Open Access

Osteogenic differentiation and inflammatory response of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‑2 in human maxillary sinus membrane‑derived cells

  • Authors:
    • Jeewan Chun
    • Junho Jung
    • Jae-Hyung Lee
    • Sang-Hwan Oh
    • Yong-Dae Kwon
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 11, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9208
  • Article Number: 81
  • Copyright: © Chun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the osteogenic potential of human maxillary sinus membrane (hMSM)‑derived cells, and the role of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‑2 (rhBMP‑2) in the inflammatory response of hMSM‑derived cells and gingival fibroblasts following sinus floor elevation procedure (SFE). hMSM‑derived cells from the samples were isolated, subcultured, and analyzed using immunohistochemical staining and flow cytometry. The hMSM‑derived cells obtained from passage 6 were used for Alizarin Red staining and quantitative reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR to observe its osteogenic activity and inflammatory reaction upon supplementation with rhBMP‑2. The hMSM‑derived cells were shown to be heterogeneous, as indicated by their positive expression of human mesenchymal stem cell markers (STRO‑1, high mobility group AT‑hook 2, CD44, CD105 and OCT‑3/4), fibroblast cell marker (fibroblast‑specific protein 1) and epithelial cell marker (epithelial cell adhesion molecule). Calcium nodules were found to be more notably evident in the rhBMP‑2 group, following osteogenic differentiation. The gene expression of osteogenic markers was significantly upregulated in the cells supplemented with rhBMP‑2. Supplementation with rhBMP‑2 also enhanced the expression of inflammatory markers in hMSM‑derived cells and gingival fibroblasts; however, NF‑κB and TNF‑α expression was not significantly increased compared with the control in the hMSM‑derived cells. hMSM contains mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) capable of differentiating into osteogenic cells. The supplementation of rhBMP‑2 enhanced osteogenic differentiation and induced an inflammatory response which was greater in gingival fibroblasts compared with hMSM‑derived cells. In summary, the hMSM is a potential contributor to the osteogenic process following SFE, and the use of rhBMP‑2 may increase the inflammatory response accordingly. The gingival tissue may be responsible for the increased inflammatory response by rhBMP‑2 and postoperative complications.

Introduction

Dental implantation at the posterior maxilla can be challenging due to insufficient subantral bone volume that is primarily caused by alveolar ridge resorption and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus (1). To ensure sufficient bone volume, sinus floor elevation (SFE) is now widely utilized and has yielded clinically favorable results (1). Various bone substitutes including allograft, xenograft and alloplastic materials are used for SFE, and their use as a scaffold for osteoconduction and vascular ingrowth has been documented in numerous studies (2-5). Previous studies have shown that SFE without graft material can also provide new bone formation that would be sufficient to support a dental implant by lifting the human maxillary sinus membrane (hMSM) and maintaining its position (6-8). These findings confirm the importance of secluded spaces where blood clots can form and act as a scaffold to allow osteoconduction and vascular ingrowth (9,10).

The residual maxillary bone, including the sinus floor and sinus walls, provides cellular components, such that bone and vessels can grow centripetally into grafted materials or into the secluded spaces from the residual bone following SFE (11,12). In addition, it is possible that the hMSM contains cells with osteogenic potential that may act as an additional source for new bone formation in SFE (13). Although the hMSM does not contain osteogenic cells in the tissue, several studies confirmed that the hMSM contains progenitor cells with a mesenchymal lineage that can potentially differentiate into an osteogenic lineage (14-19).

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multi-functional growth factors and members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily (20); of these, BMP-2 modulates osteoblastic differentiation through the BMP/Smad pathway (21-23). BMP-2 binds to the BMP receptor and activates the cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinase of the BMP receptor (BMPR)-I. The activated BMPRs phosphorylate BMP-specific Smad1/5/8 in the cytoplasm. Smad1/5/8 binds Smad4, and the resultant complex is transported to the nucleus to promote the expression of a transcription factor with a homeodomain called Dlx5. This protein domain promotes the expression of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and Osterix, both of which are key transcription factors involved in osteoblast differentiation (24,25). Therefore, recombinant human BMP (rhBMP-2) among other types of BMPs have been primarily utilized with a variety of bone graft materials to accelerate bone regeneration (26-33). The application of rhBMP-2 in SFE has been widely assessed in preclinical and clinical studies in which its osteoinductive and osteogenic capacities were confirmed (34,35); however, with the increased use of rhBMP-2, its side effects became apparent, and these include inflammatory complications, ectopic bone formation, bone resorption and inflammatory swelling (36,37). Inflammatory swelling is the most common side effect following SFE with rhBMP-2(38). It has been suggested that the cellular components in the hMSM and gingival tissue are involved in the inflammatory response following rhBMP-2 treatment (36,37). However, the effect of rhBMP-2 on hMSM-derived cells has not been investigated.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the osteogenic differentiation potential of hMSM-derived cells and the effect of rhBMP-2 on these cells with the aim of identifying the cause of the inflammatory response.

Materials and methods

Subjects

hMSM samples were collected from three individuals (1 male and 2 females, 17-33 years of age) who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy as the orthognathic surgery between April and October 2016, with a discarded hMSM available. Informed consent was obtained, and all samples were collected in accordance with relevant guidelines under and ethically approved by the Ethics Committee at the Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital (approval no. KHD IRB 1509-1). Patients who neither had experienced nor were diagnosed with sinus pathology, maxillary neoplasm, metabolic diseases, genetic disease, nor had a history of previous sinus surgery were selected. After the collection, the samples were suspended in Dulbecco's PBS (DPBS; Corning, Inc.) containing 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS; Corning, Inc.). Samples that were ~1x1 cm in size were used for cell culture.

Histological analysis

Samples were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde pH 7.4 (cat. no. P2031; Biosesang, Inc.) overnight at 4˚C, dehydrated using a series of ethanol solutions of increasing concentrations (50% ethanol, 70% ethanol and 100% ethanol), and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections 4 µm thick were incubated in Mayer's hematoxylin solution (Lillie's Modification) for 5 min and eosin Y solution (modified alcoholic) for 3 min at 25˚C using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining kit (cat. no. ab245880; Abcam), and mouse and rabbit specific HRP/DAB IHC detection kit (cat. no. ab236466; Abcam, the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) method according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cell markers, including STRO-1 (cat. no. MAB1038-SP; 1:100; R&D Systems, Inc.), high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA-2; cat. no. 8179S; 1:400; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; cat. no. 2929S; 1:500; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP-1; 13018S; 1:400; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) were used as the primary antibodies.

Isolation and culture of hMSM cells

For the isolation of hMSM cells, the samples were rinsed with DPBS to remove erythrocytes. Tissues were cut into 1-2 mm pieces and digested with 1% type I collagenase (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37˚C for 3 h in 60 mm petri dishes. Enzyme activity was neutralized with the addition of DMEM containing 10% FBS (Corning, Inc.) and 1% PS, and the samples were centrifuged at 196 x g at 25˚C for 3 min. The pellet was resuspended and transferred into a plate containing the culture medium, and the cells were incubated overnight at 37˚C with 5% CO2 to allow adherence. Subsequently, the cell cultures were washed with DPBS to remove residual non-adherent tissues and erythrocytes. The morphology of hMSM cells was observed daily using an inverted phase-contrast microscope and the culture medium was changed every two days. When the monolayer of adherent cells reached 70-80% confluence, the cells were trypsinized (TrypLE™Express; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), resuspended in growth medium and subcultured.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis

hMSM-derived cells recovered from passage 6 (P6) were subcultured in 12-well culture plates at a density of 1x105 cells/well. Cells were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 20-30 min at 25˚C and blocked with antibody diluent (GBI Labs, Inc.) overnight at 4˚C. Subsequently, cells were incubated with anti-STRO-1 (cat. no. sc-47733; 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), HMGA-2 (1:400; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), CD44 (cat. no. sc-7297; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), CD105 (cat. no. ab169545; 1:400; Abcam), EpCAM (1:400), FSP-1 (1:400) or CD34 (cat. no. sc-7324; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) overnight at 4˚C. After incubation, the wells were washed five times with DPBS. Each sample was incubated with secondary antibodies (cat. no. A11001; 1:1,000; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.; cat. no. A11034; 1:1,000; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 1 h at 25˚C. The cells were counterstained with DAPI. Images were analyzed under x200 and 400 magnification fields using light and fluorescence microscopy (IX71-F32PH; Olympus Corporation).

Flow cytometry analysis

hMSM-derived cells obtained at passage (P)2, P4, P6 and P8 were analyzed by flow cytometry to assess the expression of various markers. Cultures with a density of 1x106 cells/ml were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at 25˚C and then blocked with antibody diluent overnight at 4˚C. The cells were then labeled with monoclonal antibodies against STRO-1, EpCAM, HMGA2 and FSP-1 overnight at 4˚C and washed five times with DPBS. The secondary antibodies coupled with FITC were added, and the cells were incubated for 1 h at 25˚C in the dark. After labeling, cells were washed and resuspended in DPBS, and analyzed using a LSRFortessa™ X-20 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Alizarin Red staining

hMSM-derived cells from P6 were cultured in 6-well plates (3x105 cells/well) with non-osteogenic medium (DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% PS), osteogenic medium [DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1% PS, 5 µM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), 0.1 mM ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and 0.1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA)] or osteogenic medium supplemented with rhBMP-2 (10 ng/ml; PeproTech Inc.). After 0, 7 and 14 days of culture, the cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (cat. no. P2031; Biosesang, Inc.) for 30 min at 25˚C and rinsed with DPBS. The cells were subsequently stained with 2% Alizarin Red solution (cat. no. 6B7131; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 20 min at 25˚C, and rinsed five times with DPBS to remove non-specific stained cells.

Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR for osteogenic activity and inflammatory reaction

To investigate the expression of genes associated with osteogenic differentiation, hMSM-derived cells from P6 were cultured (3x105 cells/well) in 6-well plates for 14 days. The cells were cultured in the osteogenic medium with or without 10 ng/ml rhBMP-2. The markers used for RT-qPCR are presented in Table I, including the sequences of the primers used and the expected amplicon size. To investigate the expression of genes relevant to the inflammatory response caused by rhBMP-2, MSM-derived cells and gingival fibroblast cells (P4) were cultured (5x105 cells/well) for 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. The control group was cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% PS. The experimental groups were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% PS with 10 ng/ml rhBMP-2. Total RNA was isolated from control and experimental cultures at defined time intervals using a Ribospin™ RNA isolation kit (GeneAll, Biotechnology, Co. Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was collected in RNAse free water, and its total quantity and quality were measured spectrophotometrically (Nanodrop 2000/2000c spectrophotometer; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). First strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using AccuPower® CycleScript RT PreMIX(dT20) (Bioneer Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After cDNA synthesis, qPCR was performed using 1 µg cDNA mixed with 10 µl SYBR-Green using TOPreal™ qPCR 2x PreMIX (Enzynomics, Co., Ltd.), with 5 µM each of the forward and reverse primers. The PCR thermocycling conditions were: Initial denaturation at 95˚C for 15 min; followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95˚C for 15 sec, annealing at primer melting temperature (Tm) for 10 sec and extension at 72˚C for 30 sec. Expression levels of the target genes were quantified after normalization to the levels of β-actin using the 2-ΔΔCq method (39).

Table I

Sequences of the primers used and the expected amplicon size.

Table I

Sequences of the primers used and the expected amplicon size.

GeneSequence, 5'-3'Size, bp
β-actin 110
     Forward GTCAGGCAGCTCGTGCTCT 
     Reverse TCGTGCGTGACATTAAGGAG 
RUNX2 189
     Forward GTAGCTACTTGGGGAGGATT 
     Reverse AGATGGGACTGTGGTTACTG 
ALP 102
     Forward TCCATGTTGAGATGAGCTG 
     Reverse ACACACAGTGAACCGCAACT 
Osteocalcin 143
     Forward CGCCTGGGTCTCTTCACTAC 
     Reverse CTCACACTCCTCGCCCTATT 
Type I collagen 105
     Forward ATGACAATCTGCTCCCAAC 
     Reverse CAATGCTGTTCTTGCAGTGG 
NF-κB 158
     Forward AGATGTGGTGGAGGATTTGC 
     Reverse TGGGGTGGTCAAGAAGTAGTG 
TNF-α 116
     Forward CAAGGATGTCATTGGTGACG 
     Reverse CCTTGGTCTGCTTCTTCTCC 
IL-1β 133
     Forward TCCAGGGACAGGATATGGAG 
     Reverse TCTTTCAACACGCAGGACAG 
IL-6 179
     Forward AGGCACTGGCAGAAAACAAC 
     Reverse AGCTCTGGCTTGTTCCTCAC 

