Open Access

Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes reveals the promotive effects of UBE2T on colorectal cancer cell proliferation

  • Authors:
    • Min Luo
    • Yuqian Zhou
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 6, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12975
  • Article Number: 714
  • Copyright: © Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Via analysis using The Cancer Genome Atlas database, the present study identified 1,835 genes that were differentially expressed in CRC, including 811 upregulated and 1,024 downregulated genes. Enrichment analyses using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery tool revealed that these differentially expressed genes were associated with the regulation of CRC progression by modulating multiple pathways, such as ‘Cell Cycle, Mitotic’, ‘DNA Replication’, ‘Mitotic M‑M/G1 phases’ and ‘ATM pathway’. To identify the key genes in CRC, protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was performed and the hub modules in upregulated and downregulated PPI networks were identified. Ubiquitin‑conjugating enzyme E2 T (UBE2T), a member of the E2 family, was identified to be a key regulator in CRC. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to demonstrate that UBE2T expression was upregulated in CRC samples compared with normal tissues. Kaplan‑Meier analysis revealed that higher expression levels of UBE2T were associated with worse prognosis compared with lower UBE2T expression levels in CRC. Additionally, the present study demonstrated that knockdown of UBE2T inhibited CRC cell proliferation. Flow cytometry assays revealed that UBE2T knockdown induced cell cycle arrest at G1 phase and apoptosis in vitro. These results suggested that UBE2T may be a novel potential biomarker for CRC.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide (1). In 2017, ~46.9 per 100,000 population were newly diagnosed with CRC and there are 17.7 per 100,000 CRC-associated deaths annually in the United States (2). Unhealthy diet, obesity, smoking and genetics may contribute to CRC, which has been a main cause of tumor-related morbidities in China (3). Notably, biomarkers for the prognosis of advanced CRC remain limited. Therefore, it is urgent to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of CRC development.

Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 (UBE2) T, a member of the E2 family, serves important roles in modulating cell proliferation, apoptosis and signal transduction (46). For instance, UBE2T induces hepatocellular carcinoma growth by enhancing cell cycle progression (6). Additionally, UBE2T has been demonstrated to regulate the Fanconi anemia signaling pathway by modulating Fanconi anemia group D2 protein (FANCD2) monoubiquitination, which is a key step in the DNA damage signaling pathway (7). The upregulation of UBE2T has been reported in multiple cancer types, and is associated with the regulation of cancer cell proliferation and metastasis (812), including in gastric (11) and prostate cancer (12). However, the functional roles of UBE2T in CRC remain unclear and require further investigation.

The present study analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CRC. Moreover, protein-protein interaction network analysis was performed to identify hub regulators in the progression of CRC. Finally, loss of function assays using short hairpin RNA (shRNA/sh) was performed to confirm the potential functions of hub gene UBE2T in CRC. The present results indicated that UBE2T may be a novel key regulator of CRC progression.

Materials and methods

Analysis of public CRC RNA-Seq data

The RNA-Seq data from TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) was utilized to compare gene expression between CRC and non-tumor tissues. The genes with |log2 [fold change (FC)]|>1.0 and P-value <0.05 used as the threshold values.

Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses of DEGs

The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; version 6.8; http://david.ncifcrf.gov/summary.jsp) provides a comprehensive set of functional annotation tools for investigators to understand the biological meaning behind a number of different genes (13,14). GO functional annotation and KEGG analysis of DEGs was performed and visualized using the ImageGP database (http://www.ehbio.com/ImageGP/index.php/Home/Index/index.html).

PPI network construction and key module identification

The PPI network was built using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING; version 10.0) online database (15). Cytoscape (version 3.6.1) is a bioinformatics software for the visualization of molecular interaction networks (16). The Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) plug-in of Cytoscape was used to find closely connected regions in a network (17). The PPI network was visualized using Cytoscape and the most significant module was identified using MCODE. The selection criteria were as follows: Degree cut-off, 2; node score cut-off, 0.2; max depth, 100; and k-score, 2.

Cell culture

The RKO cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection and cultured in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone; Cytiva) at 37°C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere as previously described (18).

