Adrenomedullin and adrenotensin increase the transcription of regulator of G‑protein signaling 2 in vascular smooth muscle cells via the cAMP‑dependent and PKC pathways

  • Authors:
    • Yuanjie Mao
    • Jialin Su
    • Lei Lei
    • Lei Meng
    • Yongfen Qi
    • Yong Huo
    • Chaoshu Tang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 23, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1751
  • Pages: 323-327
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The regulator of G‑protein signaling 2 (RGS2) has been shown to be crucial in the regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure. The vascular activities of adrenomedullin (ADM) and adrenotension (ADT), two natural peptides, are dependent upon the modulation of RGS2 expression. However, the effects and pathways involved in their modulation remain unknown. This study aimed to observe the changes of RGS2 expression in response to ADM and ADT in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and to clarify the potential signaling pathways in vitro. In the present study, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were cultured with ADM and ADT of various concentrations for different time periods, and the gene expression of RGS2 was analyzed by PCR. ADM significantly increased the gene expression at 0.5 h to ~35‑fold of that at baseline, whereas ADT marginally increased the expression after 1‑2 h. SQ22,536 and chelerythrine were used to block the protein kinase A (PKA) and PKC pathways activated by incubation with ADM. The gene expression of RGS2 was reduced by SQ22,536 only. Furthermore, when SQ22,536 and chelerythrine were added to the cells incubated with ADT, the gene expression was markedly reduced by both SQ22,536 and chelerythrine. In conclusion, ADM immediately showed a marked increase in the gene expression of RGS2 in cultured VSMCs via a cAMP‑dependent pathway and ADT gradually showed a marginal increase in the gene expression via a cAMP‑dependent pathway and a PKC pathway.

Introduction

Vascular tone and blood pressure are regulated by the opposing actions of vasoconstrictor and vasodilator agonists that signal via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (1). Vasoconstrictors such as angiotensin II, endothelin, vasopressin and norepinephrine bind to their GPCRs and activate heterotrimeric Gq proteins. The Gq proteins then trigger several responses in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), including Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and Ca2+ entry through the plasma membrane, which results in myosin light chain phosphorylation and contraction (1).

The duration and intensity of GPCR signaling is modulated by the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which attenuate signaling by stimulating the G protein subunits to hydrolyze guanosine triphosphate, returning them to the inactive guanosine diphosphate-bound state (2,3). RGS2 is one of the predominant RGS proteins in the cardiovascular system and has been shown to be crucial in the regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure. RGS2 deficiency in mice is associated with a hypertensive phenotype and an increased sensitivity, as well as prolonged responsiveness to vasoconstrictors (46). In addition, genetic polymorphisms of RGS2 are correlated with hypertension and intima-media thickening of carotid arteries in humans (79).

Adrenomedullin (ADM) is a 52 amino acid peptide, which was identified and isolated from human pheochromocytoma extracts (10). Two hallmark actions of ADM, hypotension and diuresis, suggest that it is important in vascular tone regulation (11). Intravenous infusion of ADM has been demonstrated to result in prolonged hypotension in cats, rats, rabbits, sheep and humans (1221). ADM is derived from a larger precursor molecule, proADM (22). ProADM is cleaved by endogenous peptidases into 4 bioactive peptides: PreproADM22-41, preproADM45-92, preproADM95-146 (ADM) and preproADM153-185 (23). These peptidases exhibit different roles in physiological processes; the effects of preproADM22-41 are similar to that of ADM (24), while PreproADM153-185 leads to marked contractile activity in cat pulmonary arterial rings and is termed adrenotensin (ADT) (25). ADT acts in a modulatory manner to influence vasorelaxation in response to ADM (26). There appears to be complex interactions (antagonism or synergism in vascular activities) between ADM and ADT, and these interactions may be active in the regulation of circulatory homeostasis (26).

As GPCR ligands, the vascular activities of ADM and ADT depend on the modulation of RGS2 expression. However, the effects and pathways of their modulation remain unknown. This study aimed to observe the changes of RGS2 expression in response to ADM and ADT in cultured VSMCs and to clarify the potential signaling pathways in vitro.

Materials and methods

Animals

Four male Wistar rats (age, 8 weeks) purchased from the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Beijing, China), were sacrificed by intravenous administration of overdosed pentobarbital. The segment of thoracic aorta between the left subclavian and subcostal arteries was removed for VSMC isolation using enzymatic digestion, as previously described (27). This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Peking University First Hospital and recommendations for the care and use of laboratory animals of the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture.

Cell culture

Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories Inc., Logan, UT, USA), penicillin (100 U/ml; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml, Invitrogen Life Technologies) at 37°C in a humidified incubator in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Only VSMCs from the third to sixth cell passage were used. The cells were then cultured in six-well, collagen I-coated BioFlex plates containing a flexible silicone elastomer substratum (Flexcell International, Hillsborough, NC, USA).

Drugs

Angiotensin II (002-12), ADM (010-08), and adrenotensin (010-07) were purchased from Phoenix PharmaLabs, Inc. (Shanghai, China). Forskolin (66575-29-9), SQ22,536 (17318-31-9) and chelerythrine chloride (3895-92-9) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Incubation with cultured cells

Following replacement of the collagen-coated BioFlex plates with serum-free medium for 24 h, cells achieved 70% confluence and were subjected to incubation with vehicle, ADM, ADT or angiotensin II for different time periods (10−7 mol/l for 0, 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 h) or at different concentrations (10−9, 10−8 and 10−7 mol/l ADM for 0.5 h and ADT for 1 h). The cultured VSMCs were also incubated with forskolin (10−5 mol/l), a PKA pathway agonist, for different time periods (0, 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 h). SQ22,536 (10−4 mol/l) and chelerythrine (10−6 mol/l) were used to block the PKA pathway and PKC pathways by co-incubation with vehicle or ADM for 0.5 h and vehicle or ADT for 1 h. Subsequent to this, the gene expression of RGS2 was analyzed by PCR.

Gene expression

Total RNA was extracted from the cultured cells using TRIzol (Life Technologies Co., Gaithersburg, MD, USA). qPCR was performed using a Toyobo ReverTra Ace-α-®RT-PCR kit (Toyobo Life Science, Osaka, Japan). The expression of selected mRNAs was measured by qPCR using the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detector (Life Technologies). Expression of the mRNAs was normalized to that of the corresponding β-actin mRNA. PCR reactions were performed in 25 μl buffer containing 1 μl cDNA, SYBR-Green Master mix (Life Technologies) and 5 pmol sequence-specific primers: Forward: 5′-CTG CGT ACC CAT GGA CAA GA-3′ and reverse: 5′-TTG GGC TTC CCA GGA GTA GA-3′ for RGS2; and forward: 5′-AGG CCA ACC GTG AAA AGA TG-3′ and reverse: 5′-ACC AGA GGC ATA CAG GGA CAA-3′ for β-actin. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of a preincubation step for 2 min at 50°C, denaturation for 10 min at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 15 sec at 95°C and annealing/extension for 1 min at 60°C. qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

Values were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical differences between groups were determined by either one-way or two-way analysis of variance. When a statistical difference was detected, Tukey’s method of adjustment was used for multiple pairwise comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

ADM increases RGS2 in a time- and concentration-dependent manner

Following incubation with ADM (10−7 mol/l), the gene expression of RGS2 was significantly increased at 0.5 h, reaching a peak ~35 fold of that at baseline and gradually decreasing to~2-fold that of baseline at 4 h (P<0.05). When incubated for 0.5 h with different concentrations of ADM, ADM at concentrations of 10−8 and 10−7 mol/l significantly increased the gene expression of RGS2 (P<0.05; Fig. 1).

ADT increases RGS2 in a time and concentration-dependent manner

Following incubation with ADT (10−7 mol/l) the gene expression of RGS2 was significantly increased to ~3.7-fold of that at baseline after 1 h (P<0.05). Subsequent to incubation for 1 h with different concentrations of ADT, a concentration of 10−7 mol/l significantly increased the gene expression of RGS2 (P<0.05; Fig. 2). The expression of RGS2 was also significantly increased by angiotensin II incubation (10−7 mol/l) to ~2.5-fold of that at baseline at 2 h (P<0.05; Fig. 2).

Effects of signaling reagents

Forskolin (10−5 mol/l), a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent pathway agonist, significantly increased the gene expression of RGS2 at 0.5 h to a peak of ~30-fold of that at baseline (P<0.05), which then gradually decreased to ~5-fold of that at baseline at 4 h. When the PKA pathway antagonist SQ22,536 (10−4 mol/l) and PKC inhibitor chelerythrine (10−6 mol/l) was incubated with the cells treated with ADM (10−7 mol/l), the gene expression of RGS2 was markedly reduced by SQ22,536 only. Moreover, when SQ22,536 and chelerythrine was incubated with ADT (10−7 mol/l), the gene expression of RGS2 was markedly reduced by SQ22,536 and chelerythrine (P<0.05; Fig. 3).

Discussion

In the present study, it was demonstrated that the modulation of RGS2 gene expression in cultured VSMCs by ADM and ADT occurs via different pathways. As ADM and ADT are potential vascular therapeutic agents and RGS2 may be used as a future theraputic target for vascular diseases, this study provides additional information for their potential clinical application.

RGS2 has been shown to be crucial in the regulation of vascular tone and hypertension. Haplo-insufficiency or elimination of the RGS2 gene leads to hypertension in mice (6). Certain RGS2 haplotypes also cosegregate with human hypertension (8). Furthermore, RGS2 was shown to selectively inhibit Gq signaling and thereby attenuates the action of vasoconstrictors (28). Aortic rings from RGS2 knockout mice exhibited increased contraction and impaired cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) mediated relaxation in vitro(4). Previously, it was suggested that RGS2 functions as a novel target or effector of the nitric oxide-cGMP pathway to regulate vasoconstrictor signaling (4). RGS2 mediated the action of the nitric oxide-cGMP pathway in several tissues as it is widely expressed, including in vascular smooth muscle and kidney (29). RGS2 regulates blood pressure to a significant extent by mediating the ability of the nitric oxide-cGMP pathway to relax the resistance vasculature and attenuate vasoconstrictor signaling in VSMCs (5). The short-term action of nitric oxide donor on blood pressure is impaired in RGS2 knockout mice. Furthermore, the loss of RGS2 in primary smooth muscle cells from mesenteric resistance arteries increases the magnitude and duration of agonist-induced Ca2+ responses and blocks the ability of cGMP analogs to attenuate agonist-induced Ca2+ signaling (4).

In the present study, ADM significantly increased the expression of RGS2 mRNA at 0.5 h to 35-fold of that at baseline, whereas ADT and angiotensin II marginally increased the expression of RGS2 mRNA after 1–2 h. Therefore, the increased RGS2 expression may be crucial in the vascular activities of ADM and the latent and marginal increase of RGS2 expression following the stimulation of vasoconstrictors such as ADT and Angiotensin II may be a compensated change.

ADM is a potent cardiovascular-active peptide that has hypotensive, natriuretic and diuretic actions. It is considered to be important in the pathophysiology of numerous disorders, such as hypertension, acute coronary syndromes and renal failure (30). It inhibits the angiotensin II-induced proliferation and migration effects on renal mesangial cells and exhibits an anti-oxidant action on these cells (30). ADM was observed to stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity in a platelet bioassay. ADM receptors are coupled to adenylate cyclase via G-proteins and the cyclic ring structure and C-terminal amidation are essential for full binding and activity (10). Moreover, ADM has been demonstrated to activate the adenylate cyclase-cAMP system in isolated cardiac myocytes, which is one of the predominant pathways for the regulation of myocardial contractility (31). In the present study, the effects of ADM on RGS2 expression was simulated by adenylate cyclase activator forskolin and blocked by the adenylate cyclase antagonist SQ22,536. Therefore, the effect of ADM on RGS2 expression occurs via adenylate cyclase and a PKA pathway.

