Evaluation of suitable control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of maternal plasma cell-free DNA

  • Authors:
    • Qiwei Yang
    • Xiuying Li
    • Hassan Abdellah Ahmed Ali
    • Shan Yu
    • Yucheng Zhang
    • Mei Wu
    • Sujie Gao
    • Guanjie Zhao
    • Zhenwu Du
    • Guizhen Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 17, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4334
  • Pages: 7728-7734
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The content stability of commonly used control genes is considered to vary significantly in different independent experimental systems, either in the expression of RNA expression or in the level of DNA content. The present study aimed to examine a panel of six common control genes, including β‑globin (HBB), telomerase (TERT), glyceraldehyde‑3‑phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), albumin (ALB), β‑actin (ACTB) and T cell receptor γ (TRG), in order to evaluate and validate the most reliable control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in investigations for the analysis of fetal‑derived DNA and maternal‑derived DNA in maternal plasma to enable non‑invasive prenatal assessment. Plasma DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood of 20 pregnant femals (gestational age, 18.67±0.58 weeks) using a QIAamp DNA mini kit. Electrophoresis was performed to separate the fetal‑derived DNA and the maternal‑derived DNA at the 300bp position. qPCR was then performed, followed by geNorm‑, NormFinder‑ and BestKeeper‑based analyses to evaluated the content stabilities of the six candidate control genes in the fetal‑derived DNA and maternal‑derived DNA. The subsequent analysis of the experimental data revealed that HBB was expressed in the maternal‑ and fetal‑derived DNA together and in the maternal‑derived DNA alone. In addition, GAPDH in the fetal‑derived DNA enabled efficient normalization for qPCR investigations in the maternal plasma DNA.

Introduction

Following the confirmation by Lo et al (1) of the presence of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma and serum in 1997, investigations have focussed on the utilization of cffDNA in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). To date, cffDNA analysis is widely used in numerous NIPT, including for fetal gender determination (2), Rhesus blood group D (RhD) antigen status determination (3), and for the assessment of monogenic diseases and chromosomal aneuploidies prenatally (4).

CffDNA is widely accepted to originate predominantly from the product of placenta trophoblast apoptosis (5), and exhibits a distinctive molecular characteristic. CffDNA molecules are generally <300 bps in length, while the maternally-derived cell-free plasma DNA are >300 bps in length (6,7). Based on these observations, it is possible to separate cffDNA molecules from the overwhelming quantity of maternal-derived DNA.

Several techniques are used for analyzing cffDNA, including methylated DNA immunoprecipitation, digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and massively parallel sequencing (810). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the most fundamental, cost efficient and common method used for cffDNA analysis, however, its accuracy is affected by a number of external and internal factors, including the quantity of the initial samples, the quality of templates and the PCR efficiency (11). Therefore, it is necessary to normalize the gene level. At present, the use of control genes as a standard normalizer (12) is the most common method. Control genes are commonly defined as genes, which ubiquitously exist at stable levels in different biological contexts and are used to confirm the presence and quality of DNA in each sample, as well as measure the quantity of total (maternal and fetal) DNA in each sample (13). However, no single universal and entirely constant control gene has been reported. Accumulating evidence has indicated that the content levels of widely used control genes vary significantly in different independent studies (1416). Therefore, it is essential to compare and evaluate the content stability of each control gene prior to use for normalization in cffDNA analysis. To the best of our current knowledge, the commonly used control genes for cffDNA analysis are selected, almost without any preliminary evaluation of their content suitability.

The present study aimed to examine the content stability of six commonly used control genes, which exist as differently sized maternal plasma DNA molecules, including those >300 bps, considered maternally-derived DNA, and <300 bps, considered fetally-derived DNA. These control genes are β-globin (HBB), telomerase (TERT), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), albumin (ALB), β-actin (ACTB) and T cell receptor γ (TRG), and they were selected based on previous reports on cffDNA using the qPCR method. In the present study, three common statistical algorithm programs, geNorm (17), NormFinder (18) and BestKeeper (19), were used to evaluate the content stabilities of the six genes. The results of the present study aimed to reveal optimal control gene selections for further investigations on cffDNA.

Materials and methods

Plasma sample collection and DNA extraction

The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Second Hospital, Jilin University (Jilin, China). For the investigation, 2 ml of peripheral blood was collected from the cubital vein of 20 pregnant females (gestational age, 18.67±0.58 weeks) and written informed consent was obtained from each individual prior to commencement of the investigation. The blood samples were anticoagulated using EDTA (1.5%). DNA was extracted from the plasma of each sample using a QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions, within 4 h of blood collection.

Separation of maternal-and fetal-derived DNA

The extracted DNA was subjected to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (7,20), and was visualized under ultraviolet light (GIS-2008, Peiqing Science & Technology, Shanghai, China). Each lane was cut at a position of 300 bps into two discrete sections, according to the DL500 DNA marker (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan) and extracted from the agarose using a AxyPrep Gel Extraction kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA with a length <300 bps was defined as fetal-derived DNA (fetal group) and DNA with lengths >300 bps was defined as maternal-derived DNA (maternal group).

qPCR analysis

The subsequent qPCR analysis was performed using an ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA). The primers of the control genes were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and the sequences are presented in Table I.

Table I

Primer sequences, product sizes and PCR efficiency.

Table I

Primer sequences, product sizes and PCR efficiency.

SymbolPrimer sequenceProduct size (bp)PCR efficiency R2-value
HBB F-GTGCACCTGACTCCTGAGGAGA1012.580.97
R-CCTTGATACCAACCTGCCCAG
TERT F-GGTGAACCTCGTAAGTTTATGCAA972.000.97
R-GGCACACGTGGCTTTTCG
GAPDH F-GGACTGAGGCTCCCACCTTT1571.720.99
R-GCATGGACTGTGGTCTGCAA
ALB F-TGAAACATACGTTAACCCAAAGAGTTT801.790.99
R-CTCTCCTTCTCAGAAAGTGTGCATAT
ACTB F-CCTGTACGCCAACACAGTGC2112.080.98
R-ATACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCC
TRG F-AGGGTTGTGTTGGAATCAGG1601.820.97
R-CGTCGACAACAAGTGTTGTTCCAC

[i] PCR, polymerase chain reaction; F, forward; R, reverse; HBB, β-globin; TERT, telomerase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydroge-nase; ALB, albumin; ACTB, β-actin; TRG, T cell receptor γ.

The qPCR reactions were performed in a 20 µl volume containing DNA (8 ng) using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit (Takara Bio, Inc.), including 10 µl SYBR Premix Ex Taq (2X), 0.4 µl ROX Reference Dye (50X) and 1 µl forward/reverse primer (10 µM each), made up to 20 µl with deionized water, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The amplification was performed using an ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies) and subjected to the following cycling steps: Initial step of 95°C for 10 min, followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 58°C for 15 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. Each assay was performed four times. The results of the qPCR results were subjected to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. To estimate the efficiencies of amplification, a standard curve was generated by Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) for each primer pair based on four points of serial 2-fold dilutions of the DNA template and performed qPCR reactions as described above.

Statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel was used to calculate the mean and standard deviation (SD) values. The amplification efficiencies were calculated using the slope of the calibration curve with the equation, E = 2−1/slope, following which the correlation coefficients (R2 values) were determined.

The content stabilities of the six candidate control genes were assessed using three commonly used programs: geNorm (http://medgen.ugent.be/~jvdesomp/genorm/), NormFinder (http://moma.dk/normfinder-software) and BestKeeper (http://www.gene-quantification.de/bestkeeper.html), according to the manufacturer's instructions. In geNorm and NormFinder, the threshold cycle (Ct) values were converted into relative quantities using the 2−ΔCt formula (ΔCt = Ct − lowest Ct). For BestKeeper, the raw Ct values were used directly. These three programs were all based on Microsoft Excel, using different algorithms to determinate the stability of the control genes.