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted using a TRIzol® kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) from RKO cells. RT was conducted using the PrimeScript RT Reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The temperature and duration of RT were: 37°C For 30 sec, followed by 85°C for 5 sec and 4°C for 10 min. qPCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The thermocycling conditions used were as follows: 95°C For 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 40 sec. The following primer pairs were used for qPCR: UBE2T forward, 5′-ATCCCTCAACATCGCAACTGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CAGCCTCTGGTAGATTATCAAGC-3′; and GAPDH forward, 5′-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3′. GAPDH was used as endogenous control. The relative expression of target genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (19).

Western blotting

The western blot assay was performed according to a previous report (20). Total protein was extracted from RKO cells using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The concentration of proteins was determined using the Bradford method. Cell lysates (30 µg/lane) were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore). Then, the membrane was blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The antibodies used in the present study included GAPDH (1:5,000; cat no. 10494-1-AP; ProteinTech Group, Inc.), β-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. ab8227; Abcam), Bcl-2 (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-492; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), cleaved caspase-3 (1:500; cat. no. 9664; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and UBE2T (1:2,000; cat. no. 10105-2-AP; ProteinTech Group, Inc.). After washing with TBST (0.1% Tween) three times, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:3,000; cat. no. 7074; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, the membrane was visualized using an Immobilon™ Western Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (EMD Millipore).

Lentivirus vector construction for RNA interference

Recombinant lentiviral vectors were constructed as previously described (21). shRNA against UBE2T (shUBE2T; 5′-GCAACTGTGTTGACCTCTATT-3′) and shRNA negative control (shNC; 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′) were purchased from Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd. The shRNAs were annealed and ligated into the linearized GV115 lentiviral vector (Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd.). Next, 10 µg pGV115-shControl (Ctrl)/pGV115-shUBE2T were transfected into 293T cells (Sangon Biotech, Co., Ltd.) with the pHelper system (Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd.) to produce lentiviral particles. Lentiviruses were harvested after 48 h. Next, RKO cells were infected and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with lentiviruses at a multiplicity of infection of 10 for 48 h at 37°C. At 48 h after transfection, the transfection efficiency was determined using reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR and western blotting.

Cell proliferation analysis

An adherent cell cytometry system, Celigo®, was used to detect the proliferation of CRC cells as previously described (21).

Colony formation assays

A total of 1,000 RKO cells were seeded into 6-well plates and cultured with DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 weeks. Subsequently, the colonies were washed with 1 ml PBS and fixed with 1 ml 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 15 min at room temperature. Next, the colonies were stained with 500 µl Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 15–20 min at room temperature. Finally, the colonies were observed under an inverted light microscope (magnification, ×200; IX71; Olympus Corporation) and counted using ImageJ software (version 4.0; National Institutes of Health).

Cell cycle and apoptosis assays

At 2 days after transfection with shUBE2T or shNC lentivirus, RKO cells were collected, washed twice with PBS and resuspended in staining buffer containing 0.03% Triton X-100. Subsequently, 5 µl Annexin V-allophycocyanin (eBioscience; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was added to the cells to detect cell apoptosis, while 50 ng/ml PI (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was added to the cells to analyze the cell cycle. Finally, the effects of UBE2T knockdown on the cell cycle and apoptosis were detected using a FACSCalibur instrument (BD Biosciences). The cell cycle was analyzed using the FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All assays were performed three times and data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare differences between two groups P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

A total of 811 upregulated and 1,024 downregulated genes were identified in CRC

In the present study, TCGA data analysis showed 1,835 genes were identified to be DEGs, including 811 upregulated and 1,024 downregulated genes in CRC compared to adjacent non-tumor tissues. The heatmap of DEGs is presented in Fig. 1.

Enrichment analyses of upregulated and downregulated genes in CRC

To determine the function of the identified DEGs in CRC, gene enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID. Enrichment analyses of upregulated and downregulated genes were performed separately. By subjecting the upregulated genes to enrichment analysis, numerous enriched gene sets were observed. Based on bioinformatics analysis, the top 15 biological processes related to upregulated genes included ‘Cell Cycle, Mitotic’, ‘DNA Replication’, ‘ATM pathway’, ‘Mitotic M-M/G1 phases’, ‘ATR signaling pathway’, ‘M Phase’, ‘Mitotic G1-G1/S phases’, ‘S Phase’, ‘Mitotic Prometaphase’, ‘E2F transcription factor network’ ‘FOXM1 transcription factor network’, ‘G2/M Checkpoints’, ‘Activation of ATR in response to replication stress’, ‘DNA strand elongation’ and ‘Unwinding of DNA’ (Fig. 2A).

By subjecting the downregulated genes to enrichment analysis, numerous enriched gene sets were observed. Based on bioinformatics analysis, the top 15 biological processes related to down-regulated genes included ‘integrin family cell surface interactions’, ‘β1 integrin cell surface interactions’, ‘TRAIL signaling pathway’, ‘glypican pathway’, ‘proteoglycan syndecan-mediated signaling events’, ‘Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) pathway’, ‘endothelins’, ‘α9 β1 integrin signaling events’, ‘glypican 1 network’, ‘nectin adhesion pathway’, ‘IL3-mediated signaling events’, ‘IL5-mediated signaling events’, ‘GMCSF-mediated signaling events’, ‘epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition’ and ‘smooth muscle Contraction’ (Fig. 2B).

Construction of upregulated and downregulated PPI networks in CRC

The STRING online database was used to analyze the interactions among the DEGs. The results were extracted and visualized using Cytoscape software. After excluding the isolated nodes, the final upregulated PPI network was composed of 649 nodes and 11,747 edges (Fig. 3). The downregulated PPI network was composed of 771 nodes and 4,232 edges (Fig. 4).

Identification of hub upregulated and downregulated genes in CRC

A significant densely connected module was identified using the MCODE plug-in. The hub upregulated network included 101 nodes (Fig. 5A). Notably, we found multiple ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E family members served a key role in this network, including UBE2T and UBE2C (Fig. 5A). The bioinformatics analysis demonstrated that this hub network was associated with ‘DNA metabolic process’, ‘cell cycle G2/M phase transition’, ‘cellular process’, ‘cell cycle’, ‘regulation of cyclin-dependent protein kinase activity’, ‘cell cycle G1/S phase transition’, ‘mitotic cell cycle phase transition’, ‘regulation of cell cycle’, ‘mitotic sister chromatid segregation’, ‘cell proliferation’, ‘regulation of cell cycle process’, ‘cell cycle’, ‘mitotic cell cycle process’, ‘microtubule-based movement’, ‘cytokinesis’, ‘response to radiation’, ‘single-organism process’, ‘mitotic nuclear division’, ‘regulation of cellular process’, ‘meiotic cell cycle’ and ‘regulation of microtubule cytoskeleton organization’ (Fig. 6A).

The hub downregulated network included 15 nodes (Fig. 5B). The bioinformatics analysis demonstrated that this hub network was associated with ‘Chemokine signaling pathway’, ‘response to external stimulus’, ‘G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway’, ‘cellular response to stimulus’, ‘regulation of biological quality’ and ‘negative regulation of cellular processes’ (Fig. 6B).

Higher UBE2T expression in CRC samples is associated with shorter survival time

The present study focused on UBE2T, which had been reported to be a key role in the DNA damage repair pathway via FANCD2 monoubiquitination (22,23). To the best of our knowledge, the molecular functions of UBE2T in CRC remain unclear. In aforementioned bioinformatics analysis, it was reported that UBE2T is a key regulator in hub network 1 (Fig. 5A) and involved in regulating cell proliferation, cell cycle and DNA metabolic process (Fig. 6A). TCGA analysis revealed that UBE2T RNA expression was upregulated in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) (Fig. 7A) and rectum adenocarcinoma (READ) (Fig. 7B) samples compared with adjacent non-tumor tissues. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that high UBE2T expression was associated with shorter overall survival time in CRC, despite the difference is not significant enough (P>0.05; Fig. 7C).

