Application of imaging technology for the diagnosis of malignancy in the pancreaticobiliary duodenal junction (Review)
- Authors:
- Wanyi Yang
- Pingsheng Hu
- Chaohui Zuo
-
Affiliations: Department of Gastroduodenal and Pancreatic Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Clinical Research Center for Tumor of Pancreaticobiliary Duodenal Junction in Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China - Published online on: October 8, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14729
- Article Number: 596
-
Copyright: © Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Kamisawa T, Kaneko K, Itoi T and Ando H: Pancreaticobiliary maljunction and congenital biliary dilatation. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2:610–618. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ono A, Arizono S, Isoda H and Togashi K: Imaging of pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Radiographics. 40:378–392. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nikolaidis P, Hammond NA, Day K, Yaghmai V, Wood CG III, Mosbach DS, Harmath CB, Taffel MT, Horowitz JM, Berggruen SM and Miller FH: Imaging features of benign and malignant ampullary and periampullary lesions. Radiographics. 34:624–641. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zulfiqar M, Chatterjee D, Yoneda N, Hoegger MJ, Ronot M, Hecht EM, Bastati N, Ba-Ssalamah A, Bashir MR and Fowler K: Imaging features of premalignant biliary lesions and predisposing conditions with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 42:1320–1337. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu D, Yang K, Li Y, Ye X, Zhang H, Long Q, Ding X, Dong F and Xu J: Differential diagnostic value of periampullary mass: A nomogram established by random forest based on clinical characteristics and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound. 50:918–928. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Al-Hawary MM, Kaza RK and Francis IR: Optimal imaging modalities for the diagnosis and staging of periampullary masses. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 25:239–253. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen XP, Liu J, Zhou J, Zhou PC, Shu J, Xu LL, Li B and Su S: Combination of CEUS and MRI for the diagnosis of periampullary space-occupying lesions: A retrospective analysis. BMC Med Imaging. 19:772019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang C, Zhang P and Qi X: Digital and intelligent liver surgery in the new era: Prospects and dilemmas. EBioMedicine. 41:693–701. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rizzo A and Brandi G: Neoadjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A comprehensive literature review. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 27:1003542021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rizzo A and Brandi G: Pitfalls, challenges, and updates in adjuvant systemic treatment for resected biliary tract cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 15:547–554. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Di Federico A, Mosca M, Pagani R, Carloni R, Frega G, De Giglio A, Rizzo A, Ricci D, Tavolari S, Di Marco M, et al: Immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer: why do we keep failing? A focus on tumor immune microenvironment, Predictive biomarkers and treatment outcomes. Cancers (Basel). 14:24292022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guven DC, Sahin TK, Erul E, Rizzo A, Ricci AD, Aksoy S and Yalcin S: The association between albumin levels and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Mol Biosci. 9:10391212022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Di Federico A, Tateo V, Parisi C, Formica F, Carloni R, Frega G, Rizzo A, Ricci D, Di Marco M, Palloni A and Brandi G: Hacking pancreatic cancer: Present and future of personalized medicine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 14:6772021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Padilla-Thornton AE, Willmann JK and Jeffrey RB: Adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process of the pancreas: MDCT patterns of local invasion and clinical features at presentation. Eur Radiol. 22:1067–1074. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Loi M, Magallon-Baro A, Suker M, van Eijck C, Sharma A, Hoogeman M and Nuyttens J: Pancreatic cancer treated with SBRT: Effect of anatomical interfraction variations on dose to organs at risk. Radiother Oncol. 134:67–73. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gaballah AH, Kazi IA, Zaheer A, Liu PS, Badawy M, Moshiri M, Ibrahim MK, Soliman M, Kimchi E and Elsayes KM: Imaging after pancreatic surgery: Expected findings and postoperative complications. Radiographics. 44:e2300612024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bello HR, Sekhar A, Filice RW, Radmard AR and Davarpanah AH: Pancreaticoduodenal groove: Spectrum of disease and imaging features. Radiographics. 42:1062–1080. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sah SK, Panth H and Wang YX: Morphometric analysis of common bile duct: A cadaveric study. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2:64–68. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bhutia KD, Lachungpa T and Lamtha SC: Etiology of obstructive jaundice and its correlation with the ethnic population of Sikkim. J Family Med Prim Care. 10:4189–4192. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Okano K, Oshima M, Suto H, Ando Y, Asano E, Kamada H, Kobara H, Masaki T and Suzuki Y: Ampullary carcinoma of the duodenum: Current clinical issues and genomic overview. Surg Today. 52:189–197. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hou C, Zhang H, Wang X and Yang Z: The ‘Hand as Foot’ teaching method in the duodenum anatomy. Asian J Surg. 45:1768–1769. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu X, Niu R and Wu Y: The ‘Hand as Foot’ teaching method in pancreas-duodenum anatomy. Asian J Surg. 46:1448–1449. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pickhardt PJ and Bhalla S: Intestinal malrotation in adolescents and adults: Spectrum of clinical and imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179:1429–1435. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Johnson LN, Moran SK, Bhargava P, Revels JW, Moshiri M, Rohrmann CA and Mansoori B: Fluoroscopic evaluation of duodenal diseases. Radiographics. 42:397–416. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang JY, Huang J and Yang ZY: Abdominal pain after subtotal gastrectomy: A first report of accessory pancreatic fistula. J Pain Res. 13:431–435. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Apurva Abdul Sattar RS, Ali A, Nimisha Kumar Sharma A, Kumar A, Santoshi S and Saluja SS: Molecular pathways in periampullary cancer: An overview. Cell Signal. 100:1104612022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Perri G, Bortolato C, Marchegiani G, Holmberg M, Romandini E, Sturesson C, Bassi C, Sparrelid E, Ghorbani P and Salvia R: Pure biliary leak vs pancreatic fistula associated: Non-identical twins following pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 24:1474–1481. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pecorelli N, Capretti G, Sandini M, Damascelli A, Cristel G, De Cobelli F, Gianotti L, Zerbi A and Braga M: Impact of sarcopenic obesity on failure to rescue from major complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: Results from a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 25:308–317. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Skórzewska M, Kurzawa P, Ciszewski T, Pelc Z and Polkowski WP: Controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of periampullary tumours. Surg Oncol. 44:1018532022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Amr B, Shahtahmassebi G, Briggs CD, Bowles MJ, Aroori S and Stell DA: Assessment of the effect of interval from presentation to surgery on outcome in patients with peri-ampullary malignancy. HPB (Oxford). 18:354–359. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khan IA, Singh N, Gunjan D, Nayak B, Dash NR, Pal S, Lohani N, Yadav R, Gupta S and Saraya A: Serum miR-215-5p, miR-192-5p and miR-378a-5p as novel diagnostic biomarkers for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 260:1554172024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ilic M and Ilic I: Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 22:9694–9705. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Groot VP, Gemenetzis G, Blair AB, Rivero-Soto RJ, Yu J, Javed AA, Burkhart RA, Rinkes IHMB, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, et al: Defining and predicting early recurrence in 957 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 269:1154–1162. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Groot VP, Rezaee N, Wu W, Cameron JL, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Zheng L, Wolfgang CL and He J: Patterns, timing, and predictors of recurrence following pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 267:936–945. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wood LD, Canto MI, Jaffee EM and Simeone DM: Pancreatic cancer: Pathogenesis, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastroenterology. 163:386–402.e1. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
El Hakim BA, Caid N, Saoudi L, Benemla R, Ramoul R, Rekkache S and Smaili F: Clinical characteristic of pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 29 (Suppl 5):S502018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hessmann E, Buchholz SM, Demir IE, Singh SK, Gress TM, Ellenrieder V and Neesse A: Microenvironmental determinants of pancreatic cancer. Physiol Rev. 100:1707–1751. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Malsy M, Hackl C, Graf B, Bitzinger D and Bundscherer A: The effects of analgesics on the migration of pancreatic cancer cells. In Vivo. 36:576–581. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Morita S, Onaya H, Kishi Y, Hiraoka N and Arai Y: Multiple intraglandular metastases in a patient with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Intern Med. 54:1753–1756. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakase A, Koizumi T, Fujita N, Ono H and Matsumoto Y: Studies of the growth and infiltration of experimental tumor of the pancreas in rabbits. Am J Surg. 133:590–592. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW and Shroff RT: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 395:2008–2020. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burke EE, Marmor S, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM and Jensen EH: Lymph node evaluation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its value as a quality metric. J Gastrointest Surg. 19:2162–2170. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shang S, Wang J, Chen S, Tian R, Zeng H, Wang L, Xia M, Zhu H and Zuo C: Exosomal miRNA-1231 derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibits the activity of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med. 8:7728–7740. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Selvaggi F, Melchiorre E, Casari I, Cinalli S, Cinalli M, Aceto GM, Cotellese R, Garajova I and Falasca M: Perineural invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: From molecules towards drugs of clinical relevance. Cancers (Basel). 14:57932022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Chen Y, Li X and Zou X: Perineural invasion and associated pain transmission in pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel). 13:45942021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang MW, Tao LY, Jiang YS, Yang JY, Huo YM, Liu DJ, Li J, Fu XL, He R, Lin C, et al: Perineural invasion reprograms the immune microenvironment through cholinergic signaling in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 80:1991–2003. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bapat AA, Hostetter G, Von Hoff DD and Han H: Perineural invasion and associated pain in pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 11:695–707. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tan X, Sivakumar S, Bednarsch J, Wiltberger G, Kather JN, Niehues J, de Vos-Geelen J, Valkenburg-van Iersel L, Kintsler S, Roeth A, et al: Nerve fibers in the tumor microenvironment in neurotropic cancer-pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Oncogene. 40:899–908. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, Cardinale V, Carpino G, Andersen JB, Braconi C, et al: Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: The next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17:557–588. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zaccari P, Cardinale V, Severi C, Pedica F, Carpino G, Gaudio E, Doglioni C, Petrone MC, Alvaro D, Arcidiacono PG and Capurso G: Common features between neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions of the biliary tract and the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 25:4343–4359. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Felsenstein M, Hruban RH and Wood LD: New developments in the molecular mechanisms of pancreatic tumorigenesis. Adv Anat Pathol. 25:131–142. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, Marzioni M, Andersen JB, Invernizzi P, Lind GE, Folseraas T, Forbes SJ, Fouassier L, et al: Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: Current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European network for the study of cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13:261–280. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Razumilava N and Gores GJ: Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 383:2168–2179. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kato Y, Takahashi S, Gotohda N and Konishi M: The likely sites of nodal metastasis differs according to the tumor extent in distal bile duct cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 20:1618–1627. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Min SK, You Y, Choi DW, Han IW, Shin SH, Yoon S, Jung JH, Yoon SJ and Heo JS: Prognosis of pancreatic head cancer with different patterns of lymph node metastasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 29:1004–1013. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kwon HJ, Kim SG, Chun JM, Lee WK and Hwang YJ: Prognostic factors in patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 20:6658–6665. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zheng-Pywell R and Reddy S: Ampullary cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 99:357–367. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Williams JL, Chan CK, Toste PA, Elliott IA, Vasquez CR, Sunjaya DB, Swanson EA, Koo J, Hines OJ, Reber HA, et al: Association of histopathologic phenotype of periampullary adenocarcinomas with survival. JAMA Surg. 152:82–88. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, Coleman J, Abrams RA, Piantadosi S, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ and Cameron JL: Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg. 224:463–475. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin R, Pereira SP, Rosenberg WM, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thillainayagam AV, Thomas HC, Thursz MR and Wasan H; British Society of Gastroenterology, : Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: Consensus document. Gut. 51 (Suppl 6):VI1–VI9. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jiang S, Zhao R, Li Y, Han X, Liu Z, Ge W, Dong Y and Han W: Prognosis and nomogram for predicting postoperative survival of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study in China and the SEER database. Sci Rep. 8:79402018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nishio K, Kimura K, Murata A, Ohira G, Shinkawa H, Kodai S, Amano R, Tanaka S, Shimizu S, Takemura S, et al: Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between resected ampullary carcinoma and carcinoma of the second portion of the duodenum. World J Gastrointest Surg. 14:1219–1229. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burasakarn P, Higuchi R, Nunobe S, Kanaji S, Eguchi H, Okada KI, Fujii T, Nagakawa Y, Kanetaka K, Yamashita H, et al: Limited resection vs pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 26:450–460. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao Z, Zhang J, Li C, Liu T and Li W: Surgical treatment and survival analysis of primary duodenal malignant tumor: A retrospective cohort study. J Gastrointest Oncol. 13:1733–1745. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xue Y, Vanoli A, Balci S, Reid MM, Saka B, Bagci P, Memis B, Choi H, Ohike N, Tajiri T, et al: Non-ampullary-duodenal carcinomas: Clinicopathologic analysis of 47 cases and comparison with ampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol. 30:255–266. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang S, Cui Y, Zhong B, Xiao W, Gong X, Chao K and Chen M: Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analysis of primary duodenal cancers: A 14-year experience in a tertiary centre in South China. Int J Colorectal Dis. 26:219–226. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yabuuchi Y, Yoshida M, Kakushima N, Kato M, Iguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Kanetaka K, Uraoka T, Fujishiro M and Sho M; Japan Duodenal Cancer Committee, : Risk factors for non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review. Dig Dis. 40:147–155. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Overman MJ, Hu CY, Kopetz S, Abbruzzese JL, Wolff RA and Chang GJ: A population-based comparison of adenocarcinoma of the large and small intestine: Insights into a rare disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 19:1439–1445. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kakushima N, Ono H, Yoshida M, Takizawa K, Tanaka M, Kawata N, Ito S, Imai K, Hotta K, Ishiwatari H and Matsubayashi H: Characteristics and risk factors for sporadic non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 52:1253–1257. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Woo SM, Ryu JK, Lee SH, Yoo JW, Park JK, Kim YT, Jang JY, Kim SW, Kang GH and Yoon YB: Recurrence and prognostic factors of ampullary carcinoma after radical resection: Comparison with distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 14:3195–3201. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Secchi M, Leonardo R, Esteban M, Mario C and Alejandro A: Periampullary malignant tumors. Management and prognostic. Pancreatology. 17:S162017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ma Y, Jiang Q, Zhang Z, Xiao P, Yan Y, Liu J, Li Q and Wang Z: Diagnosis of hirschsprung disease by hydrocolonic sonography in children. Eur Radiol. 32:2089–2098. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Limberg B: Diagnosis and staging of colonic tumors by conventional abdominal sonography as compared with hydrocolonic sonography. N Engl J Med. 327:65–69. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang L, Wang X, Kou H, He H, Lu M, Zhou L and Yang Y: Comparing single oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the preoperative Borrmann classification of advanced gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 9:8716–8724. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang T, Su ZZ, Wang P, Wu T, Tang W, Xu EJ, Ju JX, Quan XY and Zheng RQ: Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the detection of periampullary cancer: Comparison with B-mode ultrasonography and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 85:1993–2000. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li T, Lu M, Song J, Wu P, Cheng X and Zhang Z: Improvement to ultrasonographical differential diagnosis of gastric lesions: The value of contrast enhanced sonography with gastric distention. PLoS One. 12:e01823322017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maconi G, Radice E, Bareggi E and Porro GB: Hydrosonography of the gastrointestinal tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 193:700–708. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Trikudanathan G, Njei B, Attam R, Arain M and Shaukat A: Staging accuracy of ampullary tumors by endoscopic ultrasound: Meta-analysis and systematic review. Dig Endosc. 26:617–626. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kitano M, Yoshida T, Itonaga M, Tamura T, Hatamaru K and Yamashita Y: Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol. 54:19–32. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Archibugi L, Petrone MC, Tamburrino D, Crippa S, Dabizzi E, Mariani A, Nicoletti R, Doglioni C, Capurso G, Falconi M, et al: EUS versus CT scan in establishing the T stage in surgically resected pancreatic cancer based on the new TNM 8th edition. Pancreatology. 18 (Suppl):S130–S131. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen CH, Yang CC, Yeh YH, Chou DA and Nien CK: Reappraisal of endosonography of ampullary tumors: Correlation with transabdominal sonography, CT, and MRI. J Clin Ultrasound. 37:18–25. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Moura DTH, Moura EGH, Bernardo WM, De Moura ETH, Baraca FI, Kondo A, Matuguma SE and Almeida Artifon EL: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasound for tissue diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound. 7:10–19. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oppong KW, Bekkali NLH, Leeds JS, Johnson SJ, Nayar MK, Darné A, Egan M, Bassett P and Haugk B: Fork-tip needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: A randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 52:454–461. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yeo SJ, Cho CM, Jung MK, Seo AN and Bae HI: Comparison of the diagnostic performances of same-session endoscopic ultrasound- and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided tissue sampling for suspected biliary strictures at different primary tumor sites. Korean J Gastroenterol. 73:213–218. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jo JH, Cho CM, Jun JH, Chung MJ, Kim TH, Seo DW, Kim J and Park DH; Research Group for Endoscopic Ultrasonography in KSGE, : Same-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 34:799–805. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Moura DTH, Ryou M, De Moura EGH, Ribeiro IB, Bernardo WM and Thompson CC: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary strictures: A meta-analysis of same-session procedures. Clin Endosc. 53:417–428. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Raman SP and Fishman EK: Abnormalities of the distal common bile duct and ampulla: Diagnostic approach and differential diagnosis using multiplanar reformations and 3D imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 203:17–28. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hashemzadeh S, Mehrafsa B, Kakaei F, Javadrashid R, Golshan R, Seifar F, Hajibonabi F and Salmannezhad Khorami F: Diagnostic accuracy of a 64-slice multi-detector CT scan in the preoperative evaluation of periampullary neoplasms. J Clin Med. 7:912018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liang H, Zhou Y, Zheng Q, Yan G, Liao H, Du S, Zhang X, Lv F, Zhang Z and Li YM: Dual-energy CT with virtual monoenergetic images and iodine maps improves tumor conspicuity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Insights Imaging. 13:1532022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang FB, Ni JM, Zhang ZY, Zhang L, Wu WJ, Wang D, Ji Y and Gong L: Differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas: Comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography. Abdom Imaging. 39:506–517. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li B, Zhang L, Zhang ZY, Ni JM, Lu FQ, Wu WJ and Jiang CJ: Differentiation of noncalculous periampullary obstruction: Comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol. 25:391–401. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao DZ, Guo Y, Sun YP, Liu HM, Zhang Z, Ma QL, Wang YS and Chen CL: Multi-detector spiral CT diagnosis of common bile duct ampullary carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 21:3549–3553. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jang SK, Kim JH, Joo I, Jeon JH, Shin KS, Han JK and Choi BI: Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer from other solid tumours arising from the periampullary area on MDCT. Eur Radiol. 25:2880–2888. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Angthong W, Jiarakoop K and Tangtiang K: Differentiation of benign and malignant ampullary obstruction by multi-row detector CT. Jpn J Radiol. 36:477–488. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JE, Choi SY, Lee MH, Lim S, Min JH, Hwang JA, Lee S and Kim JH: Differentiating between benign and malignant ampullary strictures: A prediction model using a nomogram based on CT imaging and clinical findings. Eur Radiol. 32:7566–7577. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, De Jong EEC, Van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A, et al: Radiomics: The bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 14:749–762. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lim CY, Min JH, Hwang JA, Choi SY and Ko SE: Assessment of main pancreatic duct cutoff with dilatation, but without visible pancreatic focal lesion on MDCT: A novel diagnostic approach for malignant stricture using a CT-based nomogram. Eur Radiol. 32:8285–8295. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jang SY, Kim JS, Baek SY, Lee HA and Lee JK: Proposed nomogram predicting neoplastic ampullary obstruction in patients with a suspected ampulla of Vater lesion on CT. Abdom Radiol (NY). 46:3128–3138. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lu J, Hu D, Tang H, Hu X, Shen Y, Li Z, Peng Y and Kamel I: Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: Differentiation of periampullary neoplasms based on CT whole-lesion histogram analysis. Eur J Radiol. 115:1–9. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Radojkovic M, Stojanovic M, Radojković D, Jeremic L, Mihailovic D and Ilic I: Histopathologic differentiation as a prognostic factor in patients with carcinoma of the hepatopancreatic ampulla of Vater. J Int Med Res. 46:4634–4639. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zimmermann C, Wolk S, Aust DE, Meier F, Saeger HD, Ehehalt F, Weitz J, Welsch T and Distler M: The pathohistological subtype strongly predicts survival in patients with ampullary carcinoma. Sci Rep. 9:126762019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ivanovic AM, Alessandrino F, Maksimovic R, Micev M, Ostojic S, Gore RM and Mortele KJ: Pathologic subtypes of ampullary adenocarcinoma: Value of ampullary MDCT for noninvasive preoperative differentiation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 208:W71–W78. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bi L, Yang L, Ma J, Cai S, Li L, Huang C, Xu J, Wang X and Huang M: Dynamic contract-enhanced CT-based radiomics for differentiation of pancreatobiliary-type and intestinal-type periampullary carcinomas. Clin Radiol. 77:e75–e83. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen WX, Xie QG, Zhang WF, Zhang X, Hu TT, Xu P and Gu ZY: Multiple imaging techniques in the diagnosis of ampullary carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 7:649–653. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bi L, Dong Y, Jing C, Wu Q, Xiu J, Cai S, Huang Z, Zhang J, Han X, Liu Q and Lv S: Differentiation of pancreatobiliary-type from intestinal-type periampullary carcinomas using 3.0T MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 43:877–886. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nalbant MO, Inci E, Akinci O, Aygan S, Gulturk U and Boluk Gulsever A: Evaluation of imaging findings of pancreatobiliary and intestinal type periampullary carcinomas with 3.0T MRI. Acad Radiol. 30:1846–1855. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dillman JR, Patel RM, Lin TK, Towbin AJ and Trout AT: Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: A clinical effectiveness study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 44:2377–2383. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW, Park SW, Lee JK, Kim JS, Lee JH, Kim KA, Kim AY, Kim PN, et al: Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: Findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology. 233:234–240. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suthar M, Purohit S, Bhargav V and Goyal P: Role of MRCP in differentiation of benign and malignant causes of biliary obstruction. J Clin Diagn Res. 9:TC08–TC012. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang GX, Ge XD, Zhang D, Chen HL, Zhang QC and Wen L: MRCP combined with CT promotes the differentiation of benign and malignant distal bile duct strictures. Front Oncol. 11:6838692021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu DS, Chen WX, Wang XD, Acharya R and Jiang XH: Pancreaticobiliary duct changes of periampullary carcinomas: Quantitative analysis at MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 81:2112–2117. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang L, Sanagapalli S and Stoita A: Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 24:2047–2060. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang S, Liu X and Zhao J, Liu Y, Liu S, Liu Y and Zhao J: Computer auxiliary diagnosis technique of detecting cholangiocarcinoma based on medical imaging: A review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 208:1062652021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dusunceli Atman E, Erden A, Ustuner E, Uzun C and Bektas M: MRI findings of intrinsic and extrinsic duodenal abnormalities and variations. Korean J Radiol. 16:1240–1252. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim JH, Kim MJ, Chung JJ, Lee WJ, Yoo HS and Lee JT: Differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas at MR imaging. Radiographics. 22:1335–1352. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baiu I and Visser B: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. JAMA. 320:20502018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakagawa K, Sho M, Fujishiro M, Kakushima N, Horimatsu T, Okada KI, Iguchi M, Uraoka T, Kato M, Yamamoto Y, et al: Clinical practice guidelines for duodenal cancer 2021. J Gastroenterol. 57:927–941. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yamamoto K, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Tsuchiya T, Tanaka R, Tonozuka R, Honjo M, Mukai S, Fujita M, Asai Y, et al: Expanding the indication of endoscopic papillectomy for T1a ampullary carcinoma. Dig Endosc. 31:188–196. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hanada K, Shimizu A, Kurihara K, Ikeda M, Yamamoto T, Okuda Y and Tazuma S: Endoscopic approach in the diagnosis of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Dig Endosc. 34:927–937. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ergul N, Gundogan C, Tozlu M, Toprak H, Kadıoglu H, Aydin M and Cermik TF: Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer; comparison with multidetector row computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 33:159–164. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Yeh R, Dercle L, Garg I, Wang ZJ, Hough DM and Goenka AH: The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 43:415–434. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pu Y, Wang C, Zhao S, Xie R, Zhao L, Li K, Yang C, Zhang R, Tian Y, Tan L, et al: The clinical application of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic cancer: A narrative review. Transl Cancer Res. 10:3560–3575. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wolske KM, Ponnatapura J, Kolokythas O, Burke LMB, Tappouni R and Lalwani N: Chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic tumor? A problem-solving approach. Radiographics. 39:1965–1982. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krishnaraju VS, Kumar R, Mittal BR, Sharma V, Singh H, Nada R, Bal A, Rohilla M, Singh H and Rana SS: Differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic masses: Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT as a new diagnostic avenue. Eur Radiol. 31:2199–2208. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ruan Z, Jiao J, Min D, Qu J, Li J, Chen J, Li Q and Wang C: Multi-modality imaging features distinguish pancreatic carcinoma from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis of the pancreatic head. Oncol Lett. 15:9735–9744. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gnanasegaran G, Agrawal K and Wan S: 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-computerized tomography and non-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-computerized tomography in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies. PET Clin. 17:369–388. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Michalski CW, Liu B, Heckler M, Roth S, Sun H, Heger U, Büchler MW and Hackert T: Underutilization of surgery in periampullary cancer treatment. J Gastrointest Surg. 23:959–965. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang JZ, Yang CX, Gao S, Bu JF, Li QQ, Wang HL, Yang KN, Tong SS, Qian LJ, Zhang J, et al: Three-dimensional visualization and evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma resectability and proposal of a new classification. World J Surg Oncol. 21:2392023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin C, Gao J, Zheng H, Zhao J, Yang H, Lin G, Li H, Pan H, Liao Q and Zhao Y: Three-dimensional visualization technology used in pancreatic surgery: A valuable tool for surgical trainees. J Gastrointest Surg. 24:866–873. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A, Oberdoerffer P, Nawy T, Hupalowska A, Rood JE, Ashenberg O, Cerami E, Coffey RJ, Demir E, et al: The human tumor atlas network: Charting tumor transitions across space and time at single-cell resolution. Cell. 181:236–249. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang C, An J, Bruno A, Cai X, Fan J, Fujimoto J, Golfieri R, Hao X, Jiang H, Jiao LR, et al: Consensus recommendations of three-dimensional visualization for diagnosis and management of liver diseases. Hepatol Int. 14:437–453. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Higuchi K, Kaise M, Noda H, Kirita K, Koizumi E, Umeda T, Akimoto T, Omori J, Akimoto N, Goto O, et al: Three-dimensional visualization improves the endoscopic diagnosis of superficial gastric neoplasia. BMC Gastroenterol. 21:2422021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ahmed TM, Rowe SP, Fishman EK, Soyer P and Chu LC: Three-dimensional CT cinematic rendering of adrenal masses: Role in tumor analysis and management. Diagn Interv Imaging. 105:5–14. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Almagro J, Messal HA, Zaw Thin M, van Rheenen J and Behrens A: Tissue clearing to examine tumour complexity in three dimensions. Nat Rev Cancer. 21:718–730. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang SH, Won Y, Lee K, Youn SI, Min SH, Park YS, Ahn SH and Kim HH: Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: A propensity-matched analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 406:473–478. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jang W, Song JS, Kim SH and Yang JD: Comparison of compressed sensing and gradient and spin-echo in breath-hold 3D MR cholangiopancreatography: Qualitative and quantitative analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 11:6342021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen Z, Xue Y, Wu Y, Duan Q, Zheng E, He Y, Li G, Song Y and Sun B: Feasibility of 3D breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse: Prospective comparison with parallel imaging technique and compressed sensing method. Acad Radiol. 29:e289–e295. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huber T, Huettl F, Tripke V, Baumgart J and Lang H: Experiences with three-dimensional printing in complex liver surgery. Ann Surg. 273:e26–e27. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang J, Fang CH, Fan YF, Xiang N, Liu J, Zhu W, Bao SS and Wang HZ: To assess the benefits of medical image three-dimensional visualization system assisted pancreaticoduodenctomy for patients with hepatic artery variance. Int J Med Robot. 10:410–417. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miyamoto R, Oshiro Y, Nakayama K and Ohkohchi N: Impact of three-dimensional surgical simulation on pancreatic surgery. Gastrointest Tumors. 4:84–89. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miyamoto R, Oshiro Y, Sano N, Inagawa S and Ohkohchi N: Three-dimensional remnant pancreatic volumetry predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic cancer patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastrointest Tumors. 5:90–99. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Javed AA, Young RWC, Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, Cohen SM, Fishman EK and Wolfgang CL: Cinematic rendering: Novel tool for improving pancreatic cancer surgical planning. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 51:878–883. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barat M, Pellat A, Terris B, Dohan A, Coriat R, Fishman EK, Rowe SP, Chu L and Soyer P: Cinematic rendering of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A review of current possibilities and future developments. Can Assoc Radiol J. 75:359–368. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cai W, Fan Y, Hu H, Xiang N, Fang C and Jia F: Postoperative liver volume was accurately predicted by a medical image three dimensional visualization system in hepatectomy for liver cancer. Surg Oncol. 26:188–194. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mise Y, Hasegawa K and Kokudo N: Response to Comment on ‘the virtual hepatectomy changed the practice of liver surgery: More details, more significance’. Ann Surg. 270:e332019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Allan A, Kealley C, Squelch A, Wong YH, Yeong CH and Sun Z: Patient-specific 3D printed model of biliary ducts with congenital cyst. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 9:86–93. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bati AH, Guler E, Ozer MA, Govsa F, Erozkan K, Vatansever S, Ersin MS, Elmas ZN and Harman M: Surgical planning with patient-specific three-dimensional printed pancreaticobiliary disease models-cross-sectional study. Int J Surg. 80:175–183. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, Shindoh J, Miki K, Akamatsu N, Arita J, Kaneko J, Sakamoto Y and Kokudo N: How has virtual hepatectomy changed the practice of liver surgery?: Experience of 1194 virtual hepatectomy before liver resection and living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 268:127–133. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Uchida M: Recent advances in 3D computed tomography techniques for simulation and navigation in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 21:239–245. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Wang Q, Du B, Wang X, Xue Q and Gao W: A meta-analysis of the three-dimensional reconstruction visualization technology for hepatectomy. Asian J Surg. 46:669–676. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang J, Guo X, Wang H, Zhang J, Liu P, Qiao Q and Wang X: The application of three-dimensional visualization in preoperative evaluation of portal vein invasion in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 12:9297–9302. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo Q, Chen J, Pu T, Zhao Y, Xie K, Geng X and Liu F: The value of three-dimensional visualization techniques in hepatectomy for complicated hepatolithiasis: A propensity score matching study. Asian J Surg. 46:767–773. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao D, Lau WY, Zhou W, Yang J, Xiang N, Zeng N, Liu J, Zhu W and Fang C: Impact of three-dimensional visualization technology on surgical strategies in complex hepatic cancer. Biosci Trends. 12:476–483. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Song JS, Kim SH, Kuehn B and Paek MY: Optimized breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 3T: Image quality analysis and clinical feasibility assessment. Diagnostics (Basel). 10:3762020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Swaraj S, Mohapatra M, Sathpathy G, Yalamanchi R, Sen K, Menon SM, Madhesia A, Kumaraswamy SM, Radha Krishna K and Bobde DV: Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in biliary obstruction. Cureus. 15:e339152023.PubMed/NCBI | |
Reddy S CT, Mohan VSK, Jeepalem SM, Manthri R, Kalawat T, Reddy V V, Hulikal N and Devi B VL: Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in management of pancreatic and periampullary masses-prospective study from a tertiary care center. Indian J Surg Oncol. 13:288–298. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wen G, Gu J, Zhou W, Wang L, Tian Y, Dong Y, Fu L and Wu H: Benefits of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the preoperative characterisation or staging of disease in the ampullary and duodenal papillary. Eur Radiol. 30:5089–5098. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng S, Luo J, Ouyang Y, Xie J, He Z, Huang B, Bai F, Xiao K, Yin B, Wang J, et al: Application analysis of omental flap isolation and modified pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (175 cases). BMC Surg. 22:1272022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gugenheim J, Crovetto A and Petrucciani N: Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Updates Surg. 74:35–42. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Meijer LL, Alberga AJ, de Bakker JK, van der Vliet HJ, Le Large TYS, van Grieken NCT, de Vries R, Daams F, Zonderhuis BM and Kazemier G: Outcomes and treatment options for duodenal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 25:2681–2692. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gössling GCL, Zhen DB, Pillarisetty VG and Chiorean EG: Combination immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Challenges and future considerations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 18:1173–1186. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |