Antiproliferative activity of gambogic acid isolated from Garcinia hanburyi in Hep3B and Huh7 cancer cells

  • Authors:
    • Parry Ngan Hon Lee
    • Wing Shing Ho
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 19, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2291
  • Pages: 1744-1750
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The anticancer activities of gambogic acid (GA) on two hepatocellular carcinoma cells with either p53 deletion (Hep3B) or p53 mutation (Huh7) were investigated in the present study. GA inhibited the growth of Hep3B and Huh7 through similar apoptotic pathways. After treatment of Hep3B and Huh7 with GA for 24 h, the IC50 was determined for both cell lines at 1.8 and 2.2 µM, respectively. The results showed that both cancer cells underwent morphological changes and DNA fragmentation. GA induced apoptosis in the two cell lines through caspases-3/7, -8 and -9 in the mitochondrial pathway. The results suggest that both the caspases in the extrinsic death receptor pathway and the mitochondrial-dependent pathway are involved in the GA-induced cell apoptosis. The inhibitory effects of GA on Hep3B and Huh7 are independent of p53-associated pathway.

Introduction

Liver cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. Herbal medicine is a valid source of new therapeutic agents since an immense chemical diversity is found in different herb medicines. Some of the active principles from herbal medicines have been isolated and characterized for cancer drug development. Herbal medicine offers promise with its complementary role in the cancer treatment with cancer drugs. Gambogic acid (GA) is one of the naturally occurring compounds present in a brownish-to-orange resin called gamboge, which is derived from Garcinia hanburyi (Fig. 1). Garcinia hanburyi has a long history of medicinal use in Southeast Asia, and it is used as a folk medicine and coloring agent (1). An improved separation method for the determination of twelve xanthones in gamboges from Garcinia hanburyi enabled researchers to purify GA from Garcinia hanburyi(2). Previous studies have reported that GA has potent antitumor activity via induction of reactive oxygen species accumulation which consequently led to apoptosis of SMMC-7721 cells (3). GA was reported to covalently modify IκB kinase β subunit to inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of NF-κB in macrophages (4). Other studies showed GA mediated the control of nucleophosmin and nucleoporins in the programmed cell death of Jurkat cells (5). GA caused microtubule depolymerization and phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase-1 leading to cell cycle arrest in MCF-7 cells (6). The induction of apoptosis in cancer cells is vital in cancer treatment. The present study explored the antitumor activity of GA in Hep3B and Huh7 human liver cancer cell lines.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

Trypsin-EDTA (1X), Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM), Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium, penicillin-streptomycin (PS) antibiotic mixture (100X) and qualified fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Invitrogen. Chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade purchased from Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO, USA. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Fisher Scientific, USA. Bromophenol Blue, Agarose, Tris-Base, Boric Acid, NaCl and SDS powder were ordered from USB, Cleveland, OH, USA. Ethanol was purchased from BDH.

Cell culture and treatment

Hep3B, Huh7 and WRL68 were purchased from ATCC and cultured according to their protocols. GA was a generous gift from the Chinese Medicine Laboratory, Hong Kong Jockey Club Institute of Chinese Medicine, and was isolated by the established method (2). GA was prepared by dissolving 4 mg of dry GA into 1 ml of DMSO. Cancer cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at the density of 5.0×105 cells/well and treated with various concentrations of GA for 24 h. Methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) solution (5 mg/ml) was added to the assay mixture and incubated for 4 h. The culture media was removed prior to addition of DMSO. Each experiment with GA treatment was repeated three times. By comparing the absorbance of the wells of cells treated with different concentrations of GA with the control, the viability of cells after GA treatment was calculated. The concentration of GA that reduced the cell viability of 50% (IC50) was recorded.

DNA extraction

The 100 bp DNA ladder was from Fermentas and the Cell Death Detection ELISA kit was purchased from Roche Applied Science. The cell samples were processed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The supernatant was subsequently removed and the DNA pellet was allowed to air dry for 15 to 20 min. TE buffer (20–50 μl) containing 0.2 mg/ml of RNase A was added to the DNA pellet. The samples were incubated at 37°C for 90 min to completely dissolve the sample. The DNA solution (2 μl) was added to 998 μl TE buffer and the concentration was measured using UV spectrophotometry (DU 650; Beckman-Coulter) with OD260.

DNA agarose gel electrophoresis

Ten microliters of the dissolved DNA samples were mixed with 2 μl 6X DNA loading dye. The mixtures were loaded on the 2% agarose gel and run at 75V for 1 h. The DNA bands were examined under UV illuminator and the gel was photographed for documentation.

DAPI stain

Changes in cell morphology during apoptosis were examined by fluorescence microscopy of DAPI-stained cells. The monolayer of cells was washed in PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. The fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS three times and incubated with 1 μg/ml of DAPI for 30 min. The cells were washed with PBS three times. The apoptotic nuclei (intensely stained, fragmented nuclei and condensed chromatin) were examined under ×400 magnification using a fluorescent microscope with a 340/380 nm excitation filter for at least two investigations.

Cell death detection with ELISA

ELISA was carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). The cells were incubated with different concentrations of GA in a 96-well plate for 24 h prior to centrifugation at 200 × g for 10 min. The lysis buffer (200 μl) was added to lyse the cell pellet. The plate was kept at room temperature for 30 min prior to centrifugation at 200 × g for 10 min. The supernatant (20 μl) was placed in the streptavidin-coated plate for analysis. The immunoreagent (80 μl) was added to the well and covered by aluminum foil with shaking at 300 rpm for 2 h. The solution in each well was removed and the well was rinsed with 250 μl incubation buffer three times. ABTS solution of 100 μl was added into the wells prior to shaking in the plate shaker at 250 rpm for color development. After 10–20 min, 100 μl ABTS Stop Solution was added to stop the reaction and the well was measured at 405 nm. Absorbance of wells was recorded and the enrichment factor, which shows the extent of apoptosis in the GA-treated cells, was calculated by the following expression: (absorbance of the GA-treated sample-blank)/(absorbance of the vehicle-treated sample-blank).

Protein expression in GA-induced cells

The antibodies, anti-p53, anti-Bcl-2, anti-Bax, anti-caspase-8 and anti-PARP, were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Anti-cytochrome c, anti-Bid and anti-GAPDH were purchased from BD Pharmingen. For HRP-secondary antibodies, anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies were obtained from Invitrogen. Cells (1×106) were seeded into a 100 mm dish. Different concentrations of GA were added prior to incubation for 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. The cell samples were spun at 14,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant of the samples was collected for protein concentration determination according to the Bio-Rad Protein Assay protocol.

Extraction of cytosolic and mitochondrial protein fraction

Cells were collected and counted prior to the addition of the cytosolic protein lysis buffer (50 μl). The sample was vortexed for 30 sec and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 1 min at 4°C. A volume of 2X SDS sample loading buffer was added to the supernatant. The whole cell lysis buffer and 2X SDS sample loading buffer were added to completely lyse the sample.

Protein gel electrophoresis by SDS-PAGE

The electrophoresis system, Mini-PROTEAN® II cell from Bio-Rad, was used to perform sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The resolving gel solution (10%) was set and poured into the gel casting form. The top of the gel was layered with 50 μl of isopropanol and the gel was left for 30 min. Stacking gel solution (4%) was added onto the top of the resolving gel. A 15-tooth comb was inserted and the gel was allowed to polymerize for 40 min. The samples mixed with 2X sample loading dye were boiled at 100°C for 10 min. After samples were loaded onto the wells, the gel was run at constant voltage at 150 V for 1 h in 1X running buffer.

Western blotting

The SDS-PAGE was completed when the dye front (blue in color) reached the bottom of the gel. The gel was removed and immersed into transfer buffer. The Whatman 3 MM paper (6 pieces/gel) and PVDF membrane were cut into the same dimension as the resolving gel. The PVDF membrane was washed with 100% methanol for 1 min and was immersed into the transfer buffer. The Whatman papers were soaked into the transfer buffer. A gel sandwich was assembled with the PVDF membrane and the resolving gel layered between two stacks of Whatman papers in the semi-dry Trans-Blot electroblotter (Bio-Rad). Proteins were transferred to the membrane at constant voltage at 10 V for 1.5 h. The membrane was collected and rinsed briefly with TBST buffer. Then, the membrane was immersed into blocking solution with primary antibody for 16 h at 4°C with continuous agitation. The primary antibody used was mouse monoclonal anti-p53 (1:1,000), anti-BID (1:1,000), anti-Bcl-2 (1:1,000), anti-Bax (1:500), anti-cytochrome c (1:2,000), anti-caspase-8 (1:1,000), anti-PARP (1:1,000), anti-transferrin receptor (1:1,000) and anti-GAPDH (1:5,000). The unbound primary antibody was removed by washing with TBST for 20 min, thrice. The membrane was immersed into secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse HRP/mouse anti-rabbit HRP) for 1 h at room temperature with slow agitation. The excess antibody was removed by washing with TBST three times (20 min). Millipore Immobilon Western HRP kit (0.5 ml of each reagent) was applied to the membrane for 3 to 5 min. After removing excess reagent, protein bands on the membrane were visualized and recorded on Fuji Super RX film (Fujifilm). Intensity of the bands was measured using ImageJ program.

Immunoprecipitation

Cells were seeded into 100 mm dishes. After 24 h, different concentrations of GA (2, 1, 0.5 μM) were added before incubation for another 24 h. The cells were collected and lysed in CHAPS buffer. The concentration of the lysate was measured and diluted 500 μg protein/500 μl buffer. The anti-Bax 6A7 monoclonal antibody (2 μg) was added to the diluted lysate and the mixture was incubated overnight at 4°C. After the incubation, 25 μl of protein A-agarose gel bead was added and the lysate was incubated for 3 h. The gel beads were washed three times using the CHAPS buffer and collected by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min. The sample loading dye (50 μl) was added to the beads prior to boiling for 10 min, followed by a centrifugation of 14,000 × g at 4°C. The supernatant was subjected to western blot analysis using mouse anti-Bax antibody.

Caspase cascade study of GA-induced cancer cells

Apo-One™ caspase-3/7 assay kit was purchased from Promega. Caspase inhibitor z-IETD-fmk and z-LEDH-fmk were from Calbiochem. Trypan blue was purchased from Invitrogen. Hemocytometer was obtained from Sigma Chemicals. Caspase-3/7 activity was examined using Apo-One™ Caspase-3/7 Assay kit (Promega). Cells (Hep3B or Huh7) were seeded in a 96-well plate in the medium for 24 h followed by GA treatment of the cell lines. Subsequently, z-DEVD-rhodamine 110 from the assay kit was added into the well. After 2 h of incubation at room temperature, the fluorescence intensity of the wells was measured by a fluorescence plate reader at excitation 492 nm and emission 535 nm.

