Hydrogen sulfide promotes cell proliferation of oral cancer through activation of the COX2/AKT/ERK1/2 axis

Introduction

Oral cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide as reported by the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization (1). The 5-year survival rate of oral cancer patients has remained at 50% for the past decades (2). Information regarding the development of oral cancer remains largely unknown.

The oral cavity is a viable environment for millions of bacteria. Some of them, such as Genera fusobacterium, Treponema denticola, Porphyromonas endodontics and Porphyromonas gingivalis, are oral resident endogenetic bacteria, which have a capacity to produce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (3). H2S was previously known as a toxic gas. To date, H2S is considered as the third gaseotransmitter along with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide, and exerts important physiological and pathological functions in the entire body. For example, H2S is involved in the process of oxidative stress-induced cytotoxicity (4–6), cardioprotection (7–9), inflammation (10–12) and cancer development (13,14). However, the underlying mechanisms regulating the multiple functions of H2S in many tissues and organs remain unknown.

Considering that H2S is one of the main causes of halitosis (3) and represents an index of oral hygiene (15) and gastrointestinal health (16), H2S is thought to be associated with oral diseases including periodontitis (17) and oral cancer (18,19). Previous studies have shown that H2S can enhance the severity of periodontitis (17,20). In addition, an H2S controlled-releasing drug has been developed for the treatment of cardiovascular disease (21). If oral cancer patients use a controlled release H2S drug to manage their cardiovascular disease, it is important to elucidate the effects of H2S on oral cancer. The effects of H2S on oral cancer remain largely unknown.

In this study, we investigated the effect of H2S on oral cancer cell proliferation and the mechanisms involved using three oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, WSU-HN6 CAL27 and Tca83, through CCK-8, EdU incorporation, flow cytometry, pathway inhibition, real-time PCR and western blot assays.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Freshly made NaHS solution was used as a hydrogen sulfide donor. Antibodies against cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK), total ERK1/2 (t-ERK), phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT), and total AKT (t-AKT), were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). An antibody against GAPDH was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), RPMI-1640 and fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin-EDTA solution and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution were purchased from Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY, USA). COX2 inhibitor niflumic acid (NA), ERK pathway inhibitor U0126 and AKT pathway inhibitor GSK690693 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was purchased from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan). Click-iT® EdU HCS Assay kit and TRIzol were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). GoScript™ reverse transcription system was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). SYBR Green PCR Master Mix was obtained from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN, USA). RIPA buffer was a product of Applygen Technologies, Inc. (Beijing, China). Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Rockford, IL, USA). Polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were purchased from Millipore Corporation (Billerica, MA, USA).

Cell culture

Human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines WSU-HN6 and CAL27 were maintained in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. Human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line Tca83 was maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution in a humidified incubator at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Optimal NaHS dose finding assay

To determine the optimal dose of hydrogen sulfide for the following experiments, we used NaHS, a commonly used donor of H2S, to treat the oral cancer cells for 5 h in a T25 flask with 4 ml medium, and then detected the H2S concentration in the atmosphere of a T25 flask by a halimeter. The optimal concentration of NaHS was based on the range of the H2S concentration found in patients with halitosis.

CCK-8 assay

Cell proliferation ability was evaluated using the CCK-8 assay which was performed as previously described (18). Briefly, cells were cultured in 96-well tissue culture plates (1×104 cells/well) with 10% FBS overnight. Then, the cells were treated with 0–1,000 µM NaHS (different doses of NaHS were used in different plates) and sealed with parafilm for an additional 5 h. The cell proliferation was measured by the CCK-8 assay according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Crystal violet assay staining assay

Cell proliferation ability was confirmed by crystal violet assay. Briefly, 1×105 cells were plated in a T25 flask with 5 ml complete medium overnight. On the following day, the cells were treated with various doses of NaHS for 3 days. The cells were fixed with 95% alcohol, stained with crystal violet, and photographed using a digital camera. Then crystal violet was discolored from the stained cells using 33% glacial acetic acid. The optical density (OD)570 of the crystal violet correlates with the number of stained cells.

