|
1
|
Djajadiningrat RS, Graafland NM, van
Werkhoven E, Meinhardt W, Bex A, van der Poel HG, van Boven HH,
Valdés Olmos RA and Horenblas S: Contemporary management of
regional nodes in penile cancer-improvement of survival. J Urol.
191:68–73. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Pagliaro LC and Crook J: Multimodality
therapy in penile cancer: When and which treatments? World J Urol.
27:221–225. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Woldu SL, Ci B, Hutchinson RC, Krabbe LM,
Singla N, Passoni NM, Clinton TN, Raj GV, Miller DS and Sagalowsky
AI: Usage and survival implications of surgical staging of inguinal
lymph nodes in intermediate- to high-risk, clinical localized
penile cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis. Urol Oncol.
36:159.e7–159.e17. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Brouwer OR, Albersen M, Parnham A, Protzel
C, Pettaway CA, Ayres B, Antunes-Lopes T, Barreto L, Campi R, Crook
J, et al: European association of Urology-American Society of
clinical oncology collaborative guideline on penile cancer: 2023
update. Eur Urol. 83:548–560. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Chipollini J, Necchi A and Spiess PE:
Outcomes for patients with node-positive penile cancer: Impact of
perioperative systemic therapies and the importance of surgical
intervention. Eur Urol. 74:241–242. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Mei H, Gu FL, Guo YL, et al: Urology
Operative Surgery[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing, People's Medical Publishing
House; China: pp. 646–648. 2008
|
|
7
|
Campbell RA, Slopnick EA, Ferry EK, Zhu H,
Kim SP and Abouassaly R: Disparity between pre-existing management
of penile cancer and NCCN guidelines. Urol Oncol.
35:531.e9–531.e14. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Daseler EH, Anson BJ and Reimann AF:
Radical excision of the inguinal and iliac lymph glands; a study
based upon 450 anatomical dissections and upon supportive clinical
observations. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 87:679–694. 1948.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Shao Y, Hu X, Ren S, Liao D, Yang Z, Liu
Y, Lia T, Wu K, Xiong S, Yang W, et al: Comparison of different
surgical methods and strategies for inguinal lymph node dissection
in patients with penile cancer. Sci Rep. 12:25602022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Cindolo L, Spiess PE, Bada M, Chipollini
JJ, Nyirády P, Chiodini P, Varga J, Ditonno P, Battaglia M, De
Nunzio C, et al: Adherence to EAU guidelines on penile cancer
translates into better outcomes: A multicenter international study.
World J Urol. 37:1649–1657. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Wang S, Du P, Tang X, An C, Zhang N and
Yang Y: Comparison of efficiency of video endoscopy and open
inguinal lymph node dissection. Anticancer Res. 37:4623–4628.
2017.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Singh A, Jaipuria J, Goel A, Shah S,
Bhardwaj R, Baidya S, Jain J, Jain C and Rawal S: Comparing
outcomes of robotic and open inguinal lymph node dissection in
patients with carcinoma of the penis. J Urol. 199:1518–1525. 2018.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Fankhauser CD, Ayres Be, Issa A, Albersen
M, Watkin N, Muneer A, Sangar V and Parnham A: Practice patterns
among penile cancer surgeons performing dynamic sentinel lymph node
biopsy and radical inguinal lymph node dissection in men with
penile cancer: A eUROGEN survey. Eur Urol Open Sci. 24:39–42. 2021.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Tan X, Cai T, Wang Y, Wu Z, Zhou Q, Guo S,
Li J, Yuan G, Liu Z, Li Z, et al: Regional lymph node mapping in
patients with penile cancer undergoing radical inguinal lymph node
dissection-a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 110:2865–2873.
2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Catalona WJ: Modified inguinal
lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of
saphenous veins: Technique and preliminary results. J Urol.
140:306–310. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Hu J, Li H, Cui Y, Liu P, Zhou X, Liu L,
Chen H, Chen J and Zu X: Comparison of clinical feasibility and
oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal
lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 98:e158622019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Vreeburg M, Donswijk ML, Albersen M,
Parnham A, Ayres B, Protzel C, Pettaway C, Spiess PE and Brouwer
OR: New EAU/ASCO guideline recommendations on sentinel node biopsy
for penile cancer and remaining challenges from a nuclear medicine
perspective. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 51:2861–2868. 2024.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Cubilla AL, Velazquez EF, Amin MB, Epstein
J, Berney DM and Corbishley CM; Members of the ISUP Penile Tumor
Panel, : The World Health Organisation 2016 classification of
penile carcinomas: A review and update from the International
Society of Urological Pathology expert-driven recommendations.
Histopathology. 72:893–904. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Naumann CM, Colberg C, Jüptner M, Marx M,
Zhao Y, Jiang P, Hamann MF, Jünemann KP, Zuhayra M and Lützen U:
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of preoperative sentinel lymph
node (SLN) imaging in penile carcinoma patients without palpable
inguinal lymph nodes via single photon emission computed
tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) as compared to planar
scintigraphy. Urol Oncol. 36:92.e17–92.e24. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Pizzocaro G: Editorial comment on:
Anatomical mapping of lymphatic drainage in penile carcinoma with
SPECT-CT: Implications for the extent of inguinal lymph node
dissection. Eur Urol. 54:8922008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Johnston MJ and Nigam R: Recent advances
in the management of penile cancer. F1000 Res 8, F1000 Faculty Rev.
–558. 2019.
|
|
22
|
Brouwer OR, Rumble RB, Ayres B, Martínez
DF, Oliveira P, Spiess PE, Johnstone PAS, Crook J, Pettaway CA and
Tagawa ST; Members of the EAU-ASCO Penile Cancer Update Panel, :
Penile cancer: EAU-ASCO Collaborative guidelines update Q and A.
JCO Oncol Pract. 20:33–37. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Marshall K, Nair SM, Willmore KE,
Beveridge TS and Power NE: Anatomical characterization of the
inguinal lymph nodes using microcomputed tomography to inform
radical inguinal lymph node dissections in penile cancer. J Surg
Oncol. 122:1785–1790. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Chakiryan NH, Dahmen A, Bandini M,
Pederzoli F, Marandino L, Albersen M, Roussel E, Zhu Y, Ye DW,
Ornellas AA, et al: Patterns of recurrence following inguinal lymph
node dissection for penile cancer: Optimizing surveillance
strategies. J Urol. 206:960–969. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Perdonà S, Izzo A, Tufano A, Passaro F,
Quarto G, Aveta A, Contieri R, Pandolfo SD, Autorino R and Spena G:
Advancing surgical management of penile cancer: Single port
bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection. International Braz J
Urol. 51:e202406632025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