Consistently, the ADM-mediated effects in calcified VSMCs and vitamin D3 plus nicotine-treated aortas were also similar to that of forskolin, while the PKA inhibitor H89 blocked the effect of ADM (32). Furthermore, ADM induced the relaxation of rat brain pericytes, which was associated with the reduced phosphorylation of myosin light chain through the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. H89 inhibited the ADM-induced increase in the number of relaxed pericytes and returned the phosphorylation of the myosin light chains to that of the control levels (33).

ADT, which is derived from the common precursor of ADM, is also an active peptide. ADT has been demonstrated to produce contractile responses in cat pulmonary arterial rings in a concentration-dependent manner (34). In anesthetized rats, an intravenous bolus injection of ADT increased the mean arterial pressure. In cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells, 10−7 mol/l ADT increased 3H-TdR incorporation (26). ADT induced endothelium-dependent vasoconstriction and elevated blood pressure (25,34). Moreover, ADT acts in a modulatory manner to influence vasorelaxation in response to ADM. ADT has been shown to antagonize the stimulatory effect of ADM on endothelial nitric oxide generation (26). ADT also induced an increase in the concentration of medium immunoreactive ADM (35). In a rat model of pulmonary hypertension, ADM and ADT exhibited opposite effects on vasoactivity and showed reciprocal inhibition in their release (36). However, the signaling pathway of ADT remains unclear. The results of the present study showed that SQ22,536 and chelerythrine chloride blocked the effects of ADT on RGS2 expression significantly, which suggest that the effect of ADT on RGS2 expression occurred via a PKA and PKC pathway.

In conclusion, our results showed that ADM immediately exhibited a significantly increased the gene expression of RGS2 in VSMCs via cAMP-dependent pathway and ADT gradually showed a marginal increase in the gene expression of RGS2 via a cAMP-dependent and a PKC pathway. This suggests the different responses of RGS2 to vasodilators and vasoconstrictors.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Ms. Lin Xue and Ms. Chunyu Zhao for their technical assistance. This study was supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant no. NSFC30600230) and the Chinese Doctoral Foundation (No. 331).

References

1 

Münzel T, Feil R, Mülsch A, Lohmann SM, Hofmann F and Walter U: Physiology and pathophysiology of vascular signaling controlled by guanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate-dependent protein kinase [Corrected]. Circulation. 108:2172–2183. 2003.

2 

Ross EM and Wilkie TM: GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins: regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 69:795–827. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Hollinger S and Hepler JR: Cellular regulation of RGS proteins: modulators and integrators of G protein signaling. Pharmacol Rev. 54:527–559. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Tang KM, Wang GR, Lu P, Karas RH, Aronovitz M, Heximer SP, Kaltenbronn KM, Blumer KJ, Siderovski DP, Zhu Y and Mendelsohn ME: Regulator of G-protein signaling-2 mediates vascular smooth muscle relaxation and blood pressure. Nat Med. 9:1506–1512. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Sun X, Kaltenbronn KM, Steinberg TH and Blumer KJ: RGS2 is a mediator of nitric oxide action on blood pressure and vasoconstrictor signaling. Mol Pharmacol. 67:631–639. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Heximer SP, Knutsen RH, Sun X, Kaltenbronn KM, Rhee MH, Peng N, Oliveira-dos-Santos A, Penninger JM, Muslin AJ, Steinberg TH, et al: Hypertension and prolonged vasoconstrictor signaling in RGS2-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 111:12592003. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Yang J, Kamide K, Kokubo Y, Takiuchi S, Tanaka C, Banno M, Miwa Y, Yoshii M, Horio T, Okayama A, et al: Genetic variations of regulator of G-protein signaling 2 in hypertensive patients and in the general population. J Hypertens. 23:1497–1505. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Riddle EL, Rana BK, Murthy KK, Rao F, Eskin E, O’Connor DT and Insel PA: Polymorphisms and haplotypes of the regulator of G protein signaling-2 gene in normotensives and hypertensives. Hypertension. 47:415–420. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Kamide K, Kokubo Y, Yang J, Takiuchi S, Horio T, Matsumoto S, Banno M, Matayoshi T, Yasuda H, Miwa Y, et al: Association of intima-media thickening of carotid artery with genetic polymorphisms of the regulator of G-protein signaling 2 gene in patients with hypertension and in the general population. Hypertens Res. 34:740–746. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Kitamura K, Kangawa K, Kawamoto M, Ichiki Y, Nakamura S, Matsuo H and Eto T: Adrenomedullin: a novel hypotensive peptide isolated from human pheochromocytoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 192:553–560. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Samson WK, Resch ZT, Murphy TC, Vargas TT and Schell DA: Adrenomedullin: is there physiological relevance in the pathology and pharmacology? News Physiol Sci. 14:255–259. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Ishiyama Y, Kitamura K, Ichiki Y, Sakata J, Kida O, Kangawa K and Eto T: Haemodynamic responses to rat adrenomedullin in anaesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 22:614–618. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Parkes DG and May CN: Direct cardiac and vascular actions of adrenomedullin in conscious sheep. Br J Pharmacol. 120:1179–1185. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Hjelmqvist H, Keil R, Mathai M, Hübschle T and Gerstberger R: Vasodilation and glomerular binding of adrenomedullin in rabbit kidney are not CGRP receptor mediated. Am J Physiol. 273:R716–R724. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Lainchbury JG, Cooper GJ, Coy DH, Jiang NY, Lewis LK, Yandle TG, Richards AM and Nicholls MG: Adrenomedullin: a hypotensive hormone in man. Clin Sci (Lond). 92:467–472. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Parkes DG: Cardiovascular actions of adrenomedullin in conscious sheep. Am J Physiol. 268:H2574–H2578. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Feng CJ, Kang B, Kaye AD, Kadowitz PJ and Nossaman BD: L-NAME modulates responses to adrenomedullin in the hindquarters vascular bed of the rat. Life Sci. 55:PL433–PL438. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Fukuhara M, Tsuchihashi T, Abe I and Fujishima M: Cardiovascular and neurohormonal effects of intravenous adrenomedullin in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol. 269:R1289–R1293. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Nakamura M, Yoshida H, Makita S, Arakawa N, Niinuma H and Hiramori K: Potent and long-lasting vasodilatory effects of adrenomedullin in humans. Comparisons between normal subjects and patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 95:1214–1221. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Shirai M, Shimouchi A, Ikeda S, Ninomiya I, Sunagawa K, Kangawa K and Matsuo H: Vasodilator effects of adrenomedullin on small pulmonary arteries and veins in anaesthetized cats. Br J Pharmacol. 121:679–686. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Champion HC, Lambert DG, McWilliams SM, Shah MK, Murphy WA, Coy DH and Kadowitz PJ: Comparison of responses to rat and human adrenomedullin in the hindlimb vascular bed of the cat. Regul Pept. 70:161–165. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Dieplinger B, Mueller T, Kollerits B, Struck J, Ritz E, von Eckardstein A, Haltmayer M and Kronenberg F; MMKD Study Group. Pro-A-type natriuretic peptide and pro-adrenomedullin predict progression of chronic kidney disease: the MMKD Study. Kidney Int. 75:408–414. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hinson JP, Kapas S and Smith DM: Adrenomedullin, a multifunctional regulatory peptide. Endocr Rev. 21:138–167. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Samson WK: Proadrenomedullin-derived peptides. Front Neuroendocrinol. 19:100–127. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Gumusel B, Chang JK, Hyman A and Lippton H: Adrenotensin: an ADM gene product with the opposite effects of ADM. Life Sci. 57:PL87–PL90. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Zhou L, Qiu Z, Ye C, Di L, Liu X, Tang C and Zhao Y: Vasoactive effects of adrenotensin and its interactions with adrenomedullin. Chin Med J (Engl). 113:269–271. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Hitomi H, Fukui T, Moriwaki K, Matsubara K, Sun GP, Rahman M, Nishiyama A, Kiyomoto H, Kimura S, Ohmori K, Abe Y and Kohno M: Synergistic effect of mechanical stretch and angiotensin II on superoxide production via NADPH oxidase in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens. 24:1089–1095. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Muslin AJ: Tuning cardiomyocyte Gq signaling with RGS2. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 41:14–16. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kehrl JH and Sinnarajah S: RGS2: a multifunctional regulator of G-protein signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 34:432–438. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Beltowski J and Jamroz A: Adrenomedullin - what do we know 10 years since its discovery? Pol J Pharmacol. 56:5–27. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Sato A, Canny BJ and Autelitano DJ: Adrenomedullin stimulates cAMP accumulation and inhibits atrial natriuretic peptide gene expression in cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 230:311–314. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Cai Y, Teng X, Pan CS, Duan XH, Tang CS and Qi YF: Adrenomedullin up-regulates osteopontin and attenuates vascular calcification via the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 31:1359–1366. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Takata F, Dohgu S, Nishioku T, Takahashi H, Harada E, Makino I, Nakashima M, Yamauchi A and Kataoka Y: Adrenomedullin-induced relaxation of rat brain pericytes is related to the reduced phosphorylation of myosin light chain through the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. Neurosci Lett. 449:71–75. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Gumusel B, Chang JK, Hao Q, Hyman A and Lippton H: Adrenotensin: an adrenomedullin gene product contracts pulmonary blood vessels. Peptides. 17:461–465. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Qi YF, Bu DF, Niu DD, Shi YR, Wang SH, Pang YZ, Tang CS and Du JB: Effects of different peptide fragments derived from proadrenomedullin on gene expression of adrenomedullin gene. Peptides. 23:1141–1147. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Cuifen Z, Lijuan W, Li G, Wei X, Zhiyu W and Fuhai L: Changes and distributions of peptides derived from proadrenomedullin in left-to-right shunt pulmonary hypertension of rats. Circ J. 72:476–481. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

2014-January
Volume 9 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Mao Y, Su J, Lei L, Meng L, Qi Y, Huo Y and Tang C: Adrenomedullin and adrenotensin increase the transcription of regulator of G‑protein signaling 2 in vascular smooth muscle cells via the cAMP‑dependent and PKC pathways. Mol Med Rep 9: 323-327, 2014
APA
Mao, Y., Su, J., Lei, L., Meng, L., Qi, Y., Huo, Y., & Tang, C. (2014). Adrenomedullin and adrenotensin increase the transcription of regulator of G‑protein signaling 2 in vascular smooth muscle cells via the cAMP‑dependent and PKC pathways. Molecular Medicine Reports, 9, 323-327. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1751
MLA
Mao, Y., Su, J., Lei, L., Meng, L., Qi, Y., Huo, Y., Tang, C."Adrenomedullin and adrenotensin increase the transcription of regulator of G‑protein signaling 2 in vascular smooth muscle cells via the cAMP‑dependent and PKC pathways". Molecular Medicine Reports 9.1 (2014): 323-327.
Chicago
Mao, Y., Su, J., Lei, L., Meng, L., Qi, Y., Huo, Y., Tang, C."Adrenomedullin and adrenotensin increase the transcription of regulator of G‑protein signaling 2 in vascular smooth muscle cells via the cAMP‑dependent and PKC pathways". Molecular Medicine Reports 9, no. 1 (2014): 323-327. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1751