Inhibition of Forkhead box protein M1 by thiostrepton increases chemosensitivity to doxorubicin in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 11, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3469
- Pages: 1457-1464
Abstract
Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurs most frequently in children, with incidence peaks between the ages of 2 and 5 years, and is one of the most common childhood malignancies worldwide (1,2). T-cell ALL (T-ALL) is an aggressive type of blood malignancy, deriving from T-cell progenitors in the thymus, and comprises 10–15% of pediatric and 25% of adult primary ALL cases (3). The age of the patient at diagnosis, leukocyte count, ethnicity, gender and immunophenotype are clinical prognostic parameters, which are utilized to classify the patients into different risk groups (1). T-ALL is classified as a high-risk group in ALL (2). With the currently used intensive multi-agent chemotherapeutic procedures, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of children with T-ALL is 70–75%, whereas the EFS is 30–40% for adults <60 years of age, and 10% in those >60 years old (4). However, these types of therapy are highly toxic, and cases of relapse often develop resistance to chemotherapy, with a poor prognosis (2). Targeting leukemia-specific molecular abnormalities may further improve outcomes and reduce the adverse side effects of therapy.
Forkhead box protein M1 (FoxM1), characterized by a 100 amino acid winged-helix DNA binding domain, is a newly unified family member of the Forkhead transcription factors (5). The protein expression of FoxM1 is usually restricted to proliferating cells and is absent in quiescent or terminally differentiated cells, however, elevated expression levels of FoxM1 have been detected in a wide range of different types of human tumor and has been implicated in cellular transformation, tumor initiation and progression (6). By regulating the G1/S and G2/M transitions and M phase progression, antagonizing cellular senescence, stimulating stem cell-like characteristics (including self-renewal), promoting multiple steps of cancer progression by inducing mitogenic and survival signals, and promoting tumor invasion, migration, and angiogenesis, FoxM1 is important in tumorigenesis and cancer progression (6). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that increased expression levels of FoxM1 are associated with a poor prognosis in various types of cancer (7–11), including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (12). In addition, FoxM1 deregulation has also been associated with the development of cancer drug resistance (13). A previous study confirmed that suppression of FoxM1 enhanced the chemosen-sitivity of various types of cancer cell to the DNA-damaging reagent, doxorubicin (14). Although a number of investigations have examined the role of FoxM1 in AML (12,15–17), the role of FoxM1 in ALL, particularly pediatric ALL, remains to be elucidated.
Thiostrepton, a natural product originally isolated from Streptomyces azureus, has received significant attention due to its potent anticancer activity as a FoxM1 inhibitor (18,19). Thiostrepton can downregulate the mRNA and protein expression levels of FoxM1 (20). The mechanism by which thiostrepton affects FoxM1 has been confirmed. Thiostrepton hinders the proteasomal degradation of a negative regulator of FoxM1 (NRFM), which either directly or indirectly inhibits the activity of FoxM1 as a transcription factor (21). Notably, thiostrepton appears to exert minimal toxicity against non-malignant cells (22). Thiostrepton has exhibited anticancer activity in rodent xenograft models, without observable toxicity (23,24). Collectively, these data suggest that thiostrepton is a suitable treatment for T-ALL, particularly in children. In the present study, the antileukemia effects of thiostrepton were examined in human T-ALL Jurkat cells. Crucially, the ability of thiostrepton to sensitize Jurkat cells to doxorubicin, which is commonly used for the treatment of ALL, was assessed.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Thiostrepton (off-white powder, 1 g), purchased from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany), was freshly dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to produce a 20 mmol/l stock solution. Doxorubicin (Haizheng Medicine Co. Ltd., Zhengjiang, China) was dissolved in a stock concentration of 10 mmol/l with ddH2O and divided into five aliquots. Rabbit monoclonal antibody against FoxM1 (cat. no. 5436) was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTpi; cat. no. PB0144), survivin (cat. no. BA4055–2), caspase-3 (cat. no. BA2885–2) and β-actin (cat. no. BA2305) were obtained from Boster Biological Technology, Ltd. (Wuhan, China).
Cell lines and cell culture
The human T-ALL Jurkat cells (Key Laboratory of Tumour Molecular Biology of Binzhou Medical University (Binzhou, China) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT, USA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) at 37°C in 5% CO2.
Cell viability assay
Cell viability was assessed using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Jurkat cells were seeded into 96-well flat plates (1.5×104 cells/well) and then treated with or without various concentrations of thiostrepton (0, 1, 2 or 3 μm/l) for 24, 48 or 72 h at 37°C. The cells in the control group were treated with the equivalent quantity of dimethyl sulfoxide, at a final concentration of 0.02%. The CCK-8 kit was then used, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm using a fluorescence spectrofluorometer (F-7000; Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and the reference OD was subtracted. RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS with 0.02% DMSO served as the reference group. Cell viability was then calculated as follows: Cell viability = (ODsample - ODreference) / (ODcontrol - ODreference) × 100%. The half maximal inhibitory concentration of cells (IC50) was obtained using a probit regression analysis method (25). Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated three times.
Cell cycle analysis
The Jurkat cells were seeded into 6-well plates in RPMI-1640, containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), with or without the agents, for 24 h at 37°C. The cells were harvested and fixed with 500 μl 70% cold (−20°C) ethanol (Shenzhen Kingstone Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) at 4°C overnight, and then incubated with RNase A (KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) for 30 min at 37°C, followed by incubation with 100 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI; KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) at room temperature for 30 min. The cell cycle distribution was detected using a flow cytometer (FACS FC500; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
Detection of apoptosis
The Jurkat cells (2.5×105 cells/ml) were seeded into 6-well plates in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS, with or without the agents, for 24 h. Tells were collected and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), suspended in 500 μl binding buffer (KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.), 5 μl annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate and 5 μl PI (KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. The apoptotic cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer.
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was isolated from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RT into complementary DNA (cDNA) was performed using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA eraser (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan). qPCR was performed using a SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) on an ABI PRISM 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The cycling parameters were as follows: 95°C for 30 sec, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec, 60°C for 34 sec. The isolation of RNA, RT and qPCR were performed, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used (Table I) were designed using Primer 5 version 5.6.0 software and synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co, Ltd. (Shanghai, China). GAPDH was used as an internal control. qPCR for each gene of each cDNA sample was assayed in triplicate. The results were calculated using the 2−∆∆Ct method. The following equations were used: ΔCt = Ct(target gene) - Ct(actin); ΔΔCt = ΔCt(thiostrepton-treated cells) - ΔCt(untreated control).
Western blot analysis
The ells were lysed in 100 μl radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China)., supplemented with 1 μl phenylmeth-ylsulfonyl fluoride (Beyotime Biotechnology), and the protein concentration of the lysate was determined using a Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). The proteins (50 μg/lane) were separated by 8–12% SDS-PAGE (Beyotime Biotechnology) and transferred to polyvinylidine difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 2 h, and then incubated overnight at 4°C with specific antibodies. The primary antibodies used were rabbit monoclonal antibody against FoxM1 (1:1,000), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against GSTpi (1:200), survivin (1:200), caspase-3 (1:200) and β-actin (1:1,000). The following day, the membrane was incubated in horesradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (1:5,000; cat. no. ZB-5301; Beijing ZhongShan-Golden Bridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, images were captured using a FluorChem FC2 gel imaging system (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA).
Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular doxorubicin accumulation
The intracellular accumulation of doxorubicin was measured using a standard fluorescent method (26). The Jurkat cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10 FBS, with increasing concentrations of thiostrepton (0, 1, 2 or 3 μM) for 24 h at 37°C. The medium was then replaced with RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and doxorubicin (0.2 μM), in which the cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were then harvested and washed twice in ice-cold PBS. The cell-associated mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of intracellular doxorubicin was determined using the FACS FC500 flow cytometer with excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 585 nm, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The significance of differences between groups were determined using Student’s t-test or analysis of variance. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The synergistic or antagonistic effects of the two drugs were evaluated, according to the formula [Q = Ea + b / (Ea + Eb - EaxEb)]. In this equation, Ea and Eb represent the individual inhibitory rates of drugs A and B, respectively, and Ea + b represents the inhibitory rate of the combined drug therapy on tumor cell proliferation. Q-values ranging between 0.85 and 1.15 indicated that the effects of the two drugs were simply additive, whereas Q-values >1.15 indicated a synergistic effect, and Q-values <0.85 indicated an antagonistic effect for the combined drug therapy.
Results
Thiostrepton suppresses the viability of Jurkat cells
The Jurkat cells were treated with various concentrations of thiostrepton (0–4 μM) for 24, 48 or 72 h, and the effect of thiostrepton on cell viability was evaluated using a CCK-8 assay. The results demonstrated that the Jurkat cells were sensitive to thiostrepton, and that thiostrepton inhibited cell growth in a time- and dose-dependent manner (P<0.05; Fig. 1). The IC50 values for thiostrepton in the Jurkat cells at 24, 48 and 72 h were 2.03, 1.52 and 1.29 μM, respectively.
Thiostrepton-mediated inhibition of FoxM1 induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and leads to apoptosis of Jurkat cells
To further characterize the mechanism underlying the antileukemia activity of thiostrepton on the Jurkat cells, the mRNA and protein expression levels of FoxM1 were determined following treatment with various concentrations of thiostrepton (0, 1, 2 or 3 μM) for 24 h, to examine whether thiostrepton affected cell cycle distribution or apoptosis. The results revealed that thiostrepton inhibited the expression of FoxM1 in a dose-dependent manner, and induced gradual dose-dependent G2/M arrest and apoptosis in the Jurkat cells (Fig. 2).
Inhibition of FoxM1 by thiostrepton enhances the antiproliferative effects of doxorubicin on Jurkat cells
Based on the aforementioned findings, the present study subsequently investigated whether the Jurkat cells with reduced expression of FoxM1 were more sensitive to doxorubicin, a common antileukemic drug used in the treatment of ALL. As shown in Fig. 1, treatment with 1 μM thiostrepton for 24 h resulted in a 7.70±0.95% reduction of viable cells (P<0.05) compared with the control group, therefore, the concentration of 1 μM was considered to be a non-cytotoxic dose. The Jurkat cells were incubated with various concentrations of doxorubicin (0–0.8 μm/l), with or without thiostrepton (1 μm/l), for 24 h. Cell proliferation was measured by performing CCK-8 assays. The results demonstrated that the combined treatment reduced the IC50 value of doxorubicin in the Jurkat cells between 0.295 and 0.198 μmol/l (Fig. 3). Thiostrepton and doxorubicin were identified to synergistically inhibit cell growth, with Q values often >1.15 (Table II). It was suggested that the inhibition of FoxM1 by thiostrepton increased the chemosensitivity of Jurkat cells to doxorubicin.
Table IIInteraction between doxorubicin and thiostrepton in combined treatment with different doses of doxorubicin. |
Thiostrepton enhances doxorubicin-induced caspase-mediated apoptosis in Jurkat cells
The present study then examined whether thiostrepton enhances doxorubicin-induced cell apoptosis. The Jurkat cells were treated with a low concentration of either thiostrepton (1 μm/l) or doxorubicin (0.2 μm/l), or treated with the two drugs in combination for 24 h. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that thiostrepton increased doxorubicin-induced apoptosis between 16.98±2.87 and 36.07±4.18% (P<0.05; Fig. 4A). To determine the mechanism leading to the cell apoptosis, the protein expression levels of survivin and caspase-3 were examined. As shown in Fig. 4B, decreases in the expression of survivin were significantly greater in the cells treated with thiostrepton and doxorubicin in combination, compared with those in the single treatment groups. In addition, combination treatment resulted in greater increases in the protein expression of caspase-3 compared with either drug alone (Fig. 4B).
Thiostrepton increases the intracellular accumulation of doxorubicin in Jurkat cells
The capability of thiostrepton to promote doxorubicin accumulation within Jurkat cells was observed (Fig. 5). The doxorubicin-associated MFI was significantly increased in Jurkat cells, which were treated with various concentrations of thiostrepton (1, 2 or 3 μM) for 24 h, which explained the enhanced effects of thiostrepton on doxorubicin cytotoxicity in the Jurkat cells. In addition, thiostrepton was observed to elevate the concentration of doxorubicin in the Jurkat cells in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.05).
Inhibition of FoxM1 by thiostrepton decreases the gene and protein expression levels of GSTpi within the Jurkat cells
To better understand the mechanism by which thiostrepton functionally elevated drug accumulation within the Jurkat cells, the mRNA and protein expression levels of GSTpi were quantitatively measured. The Jurkat cells were treated with various concentrations of thiostrepton (0, 1, 2 or 3 μM) for 24 h. The gene and protein expression levels of GSTpi in the Jurkat cells decreased significantly when the cells were treated with thiostrepton (P<0.05; Fig. 6). The results indicated that the inhibition of FoxM1 by thiostrepton downregulated the expression of GSTpi in a dose-dependent manner in the Jurkat cells (P<0.05).
Discussion
T-ALL is a genetically heterogeneous type of cancer, with 20% of childhood patients and the majority of adult patients succumbing to mortality from disease resistance or relapse (27). Current standard therapies have unsatisfactory effects on survival rates, and therapy-associated side-effects have led to a focus on identifying novel therapeutic approaches for T-ALL. The present study was the first, to the best of our knowledge, to demonstrate thiostrepton-induced inhibition of FoxM1 in human T-ALL Jurkat cells. The results revealed that thiostrepton inhibited Jurkat cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. It was also demonstrated that thiostrepton enhanced the chemo-sensitivity of the Jurkat cells to doxorubicin by enhancing doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and increasing the intracellular accumulation of doxorubicin.
The present study investigated the antileukemic effects of thiostrepton on Jurkat cell proliferation. Thiostrepton significantly inhibited the proliferation of Jurkat cells, and the IC50 value of thiostrepton in the Jurkat cells following 48 h treatment was 1.52 μmol/l, suggesting the sensitivity of the Jurkat cells to thiostrepton was comparable to that of other types of cancer cell (28,29). Furthermore, the results of the present study indicated that thiostrepton induced G2/M cell cycle phase arrest and increased apoptosis in the Jurkat cells. These results demonstrated the efficient antileukemic activity of thiostrepton on Jurkat cells, and suggested that the effects of thiostrepton may depend on the downregulation of FoxM1 target genes, which have been found to be involved in the regulation of cell growth, apoptosis, cell cycle and progression (30).
Previous studies have suggested that silencing FoxM1 enhances sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents in various types of cancer cells (14,29), therefore, the present study investigated whether the thiostrepton-mediated inhibition of FoxM1 sensitized the Jurkat cells to the effects of chemotherapy. the IC50 value of doxorubicin in the Jurkat cells decreased between 0.295 and 0.198 μmol/l when thiostrepton (1 μmol/l) was used in combination. These results demonstrated that thiostrepton enhanced the doxorubicin cytotoxicity effect within the Jurkat cells through a synergistic effect of thiostrepton and doxorubicin. Therefore, a combination therapy approach using doxorubicin and thiostrepton can improve the effect of doxorubicin and also reduce the adverse side-effects of doxorubicin, by allowing it to be used at lower doses in treating human T-ALL.
The ability to induce leukemic cell death is critical for successful treatment with chemotherapeutic drugs. In the present study, flow cytometric analysis revealed a more marked increase in apoptosis in cells treated with a combination of thiostrepton and doxorubicin, compared with those treated with either drug alone. To further examine the mechanism underlying the increased efficacy of combination treatment, proteins, which are known to regulate apoptosis, were examined. Survivin is known for its role in preventing apoptosis and conferring resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in various cell lines (31). Specifically, its anti-apoptotic function appears to be associated with the ability to directly or indirectly inhibit caspases (31). In the present study, the cells treated with thiostrepton and doxorubicin combined exhibited a greater decrease in the protein expression of survivin compared with the cells treatedwith doxorubicin only, and thiostrepton also enhanced doxorubicin-induced increases in the protein expression of caspase-3. These results suggested that the inhibition of FoxM1 by thiostrepton sensitized the Jurkat cells to doxorubicin, partly through enhanced apoptosis, possibly via a caspase-3-dependent pathway.
In the present study, thiostrepton significantly elevated the concentration of doxorubicin in Jurkat cells in a dose-dependent manner, while promoting doxorubicin accumulation within the Jurkat cells. To determine the mechanism by which thiostrepton functionally elevated drug accumulation within the Jurkat cells, the expression of GSTpi was measured. Previous studies have demonstrated that the mRNA and protein expression levels of GSTpi are high in Jurkat cells (32). GSTpi is a cytosolic isoform of glutathione s-transferases (GSTs) and its overexpression is associated with resistance to chemotherapy in various types of human cell (33). GSTs belong to a large family of functional enzymes, which catalyze the S-conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with a wide variety of electrophilic compounds (34). In addition to increasing GST enzyme activity, alteration of cellular GSH levels has also been observed to contribute the resistance of cells to doxorubicin (35). The results of the present study further revealed that the mRNA and protein expression levels of the GSTpi gene were significantly inhibited by thiostrepton. These results indicated that thiostrepton elevated the sensitivity of Jurkat cells to doxorubicin, partly by increasing the accumulation of intracellular doxorubicin, possibly via downregulating the expression of GSTpi.
In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that thiostrepton significantly inhibited the proliferation, and induced the apoptosis of Jurkat cells. The inhibition of FoxM1 by thiostrepton also chemosensitized the Jurkat cells to doxorubicin by enhancing doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and elevating the accumulation of intracellular doxorubicin. These results suggested that the inhibition of FoxM1 by thiostrepton have wide therapeutic and/or adjuvant applications for T-ALL chemotherapy. Thiostrepton may be particularly useful in young children with resistant or relapsed T-ALL, who currently require more aggressive chemotherapeutic agents.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the NCET-10-0919, ‘Taishan Scholar’ position, National Natural Science Foundation (nos. 31371321 and 81200601), the Shandong Science and Technology Committee (no. 2010GSF10264), the Foundation of Shandong Educational Committee (nos. J10LC60 and J11LC01) and the Binzhou Science and Technology Committee of China (no. 2011ZC0905).
References
Inaba H, Greaves M and Mullighan CG: Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 381:1943–1955. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bhojwani D and Pui CH: Relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol. 14:e205–217. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Van Vlierberghe P and Ferrando A: The molecular basis of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 122:3398–3406. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Martelli AM, Lonetti A, Buontempo F, et al: Targeting signaling pathways in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia initiating cells. Adv Biol Regul. 56:6–21. Apr 30–2014.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wierstra I and Alves J: FOXM1, a typical proliferation-associated transcription factor. Biol Chem. 388:1257–1274. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koo CY, Muir KW and Lam EW: FOXM1: From cancer initiation to progression and treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1819:28–37. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Priller M, Pöschl J, Abrão L, et al: Expression of FoxM1 is required for the proliferation of medulloblastoma cells and indicates worse survival of patients. Clin Cancer Res. 17:6791–6801. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xue YJ, Xiao RH, Long DZ, et al: Overexpression of FoxM1 is associated with tumor progression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 10:2002012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xia JT, Wang H, Liang LJ, et al: Overexpression of FOXM1 is associated with poor prognosis and clinicopathologic stage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 41:629–635. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu N, Jia D, Chen W, et al: FoxM1 is associated with poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients through promoting tumor metastasis. PLoS One. 8:e594122013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li X, Qiu W, Liu B, et al: Forkhead box transcription factor 1 expression in gastric cancer: FOXM1 is a poor prognostic factor and mediates resistance to docetaxel. J Transl Med. 11:2042013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu LL, Zhang DH, Mao X, Zhang XH and Zhang B: Over-expression of FoxM1 is associated with adverse prognosis and FLT3-ITD in acute myeloid leukemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 446:280–285. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Myatt SS and Lam EW: The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 7:847–859. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Halasi M and Gartel AL: Suppression of FOXM1 sensitizes human cancer cells to cell death induced by DNA-damage. PLoS One. 7:e317612012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakamura S, Hirano I, Okinaka K, et al: The FOXM1 transcriptional factor promotes the proliferation of leukemia cells through modulation of cell cycle progression in acute myeloid leukemia. Carcinogenesis. 31:2012–2021. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang X, Zeng J, Zhou M, et al: The tumor suppressive role of miRNA-370 by targeting FoxM1 in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Cancer. 11:562012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mencalha AL, Binato R, Ferreira GM, Du Rocher B and Abdelhay E: Forkhead box M1 (FoxM1) gene is a new STAT3 transcriptional factor target and is essential for proliferation, survival and DNA repair of K562 cell line. PloS one. 7:e481602012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bhat UG, Halasi M and Gartel AL: FoxM1 is a general target for proteasome inhibitors. PLoS One. 4:e65932009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hegde NS, Sanders DA, Rodriguez R and Balasubramanian S: The transcription factor FOXM1 is a cellular target of the natural product thiostrepton. Nat Chem. 3:725–731. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hedge NS, Sanders DA, Rodriguez R and Balasubramanian S: The transcription factor FOXM1 is a cellular target of the natural product thiostrepton. Nat Chem. 3:725–731. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gartel AL: Thiostrepton, proteasome inhibitors and FOXM1. Cell Cycle. 10:4341–4342. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Halasi M, Schraufnagel DP and Gartel AL: Wild-type p53 protects normal cells against apoptosis induced by thiostrepton. Cell Cycle. 8:2850–2851. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ahmed M, Uddin S, Hussain AR, et al: FoxM1 and its association with matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) signaling pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 97:E1–13. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang M and Gartel AL: Micelle-encapsulated thiostrepton as an effective nanomedicine for inhibiting tumor growth and for suppressing FOXM1 in human xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther. 10:2287–2297. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu X, Li X, Wang L, et al: Realgar induces apoptosis in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell line MEC1. Mol Med Rep. 8:1866–1870. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ji BS, He L and Liu GQ: Reversal of p-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance by CJX1, an amlodipine derivative, in doxorubicin-resistant human myelogenous leukemia (K562/DOX) cells. Life Sci. 77:2221–2232. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Van Vlierberghe P, A mbesi-I mpiombato A, De Keersmaecker K, et al: Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 122:74–82. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bhat UG, Halasi M and Gartel AL: Thiazole antibiotics target FoxM1 and induce apoptosis in human cancer cells. PLoS One. 4:e55922009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin J, Zheng Y, Chen K, Huang Z, Wu X and Zhang N: Inhibition of FOXM1 by thiostrepton sensitizes medulloblastoma to the effects of chemotherapy. Oncol Rep. 30:1739–1744. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Halasi M and Gartel AL: FOX(M1) news - it is cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 12:245–254. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zaffaroni N, Pennati M and Daidone MG: Survivin as a target for new anticancer interventions. J Cell Mol Med. 9:360–372. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou L, Jing Y, Styblo M, Chen Z and Waxman S: Glutathione-S-transferase pi inhibits As2O3-induced apoptosis in lymphoma cells: involvement of hydrogen peroxide catabolism. Blood. 105:1198–1203. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lourenco GJ, Lorand-Metze I, Delamain MT, et al: Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase mu 1, theta 1 and pi 1 genes and prognosis in Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 51:2215–2221. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ballerini S, Bellincampi L, Bernardini S, Iori R, Cortese C and Federici G: Analysis of GSTP1–1 polymorphism using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clin Chim Acta. 329:127–132. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Song YN, Guo XL, Zheng BB, et al: Ligustrazine derivate DLJ14 reduces multidrug resistance of K562/A02 cells by modulating GSTπ activity. Toxicol In Vitro. 25:937–943. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |