Identification of candidate target genes for human peripheral arterial disease using weighted gene co‑expression network analysis

  • Authors:
    • De‑Xin Yin
    • Hao‑Min Zhao
    • Da‑Jun Sun
    • Jian Yao
    • Da‑Yong Ding
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 15, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4450
  • Pages: 8107-8112
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify the potential treatment targets of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and provide further insights into the underlying mechanism of PAD, based on a weighted gene co‑expression network analysis (WGCNA) method. The mRNA expression profiles (accession. no. GSE27034), which included 19 samples from patients with PAD and 18 samples from normal control individuals were extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Subsequently, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained using the Limma package and the co‑expression network modules were screened using the WGCNA approach. In addition, the protein‑protein interaction network for the DEGs in the most significant module was constructed using Cytoscape software. Functional enrichment analyses of the DEGs in the most significant module were also performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Orthology‑Based Annotation System, respectively. A total of 148 DEGs were identified in PAD, which were used to construct the WGCN, in which two modules (gray module and turquoise module) were identified, with the gray module exhibiting a higher gene significance (GS) value than the turquoise module. In addition, a co‑expression network was constructed for 60 DEGs in the gray module. The functional enrichment results showed that the DEGs in the gray module were enriched in five Gene Ontology terms and four KEGG pathways. For example, cyclin‑dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A), FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog (FOS) and prostaglandin‑endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) were enriched in response to glucocorticoid stimulus. The results of the present study suggested that DEGs in the gray module, including CDKN1A, FOS and PTGS2, may be associated with the pathogenesis of PAD, by modulating the cell cycle, and may offer potential for use as candidate treatment targets for PAD.

Introduction

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), also known as peripheral vascular disease, is involved in the atherosclerotic occlusion of the arterial circulation to the lower extremities. The disease may manifest symptoms of intermittent claudication or severe chronic leg ischemia (1). The major risk factors for PAD are older age (>40 years), cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus (2). Patients diagnosed with PAD suffer from a limitation in exercise capacity and reduced quality of life, and are at increased risk of cardiovascular-associated morbidity and mortality (3,4).

Due to poor prognosis and the increasing number of patients with PAD, an increasing number of investigations are focussed on the identifications of biomarkers for PAD, and aim to uncover the underlying mechanism of PAD. β2-microglobulin has been considered to be a biomarker for PAD (5). In addition, Smadja et al found that thrombospondin 1 is significantly up-regulated in patients with PAD and may act as a plasmatic marker for PAD (6). Busti et al also reported that the plasma levels of certain matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), including MMP-2 and MMP-9, are correlated with the development and severity of PAD development and severity (7). Previously, Masud et al screened 87 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in PAD, and examined the functions and pathways of the DEGs by performing gene expression analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in patients with PAD and normal controls (8). However, the interactions among these genes and the exact molecular mechanism underlying PAD remain to be elucidated.

Gene co-expression network-based approaches have been widely used in analyzing microarray data, particularly for the screening of functional modules (9,10). One of the most useful gene co-expression network-based approaches is Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), which has been used to identify significant modules in a network and to screen candidate targets or biomarkers for human diseases or cancer (1113). In the present study, the mRNA expression profiles were analyzed in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples in patients diagnosed with PAD and in normal controls, to identify the DEGs associated with PAD. In addition, the significant modules were screened and a co-expression network was constructed using WGCNA. The distinct Gene Ontology (GO) functions and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were also obtained to further examine the associations between the genes and PAD. These investigations aimed to provide evidence to further elucidated the mechanism underlying PAD.

Materials and methods

Gene expression datasets

The microarray expression data (accession. no. GSE27034) for PBMC samples in patients with PAD and controls without PAD (8) were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database (14). Gene expression analysis was performed based on a platform of [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (GPL570; Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The datasets contained 37 samples, which included 19 samples from patients with PAD and 18 samples from normal controls.

Data preprocessing and screening of DEGs

The raw data were preprocessed via background correction, quantile normalization and probe summarization using the Affy package in R (Affymetrix, Inc.) (15). Subsequently, the expression profiling probes were transformed to corresponding gene symbols. In cases where there were more than one probe set in a single gene, the average expression values of all probes for the specific gene were defined as the gene expression value. In addition, when several mRNAs were mapped by one probe, this probe was considered to lack specificity and was excluded. Finally, the linear models for microarray data (Limma) package in R language (version 3.22.7; http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/3.0/bioc/html/limma.html) (16) was used to normalize the expression profiles and identify the DEGs between the PAD and normal samples. The genes identified with the cutoff criteria of fold change (FC)>1.5 and P-value<0.05 were reserved as DEGs for subsequent analysis.

WGCNA

Initially, Pearson's correlation matrices for all gene pairs were calculated using SPSS software, version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and the correlation between gene m and gene n was defined as Smn=|cor(m,n)|. Subsequently, the Pearson's correlation matrices were transformed into matrices of connection strengths using a power function, as follows amn = power (Smn, β) = |Smn|β. The β value is set as the weighting coefficient only when the correlation coefficient between log (k) and log [p(k)] reaches 0.9, where p(k) represents the proportion of nodes with connectivity (k). Thus, the β value (β=16) was determined, so that the initial correlation coefficient reached 0.9. Following determination of the adjacency parameter, the correlation matrix was transformed into an adjacency matrix, which was subsequently transformed into a topological overlap matrix (TOM). The TOM (17) was computed using the following formula:

where lmn indicates the sum of the products of the adjacency coefficients of the nodes connected to m and n. km indicates the sum of the adjacency coefficients of the nodes only connected to m. kn indicates the sum of the adjacency coefficient of the nodes only connected to n. If two nodes are not connected to each other and share no neighbors, =0.
Identification of significant modules and construction of the co-expression network

The obtained DEGs were hierarchically clustered using the dissimilarity coefficient as the distance measure, with each branch corresponding to a module. The modules containing at least 30 genes were assigned using the software of dynamic tree cut R package (version 1.62; Bioconductor, Los Angeles, CA, USA), which applies a novel dynamic branch cutting method for the detection of clusters in a dendrogram according to their shape (18). Following module detection, the eigengenes for each module were calculated, and the merged close modules were clustered into new modules. The module, which exhibited the maximal absolute correlation coefficient was considered to be the module that is most significantly associated with PAD. The network significance approach determines the module associated with PAD based on module significance (MS) (19). The MS indicates the average gene significance (GS) of all the genes in a module, and the GS of a gene is defined as -lg p, where p indicates the P-values obtained with Student's t-test using SPSS software, version 16.0. High MS values indicate a high association with PAD. In addition, the gene pairs, which were identified with the correlation coefficient >0.7 in the selected significant module were used to construct the co-expression network using Cytoscape software (version: 3.2.0; http://www.cytoscape.org/) (20).

Functional enrichment analyses

The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (21) was used to identify the enriched functions in the DEGs, with the cutoff criterion of a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05. In addition, the KEGG Orthology-Based Annotation System (KOBAS) was applied to identify the significantly enriched pathways using a hypergeometric test (22) with the cutoff criterion of P<0.05

Results

Screening of DEGs

Under the cutoff criteria of FC>1.5 and P<0.05, a total of 148 DEGs were obtained, which included 91 upregulated and 57 downregulated genes.

WGCNA analysis and identification of key modules

The 148 genes were subjected to WGCNA analysis, where the genes exhibiting similar patterns of expression were grouped into modules via hierarchical average linkage clustering (Fig. 1). The present study used two parameters (MS and P-value) to measure the relevance between the modules and PAD. Initially, the MS value of each module was calculated, and the higher the MS value, the more relevant the correlation between the module and PAD was. In total, two modules (Fig. 2) were identified with a threshold of P<0.05, which were termed the gray and turquoise modules. Furthermore, the gray module was found to exhibit a higher GS value, compared with the turquoise module, which suggested that the gray module was most significant. Finally, a co-expression network was constructed for the DEGs in the gray module with the cutoff criterion of a correlation coefficient >0.7 between two genes (Fig. 3). The resulting co-expression network contained a total of 60 genes and 167 interactions.

Functional enrichment analysis for DEGs in the gray module

Functional annotations and pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs in gray module were performed on the basis of their gene composition. The GO functional analysis revealed that the gray module was involved in responses to stimuli (Table I). For example, six DEGs, including cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A), FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog (FOS) and prostaglandin-endo-peroxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), were enriched in response to glucocorticoid stimulus; and eight DEGs, including PTPRK, FOS and CDKN1A, were enriched in response to inorganic substance. In addition, the pathway analysis indicated that the gray module was significantly involved in four pathways, including the ErbB signaling pathway (HBEGF, CDKN1A and EREG), oxytocin signaling pathway (FOS, CDKN1A and PTGS2), circadian entrainment (GUCY1B3, FOS, GNG11) and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (FOS, CXCL11, TLR4), as presented in Table II.

Table I

Enriched GO terms for the differentially expressed genes in the gray module.

Table I

Enriched GO terms for the differentially expressed genes in the gray module.

Accession no.TermCountP-valueFDRGene
GO: 0051384Response to glucocorticoid stimulus61.29E-050.020401798CDKN1A, FOS, PTGS2, DUSP1, ADM, ABCB4
GO: 0010035Response to inorganic substance81.41E-050.022301137PTPRK, FOS, CDKN1A, PTGS2, DUSP1, NR4A2, CA2, TPM1
GO: 0010033response to organic substance131.70E-050.026762768PTGS2, NR4A2, TLR4, GNG11, PMAIP1, ABCB4, FOS, CDKN1A, ACSL1, ADM, DUSP1, ID1, CA2
GO: 0031960Response to corticosteroid stimulus61.97E-050.031048526FOS, CDKN1A, PTGS2, DUSP1, ADM, ABCB4
GO: 0009991Response to extracellular stimulus82.23E-050.035204556FOS, CDKN1A, ACSL1, PTGS2, DUSP1, ADM, NR4A2, KLF4

[i] GO, gene ontology; FDR, false discovery rate.

Table II

Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database pathways for the differentially expressed genes in the gray module.

Table II

Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database pathways for the differentially expressed genes in the gray module.

TermDescriptionInputGene
hsa04012ErbB signaling pathway1839|1026|2069HBEGF, CDKN1A, EREG
hsa04921Oxytocin signaling pathway 2353|1026|5743|2983FOS, CDKN1A, PTGS2, GUCY1B3
hsa04713Circadian entrainment2983|2353|2791GUCY1B3, FOS, GNG11
hsa04620Toll-like receptor signaling pathway2353|6373|7099FOS, CXCL11, TLR4

[i] Input, corresponding entrez gene ID for the genes.

Discussion

PAD is among the common manifestations of systemic atherosclerosis, which affects other major circulations involving the cerebral and coronary circulations (23). However, the molecular mechanism underlying the disease remains to be fully elucidated. In the present study, two significant modules involved in PAD were identified and screened, and the co-expressed network was constructed using the WGCNA method by bioinformatics analysis. The present study found that certain genes in the most significant module were closely associated with the response to glucocorticoid stimulus, determined using enrichment analysis. The present study aimed to screen the important modules and genes, which were identified to be associated with PAD and examine the molecular mechanism of PAD.

The two modules were obtained using WGCNA, of which the gray module was found to be the most significant module. The genes in the gray module were associated with the responses to stimulus. CDKN1A, FOS and PTGS2 were significantly upregulated in the gray module. CDKN1A, also known as p21/WAF1/CIP1, is a regulator of cell cycle progression at the G1 and S phase (24), which is required for the response to DNA damage by inducing cell cycle arrest, inhibiting DNA replication and regulating fundamental cellular processes, including apoptosis and gene transcription (25). Furthermore, CDKN1A can interaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen, which is a DNA polymerase accessory factor and has a regulatory role in DNA damage repair and the S phase of DNA replication (25,26). In addition, CDKN1A has also been found to be associated with atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction (27). The results of the present study also showed that CDKN1A was involved in the responses to stimulus, including the response to glucocorticoid stimulus, response to inorganic substance and response to organic substance. Therefore, the present study suggested that CDKN1A may be involved in the processes and pathways, which are associated with the cell cycle in patients with PAD.

FOS/c-FOS is a proto-oncogene, which is induced by a variety of extracellular stimuli (28). FOS acts as a transcription factor, which promotes the expression of specific cell cycle regulatory genes (29) and leads to early G1-phase cyclin accumulation, and enhances cyclin D- and cyclin E-associated kinase activities (30). In addition, it has been reported that FOS interacts with the c-jun proto-oncogene to form transcription factor activating protein 1 (31), which is a crucial protein required for cell adaptation to environmental changes (32). PTGS2, also termed cyclooxygenase-2, is unexpressed under normal conditions in the majority of cells. The inhibition of PTGS2 has been shown to improve endothelial function in coronary artery disease (33). Additionally, PTGS2 has been found to interact with caveolin 1 (34), which is a predominant component of caveolae plasma membranes and is associated with the repair of DNA damage through regulating the important molecules involved in maintaining genomic integrity (35). Thus, FOS and PTGS2 are also cell cycle-associated genes and may be involved in the pathogensis of PAD.

In conclusion, the present study used the WGCNA approach to analyze the mRNA expression profile of PAD, and obtained two key modules. The results suggested that the gray module-associated genes may be associated with the development of PAD, particularly CDKN1A, FOS and PTGS2. These genes may be involved in the pathogenesis of PAD by regulating the cell cycle, and offer potential for use as potential therapeutic targets for PAD. However, further experiments are required to verify these results.

References

1 

Hiatt WR and Nehler MR: Peripheral arterial disease. 2007

2 

Hiatt WR: Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication. N Engl J Med. 344:1608–1621. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Cronberg C, Sjöberg S, Albrechtsson U, Leander P, Lindh M, Norgren L, Danielsson P, Sonesson B and Larsson EM: Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiol. 44:59–66. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ouriel K: Peripheral arterial disease. Lancet. 358:1257–1264. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Wilson AM, Kimura E, Harada RK, Nair N, Narasimhan B, Meng XY, Zhang F, Beck KR, Olin JW, Fung ET and Cooke JP: Beta2-Microglobulin as a biomarker in peripheral arterial disease: Proteomic profiling and clinical studies. Circulation. 116:1396–1403. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Smadja DM, D'audigier C, Bièche I, Evrard S, Mauge L, Dias JV, Labreuche J, Laurendeau I, Marsac B, Dizier B, et al: Thrombospondin-1 is a plasmatic marker of peripheral arterial disease that modulates endothelial progenitor cell angiogenic properties. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 31:551–559. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Busti C, Falcinelli E, Momi S and Gresele P: Matrix metalloproteinases and peripheral arterial disease. Intern Emerg Med. 5:13–25. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Masud R, Shameer K, Dhar A, Ding K and Kullo IJ: Gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the setting of peripheral arterial disease. J Clin Bioinforma. 2:62012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Horvath S and Dong J: Geometric interpretation of gene coexpression network analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 4:e10001172008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Ruan J, Dean AK and Zhang W: A general co-expression network-based approach to gene expression analysis: Comparison and applications. BMC Syst Biol. 4:82010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Malki K, Tosto MG, Jumabhoy I, Lourdusamy A, Sluyter F, Craig I, Uher R, McGuffin P and Schalkwyk LC: Integrative mouse and human mRNA studies using WGCNA nominates novel candidate genes involved in the pathogenesis of major depressive disorder. Pharmacogenomics. 14:1979–1990. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Udyavar AR, Hoeksema MD, Clark JE, Zou Y, Tang Z, Li Z, Li M, Chen H, Statnikov A, Shyr Y, et al: Co-expression network analysis identifies spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) as a candidate oncogenic driver in a subset of small-cell lung cancer. BMC Syst Biol. 7(Suppl 5): S12013. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Zhao H, Cai W, Su S, Zhi D, Lu J and Liu S: Screening genes crucial for pediatric pilocytic astrocytoma using weighted gene coexpression network analysis combined with methylation data analysis. Cancer Gene Ther. 21:448–455. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, et al: NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets-update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D991–D995, Database issue. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM and Irizarry RA: affy-analysis of affymetrix genechip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics. 20:307–315. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Smyth GK: Limma: Linear models for microarray data. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor. Gentleman R, Carey V, Huber W, Irizarry R and Dudoit S: Springer; New York: pp. 397–420. 2005, View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Yip AM and Horvath S: Gene network interconnectedness and the generalized topological overlap measure. BMC Bioinformatics. 8:222007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Langfelder P, Zhang B and Horvath S: Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: The dynamic tree cut package for R. Bioinformatics. 24:719–720. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Langfelder P and Horvath S: WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 9:559–571. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B and Ideker T: Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13:2498–2504. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Huang Da W, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Collins JR, Alvord WG, Roayaei J, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC and Lempicki RA: The DAVID gene functional classification tool: A novel biological module-centric algorithm to functionally analyze large gene lists. Genome Biol. 8:R1832007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Wu J, Mao X, Cai T, Luo J and Wei L: KOBAS server: A web-based platform for automated annotation and pathway identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:W720–W724. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

American Disease Association: Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 95:309–319. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Gartel AL and Radhakrishnan SK: Lost in transcription: p21 repression, mechanisms and consequences. Cancer Res. 65:3980–3985. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Cazzalini O, Scovassi AI, Savio M, Stivala LA and Prosperi E: Multiple roles of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(CDKN1A) in the DNA damage response. Mutat Res. 704:12–20. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Gulbis JM, Kelman Z, Hurwitz J, O'donnell M and Kuriyan J: Structure of the C-terminal region of p21(WAF1/CIP1) complexed with human PCNA. Cell. 87:297–306. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Rodriguez I, Coto E, Reguero JR, González P, Andrés V, Lozano I, Martín M, Alvarez V and Morís C: Role of the CDKN1A/p21, CDKN1C/p57 and CDKN2A/p16 genes in the risk of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. Cell Cycle. 6:620–625. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Abate C, Luk D, Gagne E, Roeder RG and Curran T: Fos and jun cooperate in transcriptional regulation via heterologous activation domains. Mol Cell Biol. 10:5532–5535. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Hunter T: Oncoprotein networks. Cell. 88:333–346. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Braun-Dullaeus RC, Mann MJ and Dzau VJ: Cell cycle progression New therapeutic target for vascular proliferative disease. Circulation. 98:82–89. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Mahner S, Baasch C, Schwarz J, Hein S, Wölber L, Jänicke F and Milde-Langosch K: C-Fos expression is a molecular predictor of progression and survival in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 99:1269–1275. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Bossis G, Malnou CE, Farras R, Andermarcher E, Hipskind R, Rodriguez M, Schmidt D, Muller S, Jariel-Encontre I and Piechaczyk M: Down-regulation of c-Fos/c-Jun AP-1 dimer activity by sumoylation. Mol Cell Biol. 25:6964–6979. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Chenevard R, Hürlimann D, Béchir M, Enseleit F, Spieker L, Hermann M, Riesen W, Gay S, Gay RE, Neidhart M, et al: Selective COX-2 inhibition improves endothelial function in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 107:405–409. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Liou JY, Deng WG, Gilroy DW, Shyue SK and Wu KK: Colocalization and interaction of cyclooxygenase-2 with caveolin-1 in human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 276:34975–34982. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Zhu H, Yue J, Pan Z, Wu H, Cheng Y, Lu H, Ren X, Yao M, Shen Z and Yang JM: Involvement of Caveolin-1 in repair of DNA damage through both homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. PloS One. 5:e120552010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2015
Volume 12 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yin DX, Zhao HM, Sun DJ, Yao J and Ding DY: Identification of candidate target genes for human peripheral arterial disease using weighted gene co‑expression network analysis. Mol Med Rep 12: 8107-8112, 2015.
APA
Yin, D., Zhao, H., Sun, D., Yao, J., & Ding, D. (2015). Identification of candidate target genes for human peripheral arterial disease using weighted gene co‑expression network analysis. Molecular Medicine Reports, 12, 8107-8112. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4450
MLA
Yin, D., Zhao, H., Sun, D., Yao, J., Ding, D."Identification of candidate target genes for human peripheral arterial disease using weighted gene co‑expression network analysis". Molecular Medicine Reports 12.6 (2015): 8107-8112.
Chicago
Yin, D., Zhao, H., Sun, D., Yao, J., Ding, D."Identification of candidate target genes for human peripheral arterial disease using weighted gene co‑expression network analysis". Molecular Medicine Reports 12, no. 6 (2015): 8107-8112. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4450