A nine-miRNA signature as a potential diagnostic marker for breast carcinoma: An integrated study of 1,110 cases
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 25, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5600
- Pages: 3297-3304
Abstract
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) has become a modern global epidemic among women as its morbidity has markedly increased over the past few decades (1). According to the Cancer Statistics 2016, BC is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death in females in the US, with 246,660 new diagnoses and 40,450 deaths projected to have occurred in 2016 (2). Recently, accumulating evidence indicates that early diagnosis and treatment result in favorable prognoses; however, current clinical tumor biomarkers lack sensitivity and specificity for early detection of BC (3). Consequently, identification of novel diagnostic biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast disease and normal samples is urgently needed. Previous studies have reported that microRNAs (miRNAs) play vital roles in the initiation and progression of BC and that certain miRNAs can serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers (4,5).
miRNAs are short non-coding RNA molecules of 18–25 nucleotides that play essential roles in regulating gene expression by binding to target mRNAs and directing RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs) to degrade target mRNAs or repress mRNA translation (6,7). Notably, miRNAs are reportedly linked to the occurrence and development of a variety of malignant tumors. Numerous studies have indicated that miRNAs could serve as oncogenes or tumor suppressors by regulating cellular biological processes, such as cell differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis (4,8,9). Moreover, miRNAs are also involved in multiple cancer-related cell signaling pathways in various malignancies, including breast cancer (10,11). Previous studies have reported that many miRNAs are aberrantly expressed in BC and thus potentially act as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Fu et al (12) showed that miR-141, miR-145, miR-183, miR-21 and miR-638, which are differentially expressed in BC and normal tissues, function as potential diagnostic indicators to distinguish tumor cases from normal cases. However, most of the previous studies focused on the diagnostic value of a single miRNA. Additionally, the small sample size of current studies and the lack of sensitivity and specificity of candidate miRNAs limit the clinical application of these biomarkers. In recent years, the development of high-throughput technologies and bioinformatics has promoted the development of such diagnostic markers.
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) provides open access to many comprehensive miRNA-sequencing datasets. In the present study, we analyzed miRNA expression data published by TCGA to identify miRNAs differentially expressed between breast tumor and normal tissues. Ultimately, we determined a nine-miRNA signature for diagnosing breast cancer. Furthermore, we predicted the targets of these miRNAs through in silico algorithms and conducted gene oncology annotation and pathway enrichment analyses to determine the potential biological functions of the nine miRNAs in the signature.
Materials and methods
Data collection from TCGA
The level three miRNASeq datasets of 1,110 BC and 104 normal samples were collected from the TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/). The miRNA expression profiles for both breast tumor and normal tissues were analyzed using Illumina HiSeq systems (781 tumor specimens and 87 normal specimens) or Illumina Genome Analyzer systems (324 tumor samples and 17 normal samples). There were no ethical issues since the data were retrieved from TCGA. The present study, was conducted in accordance with the publication guidelines proposed by TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/publications/publicationguidelines).
Processing of miRNA expression data
After downloading miRNASeq datasets, we first excluded miRNAs with no expression. Then, the expression data of the remaining miRNAs were log2-transformed for downstream analyses. To screen differentially expressed miRNAs, we conducted two-sample t-tests to compare miRNA expression levels in BC and normal breast tissues. In addition, we calculated log2 fold-change (log2FC) ratios. To reduce the false-positive rates (FPR) of our diagnostic tests, we set p<0.001 and |log2FC| >1 (13) as standards for identifying aberrantly expressed miRNAs. Statistical analyses were conducted through SPSS 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and graphs were produced by GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Selection of candidate diagnostic biomarkers
We selected differentially expressed miRNAs that were analyzed using both Illumina HiSeq and Illumina Genome Analyzer systems. Next, we generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calculated the area under the curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and calculated the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity using MedCalc software (14). miRNAs with AUC >0.9 were identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers.
Target prediction and enrichment analysis
The potential targets of candidate miRNAs were predicted by 10 online databases: TarBase, miRTarBase, TargetScan, TargetMiner, microRNA.org, RNA22, PicTar-vert, miRDB, PITA and PolymiRTS. Only target genes predicted by at least four algorithms were chosen, and genes targeted by more than one miRNA were selected for further analysis. Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and KEGG pathway analyses were conducted through the DAVID online tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) and visualized by Cytoscape 3.3.0 software and the R package ‘ggplot2’ (http://www.inside-r.org/packages/cran/ggplot2).
Results
Selection of differentially expressed miRNAs and candidate diagnostic biomarkers
A total of 66 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified (p<0.001, |log2FC| >1) after miRNA expression profiles were analyzed in BC and normal breast samples. Of these, 13 miRNAs were downregulated and 53 miRNAs were upregulated in BC specimens (data not shown). We performed ROC analysis of the 66 miRNAs and selected nine dysregulated miRNAs as candidate diagnostic markers since they showed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC >0.9). As shown in Table I, these nine dysregulated miRNAs included seven upregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-96, hsa-miR-183, hsa-miR-182, hsa-miR-141, hsa-miR-200a and hsa-miR-429) and two downregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-139 and hsa-miR-145). Differential analysis of the expression data of the selected nine miRNAs indicated that these miRNAs exhibited significant statistical differences (p<0.0001, |log2FC| >1) (Table I, Fig. 1). Among these nine miRNAs, both hsa-miR-429 and hsa-miR-200a are located on chromosome 1p36.33, while hsa-miR-183, hsa-miR-96 and hsa-miR-182 are located on chromosome 7q32.2.
Diagnostic performance of selected miRNAs
Among the seven upregulated miRNAs, the AUC values with 95% CI of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-183, hsa-miR-96, hsa-miR-182, hsa-miR-141, hsa-miR-200a and hsa-miR-429 were 0.946 (0.926–0.960), 0.965 (0.951–0.976), 0.960 (0.944–0.972), 0.934 (0.916–0.950), 0.924 (0.905–0.941), 0.921 (0.902–0.939) and 0.920 (0.900–0.937), respectively. For the two downregulated miRNAs, the AUC values with 95% CI of hsa-miR-139 and hsa-miR-145 were 0.941 (0.923–0.956) and 0.910 (0.889–0.928), respectively (Table II, Fig. 2). Furthermore, we constructed a binary logistic regression model to evaluate the combination of these nine miRNAs. The diagnostic performance of the combination was improved significantly. The results showed that the AUC reached 0.995 (95% CI=0.988–0.999), and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity reached 98.7 and 98.9%, respectively (Table II, Fig. 2).
Target prediction and enrichment analysis
We gathered target genes predicted by at least four algorithms, and then chose those that were targets of multiple miRNAs for GO and KEGG analyses. The results of target predictions for the nine miRNAs are presented as supporting information (data not shown). Eventually, we selected 1,339 target genes for GO annotation and KEGG pathway analyses. The most strongly enriched GO processes and KEGG pathways are listed in Fig. 3. The top 10 GO functional annotations and KEGG pathways are shown in Fig. 4. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses revealed that the targets of candidate miRNAs were involved in several critical cancer-related pathways, including pathways in cancer, colorectal cancer, the TGF-β, the MAPK and the Wnt signaling pathways.
Discussion
Increasing evidence indicates that dysregulation of miRNAs may be closely related to many malignances, including breast carcinoma (BC) (15–17). In the present study, we comprehensively analyzed high-throughput miRNA expression profiles of breast cancer specimens from TCGA and selected nine miRNAs with high diagnostic accuracy, including seven upregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-96, hsa-miR-183, hsa-miR-182, hsa-miR-141, hsa-miR-200a and hsa-miR-429) and two downregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-139 and hsa-miR-145).
Among the seven upregulated miRNAs, miR-21 showed the most obvious overexpression in BC specimens. As one of the first mammalian onco-miRNAs identified, miR-21 has been experimentally confirmed to participate in the initiation and progression of various carcinomas. In BC, miR-21 also plays a vital role in carcinogenesis. miR-21 is located on chromosome 17q, a region containing several oncogenes, including HER2, TOP2A and PPM1D (18–20). miR-21 has been reported to function as an onco-miRNA by directly regulating several tumor suppressors, such as tropomyosin 1 (TPM1), programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), maspin and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) (21,22). Additionally, it has been reported that miR-21 is involved in certain cancer-related signaling pathways, such as the PTEN/PI3K/AKT, the ERK1/2/MAPK and the miR-21/smad7/ERK signaling pathways, thus, promoting tumor growth and metastasis in vivo and in vitro (21,23–26).