Results

Amplification performance of primers

The qPCR amplification product was detected using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and was of the expected size with no primer dimers (Fig. 1A). A single peak was obtained in each amplification reaction during the analysis of the dissociation curves, which confirmed the specific amplification of the primers (Fig. 1B). The sequences, corresponding amplicon sizes, PCR efficiencies of the primers and R2 values are listed in Table I.

Amplification profile of the candidate control genes

The amplification profiles of the candidate control genes were estimated according to the Ct values of the six biological samples. As shown in Fig. 2, the mean Ct values of each gene in the maternal group and fetal group were determined.

The control genes exhibited Ct values varying between 32.78, for ACTB, and 38.74, for TERT, in the total samples (Fig. 2A). Among these genes, ACTB exhibited the lowest Ct value (32.25–33.43) and TERT exhibited the highest Ct value (37.23–40.22), followed by GAPDH (36.13–39.48), as shown in Fig. 2A. Among these six candidate control genes, TRG was the most variable in terms of content, with a high SD value (2.63) in the maternal group (Fig. 2B). ACTB was the candidate control gene with the lowest SD values (0.34 and 0.49 in the maternal and fetal group, respectively; Fig. 2B and C). No significant difference in Ct values were observed between the maternal and fetal group for any of the genes.

Content stability of the candidate control genes

According to the geNorm database, HBB and GAPDH were the most stable genes, with the lowest M values, which were followed by ACTB, in the total sample and fetal group, whereas ALB and TERT were ranked as the most stable genes in the maternal group (Fig. 3A–C). TRG was considered to be an unstable gene in all three groups. Notably, almost none of the pairwise variation values were below the cutoff value (V=0.15), with the exception of V5/6 in the fetal group (Fig. 3D). This result indicated that combining five control genes together in the fetal group increased the stability for normalization. No optimal combination number of control genes were identified for normalization in the other groups.

The results of the NormFinder analysis indicated that HBB was the most content stable gene, with a stability value of 0.325, in the total samples (Fig. 4A). The optimal combination of two genes was determined to be HBB and GAPDH. The stability value of the HBB/GADPH combination (0.249) was lower than that of HBB alone (0.325), which suggested that the combination of these two genes provided higher stability, compared with HBB alone (Fig. 4A). HBB and ACTB were identified as the most content stable genes in the maternal and fetal group, respectively (Fig. 4B and C).

The results of the BestKeeper analysis revealed that HBB demonstrated the highest stability in the total samples and in the maternal group, whereas GAPDH was determined as the optimal performer n the fetal group (Fig. 5A–C). On examination of the variance (Fig. 5D–F), the SD value of TRG was >1.00 in the total samples and maternal group, therefore, it was considered unacceptable and eliminated from the stability analysis.

Discussion

The identification of cffDNA in maternal plasma has become a primary target for NIPT (1). In healthy gravidae, cffDNA can be detected in maternal plasma as early as the seventh week following conception (21), which then increases as pregnancy progresses (22) and reaches a plateau in the ensuing three months, being cleared from the maternal plasma to become absent within 2 h of delivery (23). Furthermore, cffDNA molecules are generally shorter than 300 bps in length, whereas maternal-derived molecules are longer than 300 bps in length (6,7), which enables cffDNA molecules to be readily separated from the original maternal DNA using electrophoresis. These properties have rendered cffDNA as an optimal material for NIPT. At present, qPCR is the most fundamental, cost efficient and commonly used method in investigations of cffDNA. Due to its low cost and ease of operation, qPCR is constantly being applied to attempt to diagnose numerous types of hereditary disease. To date, gender determination (24,25) and several diseases, including β-thalassemia (26,27), RhD fetal blood group genotyping (2830), trisomy 21 (31) and X chromosome aneuploidies (32) have been successfully diagnosed using qPCR. In the process of quantitative investigations, control genes are important. A suitable control genes is required to be stably expressed in both maternal- and fetal-derived DNA. An ideal control gene in maternal plasma is that which is not affected or regulated by pregnancy conditions, stress response, stimulation or any other physiological or pathological state throughout the pregnancy process (33). However, there is accumulating evidence suggesting that the content levels of widely used control genes vary significantly in different independent investigations, for example the single-copy DNA control gene, HBB, which is used to represent the cell number has been suggested to be not the most reliable control gene (13). Our previous study also revealed that the content stability of widely used control genes for DNA demonstrated significant variation in the plasma DNA of pregnant and non-pregnant individuals (14). It is essential to normalize the control gene content levels and determine reliable control genes prior to any qPCR analysis. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate the content stability of control genes commonly used in maternal- and fetal-derived DNA, respectively. The present study collected blood samples in the second trimester of gestation, at which stage the content of cffDNA is stable. Subsequently, six candidate control genes were assessed, including HBB, TERT, GAPDH, ALB, ACTB and TRG, which were estimated using the geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper statistical algorithms.

Onn analysis of the raw Ct values, ACTB exhibited the lowest mean Ct values, followed by HBB and TRG. By contrast, ACTB exhibited the lowest variation in content levels, indicated by the SD values, whereas TERT exhibited the highest mean Ct values. TRG exhibited the highest SD values, which indicated that its content varied markedly.

On the basis of the results obtained from the three statistical software programmes, HBB was confirmed as the most content stable gene when analyzing maternal- and fetal-derived DNA together and maternal-derived DNA alone; GAPDH was considered the most content stable gene in fetal-derived DNA. The ranking order of the candidate genes in terms of stability differed marginally. These differences may have been caused by the different calculation algorithms used in the three software programmes (34) and indicated different features of the correlations between these control genes.

The optimal number of control genes for normalization was suggested by genes with a V-value below the cutoff value of 0.15 in geNorm (17). No optimal combination of the selected control genes had a V-value below the cutoff value, with the exception of the use of five genes in the fetal group. Thalita (35) reported that the combination of genes cannot increase the accuracy definitely and it is suggested, if conditions permit, that three of the most stable control genes are used, rather than a single gene (36). The number of control genes also depends on the experimental conditions.

Of note, the concentration of cffDNA in plasma is low (22) and the majority originates from the apoptosis of placental trophoblasts resulting in fragments shorter than 300 bps in length. These characteristics affect the PCR amplification of cffDNA, as the length of the cffDNA template is limited at 300 bps, whereas a longer template of the target gene increases the number of opportunities to be digested in the process of apoptosis (2). Therefore, amplicon sizes are required to be sufficiently short to ensure adequate effective templates for PCR amplification.

Increasingly, studies are focusing on the clinical application of cffDNA, which is relevant to NIPT. However, to the best of our knowledge, the control genes used in analysis of cffDNA are selected without confirmation of the content stability of these control genes in maternal plasma DNA. The present study validated the most content stable control genes in maternal- and fetal-derived DNA at the second trimester of gestational age, which can be used as a criterion in subsequent investigations.

In conclusion, the present study indicated that the content stability of control genes used for analyzing plasma DNA exhibited significant variation between maternal- and fetal-derived DNA, therefore, all qPCR performed to analyze cffDNA requires the initial selection of an appropriate control gene individually. The results of the present study also indicated that HBB in maternal- and fetal-derived DNA, and in maternal-derived DNA alone, and GAPDH in fetal-derived DNA enable efficient normalization for qPCR investigations in maternal plasma DNA. These results also present an appropriate strategy for the evaluation of candidate control genes for genomic DNA qPCR analysis.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Project supported by the Key Foundation of Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department, China (grant. no. 20130727038YY), the Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department, China (grant. nos. 20100942 and 20110740) and the Jilin Provincial Development and Reform Commission, China (grant. no. 20101928).

References

1 

Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW and Wainscoat JS: Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 350:485–487. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Khorram Khorshid HR, Zargari M, Sadeghi MR, Edallatkhah H, Shahhosseiny MH and Kamali K: Early fetal gender determination using real-time PCR analysis of cell-free fetal DNA during 6th–10th weeks of gestation. Acta Med Iran. 51:209–214. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Teitelbaum L, Metcalfe A, Clarke G, Parboosingh JS, Wilson RD and Johnson JM: Costs and benefits of non-invasive fetal RhD determination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 45:84–88. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Xiong L, Barrett AN, Hua R, Tan TZ, Ho SS, Chan JK, Zhong M and Choolani M: Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for β-thalassaemia using cell-free fetal DNA and next generation sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 35:258–265. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Alberry M, Maddocks D, Jones M, Abdel Hadi M, Abdel-Fattah S, Avent N and Soothill PW: Free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in anembryonic pregnancies: Confirmation that the origin is the trophoblast. Prenat Diagn. 27:415–418. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Chan KC, Zhang J, Hui AB, Wong N, Lau TK, Leung TN, Lo KW, Huang DW and Lo YM: Size distributions of maternal and fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Clin Chem. 50:88–92. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Li Y, Zimmermann B, Rusterholz C, Kang A, Holzgreve W and Hahn S: Size separation of circulatory DNA in maternal plasma permits ready detection of fetal DNA polymorphisms. Clin Chem. 50:1002–1011. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Papageorgiou EA, Fiegler H, Rakyan V, Beck S, Hulten M, Lamnissou K, Carter NP and Patsalis PC: Sites of differential DNA methylation between placenta and peripheral blood: molecular markers for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies. Am J Pathol. 174:1609–1618. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Lun FM, Tsui NB, Chan KC, Leung TY, Lau TK, Charoenkwan P, Chow KC, Lo WY, Wanapirak C, Sanguansermsri T, Cantor CR, Chiu RW and Lo YM: Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases by digital size selection and relative mutation dosage on DNA in maternal plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:19920–19925. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Fan HC, Blumenfeld YJ, Chitkara U, Hudgins L and Quake SR: Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:16266–16271. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zhong Q, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Qi J, Chen Y, Li S, Sun Y, Li C and Lan X: Expression profiling and validation of potential reference genes during Paralichthys olivaceus embryogenesis. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 10:310–318. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Dheda K, Huggett JF, Bustin SA, Johnson MA, Rook G and Zumla A: Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Biotechniques. 37:112–114. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Steinau M, Rajeevan MS and Unger ER: DNA and RNA references for qRT-PCR assays in exfoliated cervical cells. J Mol Diagn. 8:113–118. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Yang Q, Ali HA, Yu S, Zhang L, Li X, Du Z and Zhang G: Evaluation and validation of the suitable control genes for quantitative PCR studies in plasma DNA for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Int J Mol Med. 34:1681–1687. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Li X, Yang Q, Bai J, Xuan Y and Wang Y: Identification of appropriate reference genes for human mesenchymal stem cell analysis by quantitative real-time PCR. Biotechnol Lett. 37:67–73. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Li X, Yang Q, Bai J, Yang Y, Zhong L and Wang Y: Identification of optimal reference genes for quantitative PCR studies on human mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Med Rep. 11:1304–1311. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A and Speleman F: Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3:RESEARCH00342002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Andersen CL, Jensen JL and Ørntoft TF: Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: A model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 64:5245–5250. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C and Neuvians TP: Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper-Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 26:509–515. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Jorgez CJ and Bischoff FZ: Improving enrichment of circulating fetal DNA for genetic testing: Size fractionation followed by whole gene amplification. Fetal Diagn Ther. 25:314–319. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Galbiati S, Smid M, Gambini D, Ferrari A, Restagno G, Viora E, Campogrande M, Bastonero S, Pagliano M, Calza S, et al: Fetal DNA detection in maternal plasma throughout gestation. Hum Genet. 117:243–248. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Lo YM, Tein MS, Lau TK, Haines CJ, Leung TN, Poon PM, Wainscoat JS, Johnson PJ, Chang AM and Hjelm NM: Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: Implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Am J Hum Genet. 62:768–775. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Lo YM, Zhang J, Leung TN, Lau TK, Chang AM and Hjelm NM: Rapid clearance of fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet. 64:218–224. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Aghanoori MR, Vafaei H, Kavoshi H, Mohamadi S and Goodarzi HR: Sex determination using free fetal DNA at early gestational ages: A comparison between a modified mini-STR genotyping method and real-time PCR. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 207:202.e1–e8. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Lim JH, Park SY, Kim SY, Kim do J, Choi JE, Kim MH, Choi JS, Kim MY, Yang JH and Ryu HM: Effective detection of fetal sex using circulating fetal DNA in first-trimester maternal plasma. FASEB J. 26:250–258. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Yenilmez ED, Tuli A and Evrüke IC: Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis experience in the Çukurova Region of Southern Turkey: Detecting paternal mutations of sickle cell anemia and β-thalassemia in cell-free fetal DNA using high-resolution melting analysis. Prenat Diagn. 33:1054–1062. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Gao T, Nie Y, Hu H and Liang Z: Hypermethylation of IGSF4 gene for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of thalassemia. Med Sci Monit. 18:BR33–BR40. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Scheffer PG, van der Schoot CE, Page-Christiaens GC and de Haas M: Noninvasive fetal blood group genotyping of rhesus D, c, E and of K in alloimmunised pregnant women: Evaluation of a 7-year clinical experience. BJOG. 118:1340–1348. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Gutensohn K, Müller SP, Thomann K, Stein W, Suren A, Körtge-Jung S, Schlüter G and Legler TJ: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive polymerase chain reaction testing for the determination of fetal rhesus C, c and E status in early pregnancy. BJOG. 117:722–729. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Orzinska A, Guz K, Brojer E and Zupanska B: Preliminary results of fetal Rhc examination in plasma of pregnant women with anti-c. Prenat Diagn. 28:335–337. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Tsaliki E, Papageorgiou EA, Spyrou C, Koumbaris G, Kypri E, Kyriakou S, Sotiriou C, Touvana E, Keravnou A, Karagrigoriou A, et al: MeDIP real-time qPCR of maternal peripheral blood reliably identifies trisomy 21. Prenat Diagn. 32:996–1001. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Della Ragione F, Mastrovito P, Campanile C, Conti A, Papageorgiou EA, Hultén MA, Patsalis PC, Carter NP and D'Esposito M: Differential DNA methylation as a tool for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of X chromosome aneuploidies. J Mol Diagn. 12:797–807. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Peters IR, Peeters D, Helps CR and Day MJ: Development and application of multiple internal reference (housekeeper) gene assays for accurate normalisation of canine gene expression studies. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 117:55–66. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Chang E, Shi S, Liu J, Cheng T, Xue L, Yang X, Yang W, Lan Q and Jiang Z: Selection of reference genes for quantitative gene expression studies in Platycladus orientalis (Cupressaceae) Using real-time PCR. PLoS One. 7:e332782012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Marques TE, de Mendonca LR, Pereira MG, de Andrade TG, Garcia-Cairasco N, Paçó-Larson ML and Gitaí DL: Validation of suitable reference genes for expression studies in different pilocarpine-induced models of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. PLoS One. 8:e718922013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Liman M, Wenji W, Conghui L, Haiyang Y, Zhigang W, Xubo W, Jie Q and Quanqi Z: Selection of reference genes for reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR normalization in black rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli). Mar Genomics. 11:67–73. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2015
Volume 12 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yang Q, Li X, Ali HA, Yu S, Zhang Y, Wu M, Gao S, Zhao G, Du Z, Zhang G, Zhang G, et al: Evaluation of suitable control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of maternal plasma cell-free DNA. Mol Med Rep 12: 7728-7734, 2015
APA
Yang, Q., Li, X., Ali, H.A., Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Wu, M. ... Zhang, G. (2015). Evaluation of suitable control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of maternal plasma cell-free DNA. Molecular Medicine Reports, 12, 7728-7734. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4334
MLA
Yang, Q., Li, X., Ali, H. A., Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Wu, M., Gao, S., Zhao, G., Du, Z., Zhang, G."Evaluation of suitable control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of maternal plasma cell-free DNA". Molecular Medicine Reports 12.5 (2015): 7728-7734.
Chicago
Yang, Q., Li, X., Ali, H. A., Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Wu, M., Gao, S., Zhao, G., Du, Z., Zhang, G."Evaluation of suitable control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of maternal plasma cell-free DNA". Molecular Medicine Reports 12, no. 5 (2015): 7728-7734. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4334