Results

GA induces apoptosis in hepatocellular cells

The effects of GA on the viability of Hep3B and Huh7 were investigated using MTT assay. GA effectively reduced the viability of cancer cells after incubation for 24 h. The IC50 of GA for Hep3B was 1.8 and 2.2 μM for Huh7 (Figs. 2 and 3). After treatment of cells with GA, cell shrinkage and budding were recorded. DNA fragmentation and condensation were visualized by the DAPI staining investigation using fluorescence microscopy (Figs. 4 and 5). DNA fragmentation was detected after GA treatment in HCC cell lines (Fig. 5). The amount of cytosolic DNA fragment was determined with cell ELISA kit (Fig. 6). The results showed that the amount of DNA in the cytosol significantly increased after addition of GA. Apoptosis is characterized by the occurrence of cell shrinkage and membrane blebbing (7). In addition, chromatin condensation and DNA cleavage shown by DAPI staining (Fig. 4) also indicated apoptosis (8). To avoid ambiguity, DNA fragmentation, another hallmark of apoptosis, was examined after the treatment of GA on the cell lines for 24 h. The result of agarose gel electrophoresis showed the presence of DNA ladders (Fig. 5). During apoptosis, mono- and oligo-nucleosomes are released into the cytoplasm before the plasma membrane breaks down (9,10). The cytoplasmic content of the tested cells was collected and the amount of released DNA was detected by the ELISA kit. The results showed that following GA treatment, the levels of cytoplasmic DNA in HCC cells was markedly elevated (Fig. 7). These results provide evidence that GA mediated cell death through apoptosis.

Caspase cascade studies in GA-induced apoptosis

To study caspase activity in the GA-induced apoptosis, Apo-One™ Caspase-3/7 Assay was used. An increase of caspase-3/7 activity was found in the two HCC cells after GA treatment (Fig. 7). The activation of caspase-8 in the death receptor pathway and caspase-9 in the mitochondrial pathway were determined using western blot analysis (Figs. 810). The results indicate that the cleavage of the active form of caspases-8 and -9 after GA-treatment occurred in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. 11).

Caspase-8 activation in GA-treated cells leads to Bid cleavage

The involvement of Bid and its relationship with caspase-8 activation in GA-induced apoptosis were investigated. Full length Bid (24 kDa) was found to be cleaved in a time- and dose-dependent manner upon GA treatment (Fig. 12). A cell fractionation experiment was performed to investigate the level of tBid in the mitochondria. Fig. 13 indicates an accumulation of tBid in the mitochondria in the HCC cell line.

GA induces Bax conformational changes and cytochrome c release

It has been reported that Bax plays an important role in Bid-mediated apoptosis through conformational change and mediation of signaling process (11,12). Fig. 14 shows that the expression level of Bax was constant in GA-induced apoptosis. In order to further examine the role of Bax in GA-induced apoptosis, immunoprecipitation (IP) of Bax using Bax (6A7) monoclonal antibody was performed. This antibody recognizes the Bax protein with conformational change but not the native form (11). It was reported that the conformational change of Bax was triggered by the truncated form of Bid (tBid) (13). This tBid is subsequently translocated to the mitochondria with Bax. The translocation of tBid to mitochondria was shown in western blot analysis (Fig. 15). Cytochrome c, which is originally present in the mitochondria, was released.

Discussion

In the present study we provided insights into the effects of GA on the inhibition of two different types of liver cancer cells. Present chemotherapy based on the treatment of liver cancer with drugs is not yet satisfactory. Specific anticancer agents against different types of liver cancer need to be developed. We demonstrated that GA induced apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway in two types of liver cancer cells. p53 protein is a crucial factor in cellular stress responses and acts as an essential tumor suppressor (14). Upon activation, p53 controls the signaling process associated with the cell cycle based on the severity of the DNA damage. Thus, it can inhibit cell cycle progression or induce apoptosis. More than 50% of human tumors have been reported to have p53 mutations which affect p53 function. We found that GA induced caspase-associated apoptotic pathway which is important for induction of caspase-regulated apoptosis. We detected caspase protein in both cancer cells. The two HCC cell lines differ in the expression of one tumor suppressor protein, p53. Hep3B is with deleted p53 while Huh7 has mutated p53. Both cells are p53 deficient. p53, also known as tumor protein 53, is a tumor suppressor protein that in humans is encoded by the TP53 gene. p53 plays a crucial role in regulation of the cell cycle. The functions of the tumor suppressor gene have become an important target to prevent cancer. As such, p53 has been described as ‘the guardian of the genome’ due to its pivotal role in conserving the stability of genome and preventing mutation (14). p53 tumor suppressor is one of our defenses against damage due to radiation, carcinogens and viruses. When DNA damage occurs, p53 levels rise and initiate protective measures. p53 binds to several regulatory sites in the genome that consequently halts cell division through the process of programmed cell death, or apoptosis. The mediation of p53 provides a common drug target for cancer development. However, the regulation of cell cycle in p53-deficient cells may be through different apoptotic pathways. A recent study showed that p53 can mediate apoptosis by repression of HPV oncogenes and upregulation of tumor suppressor proteins in human cancer cells (15). Hep3B contains an integrated hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome in the cell which is highly associated with HCC development. However, the present findings showed that GA induces apoptosis in Hep3B and Huh7 cell death through caspases and is independent of p53-associated pathway. The results suggest the operative role of GA may be involved in killing HBV genome integrated in HCC through regulation of other apoptotic processes. A previous study indicated that GA has no influence on the viability of primary cultured rat hepatocytes (16), suggesting that GA causes less harm to normal liver cells than to its cancer counterparts. These findings also reveal that the apoptosis of liver cancer cells is regulated by different complex systems involving large numbers of molecules and that GA-mediated signaling is only part of the regulatory system. The existence of the p53-independent regulatory signals in apoptosis in liver cancer cells may represent an alternate approach for inhibition of cancer cell growth to avoid complete liver damage. To investigate the possible mechanism that led to the cell death of Hep3B and Huh7 cells, different parameters related to apoptosis including cell shrinkage and budding, DNA fragmentation and condensation, as well as cytosolic DNA content were measured. Both the death receptor pathway and the mitochondrial pathway were found to be involved in GA-induced apoptosis. Several studies showed that Bid is an important pro-apoptotic protein in cross-linking the extrinsic cell death receptor signaling pathway to mitochondria upon caspase-8-mediated cleavage (17). These findings are consistent with the previous report that integration of Bax and tBid to the outer membrane followed by the release of cytochrome c is a possible prerequisite for the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (13,18). GA induces apoptosis in p53-deficient cancer cells. GA exerts inhibitory effects on Hep3B and Huh7 cell lines through similar mode of action. Based on these results, it seems unlikely that GA-induced apoptosis is due to the p53 status. This study showed the anticancer activity of GA is mediated via both the caspases in the extrinsic death receptor pathway and the mitochondria-dependent pathway. The present study demonstrated that deletion or deficiency of p53 does not affect cell cycle. The present results indicate that GA positively regulates the cancer cell apoptosis. Therefore, GA activity in liver cancer cells may represent one of the molecular mechanisms involved in anticancer agent-induced apoptosis. The low concentration of GA towards cancer cells is one of the fundamental criteria for efficient drug development and targeting. The results suggest that GA can be developed as an anticancer drug for p53-deficient cancer cells. The present study on GA may provide a promising therapeutic strategy for different types of liver cancer.

Acknowledgements

This study was in part supported by grant no. 6903292 kindly provided by Luck Tissue MFY Ltd. We thank Mr. Matt Cheung for his technical assistance.

References

1 

Asano J, Chiba K, Tada M and Yoshii T: Cytotoxic xanthones from Garcinia hanburyi. Phytochemistry. 41:815–820. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Li S, Song JZ, Han QB, Qiao CF and Xu HX: Improved high-performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of 12 cytotoxic caged xanthones in gamboges, a potential anticancer resin from Garcinia hanburyi. Biomed Chromatogr. 22:637–644. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Nie F, Zhang X, Qi Q, Yang L, Yang Y, Liu W, Lu N, Wu Z, You Q and Guo Q: Reactive oxygen species accumulation contributes to gambogic acid-induced apoptosis in human hepatoma SMMC-7721 cells. Toxicology. 260:60–67. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Palempalli UD, Gandhi U, Kalantari P, Vunta H, Arner RJ, Narayan V, Ravindran A and Prabhu KS: Gambogic acid covalently modifies IkappaB kinase-beta subunit to mediate suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of NF-kappaB in macrophages. Biochem J. 419:401–409. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Shu W, Chen Y, Li R, Wu Q, Cui G, Ke W and Chen Z: Involvement of regulations of nucleophosmin and nucleoporins in gambogic acid-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 103:530–537. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Chen J, Gu H, Lu N, Yang Y, Liu W, Qi Q, Rong J, Wang XT, You QD and Guo QL: Microtubule depolymerization and phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase-1 and p38 were involved in gambogic acid induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells. Life Sci. 83:103–109. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Bortner CD and Cidlowski JA: Cell shrinkage and monovalent cation fluxes: role in apoptosis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 462:176–188. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Oberhammer FA, Hochegger K, Fröschl G, Tiefenbacher R and Pavelka M: Chromatin condensation during apoptosis is accompanied by degradation of lamin A+B, without enhanced activation of cdc2 kinase. J Cell Biol. 126:827–837. 1994.

9 

Bonfoco E, Krainc D, Ankarcrona M, Nicotera P and Lipton SA: Apoptosis and necrosis: two distinct events induced, respectively, by mild and intense insults with N-methyl-D-aspartate or nitric oxide/superoxide in cortical cell cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:7162–7166. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Duke RC and Cohen JJ: IL-2 addiction: withdrawal of growth factor activates a suicide program in dependent T cells. Lymphokine Res. 5:289–299. 1986.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Nechushtan A, Smith CL, Hsu YT and Youle RJ: Conformation of the Bax C-terminus regulates subcellular location and cell death. EMBO J. 18:2330–2341. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Zhang S, Zhao S, Bai L, Guan M, Mo J and Lan L: Melatonin restores normal Bax and Bcl-2 protein expression in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus in pinealectomized rats. Neural Regen Res. 6:2129–2133. 2011.

13 

Gross A, Jockel J, Wei MC and Korsmeyer SJ: Enforced dimerization of BAX results in its translocation, mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. EMBO J. 17:3878–3885. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Latonen L and Laiho M: Cellular UV damage response - functions of tumor suppressor p53. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1755:71–89. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Munagala R, Kausar H, Munjal C and Gupta RC: Withaferin A induces p53-dependent apoptosis by repression of HPV oncogenes and upregulation of tumor suppressor proteins in human cervical cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 32:1697–1705. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Yang Y, Yang L, You QD, Nie FF, Gu HY, Zhao L, Wang XT and Guo QL: Differential apoptotic induction of gambogic acid, a novel anticancer natural product, on hepatoma cells and normal hepatocytes. Cancer Lett. 256:259–266. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Li H, Zhu H, Xu C and Yuan J: Cleavage of BID by caspase mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas pathway of apoptosis. Cell. 94:491–501. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Li L, Lu N, Dai Q, Wei L, Zhao Q, Li Z, He Q, Dai Y and Guo Q: GL-V9, a newly synthetic flavonoid derivative, induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 670:13–21. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May 2013
Volume 29 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

The Cancer Story
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lee PN and Lee PN: Antiproliferative activity of gambogic acid isolated from Garcinia hanburyi in Hep3B and Huh7 cancer cells. Oncol Rep 29: 1744-1750, 2013
APA
Lee, P.N., & Lee, P.N. (2013). Antiproliferative activity of gambogic acid isolated from Garcinia hanburyi in Hep3B and Huh7 cancer cells. Oncology Reports, 29, 1744-1750. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2291
MLA
Lee, P. N., Ho, W. S."Antiproliferative activity of gambogic acid isolated from Garcinia hanburyi in Hep3B and Huh7 cancer cells". Oncology Reports 29.5 (2013): 1744-1750.
Chicago
Lee, P. N., Ho, W. S."Antiproliferative activity of gambogic acid isolated from Garcinia hanburyi in Hep3B and Huh7 cancer cells". Oncology Reports 29, no. 5 (2013): 1744-1750. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2291