Correlation and prognostic value of osteopontin and Bcl-2 in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative resection

Introduction

Osteopontin (OPN), a secreted non-collagenous, sialic-acid-rich, chemokine-like extracellular matrix (ECM) protein, has been implicated as an important mediator and a potential therapeutic target of cancer metastasis (1). OPN could inhibit the apoptosis of adherent endothelial cells induced by growth factors and cytokine depletion by enhancing Bcl-xL expression (2). Bcl-2 has been demonstrated to play important roles in the development and progression of several types of cancer (3–5), and can be an independent predictor of cancer outcome (6,7). Bcl-2 has also been found to play an important role in resistance to 5-fluorouracil-caused cell death of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (8). In a previous report, OPN silencing reduced the expression of integrin αv, β1 and β3, blocked NF-κB activation, suppressed Bcl-2/Bcl-xL and XIAP expression, increased Bax expression, and induced a mitochondria-mediated apoptosis (9). However, the correlation between OPN and BCL-2 in HCC and their potential roles in prognosis remain unclear.

In the present study, we examined the expression levels of OPN and Bcl-2 in HCC cell lines and tumor tissues from 454 cases of HCC patients to investigate the correlation between OPN and Bcl-2 and its prognostic values for HCC patients. We found that the combination of OPN and Bcl-2 could provide prognostic information for HCC patients. Bcl-2 levels may be regulated by OPN in the HCC microenvironment.

Materials and methods

Patients and cell lines

Four hundred and fifty-four patients undergoing curative resection for HCC at the Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between 2004 and 2006, were enrolled in this study. For each patient, the diagnosis of HCC was confirmed by pathologic examination and complete follow-up data were available. The clinicopathologic characteristics of patients in the tumor tissue microarray (TMA) are summarized in Table I. Follow-up was completed in March 2012. The mean survival was 61.6±1.9 months. Follow-up after surgery included serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), ultrasonography and chest X-ray every 2–3 months according to the postoperative time (8,10). The diagnosis of recurrence was based on typical imaging appearance in computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging scan and an elevated AFP level. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and mortality. Time to recurrence (TTR) was defined as the time between the start of surgery and the first report of recurrence (excluding patients who succumbed to non-liver cancer causes before recurrence) (11,12). For patients who had not experienced a recurrence at the time of mortality or last follow-up, TTR was censored at the date of mortality or the last follow-up.

Table I Associations between OPN/BCL-2 density as detected by immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays and clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patients (n=454).

Table I

Associations between OPN/BCL-2 density as detected by immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays and clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patients (n=454).

	Tumoral OPN density, n			Tumoral BCL-2 density, n
Variable	High (n=227)	Low (n=227)	P-value	High (n=227)	Low (n=227)	P-value
Gender
Female	35	42	0.381	39	38	0.901
Male	192	185		188	189
Age, years
≤51	123	111	0.260	117	117	1.000
>51	104	116		110	110
Preoperative AFP (ng/ml)
≤20	86	79	0.495	78	87	0.380
>20	141	148		149	140
HBsAg
Negative	26	10	0.006	19	17	0.728
Positive	201	217		208	210
Liver cirrhosis
No	22	25	0.664	27	20	0.281
Yes	205	202		200	207
ALT (units/l)
≤75	200	200	1.000	200	200	1.000
>75	27	27		27	27
Tumor size (cm)
≤5	157	174	0.073	158	173	0.113
>5	70	53		69	54
Tumor encapsulation
Complete	122	114	0.452	108	128	0.060
None	105	113		119	99
Vascular invasion
No	161	145	0.109	152	154	0.841
Yes	66	82		75	73
BCLC stage
A	151	143	0.432	147	147	1.000
B/C	76	84		80	80
Tumor differentiation
I–II	190	156	<0.001	169	177	0.378
III–IV	37	71		58	50

[i] ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; NS, not significant (χ² tests). χ² tests were conducted for all analyses. OPN, osteopontin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma. AFP, α-fetoprotein.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Shanghai, China). Snap-frozen or paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were obtained from these patients after receiving written informed consent. Fresh tissues for western blotting were collected immediately after resection, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C.

MHCC97-H and MHCC97-L (human HCC cell lines with different metastatic potentials established by authors’ institute from the same parent cell line), SMMC-7721, HepG2 cells (low-metastatic; American Type Culture Collection) were used in this study. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-BRL, New York, NY, USA) at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.

Tissue microarray immunohistochemistry analysis for OPN and Bcl-2

Tissue microarrays were constructed as previously described (13). Briefly, duplicate 1-mm-diameter cylinders were obtained from 2 different areas of the donor blocks and transferred to the recipient paraffin block at defined array positions (Shanghai Biochip Co., Ltd.). Consecutive 4-μm-thick sections were obtained on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-coated slides (14).

Immunohistochemistry was carried out using a two-step protocol according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the sections were dewaxed in xylene and graded alcohols, hydrated, and washed in PBS. After endogenous peroxidase was inhibited by 3% H2O2 for 30 min, the sections were pretreated in a microwave oven (14 min in sodium citrate buffer; pH=6), nonspecific binding sites were blocked with Protein Block (Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), and then the tissues were incubated with primary antibodies for 12 h in a moist chamber at 4°C. Primary antibodies used for detecting the expression levels of OPN and Bcl-2 were mouse anti-human OPN antibody (1:100) and rabbit anti-human Bcl-2 antibody (1:100; both from Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The components of the Envision-plus detection system were applied (EnVision+/HRP/Mo; Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). Reaction products were visualized by incubation with 3,3-diaminobenzidine solution. Negative controls were treated identically but with the primary antibodies omitted (12).

The images of 4 representative fields were captured by the Leica QWin Plus version 3 software and identical settings were used for each image under high-power magnification (x200). The density of positive staining was evaluated using a Leica CCD camera DFC420 connected to a Leica DMIRE2 microscope (Leica Microsystems Imaging Solutions, Cambridge, UK) and a computer. The OPN and Bcl-2 densities were determined by Image-Pro Plus version 5.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA) as previously described (10). Uniform settings were used for each antibody staining. The IOD of all positive staining in each image was measured and the density of each antibody was calculated as the product of IOD/total area.

Western blot analysis

The protein levels of OPN and Bcl-2 in cell lines and tumor tissues were evaluated via western blot analysis. Total protein was extracted in lysis buffer for 45 min on ice. Equal amounts of protein of each sample (50 μg) were denatured by heating at 100°C for 5 min with Laemmli loading buffer, and subsequently loaded on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore). Primary antibodies against OPN (1:1,000) and Bcl-2 (1:1,000) (Abcam) were used. A monoclonal antibody against GAPDH (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) was used as the internal control. The bands were quantified using Gel-Pro Analyzer 4.0 (Media Cybernetics). The OPN/GAPDH and Bcl-2/GAPDH ratios were calculated for relative quantization. Each experiment was repeated at least 3 times.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival and recurrence curves and to estimate OS and TTR. The log-rank test was used to compare TTR and OS between patients in different groups. The Spearman’s rank and Fisher’s exact tests were applied to demonstrate clinicopathological correlations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards model. Student’s t-test was used for the comparison of data between groups; if variances within groups were not homogeneous, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used. Values are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. p<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. For OPN and Bcl-2 density, the cutoff for the definition of subgroups was the median value.

Results

OPN and Bcl-2 expression in HCC cell lines

After assessing OPN and Bcl-2 expression levels in MHCC97-H, MHCC97-L, HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cell lines by western blot analysis, we found that OPN expression increased with increasing metastatic potential in human HCC cell lines while Bcl-2 decreased with increasing metastatic potential (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1 Protein expression levels of OPN and Bcl-2 in HCC tissues and cell lines by western blotting. (A) OPN expressed highly in recurrent tumor tissues but low in non-recurrent ones. The trend of Bcl-2 expression was the opposite. In the relative quantitative analysis below, OPN was significantly higher in recurrent than in non-recurrent tumor tissue (**p<0.001). Bcl-2 was significantly higher in non-recurrent than in recurrent tumor tissue (*p=0.046). (B) OPN and Bcl-2 expression levels were detected by western blotting in MHCC97-H, MHCC97-L, HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cell lines. Relative quantization is also shown. OPN expression increased with increasing metastatic potential in human HCC cell lines. Bcl-2 decreased with increasing metastatic potential. (C) Expression levels of OPN and Bcl-2 in MHCC97-H cells transfected with mock, shNon and shOPN. Expression levels of OPN in MHCC97-H cells transfected with shOPN decreased significantly compared with mock and shNon. Bcl-2 expression increased significantly in shOPN MHCC97-H cells. A monoclonal antibody against GAPDH was used as an internal control. OPN, osteopontin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

To investigate the association between OPN and BCL2, we analyzed the expression level of BCL2 in HCCLM3 cells transfected with lentiviral vectors with specific miRNAs for OPN, whose OPN levels were previously analyzed (9); Bcl-2 expression increased significantly in HCCLM3 cells when OPN was knocked down (Fig. 1C).