EdU incorporation assay

Cell proliferation ability was also detected using the 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assay. Briefly, 5×105 cells were plated in a T25 flask with 5 ml complete medium overnight, and then the cells were serum-starved. At 24 h post-starvation, the cells were treated with various doses of NaHS in the presence of EdU for an additional 5 h. The labeled cells were trypsinized for EdU incorporation assay using the Click-iT EdU HCS assay kit (Invitrogen). EdU-positive cells were detected by flow cytometry.

Real-time PCR

Cells in mid-logarithmic growth were used for real-time PCR. Total RNA was extracted from the tumor cells using TRIzol reagent, and cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription with the GoScript™ reverse transcription system. Relative quantitative real-time PCR reactions were performed with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix in an ABI Prism 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the endogenous control. The sequences of the COX2 primers were 5′-CTGGCGCTCAGCCATACAG-3′ and 5′-ACACTCATACATACACCTCGGT-3′. The thermal cycling consisted of 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, and at 60°C for 1 min. All amplifications were performed in triplicate for each sample and repeated three times independently. Relative expression of the target genes was analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Western blot analysis

Cells were lysed on ice in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics). The concentration of total protein was determined using the BCA protein assay kit. Equal quantities of protein (30 µg) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h and probed with primary antibodies against GAPDH, COX2, p-ERK, t-ERK, p-AKT, t-AKT, respectively, at 4°C overnight. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked secondary antibodies, the protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (Applygen Technologies).

Pathway inhibition assay

To investigate the role of COX2, ERK and AKT pathways in hydrogen sulfide-induced cancer cell proliferation, pathway inhibition assays were carried out using an inhibitor for each molecule/pathway. Based on our preliminary data and previous studies (22–24), we found that COX2 could be markedly downregulated by 100 µM niflumic acid (NA) at 24 h post-treatment; p-ERK and p-AKT could be significantly blocked by 50 µM U0126 and 1 µM GSK690693 at 1 h post-treatment, respectively. Therefore, in the present study, WSU-HN6 cells were pretreated with either COX2 inhibitor NA for 24 h, ERK pathway inhibitor U0126 for 1 h, or AKT pathway inhibitor GSK690693 for 1 h, under serum-starvation condition, and then exposed to NaHS for 5 h for the real-time PCR and western blot assays or with EdU reagent for the EdU incorporation assay.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Significance was established at the P<0.05 level.

Results

Determination of the optimal NaHS concentration

The NaHS dose finding assay showed that the concentration of H2S in the atmosphere of 1,000 µM NaHS-treated cells was 698.33±18.93 ppb, which is equal to 1073.34±29.09 µg/l. Based on previous studies, the concentration of H2S in patients with halitosis is 810.30±204.09 µg/l (25). Therefore, the H2S concentration released from 250, 500 and 1,000 µM NaHS was comparable with the H2S concentration found in the oral cavity of patients with halitosis, and 1,000 µM NaHS was in the range of the highest concentration of H2S in the oral cavity of halitosis patients (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1 H2S promotes oral cancer cell proliferation. (A) Measurement of the H2S concentration released from various doses of NaHS in the atmosphere of the T25 flask with 4-ml culture medium determined using a halimeter. (B) CCK-8 assays were used to determine the proliferative effect of a 5-h NaHS treatment at the indicated concentrations in the WSU-HN6, CAL27 and Tca83 cells. (C and D) Representative images of WSU-HN6 and CAL27 cells treated with the indicated doses of NaHS for 3 days, following fixation with 95% alcohol and staining with crystal violet. (E and F) The optical density (OD)570 of the crystal violet released from the stained WSU-HN6 and CAL27 cells. (G) EdU incorporation assay was used to confirm the CCK-8 assay and crystal violet staining assay results in the WSU-HN6 cell line. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.