Knockdown of UBE2T inhibits CRC cell proliferation

To investigate the molecular functions of UBE2T in CRC, lentivirus-mediated knockdown of UBE2T in RKO cells was performed. RT-qPCR and western blotting demonstrated that both the RNA and protein expression levels of UBE2T were reduced in RKO cells infected with shUBE2T lentivirus compared with cells infected with control lentivirus (Fig. 7D and E). Furthermore, western blot analysis of Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase 3 and an Annexin V/FACS kit were used to detect cell apoptosis after knockdown of UBE2T in RKO cells. UBE2T knockdown induced a reduction in Bcl-2 expression and an increase in cleaved caspase 3 protein expression in RKO cells (Fig. 7F). The percentage of apoptotic RKO cells was significantly increased in the UBE2T knockdown group compared with the control group (Fig. 7G and H). These results demonstrated that UBE2T was associated with the regulation of apoptosis in CRC.

To detect the effects of UBE2T knockdown on proliferation in RKO cells, a Celigo® assay was used to monitor cell proliferation for 5 days (Fig. 8A and B). Knockdown of UBE2T exerted a significant impairment on cell proliferation from day 3 compared with the normal group (Fig. 8A and B).

Knockdown of UBE2T induces cell cycle arrest

A colony formation assay was performed to validate the role of UBE2T in the regulation of CRC cell proliferation. The results demonstrated that UBE2T knockdown in RKO cells induced a decrease in colony formation compared with the control group (Fig. 8C and D). The number of colonies in the UBE2T knockdown group was reduced by ~50% compared with the control group (Fig. 8C and D).

The abnormal regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis contributes to proliferation in cancer cells (24). To investigate the roles of UBE2T in the cell cycle and apoptosis, a series of flow cytometry assays was performed. Using a PI/FACS kit, it was revealed that the percentage of cells in the S phase was significantly reduced in UBE2T knockdown RKO cells compared with the control group. However, the percentage of cells in the G1 phase was significantly increased in UBE2T knockdown RKO cells compared with the control group, suggesting that the UBE2T gene was associated with cell cycle regulation (Fig. 8E and F).

Discussion

Identification of key regulators that contribute to cancer progression is critical for cancer diagnosis and treatment. In the present study, 1,835 genes were identified to be DEGs, including 811 upregulated and 1,024 downregulated genes. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that these DEGs were associated with the regulation of cell proliferation of CRC by modulating multiple pathways, including mitotic nuclear division, response to radiation, Cell cycle, mitotic cell cycle process, mitotic sister chromatid segregation, cell proliferation and DNA metabolic process.

To identify hub genes in CRC, PPI networks were constructed and two hub networks were revealed. Among them, the upregulated hub network included 101 nodes and the downregulated hub network included 15 nodes. Most of these genes have been reported to serve a crucial role in human CRC (2528). For example, high serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK4 expression promotes tumor progression and induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in CRC (25). Serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK1 has tumor-suppressive potential in adenomatous polyposis coli-truncated colon cancer cells (26). Cell division cycle-associated protein 3 mediates p21-dependent proliferation by regulating E2F transcription factor 1 expression in CRC (27). Mitotic checkpoint kinase monopolar spindle 1/TTK protein kinase is associated with the prognosis of patients with colon cancer and regulates tumor cell proliferation and differentiation via the protein kinase C α/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways (29). PDZ binding kinase/T-lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase interacts with the DNA-binding domain of tumor suppressor p53 and modulates the expression of transcriptional targets, including p21 (30).

Notably, the present study identified that multiple members of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E family served a key role in CRC, which have been reported to modulate the progression of human cancer, such as UBE2T (11) and UBE2C (31). In previous reports, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E family members have been identified to regulate cancer development (32,33). For instance, UBE2C expression is higher in late-stage tumors compared with in early-stage tumors (32). Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2O has been reported to regulate the cellular clock function by promoting the degradation of the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 (33). UBE2T is a member of the ubiquitinconjugating enzyme family. The ubiquitin-proteasome signaling pathway serves a key role in cell proliferation and DNA damage repair (28,34,35). UBE2T expression has been reported to be upregulated in multiple types of tumors, such as prostate cancer and lung cancer (6,8,9,11,12,36,37). However, to the best of our knowledge, the association between UBE2T and CRC has not been investigated. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to demonstrate that UBE2T expression was upregulated in COAD and READ samples compared with normal tissues. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that higher levels of UBE2T were associated with worse prognosis compared with low UBE2T expression levels in CRC. Additionally, the present study revealed that knockdown of UBE2T inhibited CRC cell proliferation. Flow cytometry assays revealed that UBE2T knockdown induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in vitro.

In summary, the present study screened DEGs in CRC. Further validation demonstrated that UBE2T expression was upregulated in CRC and knockdown of UBE2T inhibited the proliferation of CRC cells by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. These results indicated that UBE2T may be a novel potential biomarker for CRC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

ML and YZ designed the study and drafted the initial manuscript. ML performed the experiments. YZ analyzed the data. ML and YZ confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Rawla P, Sunkara T and Barsouk A: Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: Incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Prz Gastroenterol. 14:89–103. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A and Jemal A: Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:177–193. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ and He J: Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:115–132. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Morreale FE, Bortoluzzi A, Chaugule VK, Arkinson C, Walden H and Ciulli A: Allosteric targeting of the fanconi anemia ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ube2T by fragment screening. J Med Chem. 60:4093–4098. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Alpi A, Langevin F, Mosedale G, Machida YJ, Dutta A and Patel KJ: UBE2T, the Fanconi anemia core complex, and FANCD2 are recruited independently to chromatin: A basis for the regulation of FANCD2 monoubiquitination. Mol Cell Biol. 27:8421–8430. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Liu LL, Zhu JM, Yu XN, Zhu HR, Shi X, Bilegsaikhan E, Guo HY, Wu J and Shen XZ: UBE2T promotes proliferation via G2/M checkpoint in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 11:8359–8370. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Alpi AF, Pace PE, Babu MM and Patel KJ: Mechanistic insight into site-restricted monoubiquitination of FANCD2 by Ube2t, FANCL, and FANCI. Mol Cell. 32:767–777. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hao J, Xu A, Xie X, Hao J, Tian T, Gao S, Xiao X and He D: Elevated expression of UBE2T in lung cancer tumors and cell lines. Tumour Biol. 29:195–203. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Hao P, Kang B, Li Y, Hao W and Ma F: UBE2T promotes proliferation and regulates PI3K/Akt signaling in renal cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 20:1212–1220. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Liu LP, Yang M, Peng QZ, Li MY, Zhang YS, Guo YH, Chen Y and Bao SY: UBE2T promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth via ubiquitination of p53. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 493:20–27. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Luo C, Yao Y, Yu Z, Zhou H, Guo L, Zhang J, Cao H, Zhang G, Li Y and Jiao Z: UBE2T knockdown inhibits gastric cancer progression. Oncotarget. 8:32639–32654. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Wen M, Kwon Y, Wang Y, Mao JH and Wei G: Elevated expression of UBE2T exhibits oncogenic properties in human prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 6:25226–25239. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Huang da W, Sherman BT and Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 4:44–57. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Huang DW, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Kir J, Liu D, Bryant D, Guo Y, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC and Lempicki RA: DAVID bioinformatics resources: Expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:W169–W175. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Roth A, Santos A, Tsafou KP, et al: STRING v10: Protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:D447–D452. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B and Ideker T: Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13:2498–2504. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Bader GD and Hogue CW: An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 4:22003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Shi J, Zhong X, Song Y, Wu Z, Gao P, Zhao J, Sun J, Wang J, Liu J and Wang Z: Long non-coding RNA RUNX1-IT1 plays a tumour-suppressive role in colorectal cancer by inhibiting cell proliferation and migration. Cell Biochem Funct. 37:11–20. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Chuang KC, Chen FW, Tsai MH and Shieh JJ: EGR-1 plays a protective role in AMPK inhibitor compound C-induced apoptosis through ROS-induced ERK activation in skin cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 21:3042021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Cui F, Hu J, Ning S, Tan J and Tang H: Overexpression of MCM10 promotes cell proliferation and predicts poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Prostate. 78:1299–1310. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Kelsall IR, Langenick J, MacKay C, Patel KJ and Alpi AF: The Fanconi anaemia components UBE2T and FANCM are functionally linked to nucleotide excision repair. PLoS One. 7:e369702012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Rickman KA, Lach FP, Abhyankar A, Donovan FX, Sanborn EM, Kennedy JA, Sougnez C, Gabriel SB, Elemento O, Chandrasekharappa SC, et al: Deficiency of UBE2T, the E2 ubiquitin ligase necessary for FANCD2 and FANCI ubiquitination, causes FA-T subtype of fanconi anemia. Cell Rep. 12:35–41. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Seoane J: Cancer: Division hierarchy leads to cell heterogeneity. Nature. 549:164–166. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Liao Z, Zhang H, Fan P, Huang Q, Dong K, Qi Y, Song J, Chen L, Liang H, Chen X, et al: High PLK4 expression promotes tumor progression and induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 54:479–490. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Raab M, Sanhaji M, Matthess Y, Hörlin A, Lorenz I, Dötsch C, Habbe N, Waidmann O, Kurunci-Csacsko E, Firestein R, et al: PLK1 has tumor-suppressive potential in APC-truncated colon cancer cells. Nat Commun. 9:11062018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Qian W, Zhang Z, Peng W, Li J, Gu Q, Ji D, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Ji B, Wang S, et al: CDCA3 mediates p21-dependent proliferation by regulating E2F1 expression in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 53:2021–2033. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Nakayama KI and Nakayama K: Ubiquitin ligases: Cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:369–381. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Zhang L, Jiang B, Zhu N, Tao M, Jun Y, Chen X, Wang Q and Luo C: Mitotic checkpoint kinase Mps1/TTK predicts prognosis of colon cancer patients and regulates tumor proliferation and differentiation via PKCα/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathway. Med Oncol. 37:52019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Hu F, Gartenhaus RB, Eichberg D, Liu Z, Fang HB and Rapoport AP: PBK/TOPK interacts with the DBD domain of tumor suppressor p53 and modulates expression of transcriptional targets including p21. Oncogene. 29:5464–5474. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zhang HQ, Zhao G, Ke B, Ma G, Liu GL, Liang H, Liu LR and Hao XS: Overexpression of UBE2C correlates with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 22:1665–1671. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Dastsooz H, Cereda M, Donna D and Oliviero S: A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of UBE2C in cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 20:22282019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Chen S, Yang J, Zhang Y, Duan C, Liu Q, Huang Z, Xu Y, Zhou L and Xu G: Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2O regulates cellular clock function by promoting the degradation of the transcription factor BMAL1. J Biol Chem. 293:11296–11309. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Voutsadakis IA: Ubiquitin- and ubiquitin-like proteins-conjugating enzymes (E2s) in breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 40:2019–2034. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Hoeller D, Hecker CM and Dikic I: Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins in cancer pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:776–788. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Zhang W, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Liu X, Yang P, Wang J, Hu K, He X, Zhang X and Jing H: High expression of UBE2T predicts poor prognosis and survival in multiple myeloma. Cancer Gene Ther. 26:347–355. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Gong YQ, Peng D, Ning XH, Yang XY, Li XS, Zhou LQ and Guo YL: UBE2T silencing suppresses proliferation and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in bladder cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 12:4485–4492. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2021
Volume 22 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Luo M and Luo M: Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes reveals the promotive effects of UBE2T on colorectal cancer cell proliferation. Oncol Lett 22: 714, 2021
APA
Luo, M., & Luo, M. (2021). Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes reveals the promotive effects of UBE2T on colorectal cancer cell proliferation. Oncology Letters, 22, 714. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12975
MLA
Luo, M., Zhou, Y."Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes reveals the promotive effects of UBE2T on colorectal cancer cell proliferation". Oncology Letters 22.4 (2021): 714.
Chicago
Luo, M., Zhou, Y."Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes reveals the promotive effects of UBE2T on colorectal cancer cell proliferation". Oncology Letters 22, no. 4 (2021): 714. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12975