Expression of OPN and Bcl-2 in HCC

OPN expressed highly in recurrent tumor tissue but low in non-recurrent ones by western blotting. Bcl-2 was expressed low in recurrent tumor tissue and low in non-recurrent ones. In the relative quantitative analysis below, OPN was significantly higher in recurrent tumor tissue than in non-recurrent ones (**p<0.001). Bcl-2 was significantly higher in non-recurrent than in recurrent tumor tissue (*p=0.046) (Fig. 1A).

The positive staining for OPN was mainly found in HCC cells in the peripheral region of cancer nodules, rather than in the noncancerous hepatocytes. OPN staining was localized in the cytoplasm of HCC cells. Immunoreactivity for Bcl-2 was observed both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of HCC cells (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 Different expression status of OPN and Bcl-2 detected by immunohistochemical staining in the consecutive sections of HCC tissues from the same patient. (A) HCC of case 342 is high OPN expression; (B) case 342 is high Bcl-2 expression; (C) case 308 is high OPN expression; (D) case 308 is low Bcl-2 expression; (E) case 336 is low OPN expression; (F) case 336 is high Bcl-2 expression; (G) case 336 is low OPN expression. (H) case 336 is low Bcl-2 expression. Positive cells were stained brown (magnification, ×100); bar=100 μm. OPN, osteopontin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

As shown in Table I, high OPN expression in tumor tissue was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation (p<0.001) and HBsAg level (p=0.006). However, no statistically significant association was found between the Bcl-2 expression and these clinical characteristics.

Prognostic value of OPN and Bcl-2 in 454 HCC patients

Using IOD median value as the cutoff value, 454 HCC patients were divided into 2 groups. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year OS rates of high-OPN patients (75.9, 54.6, 46.9 and 42.7%, respectively) were significantly lower than those of low-OPN patients (87.1, 72.4, 64 and 55.2%, respectively; p=0.002) (Fig. 3A). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year recurrence rates of high-OPN patients (41.1, 46.6, 51.9 and 57.3%, respectively) were much higher than those of low-OPN patients (23.8, 33.9, 42.2 and 48.4%, respectively; p=0.025) (Fig. 3B). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year OS rates of high-Bcl-2 patients (84.3, 68.9, 63.4 and 57.8%, respectively) were significantly lower than those of low-Bcl-2 patients (78.7, 58.3, 47.8 and 40.5%, respectively; p=0.001) (Fig. 3C). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year tumor recurrence rates of high Bcl-2 patients (24.9, 32.7, 42.0 and 48.9%, respectively) were much higher than those of low Bcl-2 patients (39.6, 46.0, 51.9 and 57.0%, respectively; p=0.019) (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3 Prognostic significance assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. (A and B) The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year overall survival rates (log-rank test, p=0.002; 87.1, 72.4, 64 and 55.2%, respectively for low OPN patients, vs. 75.9, 54.6, 46.9 and 42.7%, respectively for high OPN patients) and cumulative recurrence rates (p=0.025; 23.8, 33.9, 42.2 and 48.4%, respectively for low OPN patients, vs. 41.1, 46.6, 51.9 and 57.3%, respectively for high OPN patients) of low OPN patients were significantly different from those of high OPN patients. (C and D) The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year overall survival rates (p=0.001; 78.7, 58.3, 47.8 and 40.5%, respectively for low Bcl-2 patients, vs. 84.3, 68.9, 63.4 and 57.8%, respectively for high Bcl-2 patients) and cumulative recurrence rates (p=0.019; 39.6, 46.0, 51.9 and 57.0%, respectively for low Bcl-2 patients, vs. 24.9, 32.7, 42.0 and 48.9%, respectively for high Bcl-2 patients) of low Bcl-2 patients were significantly different from those of high Bcl-2 patients. (E and F) By combining OPN and Bcl-2, the 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year overall survival rates (p<0.001; 89.0, 75.6, 72.0 and 67.1%, respectively for group II, vs. 70.3, 43.9, 35.3 and 33.1%, respectively for group III) and cumulative recurrence rates (p=0.001; 21.3, 29.0, 39.9 and 44.3%, respectively for group II, vs. 55.7, 59.3, 60.7 and 60.7%, respectively for group III) of group II patients were significantly different from those of group III patients. Group I, patients with high OPN and high Bcl-2 (n=125); group II, patients with high OPN and low Bcl-2 (n=102); group III, patients with low OPN and high Bcl-2 (n=102); group IV, low OPN and low Bcl-2 (n=125). OPN, osteopontin.

Combined value of OPN and Bcl-2 to predict OS or TTR

Based on the expression levels of OPN and Bcl-2, we stratified the 454 HCC patients into four groups: Group I, patients with high OPN and high Bcl-2 (n=125); Group II, high OPN and low Bcl-2 (n=102); Group III, low OPN and high Bcl-2 (n=102); Group IV, low OPN and low Bcl-2 (n=125). The patients of Group II (high OPN/low Bcl-2) had much shorter OS and TTR compared with those of Group III (low OPN/high Bcl-2). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year OS rates of Group II (89.0%, 75.6%, 72.0% and 67.1%, respectively) were significantly lower compared with Group III (70.3%, 43.9%, 35.3% and 33.1%, respectively; p<0.001) (Fig. 3E). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year recurrence rates of Group II (21.3%, 29.0%, 39.9% and 44.3%, respectively) were significantly lower than those of patients in Group III (55.7%, 59.3%, 60.7% and 60.7%, respectively; p=0.001) (Fig. 3F).

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic values of OPN and Bcl-2 in HCC patients

To further evaluate the prognostic value of OPN and Bcl-2 for HCC patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the clinicopathological characteristics as well as the OPN and Bcl-2 levels (Tables II and III). In the univariate analysis, serum AFP level, tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, BCLC stage, tumor differentiation and tumor encapsulation were shown to be associated with OS of HCC patients, and serum AFP, tumor size, vascular invasion, BCLC stage with TTR. The OPN and Bcl-2 expression levels in HCC tissues were also significantly associated with both OS and TTR.

Table II Univariate analyses of factors associated with overall survival and time to recurrence.

Table II

Univariate analyses of factors associated with overall survival and time to recurrence.

	Overall survival		Time to recurrence
Variable	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P-value	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P-value
Gender (male vs. female)	0.974 (0.687–1.382)	0.882	1.066 (0.735–1.545)	0.737
Age, years (>52 vs. ≤52)	1.057 (0.812–1.377)	0.679	1.056 (0.806–1.382)	0.694
AFP (ng/ml; >20 vs. ≤20)	1.597 (1.196–2.131)	0.001	1.411 (1.061–1.875)	0.018
HBsAg (positive vs. negative)	1.766 (0.999–3.122)	0.050	2.224 (1.188–4.162)	0.012
Liver cirrhosis (yes vs. no)	1.464 (0.892–2.401)	0.131	1.625 (0.976–2.706)	0.062
ALT (units/l; >75 vs. ≤75)	1.062 (0.710–1.590)	0.768	0.910 (0.595–1.393)	0.666
Tumor size (cm; >5 vs. ≤5)	1.758 (1.327–2.329)	<0.001	1.639 (1.220–2.202)	0.001
Tumor number (multiple vs. single)	1.468 (0.917–2.350)	0.110	0.919 (0.524–1.612)	0.769
Vascular invasion (yes vs. no)	2.041 (1.560–2.671)	<0.001	1.590 (1.197–2.112)	0.001
BCLC stage (B/C vs. A)	2.055 (1.573–2.684)	<0.001	1.527 (1.153–2.021)	0.003
Tumor differentiation (III–IV vs. I–II)	1.521 (1.132–2.045)	0.005	1.338 (0.980–1.827)	0.067
Tumor encapsulation (none vs. complete)	1.414 (1.085–1.844)	0.010	1.268 (0.968–1.660)	0.084
OPN (high vs. low)	1.530 (1.171–1.999)	0.002	1.359 (1.036–1.782)	0.027
Bcl-2 (high vs. low)	0.639 (0.489–0.836)	0.001	0.727 (0.554–0.953)	0.021
Combination of OPN and Bcl-2
Overall		<0.001		0.002
II vs. III	2.726 (1.784–4.164)	<0.0001	1.922 (1.285–2.876)	0.001

[i] Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AFP, α-fetoprotein; NS, not significant (Cox proportional hazards regression model); BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system; I, OPN high and Bcl-2 high; II, OPN high and Bcl-2 low; III, OPN low and Bcl-2 high; IV, OPN low and Bcl-2 low. OPN, osteopontin.

Table III Multivariate analyses of factors associated with overall survival and time to recurrence.

Table III

Multivariate analyses of factors associated with overall survival and time to recurrence.

	Overall survival		Time to recurrence
Variable	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P-value	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P-value
AFP (ng/ml; >20 vs. ≤20)	1.397 (1.038–1.880)	0.027	1.263 (0.941–1.694)	NS
Tumor size (cm; >5 vs. ≤5)	1.826 (1.364–2.444)	<0.001	1.697 (1.253–2.299)	0.001
HBsAg (positive vs. negative )	1.373 (0.767–2.458)	NS
Vascular invasion (yes vs. no )	1.648 (1.246–2.181)	<0.001	1.381 (1.029–1.855)	0.032
Tumor encapsulation (none vs. complete)	1.421 (1.084–1.863)	0.011
Tumor differentiation (III–IV vs. I–II)	1.187 (0.873–1.615)	NS
OPN (high vs. low)	1.652 (1.250–2.183)	<0.001	1.478 (1.115–1.959)	0.007
Bcl-2 (high vs. low)	0.532 (0.404–0.701)	<0.001	0.632 (0.478–0.835)	0.001
Combination of OPN and Bcl-2
Overall		<0.001		0.001
II vs. III	3.725 (2.330–5.954)	<0.0001	2.244 (1.469–3.429)	0.0002

[i] Multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AFP, α-fetoprotein; NS, not significant (Cox proportional hazards regression model); BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. I, OPN high and Bcl-2 high; II, OPN high and Bcl-2 low; III, OPN low and Bcl-2 high; IV, OPN low and Bcl-2 low. HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; OPN, osteopontin.

Individual characteristics that showed significance by univariate analysis were adopted as covariates in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, and then combined variables were further analyzed. Both OPN and Bcl-2 were demonstrated to be independent prognostic indicators for OS (p<0.001 both for OPN and Bcl-2) and TTR (p=0.004 for OPN, p=0.002 for Bcl-2). Moreover, combination of OPN with Bcl-2 was an even more powerful independent prognostic indicator for both OS (p<0.001) and TTR (p<0.001). Hazard ratio analysis showed Bcl-2 was a protective factor in HCC prognosis (Fig. 4C and D).

Figure 4 (A and B) ROC analysis was performed. For both mortality and recurrence, the predictive value of the combination was the best. FPF, false-positive fraction; TPF, true-positive fraction. (C and D) Clinicopathological factors showing significance by univariate survival analysis and the combination of OPN and Bcl-2 were adopted for hazard ratio analysis. As shown in the figure, Bcl-2 was a protective factor in HCC prognosis. OPN, osteopontin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

ROC analysis for OPN and Bcl-2

Clinicopathological factors showing significance by multivariate survival analysis and the combination of OPN and Bcl-2 were adopted for ROC analysis. For both mortality and recurrence, the predictive value of the combination of OPN and Bcl-2 was the best. The area under the curve of this combination was 0.622 (95% CI, 0.570–0.673; p<0.001) for mortality and 0.569 (95% CI, 0.516–0.622; p=0.011) for recurrence (Fig. 4A and B).

Discussion

The poor prognosis of HCC is often the result of late diagnosis or high rate of recurrence after surgery. Metastasis is a major complication of HCC pathogenesis that typifies a poor prognosis. Current approaches are hindered by a lack of clinically useful biomarkers. OPN has been implicated as an important mediator of tumor metastasis and has been investigated for use as a biomarker for advanced disease and as a potential therapeutic target in the regulation of cancer metastasis. It is a secreted multifunctional glycoprotein expressed at high levels in tumors and the surrounding stroma of numerous types of cancer, including liver (15–17). Increased serum and plasma OPN levels are associated with advanced-stage lung, breast (18), colon and prostate carcinomas (19,20). OPN expression can predict high-grade, late-stage and early-recurrence HCC (21).

Our previous study identified OPN as a predictive marker for HCC and a molecular target of the HCC metastatic phenotype. The data demonstrated a correlation between OPN mRNA expression and primary HCC metastasis (22). Furthermore, increased OPN levels were associated with increased aggressiveness and metastatic potential of HCC and positively correlated with poor prognosis and early tumor recurrence in HCC patients (23,24).

In vitro, we found that OPN expression increased with increasing metastatic potential in human HCC cell lines while Bcl-2 decreased with increasing metastatic potential. These data support the findings in HCC TMA and demonstrated that OPN may interact with Bcl-2 in HCC tumors and cells. Thus, we performed miRNAs for OPN in MHCC97-H cells which have a high expression level of OPN. We found that OPN decreased in shOPN MHCC97-H cells significantly compared with mock and shNon ones. Bcl-2 expression increased significantly in shOPN MHCC97-H cells. This discovery appears to be in contrast to previous reports. For example, in malignant gliomas, OPN siRNA induced clear upregulation of Bax expression, downregulation of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL (25). Our findings are based on large cohort of HCC patients. Hung et al(8) reported that HBV pre-S2D increased Bcl-2 expression, indicating that the cohort of HCC patients, who had 92.1% HBV infection, will have some difference compared with other types of tumors. Furthermore, patients with higher OPN levels had significantly shorter median survival time and recurrence time than the lower ones. It was confirmed that OPN levels are also significantly higher in recurrent tumor tissues than in the non-recurrent ones by western blotting (p<0.001). In previous reports, an elevated plasma level of OPN was regarded as a potential prognostic biomarker, and overexpression of OPN was closely correlated with intrahepatic metastasis, early recurrence, and a poorer prognosis; this result is similar to ours in tumor tissue (21,22,24,26).

Improving OPN predicting efficiency for HCC patients needs to be elucidated. It is necessary to combine OPN and Bcl-2 to deal with this issue. Therefore, we used TMA contained 454 HCC cases to examine both OPN and Bcl-2 expression levels. Inversely, the higher BCL-2 levels were associated with longer median survival time and recurrence time in HCC patients. The co-index of OPN/Bcl-2 was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (p<0.001) and time to recurrence (p=0.001).

Bcl-2 overexpression has since been reported in several tumor types and is often correlated with poor survival (27). Bcl-2 is best known for its ability to suppress apoptosis and belongs to a group of related proteins that are key regulators of apoptosis or programmed cell death (28). The phenomenon of Bcl-2 expression in our study seems to deviate from the common notion that genes are ‘vicious’ factors. Furthermore, numerous studies have suggested that the gene may undergo conversion from protector to killer under some circumstances. Dawson et al(7) performed a study on breast cancer in 11,212 women and found that increasing expression levels of Bcl-2 predict better survival in early breast cancer and Bcl-2 is a suitable time-independent prognostic marker in early breast cancer.

Several possible mechanisms have been founf regarding this seemingly contradictory phenomenon. First, mutations in translocated Bcl-2 alleles have been identified in lymphomas which ablate the aspartic acid residue required for caspase cleavage (29). Of note, proteolytic removal of N-terminal sequences by caspase-mediated cleavage could reverse the phenotype of Bcl-2 (30). Second, the orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 can be induced to translocate from nucleus to cytosol, binding Bcl-2, and inducing a conformational change in Bcl-2 that probably mimics what happens during caspase cleavage, exposing the normally buried BH3 domain of Bcl-2 and causing it to function as a pro-apoptotic protein (31). Another hypothesis (28) considers increased expression of Bcl-2 protein may also disrupt the balance with other members of the Bcl-2 family, including the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins. The molecular nature of such pores and how anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins may regulate them remains to be clarified. A potentially similar mechanism identified for Bcl-xL showed that lipid modifications of K-Ras can promote its association with Bcl-xL in mitochondria and induce apoptosis (32). Thus, depending on which proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL interact with, their phenotypes can be converted from anti- to pro-apoptotic (33), providing a potential explanation for why high levels of Bcl-2 expression are sometimes associated with improved patient prognosis (34).

Most studies have demonstrated that HCC tissues do not express or have only a low positive rate of Bcl-2 protein. Sometimes the positive rate of Bcl-2 in HCC tissues was lower than that in the non-tumor liver tissues immediately adjacent to HCC tissues (35). The mechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear. There may be specific characteristics of the regulation of Bcl-2 in HCC.

In conclusion, we showed that OPN/Bcl-2 expression is a promising independent predictor of recurrence and survival in HCC that may aid in the therapy of HCC patients. Bcl-2 levels may be regulated by OPN in the HCC microenvironment. The HBV background of the patients may have some unique influence on Bcl-2 expression (8). Related mechanisms should be investigated in future studies.

References