|
1
|
Zuckerman JD: Hip fracture. N Engl J Med.
334:1519–1525. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Miyamoto RG, Kaplan KM, Levine BR, Egol KA
and Zuckerman JD: Surgical management of hip fractures: An
evidence-based review of the literature. I: Femoral neck fractures.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 16:596–607. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Heinonen
A, Vuori I and Järvinen M: Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 18
(Suppl 1):S57–S63. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
National hip fracture database (NHFD)
annual report 2017: https://www.nhfd.co.uk/files/2017ReportFiles/NHFD-AnnualReport2017.pdf.
Accessed: November, 2020.
|
|
5
|
Fisher AA, Davis MW, Rubenach SE,
Sivakumaran S, Smith PN and Budge MM: Outcomes for older patients
with hip fractures: The impact of orthopedic and geriatric medicine
cocare. J Orthop Trauma. 20:172–178. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Erez O and Dougherty PJ: Early
complications associated with cephalomedullary nail for
intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Trauma. 72:E101–E105.
2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Rogers FB, Shackford SR and Keller MS:
Early fixation reduces mobility and mortality in elderly patients
with hip fractures form low-impact falls. J Trauma. 39:261–265.
1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Anglen JO and Weinstein JN: American Board
of Orthopaedic Surgery Research Committee. Nail or plate fixation
of intertrochanteric hip fractures: Changing pattern of practice. A
review of the American board of orthopaedic surgery database. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 90:700–707. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Werner BC, Fashandi AH, Gwathmey FW and
Yarboro SR: Trends in the management of intertrochanteric femur
fractures in the United States 2005-2011. Hip Int. 25:270–276.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG, Rueda D,
Larrauri PM and Soler JJ: Use of the gamma nail in the treatment of
fractures of the proximal femur. 1998. J Orthop Trauma. 17 (Suppl
8):S51–S56. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Lorich DG, Geller DS and Nielson JH:
Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: Management and current
controversies. Instr Course Lect. 53:441–454. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Hesse B and Gachter A: Complications
following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma
nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 124:692–698. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Radford PJ, Needoff M and Webb JK: A
prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the
gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75:789–793.
1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M and Calvert
PT: Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A
randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic
hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 73:330–334. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Baumgaertner MR and Solberg BD: Awareness
of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric
fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 79:969–971.
1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip
after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold
arthroplasty. An endresult study using a new method of result
evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 51:737–755. 1969.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Katz J and Melzack R: Measurement of pain.
Surg Clin North Am. 79:231–252. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J
and Piehl-Baker L: Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically
impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 64:35–40.
1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Wade DT: Measurement in neurological
rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg. 5:682–686.
1992.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Oldmeadow LB, Edwards ER, Kimmel LA, Kipen
E, Robertson VJ and Bailey MJ: No rest for the wounded: Early
ambulation after hip surgery accelerates recovery. ANZ J Surg.
76:607–611. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Dragosloveanu Ş, Dragosloveanu CDM, Stanca
HT, Cotor DC, Dragosloveanu CI and Stoica CI: A new perspective
towards failure of gamma nail systems. Exp Ther Med.
20(216)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Okcu G, Ozkayin N, Okta C, Topcu I and
Aktuglu K: Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity
fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail? Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 471:2768–2775. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM,
van der Heijden FH, den Hoed PT, Kerver AJ and van Vugt AB:
Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomized comparison
of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg
Br. 86:86–94. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Elis J, Chechik O, Maman E and Steinberg
EL: Expandable proximal femoral nails versus 95 dynamic condylar
screw-plates for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric
fractures. Injury. 43:1313–1317. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Zhang Y, Zhang S, Wang S, Zhang H, Zhang
W, Liu P, Ma J, Pervaiz N and Wang J: Long and short intramedullary
nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1,
A2 and A3): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol
Surg Res. 103:685–690. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Sellan M, Bryant D, Tieszer C, Papp S,
Lawendy A, Liew A, Viskontas D, MacLeod M, Coles C, Carey T, et al:
Short versus long interTAN fixation for geriatric intertrochanteric
hip fractures: A multicentre head-to-head comparison. J Orthop
Trauma. 33:169–174. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Hou Z, Bowen TR, Irgit KS, Matzko ME,
Andreychik CM, Horwitz DS and Smith WR: Treatment of
pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): Long versus short
cephalomedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 27:318–324.
2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Boone C, Carlberg KN, Koueiter DM, Baker
KC, Sadowski J, Wiater PJ, Nowinski GP and Grant KD: Short versus
long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur
fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2). J Orthop Trauma. 28:e96–e100.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Kleweno C, Morgan J, Redshaw J, Harris M,
Rodriguez E, Zurakowski D, Vrahas M and Appleton P: Short versus
long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric
hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. J Orthop Trauma.
28:391–397. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Vicario C, Marco F, Ortega L, Alcobendas
M, Dominguez I and López-Durán L: Necrosis of the femoral head
after fixation of trochanteric fractures with gamma locking nail. A
cause of late mechanical failure. Injury. 34:129–134.
2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Den Hartog BD, Bartal E and Cooke F:
Treatment of the unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Effect of the
placement of the screw, its angle of insertion, and osteotomy. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 73:726–733. 1991.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Lenich A, Bachmeier S, Prantl L, Nerlich
M, Hammer J, Mayr E, Al-Munajjed AA and Füchtmeier B: Is the
rotation of the femoral head a potential initiation for cutting
out? A theoretical and experimental approach. BMC Musculoskelet
Disord. 12(79)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Parker MJ and Handoll HH: Gamma and other
cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants
for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev: CD000093, 2010.
|
|
34
|
Vaughn J, Cohen E, Vopat BG, Kane P,
Abbood E and Born C: Complications of short versus long
cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures,
minimum1 year follow-up. Eur J Orthop SurgTraumatol. 25:665–670.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Lindvall E, Ghaffar S, Martirosian A and
Husak L: Short versus long intramedullary nails in the treatment of
pertrochanteric hip fractures: Incidence of ipsilateral fractures
and costs associated with each implant. J Orthop Trauma.
30:119–124. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