Previous studies have shown that the miR-183/miR-96/miR-182 cluster is overexpressed in various malignant tumors, including BC; thus, this cluster may be an onco-miRNA cluster and could potentially act as a multi-marker for diagnosing malignancies (27). The upregulated miR-183/miR-96/miR-182 cluster inhibits transcriptional factors, such as FOXO1 and FOXO3, and thus, promotes BC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration and reduces cell apoptosis in vivo and in vitro (28,29).
As members of the miR-200 family, miR-141, miR-200a and miR-429 exert multiple complex effects on tumor occurrence and development in different carcinomas. Among the three miRNAs, miR-429 and miR-200a are located on chromosome 1p36.33, while miR-141 is located on chromosome 12p13.31. Several studies suggest that miR-200a, miR-429 and miR-141 may be tumor suppressors since they are downregulated in cancer samples (30–32). However, other studies showed that these three miRNAs may function as oncogenes since they are upregulated in tumor tissues (33–36). In the present study, the expression levels of the three miRNAs were significantly elevated in BC specimens compared with normal breast tissues. These discrepancies may be partially explained by the various sources of the cases studied, different detection techniques and different platforms used. It is reported that members of the miR-200 family can reverse epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by increasing E-cadherin expression and decreasing ZEB1, ZEB2 and β-catenin expression, further inhibiting cancer cell invasion and migration (31,37–40). Notably, EMT mechanisms are distinct in various malignancies, and the expression of EMT markers (E-cadherin and ZEB) is inconsistent in diverse types of cancers and different histological types of the same cancer (41). This could partially explain the opposing actions of miR-200a, miR-429 and miR-141 on tumorigenesis.
Real-time PCR and miRNA microarray confirm that miR-139 is downregulated in breast cancer (42–44), which is consistent with our results. In vitro, forced expression of miR-139 in the BC cell line MDA-MD-231 was found to suppress cell migration and invasion by targeting genes involved in metastasis-related signaling pathways (42). Functional experiments conducted by Hua et al (45) revealed that increased expression of miR-139 reduced cell proliferation in luminal type BC cells by directly targeting topoisomerase IIα (TOP2α), an oncogene that can promote cell proliferation in vitro.
Both previous studies, and our present study, revealed that miR-145 is downregulated in BC samples (46–50). Acting as an oncogene, miR-145 promoted cell apoptosis (46), and suppressed cell growth, proliferation, migration and invasion (47,51) in vitro. More importantly, the decreased expression of miR-145 was found to be negatively correlated with several clinicopathological parameters, such as ER and HER2 status, tumor size and lymph node metastasis (52), which indicated its potential diagnostic or prognostic value in the clinic.
Current studies have focused on the diagnostic value of dysregulated miRNAs in BC (12,53). However, this is the first identification of a nine-miRNA signature as a potential multi-marker for diagnosing BC found by analyzing high-throughput miRNA expression profiles from TCGA data. In the present study, the ROC curve of the combined nine differentially expressed miRNAs showed an extremely high diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.995 (95% CI=0.988–0.999), and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 98.7 and 98.9%, respectively. The diagnostic value of these nine miRNAs combined was higher than that of the individual miRNAs, indicating that the nine-miRNA signature could serve as a potential multi-marker for diagnosing BC.
Previous studies have demonstrated that miRNAs play vital roles in carcinogenesis through participation in cancer-related pathways. Therefore, we performed target prediction of the nine selected miRNAs and subsequently carried out GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses to explore the potential effects of these nine miRNAs on carcinogenesis. GO and KEGG pathways revealed that the targets of these dysregulated miRNAs were involved in many critical cancer-related biological processes and pathways, such as positive regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process, regulation of transcription, regulation of gene expression, the enzyme-linked receptor protein signaling pathway, pathways in cancer, the TGF-β signaling pathway, and the MAPK signaling pathway. The results of enrichment analyses suggested that these nine miRNAs could regulate important pathways correlated with breast cancer by targeting oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study identifying a nine-miRNA signature as a multi-biomarker for diagnosing BC based on TCGA datasets. Nevertheless, the present study has several limitations. Firstly, our data were retrieved from TCGA and had not been verified in experiments. Therefore, further multicenter clinical trials are needed in the future to confirm our findings. Secondly, the expression profiling of these miRNAs was only based on tissue. It may be of more clinical value to investigate noninvasive diagnostic markers.
In conclusion, in the present study, we identified a tumor-specific miRNA signature in BC containing seven upregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-183, hsa-miR-96, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-182, hsa-miR-141, hsa-miR-200a and hsa-miR-429) and two downregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-139 and hsa-miR-145) by analyzing high-throughput data from a TCGA dataset. We discovered that these nine aberrantly expressed miRNAs may play important roles in the initiation and progression of BC. More importantly, we assessed the combination of these nine miRNAs, and found that an integrated analysis of these nine miRNAs improved the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis. However, multicenter studies with large sample sizes are needed to validate our findings before the clinical application of this nine-miRNA signature.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China (no. 2015GXNSFAA139187) and the Guangxi Provincial Health Bureau Scientific Research Project (no. Z2014057).
References
Schneider AP II, Zainer CM, Kubat CK, Mullen NK and Windisch AK: The breast cancer epidemic: 10 facts. Linacre Q. 81:244–277. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:7–30. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Donepudi MS, Kondapalli K, Amos SJ and Venkanteshan P: Breast cancer statistics and markers. J Cancer Res Ther. 10:506–511. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou J, Tian Y, Li J, Lu B, Sun M, Zou Y, Kong R, Luo Y, Shi Y, Wang K, et al: miR-206 is down-regulated in breast cancer and inhibits cell proliferation through the up-regulation of cyclinD2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 433:207–212. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gao Y, Cai Q, Huang Y, Li S, Yang H, Sun L, Chen K and Wang Y: MicroRNA-21 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer patients: A pooled analysis of individual studies. Oncotarget. 7:34498–34506. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 116:281–297. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carthew RW and Sontheimer EJ: Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell. 136:642–655. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang P, Chen L, Zhang J, Chen H, Fan J, Wang K, Luo J, Chen Z, Meng Z and Liu L: Methylation-mediated silencing of the miR-124 genes facilitates pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis by targeting Rac1. Oncogene. 33:514–524. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marquardt JU and Galle PR: Epigenetic regulation of methionine adenosyltransferase 1A: A role for MicroRNA-based treatment in liver cancer? Hepatology. 57:2081–2084. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xia H, Ooi LL and Hui KM: MicroRNA-216a/217-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition targets PTEN and SMAD7 to promote drug resistance and recurrence of liver cancer. Hepatology. 58:629–641. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang F, Li L, Chen Z, Zhu M and Gu Y: MicroRNA-214 acts as a potential oncogene in breast cancer by targeting the PTEN-PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Int J Mol Med. 37:1421–1428. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fu SW, Lee W, Coffey C, Lean A, Wu X, Tan X, Man YG and Brem RF: miRNAs as potential biomarkers in early breast cancer detection following mammography. Cell Biosci. 6:62016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi H, Chen J, Li Y, Li G, Zhong R, Du D, Meng R, Kong W and Lu M: Identification of a six microRNA signature as a novel potential prognostic biomarker in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 7:21579–21590. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bland JM and Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1:307–310. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Riecke L, Sack AT and Schroeder CE: Endogenous delta/theta sound-brain phase entrainment accelerates the buildup of auditory streaming. Curr Biol. 25:3196–3201. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng Q, Yi B, Wang A and Jiang X: Exploring and exploiting the fundamental role of microRNAs in tumor pathogenesis. Onco Targets Ther. 6:1675–1684. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tan YY, Xu XY, Wang JF, Zhang CW and Zhang SC: MiR-654-5p attenuates breast cancer progression by targeting EPSTI1. Am J Cancer Res. 6:522–532. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jacot W, Fiche M, Zaman K, Wolfer A and Lamy PJ: The HER2 amplicon in breast cancer: Topoisomerase IIA and beyond. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1836:146–157. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zaczek A, Markiewicz A, Supernat A, Bednarz-Knoll N, Brandt B, Seroczyńska B, Skokowski J, Szade J, Czapiewski P, Biernat W, et al: Prognostic value of TOP2A gene amplification and chromosome 17 polysomy in early breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 18:885–894. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lambros MB, Natrajan R, Geyer FC, Lopez-Garcia MA, Dedes KJ, Savage K, Lacroix-Triki M, Jones RL, Lord CJ, Linardopoulos S, et al: PPM1D gene amplification and overexpression in breast cancer: A qRT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization study. Mod Pathol. 23:1334–1345. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu S, Wu H, Wu F, Nie D, Sheng S and Mo YY: MicroRNA-21 targets tumor suppressor genes in invasion and metastasis. Cell Res. 18:350–359. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mandal CC, Ghosh-Choudhury T, Dey N, Choudhury GG and Ghosh-Choudhury N: miR-21 is targeted by omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid to regulate breast tumor CSF-1 expression. Carcinogenesis. 33:1897–1908. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang F, Wang Y, Xue J, Ma Q, Zhang J, Chen YF, Shang ZZ, Li QQ, Zhang SL and Zhao L: Effect of Corilagin on the miR-21/smad7/ERK signaling pathway in a schistosomiasis-induced hepatic fibrosis mouse model. Parasitol Int. 65:308–315. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu F, Zheng S, Liu T, Liu Q, Liang M, Li X, Sheyhidin I, Lu X and Liu W: MicroRNA-21 promotes the proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in Eca109 via activating ERK1/2/MAPK pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 381:115–125. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Han M, Liu M, Wang Y, Mo Z, Bi X, Liu Z, Fan Y, Chen X and Wu C: Re-expression of miR-21 contributes to migration and invasion by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition consistent with cancer stem cell characteristics in MCF-7 cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 363:427–436. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Han M, Wang F, Gu Y, Pei X, Guo G, Yu C, Li L, Zhu M, Xiong Y and Wang Y: MicroRNA-21 induces breast cancer cell invasion and migration by suppressing smad7 via EGF and TGF-β pathways. Oncol Rep. 35:73–80. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Marino AL, Evangelista AF, Vieira RA, Macedo T, Kerr LM, Abrahão-Machado LF, Longatto-Filho A, Silveira HC and Marques MM: MicroRNA expression as risk biomarker of breast cancer metastasis: A pilot retrospective case-cohort study. BMC Cancer. 14:7392014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gebremedhn S, Salilew-Wondim D, Hoelker M, Rings F, Neuhoff C, Tholen E, Schellander K and Tesfaye D: MicroRNA-183-96-182 cluster regulates bovine granulosa cell proliferation and cell cycle transition by coordinately targeting FOXO1. Biol Reprod. 94:1272016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin H, Dai T, Xiong H, Zhao X, Chen X, Yu C, Li J, Wang X and Song L: Unregulated miR-96 induces cell proliferation in human breast cancer by downregulating transcriptional factor FOXO3a. PLoS One. 5:e157972010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang L, Guo F, Huo B, Lv Y, Wang Y and Liu W: Expression and clinical significance of the microRNA-200 family in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 9:2317–2324. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G and Kang Y: The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 283:14910–14914. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tan H, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Peng L and Ji T: miR141 expression is downregulated and negatively correlated with STAT5 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 11:1803–1808. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu SJ, Hu JY, Kuang XY, Luo JM, Hou YF, Di GH, Wu J, Shen ZZ, Song HY and Shao ZM: MicroRNA-200a promotes anoikis resistance and metastasis by targeting YAP1 in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 19:1389–1399. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li J, Du L, Yang Y, Wang C, Liu H, Wang L, Zhang X, Li W, Zheng G and Dong Z: MiR-429 is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer and exerts its anti-apoptotic function by targeting SOX2. Cancer Lett. 329:84–90. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoneyama K, Ishibashi O, Kawase R, Kurose K and Takeshita T: miR-200a, miR-200b and miR-429 are onco-miRs that target the PTEN gene in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 35:1401–1410. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang X, Li P, Rong M, He R, Hou X, Xie Y and Chen G: MicroRNA-141 is a biomarker for progression of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung: Clinical analysis of 125 patients. Tohoku J Exp Med. 235:161–169. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu CL, Ho JY, Chou SC and Yu DS: MiR-429 reverses epithelial-mesenchymal transition by restoring E-cadherin expression in bladder cancer. Oncotarget. 7:26593–26603. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nishijima N, Seike M, Soeno C, Chiba M, Miyanaga A, Noro R, Sugano T, Matsumoto M, Kubota K and Gemma A: miR-200/ZEB axis regulates sensitivity to nintedanib in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 48:937–944. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Asakura T, Yamaguchi N, Ohkawa K and Yoshida K: Proteasome inhibitor-resistant cells cause EMT-induction via suppression of E-cadherin by miR-200 and ZEB1. Int J Oncol. 46:2251–2260. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Korpal M and Kang Y: The emerging role of miR-200 family of microRNAs in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer metastasis. RNA Biol. 5:115–119. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JW, Park YA, Choi JJ, Lee YY, Kim CJ, Choi C, Kim TJ, Lee NW, Kim BG and Bae DS: The expression of the miRNA-200 family in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 120:56–62. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krishnan K, Steptoe AL, Martin HC, Pattabiraman DR, Nones K, Waddell N, Mariasegaram M, Simpson PT, Lakhani SR, Vlassov A, et al: miR-139-5p is a regulator of metastatic pathways in breast cancer. RNA. 19:1767–1780. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang HD, Sun DW, Mao L, Zhang J, Jiang LH, Li J, Wu Y, Ji H, Chen W, Wang J, et al: MiR-139-5p inhibits the biological function of breast cancer cells by targeting Notch1 and mediates chemosensitivity to docetaxel. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 465:702–713. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Romero-Cordoba S, Rodriguez-Cuevas S, Rebollar-Vega R, Quintanar-Jurado V, Maffuz-Aziz A, Jimenez-Sanchez G, Bautista-Piña V, Arellano-Llamas R and Hidalgo-Miranda A: Identification and pathway analysis of microRNAs with no previous involvement in breast cancer. PLoS One. 7:e319042012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hua W, Sa KD, Zhang X, Jia LT, Zhao J, Yang AG, Zhang R, Fan J and Bian K: MicroRNA-139 suppresses proliferation in luminal type breast cancer cells by targeting Topoisomerase II alpha. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 463:1077–1083. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
MiR-145 promotes TNF-α-induced apoptosis by facilitating the formation of RIP1-FADDcaspase-8 complex in triple-negative breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 37:8599–8607. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zheng M, Sun X, Li Y and Zuo W: MicroRNA-145 inhibits growth and migration of breast cancer cells through targeting oncoprotein ROCK1. Tumour Biol. 37:8189–8196. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lv J, Xia K, Xu P, Sun E, Ma J, Gao S, Zhou Q, Zhang M, Wang F, Chen F, et al: miRNA expression patterns in chemoresistant breast cancer tissues. Biomed Pharmacother. 68:935–942. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eades G, Wolfson B, Zhang Y, Li Q, Yao Y and Zhou Q: lincRNA-RoR and miR-145 regulate invasion in triple-negative breast cancer via targeting ARF6. Mol Cancer Res. 13:330–338. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sengupta S, Das JK and Gangopadhyay A: Naevoid psoriasis and ILVEN: Same coin, two faces? Indian J Dermatol. 57:489–491. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yan X, Chen X, Liang H, Deng T, Chen W, Zhang S, Liu M, Gao X, Liu Y, Zhao C, et al: miR-143 and miR-145 synergistically regulate ERBB3 to suppress cell proliferation and invasion in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 13:2202014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Min W, Wang B, Li J, Han J, Zhao Y, Su W, Dai Z, Wang X and Ma Q: The expression and significance of five types of miRNAs in breast cancer. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 20:97–104. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hou Y, Wang J, Wang X, Shi S, Wang W and Chen Z: Appraising microRNA-155 as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for cancer detection: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 95:e24502016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |