01427,60026.75±4.4224.05
Control (n=20)18,172±1,33118,18529,602±3,61826,01536.37±9.7240.13

[i] Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI: ≥25 and <25 kg/m2. FABP4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; TN, triple negative; BMI, body mass index.

Table IV.

P-values were calculated to assess the differences in protein levels between patients and controls, and among the different breast cancer subtypes.

Table IV.

P-values were calculated to assess the differences in protein levels between patients and controls, and among the different breast cancer subtypes.

A, BMI ≥25 kg/m2

P-values

GroupsFABP4RBP4MMP-9/NGAL
Breast cancer vs. control0.0020.0700.300
Luminal vs. control<0.0010.1000.800
TN/HER-2 vs. control0.5400.0690.070
Luminal vs. TN/HER-20.0180.4300.014

B, BMI <25 kg/m2

P-values

GroupsFABP4RBP4 MMP-9/NGAL

Breast cancer vs. control0.0550.9000.900
Luminal vs. control0.1200.6000.362
TN/HER-2 vs. control0.0610.7000.400
Luminal vs. TN/HER-20.9000.2500.090

[i] FABP4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; TN, triple negative; BMI, body mass index.

FABP4, RBP4, MMP9/NGAL complex, menopausal status, diabetes and social background

Finally, we further evaluate the relationship of the tested serum proteins with menopausal status, diabetes, and social background of the examined patients including smoking and exercise. Considering our results, it was observed that serum FABP4 levels are significantly increased in postmenopausal breast cancer patients when compared with that of premenopausal patients (median concentration 32,720 pg/ml vs. 14,550 pg/ml, P=0.0005) (Table V). In addition, in the cohort of postmenopausal patients the concentration of FABP4 protein is significantly higher in individuals with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 than patients with BMI <25 kg/m2 (median concentration 40,050 pg/ml vs. 24,610 pg/ml, P=0.03) (Table VI). In addition, the link of FABP4 with diabetes reached the limits of statistical significance, as the serum FABP4 concentration was found to be higher in breast cancer patients with diabetes when compared with that of patients with no diabetes (median concentration 54,310 pg/ml vs. 27,460 pg/ml, P=0.05) (Table VII).

Table V.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of patients with breast cancer separated according to menopausal status.

Table V.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of patients with breast cancer separated according to menopausal status.

FABP4RBP4MMP-9/NGAL



Menopause statusMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-valueMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-valueMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-value
Postmenopause (n=44)42,446±3,55832,720<0.00128,069±1,47427,4350.21141.52±3.0839.760.900
Premenopause (n=9)18,172±3,25914,550 23,941±1,80224,550 39.97±12.3922.29

[i] FABP4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.

Table VI.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of postmenopausal women with breast cancer, divided according to BMI values.

Table VI.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of postmenopausal women with breast cancer, divided according to BMI values.

FABP4RBP4MMP-9/NGAL



PostmenopauseMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-valueMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-valueMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-value
BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (n=31)46,802±447140,0500.03027,334±1,32027,5900.44046.21±3.5245.560.016
BMI <25 kg/m2 (n=13)32,058±755624,610 29,821±3,94925,900 30.34±5.1525.17

[i] FABP4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; BMI, body mass index.

Table VII.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of patients with breast cancer, separated according to diabetes.

Table VII.

Mean and median concentrations of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of patients with breast cancer, separated according to diabetes.

FABP4RBP4MMP-9/NGAL



DiabetesMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-valueMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-valueMean ± SD (pg/ml)Median (pg/ml)P-value
yes (n=45)51,184±7,82754,3100.05032,323±6,01126,6050.10031.71±5.6427.900.200
no (n=8)36,083±3,49127,460 26,487±1,05827,500 42.96±3.6540.77

[i] FABP4, fatty acid-binding protein 4; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.

Although the serum levels of MMP9/NGAL complex are not modified considering the menopausal status of patients, it was observed that MMP9/NGAL complex in postmenopausal individuals is significantly higher in patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 than patients with BMI <25 kg/m2 (mean concentration ng/ml; 46.21±3.51 vs. 30.34±5.15, P=0.016) (Table VI). Moreover, no significant association was recorded between MMP9/NGAL complex and diabetes in breast cancer patients as well as no significant association was detected regarding RBP4 serum levels either with menopausal status or diabetes (Table VII). Furthermore, it was revealed that smoking and exercise do not influence the serum levels of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL in breast cancer patients.

Discussion

The stratification of breast cancer severity lies on numerous factors, including TNM stage, tumor grade, lymphatic invasion as well as the expression of the hormonal receptors ER, PR and HER-2 (39,40). Although these factors offer crucial information concerning the risk profile of patients and they significantly contribute to select the most suitable therapeutic approach (41,42), today, there is a growing interest in the establishment of novel biomarkers that will enable the accurate prognosis and diagnosis of breast disease (8,9,41,42). Hence, the present analysis focused on the study of serum FABP4, RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL complex levels in women diagnosed with breast cancer along with healthy women, while results were further associated with the different breast cancer molecular subtypes, BMI, menopause status diabetes and social background of patients.

In the present study differential serum levels of FABP4, RBP4 and MMP9/NGAL complex were detected in breast cancer cases, while different serum levels of the corresponding proteins were observed between the different molecular subtypes of breast disease, as well. In particular, increased serum concentration of FABP4 was detected in the examined breast cancer cases compared to control group, supporting previous findings (1012,17,43,44). Although substantially increased serum FABP4 levels were recorded in Luminal breast cancer samples, the concentration of the respective protein was found to be decreased in TN/HER-2 cases. These results imply that FABP4 may be a key element in the development of specific breast cancer molecular subtype and that each subtype uses different metabolic pathways. Indeed, receptor positive breast cancers are associated with gene signature involved in de novo lipogenesis, fat acid mobilization and oxidation while TNBC are associated with genes expressed in exogenous lipid uptake (45). This may support the hypothesis that specific metabolic lipid pathways are probably accelerated or moderated depending on tumor ER and HER-2 status. Interestingly, a previous study concerning the tissue analysis of breast tumors showed that the concentration of FABP4 was higher in HER-2 tumors and lower in Luminal A tumors, suggesting that this discrepancy lies mainly on differences in lipid metabolic pathways that have been observed in the different breast cancer subtypes (43,46). Taking all these data into account it was anticipated that the different serum FABP4 levels that were detected in Luminal and TN/HER-2 breast cancers might be observed due to a possible stronger association between lipid metabolic status and breast cancer subtypes and therefore different levels of FABP4 might be circulating in the serum of patients. However, further analyses are required in order to confirm this hypothesis.

In regard to RBP4, previous research studies have recommended that RBP4 is not associated with breast cancer development, while the expression of RBP4 gene seems to be down regulated in breast cancer cases (27,47). In contrast, a more recent study revealed for the first time that increased serum levels of RBP4 are related with breast cancer in menopausal women (28). In the present analysis no significant association between the serum levels of RBP4 and the development of breast cancer was observed in the tested patients (27,47). Interestingly, a previous analysis by Formelli et al (27) suggested that low plasma RBP4 levels are found in postmenopausal women (≥55 years old) and these patients exhibited poor prognosis of breast disease. In the present analysis, no significant association was recorded between serum levels of RBP4 and the development of breast cancer, while no significant relationship was described between RBP4 and menopausal status of the examined breast cancer patients.