H2S promotes the growth of oral cancer cells

To evaluate the effect of H2S on oral cancer cell proliferation, the CCK-8, crystal violet staining and EdU incorporation assays were performed. The CCK-8 assay showed that H2S significantly promoted the proliferation of the WSU-HN6 and CAL27 cells in a dose-dependent manner. The WSU-HN6, CAL27 and Tca83 cells treated with 1,000 µM NaHS exhibited a 22.94, 33.79 and 32.20% increase in proliferation, respectively (Fig. 1B, P<0.05). Crystal violet staining assay showed that the cell growth of WSU-HN6 and CAL27 cells was accelerated by NaHS in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1C–F). The CCK-8 results were further confirmed in the WSU-HN6 cells using the EdU incorporation assay, which showed a 16.19±1.89% increase in the proliferation of the WSU-HN6 cells following treatment with 1,000 µM NaHS (Fig. 1G, P<0.05).

H2S promotes oral cancer cell proliferation through the activation of COX2, ERK and AKT signaling pathways

To analyze the molecular changes during NaHS-induced cancer cell proliferation, we detected the changes in cancer proliferation-related molecule COX2 by real-time PCR (Fig. 2A) and western blotting (Fig. 2B), and pathways including ERK and AKT by western blotting (Fig. 2C). The results showed that compared with the corresponding controls, hydrogen sulfide markedly upregulated COX2 at the mRNA and protein levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2A and B). Meanwhile, H2S significantly activated p-ERK and p-AKT expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2 H2S activates the COX2, AKT and ERK1/2 pathways. After a 5-h treatment with NaHS (0–1,000 µM), WSU-HN6 cells were harvested for real-time PCR and western blotting. (A) Real-time PCR showed that NaHS dose-dependently increased the expression of COX2 at the mRNA level. (B and C) Western blotting showed that NaHS dose-dependently increased the expression of COX2 and upregulated the expression of p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 at the protein level. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001.

Inhibition of COX2, ERK and AKT by their corresponding inhibitors significantly blocks H2S-induced oral cancer cell proliferation

To investigate the role of COX2, the ERK and AKT pathways in H2S-induced oral cancer cell proliferation, we uses the CCK-8 and EdU cellular incorporation assays to detect the change in proliferation. The proliferation of WSU-HN6 cells caused by H2S was decreased by inhibition of COX2, ERK and AKT pathways. CCK-8 assay showed that in the WSU-HN6 cells, treatment of NA (COX2 inhibitor) resulted in a nearly 50% decrease in growth caused by H2S. Meanwhile, U0126 (ERK pathway inhibitor) and GSK690693 (AKT pathway inhibitor) achieved a less significant decrease in proliferation as determined by the CCK-8 assay (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3 NA (niflumic acid, COX2 inhibitor), U0126 (ERK1/2 pathway inhibitor) and GSK690593 (AKT pathway inhibitor) inhibit H2S-induced oral cancer cell proliferation in the WSU-HN6 cell line, respectively. (A) CCK-8 proliferation assay showed that NA, U0126 and GSK690693 can respectively decrease the effect of the H2S-induced oral cancer cell proliferation. (B) EdU incorporation data are consistent with the CCK-8 results. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.

The EdU incorporation assay further confirmed the CCK-8 results. Compared with the untreated control, all these inhibitors alone decreased the percentage of EdU-positive cells while NaHS alone increased the percentage of EdU-positive cells. NA alone caused a 11.07±3.71% increase, while U0126 and GSK690693 caused a 3.9±0.98 and 3.22±1.00% decrease in the WSU-HN6 cells. Compared with NaHS treatment alone, NaHS in combination with NA yielded a 31.24±6.39% decrease; NaHS combined with U0126 yielded a 51.50±1.95% decrease; and NaHS plus GSK690693 yielded a 50.35±1.89% decrease in Edu-positive cells. The results above indicated that H2S-induced upregulation of COX2, p-ERK and p-AKT plays a positive role in the process of H2S-induced proliferation of oral cancer cells (Fig. 3B).

COX2 inhibitor downregulates NaHS-induced p-AKT and p-ERK expression

To further verify the role of COX2 in the promotion of proliferation, we detected the changes in the ERK and AKT pathway folowing the treatment of NA. NA not only decreased COX2 expression caused by H2S at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 4A and B), but also decreased p-ERK and p-AKT expression when the cells were treated with 1,000 µM of NaHS (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4 Effect of COX2 inhibitor NA on the NaHS-induced expression pattern of COX2, AKT and ERK1/2 in WSU-HN6 cells. WSU-HN6 cells were subjected to pretreatment with NA for 24 h, and then treated with 0–1,000 µM NaHS for 5 h. (A) Real-time PCR showed that NA abolished H2S-induced increase of COX2 at the mRNA level. (B and C) Western blotting shows that NA downregulated the elevated expression pattern of COX2, p-AKT and p-ERK1/2. ***P<0.001.

Blockade of the ERK pathway by U0126 upregulates H2S-induced p-AKT expression, but does not affect H2S-induced COX2 expression

To investigate the role of the ERK pathway in proliferation, U0126 was used to inhibit p-ERK. Western blotting showed that U0126 completely blocked the activation of the ERK pathway by eliminating p-ERK expression (Fig. 5C). Real-time PCR and western blotting showed that inhibition of the ERK pathway by U0126 did not change COX2 expression at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 5A and B). Furthermore, U0126 increased the activation of the H2S-induced p-AKT pathway (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5 Effects of ERK1/2 inhibitor U0126 on the changes in NaHS-induced COX2, p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 expression pattern. WSU-HN6 cells were subjected to pretreatment with U0126 for 1 h, and then treated with NaHS for 5 h. Real-time PCR (A) and western blotting (B) showed that pretreatment of U0126 did not alter the COX2 expression pattern induced by NaHS at the mRNA and protein levels. (C) Western blotting showed that pretreatment with U0126 completely blocked p-ERK1/2 expression, and also upregulated p-AKT expression along with an increase in NaHS concentrations.

Blockade of the AKT pathway downregulates H2S-induced p-ERK expression, but does not affect H2S-induced COX2 expression

To verify the role of the AKT pathway in H2S-induced cell proliferation, GSK690693 was used for inhibition of p-AKT. Western blotting showed that GSK690693 decreased the expression of p-AKT (Fig. 6C). Real-time PCR results showed that GSK690693 did not change H2S-induced COX2 expression at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 6A and B), although GSK690693 alone induced an increase in COX2 at the mRNA level. In addition, inhibition of the AKT pathway decreased the expression level of p-ERK (Fig. 6C).

Figure 6 Effects of AKT inhibitor GSK690693 on the changes in NaHS-induced COX2, p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 expression pattern. WSU-HN6 cells were subjected to pretreatment with GSK690693 for 1 h, and then treated with NaHS for 5 h. Real-time PCR (A) and western blotting (B) showed that pretreatment of U0126 did not alter the COX2 expression pattern induced by NaHS at the mRNA and protein levels. (C) Western blotting showed that pretreatment of GSK690693 reduced the p-AKT expression induced by 1,000 µM NaHS, and also markedly inhibited p-ERK1/2 expression mediated by 1,000 µM. *P<0.05.

Discussion

H2S is characterized by its rotten egg odor yet exists widespread in the body. It is produced naturally by either protein metabolism through cystathionine γ-lyase, (CSE), cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS), and 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MT), or bacteria existing in the digestive, respiratory or genital tracts reducing compound-containing sulfur element (26). Since it has been identified as the third gaseotransmitter playing an important physiological and pathological role in the body, more attention has been given to its beneficial properties in many organs and systems. However, in the oral cavity, H2S is commonly considered to play a deleterious role. For example, H2S is taken as one of the main contributors of bad mouth breath (halitosis), which is often associated with dental plaque and periodontal disease (17,20). Moreover, H2S can promote cell cycle progression in oral cancer cells (18). However, the mechanisms involved in the regulation of oral cancer growth by H2S are not fully elucidated.

In the present study, we investigated the underlying mechanism and found that the COX2-AKT-ERK1/2 axis is closely associated the regulation of oral cancer growth by H2S. We firstly identified that the concentrations of H2S released from 250, 500 and 1,000 µM NaHS used in the T25 flask were comparable with the H2S concentrations found in patients with halitosis. In addition, 1,000 µM NaHS is in the range of the highest concentration of H2S in the oral cavity of halitosis patients (25). Next, we confirmed that H2S promoted oral cancer growth through CCK-8 crystal violet staining and EdU incorporation assays. Meanwhile, we found that COX2, ERK and AKT may be involved in this process through real-time PCR and western blotting.

Along with the increase in NaHS concentration, an increase in the dose-dependent proliferation of oral cancer cells and upregulation of COX2 expression were concurrent. In addition, when COX2 expression was blocked by the COX2 inhibitor, the effect of H2S-induced oral cancer cell proliferation was completely inhibited. These results indicated that the regulation of oral cancer cell growth by H2S was closely related with COX2 expression. It was previously found that COX2 expression has a close relationship with the proliferation of other cancers (23,24,26–28). Activation of COX2 contributes to the progression from Barrett's metaplasia to esophageal cancer (27). Upregulation of COX2 expression promotes colorectal tumorigenesis and metastasis (28). Inhibition of COX2 decreases the ability of breast cancer cell motility in breast cancer tissues (23,24). Of importance, a meta-analysis showed that COX2 expression in oral cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in normal benign tissues, and positive COX2 expression may be a marker of worse prognosis in oral cancer patients (29).

In addition to the COX2 molecule, we also found two important pathways (AKT and ERK pathways) associated with the H2S-induced oral cancer cell proliferation, AKT and ERK were activated during H2S-induced cell proliferation, and blockade of either ERK or AKT pathway reduced this effect. The results indicate that H2S-mediated oral cancer growth is also related with the AKT and ERK pathways. A previous study reported that ERK activation is necessary for cancer cell proliferation (30). Activation of the ERK pathway enhanced the resistance of prostate cancer and osteosarcoma cells to apoptosis (31). Scutellarein inhibits proliferation of the human lung cancer via reducing the expression levels of p-ERK (32). Baicalin dose-dependently inhibited vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by blocking the ERK pathway (33). Activation of the AKT pathway contributes to the proliferation of gastric cancer (34) and cervical cancer cells (35). Curcumin was found to play an anticancer role by suppressing AKT phosphorylation (36). Furthermore, inactivation of the AKT and ERK pathways contributes to the inhibition of prostate cancer growth (37).

The results of this experiment are in accordance with the proliferation-promoting role of the ERK and AKT pathways. Through pathway inhibition and EdU incorporation assays, we can conclude that the COX2, ERK and AKT pathways are involved in the regulation of oral cancer growth by H2S. The next question is whether COX2, ERK and AKT pathways have a regulatory role in the hydrogen sulfide-regulated oral cancer growth. From the pathway inhibition assays, we found that blockade of COX2 clearly downregulated H2S-induced p-ERK and p-AKT expression. Inactivation of the AKT pathway markedly decreased H2S-induced p-ERK expression but did not alter the COX2 expression level. Inhibition of the ERK pathway significantly increased H2S-induced p-AKT expression but did not significantly alter the level of COX2 expression. Based on these data (Fig. 7), we can deduce that H2S promotes oral cancer cell proliferation through the COX2/AKT/ERK1/2 axis. Upregulation of p-AKT expression by H2S is due to the reactive response after blockade of the ERK pathway. The cells express more p-AKT in order to enhance the expression level of p-ERK, that is, to activate the ERK pathway.

Figure 7 Proposed molecular model: H2S induced the proliferation of oral squamous cancer carcinoma cell through COX2-AKT-ERK1/2 signaling axis. Arrows represent stimulatory modification and the activation of the indicated pathways.

In conclusion, in the present study, we, for the first time, identified a new mechanism elucidating that H2S promotes oral cancer cell proliferation through the COX2/AKT/ERK1/2 axis, which may provide new potential targets by which to eliminate the effect of H2S on oral cancer development.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Research Fund for Capital Medical Development (2011-0425-02), Research Grants from the Nature Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (no. QC2014C107), National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81470707), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81300901), and Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (14JCQNJC12500).

References