[i] RUNX2, runt-related transcription factor 2; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; TNF-α, tumor-necrosis factor-α; IL, interleukin.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as individual data or as the mean ± the standard error of the mean of at least three repeats. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test and a Mann-Whitney U test in SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Histological findings

H&E staining allowed visualization of the epithelial lining, lamina propria and periosteal-like lining (Fig. 1A-C). The hMSM sections were also stained using the ABC method, which revealed a number of cells positive for the mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) marker (STRO-1), fibroblast marker (FSP-1) and epithelial cell marker (EpCAM) (Fig. 1D-F).

Morphological and IHC findings

Adherent hMSM-derived cells were heterogeneous, consisting of epithelial-like cells with a polygonal shape and fibroblast-like cells with a bipolar elongated shape. As the number of cell passages increased, the number of fibroblast-like cells also increased. The hMSM-derived cells expressed MSC markers such as STRO-1, HMGA2, CD44 and CD105 but they did not express the hematopoietic marker CD34. The epithelial cell marker EpCAM and fibroblast marker FSP-1 were also expressed (Fig. 2).

Flow cytometry

The hMSM-derived cells expressed STRO-1, HMGA2, EpCAM and FSP-1 markers in all examined passages (P2, P4, P6 and P8). The signals for these markers increased between P2 to P6, but decreased at P8. Cells positive for the MSC markers (STRO-1 and HMGA2) peaked at P6 (Fig. 3).

Osteogenic activity

Calcium nodules stained with Alizarin Red S became more evident as the culture period increased, and were most numerous in the rhBMP-2 group (Fig. 4A and B). RT-qPCR was performed to analyze the gene expression of the osteogenic markers including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), RUNX2, type 1 collagen and osteocalcin following osteogenic differentiation. The expression of the osteogenic genes was significantly higher in the rhBMP-2 groups compared with the control group (Fig. 5). Expression of all these markers were upregulated after 7 and 14 days of culture. Apart from ALP, the expression of the markers in the rhBMP-2 group was significantly higher after 14 days compared with after 7 days. ALP expression in the rhBMP-2 group was higher (up to 24-fold) upon measurement after 7 days of culture compared with day 0, and subsequently significantly decreased in both control and rhBMP-2 groups.

Inflammatory reaction to rhBMP-2

As shown in Fig. 6, the gene expression of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) in the hMSM-derived cell and gingival fibroblast groups gradually increased over time, with an 8.2-fold and 15.9-fold increase in expression after 72 h of incubation, respectively. However, the gene expression of NF-κB in the hMSM-derived cells did not differ significantly compared with the control group. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the hMSM-derived cell group treated with rhBMP-2 was significantly lower compared with the control group; however, in the gingival fibroblast group, it was significantly higher compared with the control group. Interleukin (IL)-1β expression peaked at 48 h with a 2.9-fold increase in expression compared with the control in the hMSM-derived cells, and at 24 h with a 3.8-fold increase in gingival fibroblasts. The expression of IL-6 gene expression peaked at 72 h, with a 3-fold increase in the hMSM-derived cells, and an 18-fold increase in gingival fibroblast cells. The expression of IL-1β and IL-6 in both groups was significantly higher compared with the control group.

Discussion

SFE has become a standard procedure to increase subantral bone volume at the atrophic posterior maxilla (39-41). Autogenous bone, allograft, xenograft and alloplastic materials have been used as bone graft materials (2). Since xenograft and alloplastic materials are only osteoconductive, osteogenic and angiogenic cells and growth factors from the residual maxillary bone serve a crucial role in osteogenesis (42). In addition, the presence of human (h)MSCs is also an important factor for SFE, as hMSCs can differentiate into osteogenic cells (43). Therefore, if the hMSM contains hMSCs, osteogenesis is expected to occur following SFE, which is far from the sinus floor and walls. BMP-2 modulates osteoblastic differentiation through the BMP/Smad pathway by binding to the BMP receptor (21-24). Accordingly, the present study was designed to verify if the hMSM contains a type of MSCs that exhibits the potential to differentiate into osteogenic cells, and if BMP-2 could enhance the osteogenic differentiation of the hMSM derived cells. In addition, the role of BMP-2 in eliciting an inflammatory response was investigated according to cellular composition and tissue type, as it is possible that the use of BMP-2 may increase postoperative complications following SFE (44).

The isolated hMSM-derived cells showed characteristics of epithelial-like cells and fibroblast-like cells morphologically, indicating that the cells were heterogeneous and may contain hMSCs (43-45). The presence of hMSCs was confirmed by STRO1, CD44, CD105 and HMGA2-positive cells (46). As STRO1-positive progenitors are considered to be derived from a perivascular niche, the MSCs could have arisen from developing blood vessels that are abundant in the hMSM tissue (15,47,48). In addition, the presence of fibroblasts and epithelial cells were also confirmed by the presence of the fibroblast marker FSP-1 and the epithelial marker EpCAM (49,50). Interestingly, the number of cells exhibiting the morphological characteristics of mesenchymal progenitor cells and STRO1-positive cells increased with the increasing number of passages.

The hMSM-derived cells contained a cell population capable of differentiating into osteogenic cells. Calcified nodules were observed after 14 days of incubation in the osteogenic medium, and mineralization was enhanced with rhBMP-2 supplementation. The gene expression of osteogenic markers including ALP, RUNX2, Type I collagen and osteocalcin, were also significantly upregulated in the presence of rhBMP-2 compared with those in the control group. These results suggest that the use of rhBMP-2 in SFE may induce and facilitate osteogenesis initiated by the hMSM-derived MSCs.

Several studies have suggested that the hMSM contains a population of multipotent stem cells that may contribute to osteogenesis. A study by Graziano et al (13) in which mesenchymal progenitors in the hMSM were isolated and characterized, showed that they possessed the intrinsic capacity to regenerate maxillary bone volume. Another study also reported that the hMSCs isolated from the hMSM were capable of generating bone-like tissue (15), in agreement with the results of the present study.

Currently, rhBMP-2 is widely used for bone regeneration as an osteoinductive adjuvant; however, concerns were raised, as postoperative complications associated with rhBMP-2 have been reported (36-38,51,52). In 2008, the United States Food and Drug Administration issued a warning regarding the use of rhBMP-2, due to the risk of cervical spine swelling and death (36,37), and there is a study describing local reactions, infections, wound complications and graft failures as common adverse events of BMP-2 use (38). Local reactions, such as edema, erythema and pain were the most frequently reported events, and this suggests that inflammatory reactions may increase with the use of rhBMP-2. According to the side effects profile of BMP-2 reviewed by Nguyen et al (53), both in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies show that BMP-2 induces inflammation, as evidenced by increased levels of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IL-18 and TNF-α (37,53,54).

In the present study, it was demonstrated that the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β and IL-6 were significantly upregulated by rhBMP-2 in both groups. However, expression of TNF-α, which regulates immune cells and induces inflammation, was significantly downregulated, and NF-κB expression was not significantly different compared with the control in the hMSM-derived cells. On the contrary, the expression of these inflammatory markers were upregulated in the gingival fibroblast group. This result suggests that the hMSCs may serve a role in the decreased inflammatory response.

In agreement with this result, several studies have shown that MSCs modulate allogeneic immune cell responses, and that MSCs serve as guardians against excessive inflammatory responses (55-59). Aggarwal and Pittenger (55) demonstrated that hMSCs interact with a variety of immune cells to inhibit or limit the inflammatory response, and promote anti-inflammatory pathways; however, it is difficult to conclude if hMSCs serve a role in reducing inflammation, as the hMSM consists of various cell types and their inflammatory response is not balanced with the result.

Further studies are required to identify the mechanism and the role of hMSCs in the rhBMP-2 induced inflammatory response. The expression of the markers and BMP-2 receptor are required to verify these results, and various concentrations of rhBMP-2 should be examined, as rhBMP-2 initiates a dose-dependent inflammatory response (60). However, the present study showed that hMSM contributes to the osteogenic process through hMSCs, and that the use of rhBMP-2 in SFE increases the inflammatory response resulting in more acute postoperative complications than without the use of rhBMP-2 in conventional SFE. In addition, the severity of the inflammatory response may differ by region depending on the cellular composition of the tissue affected.

In conclusion, the present study confirmed that hMSM contains hMSCs that are capable of differentiating into osteogenic cells. Supplementation of rhBMP-2 enhances osteogenic differentiation. In addition, rhBMP-2 induced an inflammatory response, and the response was smaller in the hMSM-derived cells and larger in the gingival fibroblasts. The use of rhBMP-2 in SFE may increase the inflammatory response and the gingival tissue may be responsible for the increased response and postoperative complications. Extra precautions are required for the clinical use of rhBMP-2.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant no. HI14C0175).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JC and JJ wrote the manuscript. JC performed the experiments. JJ analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. J-HL and S-HO interpreted the results. Y-DK conceived and designed the study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and all samples were collected in accordance with relevant guidelines and approved by the Ethics Committee at the Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital (approval no. KHD IRB 1509-1).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Raghoebar GM, Onclin P, Boven GC, Vissink A and Meijer HJA: Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 46 (Suppl 21):S307–S318. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Stumbras A, Krukis MM, Januzis G and Juodzbalys G: Regenerative bone potential after sinus floor elevation using various bone graft materials: A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 50:548–558. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Helder MN, van Esterik FAS, Kwehandjaja MD, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Klein-Nulend J and Schulten E: Evaluation of a new biphasic calcium phosphate for maxillary sinus floor elevation: Micro-CT and histomorphometrical analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 29:488–498. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Farré-Guasch E, Prins HJ, Overman JR, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Schulten EA, Helder MN and Klein-Nulend J: Human maxillary sinus floor elevation as a model for bone regeneration enabling the application of one-step surgical procedures. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 19:69–82. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Solar P, Geyerhofer U, Traxler H, Windisch A, Ulm C and Watzek G: Blood supply to the maxillary sinus relevant to sinus floor elevation procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 10:34–44. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Riben C and Thor A: Follow-up of the sinus membrane elevation technique for maxillary sinus implants without the use of graft material. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 18:895–905. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Sohn DS, Moon JW, Lee WH, Kim SS, Kim CW, Kim KT and Moon YS: Comparison of new bone formation in the maxillary sinus with and without bone grafts: Immunochemical rabbit study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 26:1033–1042. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Parra M, Olate S and Cantin M: Clinical and biological analysis in graftless maxillary sinus lift. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43:214–220. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Stefanski S, Svensson B and Thor A: Implant survival following sinus membrane elevation without grafting and immediate implant installation with a one-stage technique: An up-to-40-month evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 28:1354–1359. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Cricchio G, Sennerby L and Lundgren S: Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: A 1- to 6-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 22:1200–1212. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Cordaro L, Bosshardt DD, Palattella P, Rao W, Serino G and Chiapasco M: Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: Histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19:796–803. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Avera SP, Stampley WA and McAllister BS: Histologic and clinical observations of resorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes used in maxillary sinus graft containment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 12:88–94. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Graziano A, Benedetti L, Massei G, Cusella de Angelis MG, Ferrarotti F and Aimetti M: Bone production by human maxillary sinus mucosa cells. J Cell Physiol. 227:3278–3281. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Gruber R, Kandler B, Fuerst G, Fischer MB and Watzek G: Porcine sinus mucosa holds cells that respond to bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-6 and BMP-7 with increased osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15:575–580. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Guo J, Weng J, Rong Q, Zhang X, Zhu S, Huang D, Li X and Chen S: Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human maxillary sinus membrane. Sci Rep. 5(11660)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Srouji S, Kizhner T, Ben David D, Riminucci M, Bianco P and Livne E: The Schneiderian membrane contains osteoprogenitor cells: In vivo and in vitro study. Calcif Tissue Int. 84:138–145. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Kim SW, Lee IK, Yun KI, Kim CH and Park JU: Adult stem cells derived from human maxillary sinus membrane and their osteogenic differentiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24:991–998. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Berberi A, Al-Nemer F, Hamade E, Noujeim Z, Badran B and Zibara K: Mesenchymal stem cells with osteogenic potential in human maxillary sinus membrane: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 21:1599–1609. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Cho KS, Park HY, Roh HJ, Bravo DT, Hwang PH and Nayak JV: Human ethmoid sinus mucosa: A promising novel tissue source of mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 5(15)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Lin GH, Lim G, Chan HL, Giannobile WV and Wang HL: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 outcomes for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 27:1349–1359. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Yamaguchi A, Komori T and Suda T: Regulation of osteoblast differentiation mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins, hedgehogs, and Cbfa1. Endocr Rev. 21:393–411. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Itoh S, Itoh F, Goumans MJ and Ten Dijke P: Signaling of transforming growth factor-beta family members through Smad proteins. Eur J Biochem. 267:6954–6967. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Miyazono K: Positive and negative regulation of TGF-beta signaling. J Cell Sci. 113:1101–1109. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Lee MH, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Park HD, Kang AR, Kyung HM, Sung JH, Wozney JM, Kim HJ and Ryoo HM: BMP-2-induced Runx2 expression is mediated by Dlx5, and TGF-beta 1 opposes the BMP-2-induced osteoblast differentiation by suppression of Dlx5 expression. J Biol Chem. 278:34387–34394. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Lee MH, Kwon TG, Park HS, Wozney JM and Ryoo HM: BMP-2-induced Osterix expression is mediated by Dlx5 but is independent of Runx2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 309:689–694. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Nakashima M and Reddi AH: The application of bone morphogenetic proteins to dental tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 21:1025–1032. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Bowler D and Dym H: Bone morphogenic protein: Application in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 59:493–503. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Srouji S, Ben-David D, Lotan R, Riminucci M, Livne E and Bianco P: The innate osteogenic potential of the maxillary sinus (Schneiderian) membrane: An ectopic tissue transplant model simulating sinus lifting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 39:793–801. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Sohn DS and Moon YS: Histomorphometric study of rabbit's maxillary sinus augmentation with various graft materials. Anat Cell Biol. 51 (Suppl 1):S1–S12. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Valentin-Opran A, Wozney J, Csimma C, Lilly L and Riedel GE: Clinical evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Clin Orthop Relat Res 110-120, 2002.

31 

Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Rossi F and Perale G: Bone grafts: Which is the ideal biomaterial? J Clin Periodontol. 46 (Suppl 21):S92–S102. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Jung RE, Glauser R, Scharer P, Hammerle CH, Sailer HF and Weber FE: Effect of rhBMP-2 on guided bone regeneration in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 14:556–568. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Freitas RM, Spin-Neto R, Marcantonio Junior E, Pereira LA, Wikesjö UM and Susin C: Alveolar ridge and maxillary sinus augmentation using rhBMP-2: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 17 (Suppl 1):e192–e201. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Boyne PJ, Lilly LC, Marx RE, Moy PK, Nevins M, Spagnoli DB and Triplett RG: De novo bone induction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 63:1693–1707. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Torrecillas-Martinez L, Monje A, Pikos MA, Ortega-Oller I, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P and Wang HL: Effect of rhBMP-2 upon maxillary sinus augmentation: A comprehensive review. Implant Dent. 22:232–237. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

James AW, LaChaud G, Shen J, Asatrian G, Nguyen V, Zhang X, Ting K and Soo C: A review of the clinical side effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 22:284–297. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Lee KB, Taghavi CE, Murray SS, Song KJ, Keorochana G and Wang JC: BMP induced inflammation: A comparison of rhBMP-7 and rhBMP-2. J Orthop Res. 30:1985–1994. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Woo EJ: Adverse events reported after the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 70:765–767. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M and Lang NP: A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 35 (Suppl 8):S216–S240. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Mohan N, Wolf J and Dym H: Maxillary sinus augmentation. Dent Clin North Am. 59:375–388. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Tawil G, Barbeck M, Unger R, Tawil P and Witte F: Sinus floor elevation using the lateral approach and window repositioning and a xenogeneic bone substitute as a grafting material: A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 33:1089–1096. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Baksh D, Song L and Tuan RS: Adult mesenchymal stem cells: Characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. J Cell Mol Med. 8:301–316. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Kelly MP, Vaughn OL and Anderson PA: Systematic review and meta-analysis of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in localized alveolar ridge and maxillary sinus augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 74:928–939. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Väänänen HK: Mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Med. 37:469–479. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Dennis JE, Carbillet JP, Caplan AI and Charbord P: The STRO-1+ marrow cell population is multipotential. Cells Tissues Organs. 170:73–82. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Shi S and Gronthos S: Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. J Bone Miner Res. 18:696–704. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Chaudhury H, Raborn E, Goldie LC and Hirschi KK: Stem cell-derived vascular endothelial cells and their potential application in regenerative medicine. Cells Tissues Organs. 195:41–47. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Litvinov SV, Velders MP, Bakker HA, Fleuren GJ and Warnaar SO: Ep-CAM: A human epithelial antigen is a homophilic cell-cell adhesion molecule. J Cell Biol. 125:437–446. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Strutz F, Okada H, Lo CW, Danoff T, Carone RL, Tomaszewski JE and Neilson EG: Identification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1. J Cell Biol. 130:393–405. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Draenert FG, Nonnenmacher AL, Kammerer PW, Goldschmitt J and Wagner W: BMP-2 and bFGF release and in vitro effect on human osteoblasts after adsorption to bone grafts and biomaterials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 24:750–757. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Kao DW, Kubota A, Nevins M and Fiorellini JP: The negative effect of combining rhBMP-2 and Bio-Oss on bone formation for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 32:61–67. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

53 

Nguyen V, Meyers CA, Yan N, Agarwal S, Levi B and James AW: BMP-2-induced bone formation and neural inflammation. J Orthop. 14:252–256. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Huang RL, Yuan Y, Tu J, Zou GM and Li Q: Opposing TNF-α/IL-1β- and BMP-2-activated MAPK signaling pathways converge on Runx2 to regulate BMP-2-induced osteoblastic differentiation. Cell Death Dis. 5(e1187)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Aggarwal S and Pittenger MF: Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 105:1815–1822. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Sotiropoulou PA and Papamichail M: Immune properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Methods in molecular biology. 407:225–243. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Gonzalez-Rey E, Gonzalez MA, Varela N, O'Valle F, Hernandez-Cortes P, Rico L, Büscher D and Delgado M: Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammatory and T cell responses and induce regulatory T cells in vitro in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 69:241–248. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Prockop DJ and Oh JY: Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs): Role as guardians of inflammation. Mol Ther. 20:14–20. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Castro-Manrreza ME: Participation of mesenchymal stem cells in the regulation of immune response and cancer development. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 73:380–387. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Zara JN, Siu RK, Zhang X, Shen J, Ngo R, Lee M, Li W, Chiang M, Chung J, Kwak J, et al: High doses of bone morphogenetic protein 2 induce structurally abnormal bone and inflammation in vivo. Tissue Eng Part A. 17:1389–1399. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2020
Volume 20 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Chun J, Jung J, Lee J, Oh S and Kwon Y: Osteogenic differentiation and inflammatory response of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‑2 in human maxillary sinus membrane‑derived cells. Exp Ther Med 20: 81, 2020
APA
Chun, J., Jung, J., Lee, J., Oh, S., & Kwon, Y. (2020). Osteogenic differentiation and inflammatory response of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‑2 in human maxillary sinus membrane‑derived cells. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 20, 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9208
MLA
Chun, J., Jung, J., Lee, J., Oh, S., Kwon, Y."Osteogenic differentiation and inflammatory response of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‑2 in human maxillary sinus membrane‑derived cells". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 20.5 (2020): 81.
Chicago
Chun, J., Jung, J., Lee, J., Oh, S., Kwon, Y."Osteogenic differentiation and inflammatory response of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‑2 in human maxillary sinus membrane‑derived cells". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 20, no. 5 (2020): 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9208