Nowadays, little is known concerning the impact of MMP-9/NGAL complex on breast disease. A previous analysis derived by our group observed for the first time significantly increased serum levels of MMP-9/NGAL complex in breast cancer cases (29). In contrast to previous findings, we observed low levels of MMP-9/NGAL complex in breast cancer cases compared to healthy women but this association did not reach the limits of statistical significance. It is important to underline that significantly lower levels of MMP-9/NGAL complex were found in TN/HER-2 group compared to either healthy women or Luminal breast cancers (P<0.05). One possible explanation of the contradictory results could be the age group of the examined population, since in the previous study the mean age of the tested women was 52.8 years old, while in the present analysis the mean age of the examined patients was 62.8 years old (29). As a result, the age of the tested population may influence the MMP-9/NGAL complex levels (48,49). An additional explanation could be the molecular subtype of breast cancer cases. Notably, in the previous analysis by our group the breast lesions were classified into four groups including sclerosis adenosis, atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma, while there was no available data concerning the molecular subtype of breast cancer (29). As a consequence the composition of breast cancer cases in TN/HER-2 subtype may influence the serum levels of MMP-9/NGAL complex and consequently might affect the prognostic value of MMP-9/NGAL complex in developing breast cancer. As a consequence, more analyses are needed in order to examine whether low serum MMP-9/NGAL complex levels might indicate the development of TN/HER-2 breast cancer in the examined women.

Finally, in order to assess the impact of obesity on the described associations, a stratified analysis based on BMI values and the serum levels of the corresponding proteins was carried out. According to our results it was revealed that FABP4 in patients with high BMI values (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) is considerably increased, supporting previous findings (11). Moreover, patients diagnosed with Luminal breast cancer and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 exhibited significantly higher levels of FABP4 (P<0.02). In addition, the serum levels of RBP4, MMP-9/NGAL complex are not influenced by BMI value, supporting previous studies (28,29). However the concentration of MMP-9/NGAL complex was found to be significantly decreased in patients with TN/HER-2 breast cancer and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 when compared to patients with Luminal subtype. It is significant to highlight that in patients with BMI <25 kg/m2 the previously described associations did not reach the limits of statistical significance. Taking all these data into consideration it was suggested that BMI values regulate the described associations and thus BMI should be taken into consideration in order to draw more accurate conclusions concerning the prognosis of breast disease.

In addition, when protein serum levels were considered together with menopausal status, BMI and diabetes, it was observed that FABP4 concentration is significantly increased in postmenopausal patients with high BMI values as well as in breast cancer patients with diabetes, supporting previous findings (11,17,50). Although FABP4 and estrogens have been associated with obesity and obesity-associated breast cancer development, a recent analysis proved that FABP4 and estrogens have an independent impact on obesity related breast cancer growth (51). Interestingly, MMP9/NGAL complex was significantly associated in breast cancer development in postmenopausal women. As it was described above no considerable association was found between MMP9/NGAL complex and breast cancer development. However, this association reaches the limits of statistical significance in postmenopausal women with BMI ≥25 kg/m2. As a consequence, further analyses are required in order to confirm these outcomes as well as to examine whether MMP9/NGAL complex in association with estrogens contribute to the growth of breast cancer. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study that implicates MMP9/NGAL complex to the development of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Our results imply that there is a bidirectional interaction between circulating FABP4 and ER/PR receptors in tumor microenvironment. The relationship between lipid metabolism and breast cancer molecular subtypes varies considerably regarding menopausal status, BMI, presence of diabetes. Adipocytes and secreted fatted acid proteins induce resistance against to hormonal therapy, HER-2 targeting agents and radiotherapy (52). From a clinical perspective, the therapeutic interventions targeting multiple molecular pathways that are implicated in tumor establishment and progression could be more effective. That is to say the specific blockade of FABP4 may improve the efficacy of endocrine therapies and moderate resistance. Further studies should be conducted in order to better evaluate the complexity of lipid metabolism and the impact of obesity-related proteins as a diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic tool in specific group of patients. This study has some limitations. The number of participants was small, while all specimens were collected from a single institute. As a consequence, further analyses are required in a larger population scale derived from different tertiary care Greek hospitals in order to reinforce our findings.

In conclusion, our results support the initial recommendation that FABP4 can be regarded as a powerful biomarker of breast cancer development, while its strong association with obesity indicates that FABP4 is a key therapeutic target for treatment of obesity-related breast cancer (17). To the best of our knowledge this is the first study that describes the association of serum FABP4 and MMP-9/NGAL levels in Luminal and TN/HER-2 breast cancer subtypes, respectively, suggesting that the measurement of these two factors may provide significant information concerning not only breast cancer development but also the growth of specific breast cancer subtype, in order to better evaluate the interaction of the respective circulating proteins in specific group of patients (postmenopausal, obese, diabetes). The present analysis anticipated that the metabolic profile of breast cancer subtype, the menopausal status and BMI of the examined women should be taken into consideration in order to select the most suitable biomarker, offering crucial information regarding the personalized prognosis, diagnosis and the proper therapy of breast disease.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Hellenic Anticancer Institute, a private non-profit organization. The funding source had no involvement in study design, conduct of research or manuscript publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Author's contribution

GB, EZ and FZ designed the present study. DB collected and analyzed samples, and interpreted results. GB, DT and EK analyzed and interpreted the data. DT and GB wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients provided their written informed consent prior to enrollement. The current study was approved by the ‘Saint Savvas’ General Anticancer Hospital Ethics Committee (approval no. 1617017278).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Bertucci F and Birnbaum D: Reasons for breast cancer heterogeneity. J Biol. 7:62008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Laversanne M, Brewster DH, Gombe Mbalawa C, Kohler B, Piñeros M, Steliarova-Foucher E, Swaminathan R, Antoni S, et al: Cancer incidence in five continents: Inclusion criteria, highlights from Volume X and the global status of cancer registration. Int J Cancer. 137:2060–2071. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, Ruddy K, Tsang J and Cardoso F: Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 5:662019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L and Jemal A: Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:52–62. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), : Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 365:1687–1717. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Colomer R, Aranda-Lopez I, Albanell J, García-Caballero T, Ciruelos E, López-García MÁ, Cortés J, Rojo F, Martín M and Palacios-Calvo J: Biomarkers in breast cancer: A consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology. Clin Transl Oncol. 20:815–826. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Kashyap D and Kaur H: Cell-free miRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers in breast cancer: Significance in early diagnosis and metastasis prediction. Life Sci. 246:1174172020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Bourgain C, Pourtau L, Mazouni C, Bungener M and Bonastre EJ: Imperfect biomarkers for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer with good prognosis. Soc Sci Med. 246:1127352020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Guaita-Esteruelas S, Bosquet A, Saavedra P, Gumà J, Girona J, Lam EW, Amillano K, Borràs J and Masana L: Exogenous FABP4 increases breast cancer cell proliferation and activates the expression of fatty acid transport proteins. Mol Carcinog. 56:208–217. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Guaita-Esteruelas S, Saavedra-Garcia P, Bosquet A, Borràs J, Girona J, Amiliano K, Rodríguez-Balada M, Heras M, Masana L and Gumà J: Adipose-derived fatty acid-binding proteins plasma concentrations are increased in breast cancer patients. Oncologist. 22:1309–1315. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Guaita-Esteruelas S, Guma J, Masana L and Borras J: The peritumoural adipose tissue microenvironment and cancer. The roles of fatty acid binding protein 4 and fatty acid binding protein 5. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 462:107–118. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Zimmerman AW and Veerkamp JH: New insights into the structure and function of fatty acid-binding proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 59:1096–1116. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zeng J, Sauter ER and Li B: FABP4: A new player in obesity-associated breast cancer. Trends Mol Med. 26:437–440. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Prentice KJ, Saksi J and Hotamisligil GS: Adipokine FABP4 integrates energy stores and counterregulatory metabolic responses. J Lipid Res. 60:734–740. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Cao H, Sekiya M, Ertunc ME, Burak MF, Mayers JR, White A, Inouye K, Rickey LM, Ercal BC, Furuhashi M, et al: Adipocyte lipid chaperone AP2 is a secreted adipokine regulating hepatic glucose production. Cell Metab. 17:768–778. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Hao J, Zhang Y, Yan X, Yan F, Sun Y, Zeng J, Waigel S, Yin Y, Fraig MM, Egilmez NK, et al: Circulating adipose fatty acid binding protein is a new link underlying obesity-associated breast/mammary tumor development. Cell Metab. 28:689–705 e5. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer CG, Liu S, et al: ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 1:555–567. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Peek ME, Bhatnagar A, McCarty NA and Zughaier SM: Pyoverdine, the major siderophore in pseudomonas aeruginosa, evades NGAL recognition. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012:8435092012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Flowe DR: The lipocalin protein family: Structure and function. Biochem J. 318:1–14. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kawaguchi R, Yu J, Honda J, Hu J, Whitelegge J, Ping P, Wiita P, Bok D and Sun H: A membrane receptor for retinol binding protein mediates cellular uptake of vitamin A. Science. 315:820–825. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Berry DC, Jin H, Majumdar A and Noy N: Signaling by vitamin A and retinol-binding protein regulates gene expression to inhibit insulin responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:4340–4345. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Norseen J, Hosooka T, Hammarstedt A, Yore MM, Kant S, Aryal P, Kiernan UA, Phillips DA, Maruyama H, Kraus BJ, et al: Retinol-binding protein 4 inhibits insulin signaling in adipocytes by inducing proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages through a c-Jun N-terminal kinase- and toll-like receptor 4-dependent and retinol-independent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol. 32:2010–2019. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Abola MV, Thompson CL, Chen Z, Chak A, Berger NA, Kirwan JP and Li L: Serum levels of retinol-binding protein 4 and risk of colon adenoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 22:L1–L4. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Cheng Y, Liu C, Zhang N, Wang S and Zhang Z: Proteomics analysis for finding serum markers of ovarian cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014:1790402014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Chen Y, Azman SN, Kerishnan JP, Zain RB, Chen YN, Wong YL and Gopinath SC: Identification of host-immune response protein candidates in the sera of human oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. PLoS One. 9:e1090122014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Formelli F, Meneghini E, Cavadini E, Camerini T, Di Mauro MG, De Palo G, Veronesi U, Berrino F and Micheli A: Plasma retinol and prognosis of postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 18:42–48. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Jiao C, Cui L, Ma A, Li N and Si H: Elevated Serum Levels of Retinol-Binding Protein 4 Are Associated with Breast Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study. PLoS One. 11:e01674982016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Provatopoulou X, Gounaris A, Kalogera E, Zagouri F, Flessas I, Goussetis E, Nonni A, Papassotiriou I and Zografos G: Circulating levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and their complex MMP-9/NGAL in breast cancer disease. BMC Cancer. 9:3902009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Barasch J, Hollmen M, Deng R, Hod EA, Rupert PB, Abergel RJ, Allred BE, Xu K, Darrah SF, Tekabe Y, et al: Disposal of iron by a mutant form of lipocalin 2. Nat Commun. 7:129732016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Chakraborty S, Kaur S, Guha S and Batra SK: The multifaceted roles of neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) in inflammation and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1826:129–169. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Candido S, Abrams SL, Steelman LS, Lertpiriyapong K, Fitzgerald TL, Martelli AM, Cocco L, Montalto G, Cervello M, Polesel J, et al: Roles of NGAL and MMP-9 in the tumor microenvironment and sensitivity to targeted therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1863:438–448. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Torti SV and Torti FM: Iron and cancer: More ore to be mined. Nat Rev Cancer. 13:342–355. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Roli L, Pecoraro V and Trenti T: Can NGAL be employed as prognostic and diagnostic biomarker in human cancers? A systematic review of current evidence. Int J Biol Markers. 32:e53–e61. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Chen YC, Chang SC, Huang YH, Lee YJ, Chang CC, Liao JW and Hsu WL: Expression and the molecular forms of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and matrix metalloproteinase 9 in canine mammary tumours. Vet Comp Oncol. 17:427–438. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Yan L, Borregaard N, Kjeldsen L and Moses MA: The high molecular weight urinary matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity is a complex of gelatinase B/MMP-9 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Modulation of MMP-9 activity by NGAL. J Biol Chem. 276:37258–37265. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Sung H, Choi JY, Lee SA, Lee KM, Han S, Jeon S, Song M, Lee Y, Park SK, Yoo KY, et al: The association between the preoperative serum levels of lipocalin-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and prognosis of breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 12:1932012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Huang H: Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a cancer biomarker and MMP-9 biosensors: Recent advances. Sensors (Basel). 27:32492018. View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B and Senn HJ; Panel members, : Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: Highlights of the St gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 24:2206–2223. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B and Senn HJ; Panel members, : Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: Highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 22:1736–1747. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Waks AG and Winer EP: Breast cancer treatment: A Review. JAMA. 321:288–300. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Fragomeni SM, Sciallis A and Jeruss JS: Molecular Subtypes and Local-Regional Control of Breast Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 27:95–120. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Kim S, Lee Y and Koo JS: Differential expression of lipid metabolism-related proteins in different breast cancer subtypes. PLoS One. 10:e01194732015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Wu Q, Li B, Li Z, Li J and Sun S and Sun S: Cancer-associated adipocytes: key players in breast cancer progression. J Hematol Oncol. 12:952019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Koundouros N and Poulogiannis G: Reprogramming of fatty acid metabolism in cancer. Br J Cancer. 122:4–22. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Moreno-Sanchez R, Rodriguez-Enriquez S, Marin-Hernandez A and Saavedra E: Energy metabolism in tumor cells. FEBS J. 274:1393–1418. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Merdad A, Karim S, Schulten HJ, Jayapal M, Dallol A, Buhmeida A, Al-Thubaity F, GariI MA, Chaudhary AG, Abuzenadah AM and Al-Qahtani MH: Transcriptomics profiling study of breast cancer from Kingdom of Saudi Arabia revealed altered expression of Adiponectin and Fatty Acid Binding Protein4: Is lipid metabolism associated with breast cancer? BMC Genomics. 16 (Suppl 1):S112015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Lanning NJ, Castle JP, Singh SJ, Leon AN, Tovar EA, Sanghera A, MacKeigan JP, Filipp FV and Graveel CR: Metabolic profiling of triple-negative breast cancer cells reveals metabolic vulnerabilities. Cancer Metab. 5:62017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Tayyari F, Gowda GAN, Olopade OF, Berg R, Yang HH, Lee MP, Ngwa WF, Mittal SK, Raftery D and Mohammed SI: Metabolic profiles of triple-negative and luminal A breast cancer subtypes in African-American identify key metabolic differences. Oncotarget. 9:11677–11690. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Hancke K, Grubeck D, Hauser N, Kreienberg R and Weiss JM: Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein as a novel prognostic factor in obese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 119:367. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Li B, Hao J, Yan X, Kong M and Sauter ER: A-FABP and oestrogens are independently involved in the development of breast cancer. Adipocyte. 8:379–385. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Choi J, Cha YJ and Koo JS: Adipocyte biology in breast cancer: From silent bystander to active facilitator. Prog Lipid Res. 69:11–20. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2021
Volume 21 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tsakogiannis D, Kalogera E, Zagouri F, Zografos E, Balalis D and Bletsa G: Determination of FABP4, RBP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex in the serum of women with breast cancer. Oncol Lett 21: 85, 2021
APA
Tsakogiannis, D., Kalogera, E., Zagouri, F., Zografos, E., Balalis, D., & Bletsa, G. (2021). Determination of FABP4, RBP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex in the serum of women with breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 21, 85. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12346
MLA
Tsakogiannis, D., Kalogera, E., Zagouri, F., Zografos, E., Balalis, D., Bletsa, G."Determination of FABP4, RBP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex in the serum of women with breast cancer". Oncology Letters 21.2 (2021): 85.
Chicago
Tsakogiannis, D., Kalogera, E., Zagouri, F., Zografos, E., Balalis, D., Bletsa, G."Determination of FABP4, RBP4 and the MMP‑9/NGAL complex in the serum of women with breast cancer". Oncology Letters 21, no. 2 (2021): 85. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12346