Open Access

Rapid and sensitive detection of Plesiomonas shigelloides by cross‑priming amplification of the hugA gene

  • Authors:
    • Shuang Meng
    • Yi Wang
    • Yan Wang
    • Changyun Ye
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 14, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5937
  • Pages: 5443-5450
  • Copyright: © Meng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Plesiomonas shigelloides (P. shigelloides) is implicated as an aetiological agent of human gastroenteritis in humans, for which reliable laboratory detection of P. shigelloides is clinically and epidemiologically desirable. A simple molecular method for rapid detection of P. shigelloides using cross‑priming amplification (CPA) has been developed, with hugA as the target. The hugA gene is required for haem iron utilisation and is critical for the survival and growth of P. shigelloides. The assay output was visualised as a colour change with no need to open the reaction tubes, and no false‑positive results were detected for the 33 non‑ P. shigelloides strains examined to assess assay specificity. The limit of detection was 200 fg P. shigelloides DNA per reaction and 3x103 CFU per g in human stools, which was 100 and 10‑fold more sensitive than polymerase chain reaction, respectively. The CPA method was used to detect the presence of P. shigelloides in stool specimens from 70 patients with diarrhoea and 30 environmental water samples, with no difference in accuracy between the CPA assay and the biological culture. The present study, therefore, suggests that the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay may represent a valuable tool for rapid and sensitive detection of P. shigelloides in primary care facilities and clinical laboratories.

Introduction

Plesiomonas shigelloides (P. shigelloides) is the only species member of the Plesiomonas genus, and the only oxidase-positive member of the Enterobacteriaceae family (1). P. shigelloides is present worldwide, primarily in aquatic environments, including freshwater, estuarine and marine environments (24). P. shigelloides induces various types of gastroenteritis, including acute secretory gastroenteritis, invasive shigellosis-like disease and cholera-like illness, infections increasing in recent years (57).

In humans, although extra-intestinal diseases of P. shigelloides are rare, it has been associated with secondary infections in immunocompromised states, including malignancy, blood disorders and hepatobiliary disease (810). P. shigelloides may often be missed in stool samples due to its small colony size and relatively low prevalence in gastrointestinal samples. The lack of a routine assay for P. shigelloides in cases of gastroenteritis means that this bacterium is identified only occasionally (11). Xia et al (12) reported a case of meningoencephalitis caused by P. shigelloides with a fatal outcome in a Chinese neonate. Therefore, its earlier and accurate identification, and the prescription of the correct antibiotic therapy may be critical for patient prognosis.

The traditional culture-based approaches for detection of P. shigelloides involve enrichment in liquid media and isolation of colonies on selective media. Although extensively used, these assays are time-consuming and laborious, taking more than three days. In addition, the isolates of P. shigelloides appear as green colonies on Hektoen enteric agar, with an appearance similar to that of Shigella (13).

Molecular-based techniques, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative PCR assays, have been established for the detection of P. shigelloides, producing reliable results. However, PCR-based techniques rely on expensive thermal cycler or complex sample-handling procedures, limiting its application (14). Therefore, there is an urgent requirement to devise a novel strategy for rapid, robust and sensitive identification of P. shigelloides using simple equipment.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), as a rapid, specific and sensitive detection methodology, has been used to detect various pathogens, including parasites, fungi, bacteria and viruses (15). However, primer design for LAMP techniques is complicated, requiring a specific, long, highly conserved fragment. This limits the application of LAMP for the detection of pathogens (16). A novel technology, cross-priming amplification (CPA), overcomes the technical difficulties posed by current LAMP approaches, which contains five specially designed primers (1s, 2a, 3a, 4s and 5a) that recognise five conserved regions on the target sequence. Each cross primer contains 5′ tail sequences identical to each other's priming site and thus introduces additional priming sites in each round of extension. The primers are designed to accomplish the basic goal of isothermal generation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) using a strand-displacing polymerase such as Bst, and the DNA target sequence may be amplified without an initial denaturation step or addition of a nicking enzyme (1720). The CPA products may be detected by an increase in turbidity, agarose gel electrophoresis of amplicons or by visualization of a colour alteration in the presence of Loopamp® Fluorescent Detection Reagent.

Several potential virulence factors of P. shigelloides have been described, however, the pathogenesis of P. shigelloides-associated gastroenteritis remains to be elucidated (21,22). Acquisition of iron has been demonstrated to be involved in the virulence of a variety of bacterial pathogens (23,24). Heme is the primary source of iron within the body, and numerous pathogenic bacteria carry heme transport systems (25). The strains of P. shigelloides express highly specific outer membrane receptors that bind, extract and transport heme into the bacterial periplasm (26). The hugA genes (heme iron utilization locuaccession no. AY008342.1) encoding the heme iron utilization system of P. shigelloides have been isolated and characterized, and are essential for the growth of P. shigelloides.

The present study aimed to develop a rapid, cost-effective and efficient CPA method for detecting P. shigelloides, and evaluating the assay performance with pathogen-simulated human stool. In addition, the CPA method was compared with PCR to determine the sensitivity and evaluate the practical application in clinical samples.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Stool specimens were acquired from 70 patients with diarrhoea, aged from 18 to 50 years old, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Beijing, China), according to the medical research regulations of the Ministry of Health (Beijing, China; approval no. ICDC-2014003).

Bacterial strains

A total of 53 strains (20 P. shigelloides strains and 33 non-P. shigelloides strains, listed in Table I) were used for specificity testing. The bacterial load of the strains used for specificity evaluation was 105 pg/ml, which is high enough to prevent false-negative amplifications. P. shigelloides ATCC 51903 (GenBank accession number AY008342.1) was selected as the positive control for the assay optimisation, sensitivity evaluation, and to spike human stool samples. All strains were cultured overnight at 37°C on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Table I.

Bacterial strains used in the present study.

Table I.

Bacterial strains used in the present study.

Latin nameStrain no. (source of strain)No. of strains
Plesiomonas shigelloidesATCC 519031
Isolated strains (ICDC)19
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coliIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Enteroinvasive Escherichia coliIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coliEDL 933 (isolated previously in our laboratory)1
Enteroaggregative Escherichia coliIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Salmonella entericaATCC 140281
Shigella flexneriIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Shigella sonneiATCC 259311
Proteus vulgarisIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Aeromonas veroniiATCC 356221
Aeromonas salmonicidaATCC 79651
Aeromonas caviaeATCC 154681
Aeromonas mediaATCC 339071
Clostridium perfringensIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Enterobacter cloacaeIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Serratia marcescensIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Vibrio parahaemolyticusATCC 178021
Staphylococcus aureusATCC 65381
Streptococcus pneumoniaeIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Streptococcus pyogenesIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Streptococcus sanguisIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Streptococcus salivariusIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Streptococcus bovisIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Enterococcus faecalisATCC 356671
Yersinia enterocoliticaATCC 237151
Pseudomonas aeruginosaATCC 154421
Aeromonas hydrophilaATCC 79661
Listeria monocytogenesATCC 540032
Enterobacter sakazakiiATCC 513291
Campylobacter jejuniATCC 332911
Vibrio minicusIsolated strain (ICDC)1
Vibrio vulnificusIsolated strain (ICDC)1

[i] ATCC, American type culture collection; ICDC, national institute for communicable disease control and prevention, Chinese center for disease control and prevention.

Genomic DNA extraction

Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from all cultured strains using DNA extraction kits (QIAamp DNA minikitQiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

P. shigelloides hugA CPA primers and reaction conditions

A set of five primers was manually designed to target the nucleotide sequence of P. shigelloides ATCC 51903, based on the mechanism of CPA (27). The sequences and locations of the primers within hugA are presented in Table II and Fig. 1. CPA reactions were performed using the Loopamp kit (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in a final volume of 20 µl containing 2.4 mM cross primer As, 1.44 mM each of primers 2a and 3a, 0.3 mM each of displacement primers 4s and 5a, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM KCl, 4 mM MgSO4, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 0.1% Tween 20, 0.8 M betaine, 1.4 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), 1 µl of Bst DNA polymerase (8 U µl−1), 1 µl Loopamp Fluorescent Detection Reagent (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd.) and 1 µl DNA template. The reaction mixture was incubated in an LA320 Real-Time Turbidimeter (Teramecs Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) at 63°C for 60 min, and then heated at 95°C for 5 min to terminate the reaction. Amplified products were directly detected by observing a colour change from orange to green by the naked eye, or by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels using staining with GoldenView reagent. Furthermore, real-time monitoring of the CPA reaction was performed by recording the optical density at 650 nm every 6 sec using the LA-320C Real-Time Turbidimeter. A positive reaction was defined as a turbidity cut-off value of >0.1 within 60 min.

Table II.

CPA and PCR primers used to detect Plesiomonas shigelloides.

Table II.

CPA and PCR primers used to detect Plesiomonas shigelloides.

Assay typePrimer/probe nameSequence (5′-3′)Length (nt)
hugA-CPAAS (2a+1s) AAGCCAATCCCGATTTGAAACCTTTTGTTAAAGCGCATCTGAGCTGAG48
3a GGAGACCGCCAAAAACAAAGAGAT24
2a AAGCCAATCCCGATTTGAAACC22
4s GTCGCCCCAAACGCTAACTC20
5a CGATGGGCTGCAACGTGTT19
hugA-PCRF GCGAGCGGGAAGGGAAGAACC21
R GTCGCCCCAAACGCTAACTCATCA24

[i] CPA, cross-priming amplification; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; F, forward; R, reverse.

Evaluation of the specificity, sensitivity and reproducibility of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay

To determine the specificity of the CPA assay, the CPA reaction was performed under the conditions described above with DNA templates from 20 P. shigelloides and 33 non-P. shigelloides strains (Table I). All detection assays were performed in triplicate.

To assess the analytical sensitivity of CPA assay, CPA assays were performed using serial dilutions (20, 2 ng, 200, 20, 2 pg, 200, 100 and 50 fg per µl) of P. shigelloides genomic DNA. The genomic templates (1 µl) were added into the CPA mixture and at least 3 replicates of each dilution were assessed to define the limit of detection (LoD) of the CPA approach. Mixtures without DNA templates served as a negative control. The sensitivity of the CPA assay on P. shigelloides was determined by analyzing the amplifications produced from the serial dilutions of the P. shigelloides genomic DNA.

To compare the sensitivities of the CPA and PCR assay in pure culture, template DNA from P. shigelloides (ATCC 51903) was serially diluted (20, 2.0 ng, 200, 20, 2.0 pg, 200 fg, 100 and 50 fg per µl). The LoD of CPA and PCR was ascertained using the two assays.

To evaluate the reproducibility of the CPA assay, different concentrations (20 ng, 200 and 2.0 pg) of template DNA from P. shigelloides (ATCC 51903) were amplified two ways (10 times on one day and once each on 10 different days). The intra-assay and inter-assay variation were analysed at the time of precipitation, as measured by turbidity on the Real-Time Turbidimeter. The coefficient of variation (CV) is equal to the standard deviation (SD) divided by the mean average, multiplied by 100. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software (version, 19.0; IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).

PCR amplifications were performed in a final volume of 20 µl containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 0.001% gelatin, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 µM each of hugA forward and hugA reverse primers, 0.2 mM each of dNTPs, 0.5 units of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan) and 1 µl DNA template. The program consisted of an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C, 35 cycles of 30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C, and 30 sec at 72°C, and a final 5 min extension at 72°C. The PCR products were visualised by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis to verify the presence of the expected 435-bp fragment.

P. shigelloides hugA CPA application in simulated human stools specimens

Human stool specimens were obtained from a healthy donor with the written informed consent. The human stool specimens were confirmed to be P. shigelloides-negative using a traditional culture assay and PCR amplification (Table III). To determine the LoD of CPA in human stool, 10-fold serial dilutions of a mid-log phase culture of P. shigelloides grown in BHI broth at 37°C were prepared in PBS, quantified using the standard plating method, and added to the stool samples at 3×101-3×106 CFU/g. Aliquots (0.2 g) of the stools were used for DNA extraction with a QIAamp DNA Mini kit. This experiment was performed in triplicate independently, and the supernatants (2 µl) were used for CPA and PCR.

Table III.

Reproducibility of the Plesiomonas shigelloides hugA cross-priming amplification assay.

Table III.

Reproducibility of the Plesiomonas shigelloides hugA cross-priming amplification assay.

ReproducibilityTemplate DNA (pg/reaction)Number of detectionsMean time of precipitation (mins)Standard deviationCoefficient of variation (%)
Intra-assay 2×1041023.40.210.90
2×1021027.30.371.36
21038.40.491.28
Inter-assay 2×1041023.30.230.99
2×1021027.50.331.20
21038.70.661.71
Practical application of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay

To estimate the feasibility of the CPA assay to detect P. shigelloides in clinical samples, 100 samples (70 stool specimens from patients with diarrhoea and 30 water samples from the environment) were analysed using the CPA method, and compared with the results from the traditional culture and PCR methods. Culture-based detection of stool samples was performed by enriching 2 g stool specimens in 20 ml tetrathionate broth without iodine (Oxoid; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) for 10 h at 37°C, and then streaking on inositol brilliant green bile salts (IBB) agar (Oxoid; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and the plates incubated at 35°C for 24 h. Pink colonies suspected to be P. shigelloides were Gram stained, picked onto BHI agar at 37°C for 18 h and subjected to biochemical tests using the API 20E system (BioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) (25).

Water samples (500 ml) were filtered through sterile analytical filters (NalgenThermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with pore sizes of 0.45 µm, within 30 h of sample collection. The filters were enriched in 20 ml tetrathionate broth without iodine for 10 h at 37°C, streaked on IBB agar and the plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 h (25). Pink colonies suspected to be P. shigelloides were Gram stained, picked onto BHI agar at 37°C for 18 h and subjected to biochemical tests using the API 20E system.

DNA was extracted from 1 ml aliquots of the enrichment broth using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit, and 2 µl of each DNA extract was used as the template in the CPA and PCR assays. P. shigelloides (ATCC 51903) genomic DNA was used as the positive control template, and sterile water was used as the negative control template.

Results

Primer design for the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay

For the P. shigelloides-specific hugA gene, a set of 5 primers, which targeted 5 distinct regions, was designed for the CPA assay by sequence alignment and primer software Primer Premier 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA). These included the amplification primer 2a and 1s, designated as the cross primer (As) and two amplification primers (3a and 2a). The specificity of the CPA primers was confirmed using the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The details of the primers are presented in Table II and Fig. 1.

Confirmation and detection of P. shigelloides CPA products

The amplification products were examined by visual inspection using Loopamp Fluorescent Detection Reagent and the positive amplifications were directly observed due to the colour change from the original orange to green (Fig. 2A). In addition, the conventional CPA products were assessed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and positive results demonstrated a typical ladder-like pattern (Fig. 2B).

Specificity of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay

The specificity of the CPA assay towards the P. shigelloides hugA gene was examined by performing the assay with DNA from 53 bacterial strains from 29 different species as the template (Table I). The 20 P. shigelloides strains were correctly identified, whereas no amplification was observed in the 33 non-P. shigelloides strains. The results demonstrated that the specificity of the CPA assay was 100%, and the sequence revealed no cross-reaction with different pathogens.

Sensitivity of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay

The sensitivity of CPA assay towards P. shigelloides was examined by determining the LoD of reactions performed with serial dilutions of P. shigelloides genomic DNA (20, 2 ng, 200, 20, 2 pg, 200, 100 and 50 fg per µl). The LoD of CPA (Fig. 3A) was 200 fg DNA/tube, whereas the LoD of PCR assay was 20 pg DNA/tube (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that the CPA assay was 100-fold more sensitive than the PCR assay for detecting P. shigelloides genomic DNA.

Reproducibility of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay

The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was determined using various quantities of template DNA (20 ng, 200 and 2.0 pg) 10 times in a single run. The inter-assay CV was determined by performing the CPA assay using the same templates in 10 separate runs. The intra-assay CV ranged from 0.9 to 1.36%, and the inter-assay CV ranged from 0.99 to 1.71% (Table III). The reproducibility of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay was, therefore, good.

P. shigelloides hugA CPA efficacy in human stool specimens

The LoD of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay on human stools containing measured concentrations of P. shigelloides was examined. The CPA assay identified the presence of P. shigelloides in stools containing as little as 3×103 CFU per g stool (Fig. 4A), whereas PCR had a LoD of 3×104 CFU/g stool (Fig. 4B).

Utility of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay for detection in clinical and environmental samples

The P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay, PCR and culture-based detection were used to detect P. shigelloides in 100 clinical and environmental specimens (70 stool samples from patients with diarrhoea and 30 environmental water samples). The P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay and PCR method detected P. shigelloides in 11 (15.7%) and 8 (11.4%) stool specimens, respectively (Table IV). In the case of water samples, 4 (13.3%) and 3 (10.0%) water samples were P. shigelloides positive by CPA and PCR, respectively (Table IV). The samples that were positive by PCR were also positive by CPA. P. shigelloides strains were successfully isolated from all the CPA positive samples. The CPA detection accuracy was 100% compared with the traditional culture method. All samples were subjected to culture-based detection. The P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay, therefore, appears to be more sensitive for the detection of P. shigelloides in clinical and environmental samples than conventional PCR.

Table IV.

Practical application of the Plesiomonas shigelloides hugA cross-priming amplification assay.

Table IV.

Practical application of the Plesiomonas shigelloides hugA cross-priming amplification assay.

Diarrhoea patient specimens (n=70)Environmental water samples (n=30)


Detection methodPositiveNegativePositiveNegative
Polymerase chain reaction  862327
Culture1159426
Cross-priming amplification1159426

Discussion

In the present study, a CPA assay was developed for the rapid detection of P. shigelloides as a potential on-site and point-of-care test in clinics. P. shigelloides is an important pathogen, which may contaminate food or aquatic environment and causes gastrointestinal illness (68). However, the current lack of a rapid and sensitive diagnostic method can result in inappropriate antimicrobial therapies being administered, potentially leading to further complications and fatal outcomes (12,28). Therefore, a rapid, sensitive, specific and economical detection method is urgently required.

The conventional methods for the isolation and identification of P. shigelloides involve enrichment in fluid media and subsequent isolation of colonies on selective media. Although extensively performed, the methods are labor-intensive and time-consuming, making it unsuitable for the rapid detection of causative pathogens associated with sporadic and outbreaks cases (25). As an alternative, various PCR-based assays have been developed for the detection of P. shigelloides. However, PCR-based methods require a high-precision thermal cycler, which restricts their widespread application and mean that these techniques are not suited to diagnosis of P. shigelloides in basic clinical and field laboratories in rural areas. Several isothermal amplification methods have been developed for the rapid diagnosis of infectious pathogens, including LAMP, which is a promising low-cost method for detecting various infectious pathogens (1720). To date, the LAMP technique has been used to detect P. shigelloides in stool and environment specimens. However, LAMP assays require primers with high stringency, for which primer design is complicated and requires specific software (Primer Explorer V4 softwarEiken Chemical Co. Ltd.), therefore, posing an obstacle for clinical application (16). Moreover, in LAMP, an additional step of DNA template denaturation is required (29). The CPA assay reported in the study does not require a denaturation step, does not require specific software for primer design, and as the gene target sequence used for primer design in the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay is shorter than required for the LAMP assay, the subsequently reduced detection time is conducive to clinical application, as described by Fang et al (30) for the detection of M. tuberculosis in sputum samples. CPA is a powerful innovative gene amplification technique, which has been described as an easy and rapid diagnostic tool for the detection of pathogens (27). The equipment requirements for the CPA assay are also limited to a heat block or water bath, maintaining a constant temperature of 63°C for 1 h. The measurement of CPA products is possible by measuring turbidity, electrophoresis of amplicons or visual observation when using the Loopamp Fluorescent Detection Reagent. These features establish the CPA assay as a suitable method for P. shigelloides detection in basic clinical and field laboratories.

A 128-nucleotide fragment of the hugA gene was selected as the target for the CPA assay primers, as this gene is highly conserved in P. shigelloides strains (25). Primer specificity was determined by subjecting 33 non-P. shigelloides strains (causing similar clinical syndromes to P. shigelloides) to the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay, revealing 100% specificity of the CPA assay for P. shigelloides. Positive amplification was completed by visual inspection, and no positive reactions were observed in the assays of non-P. shigelloides strains. The results of the present study suggested that the CPA assay for the detection of the gene that encodes the HugA outer membrane receptor required for heme iron utilization by P. shigelloides may be a reliable method to detect P. shigelloides. This procedure combined with an enrichment step allows P. shigelloides detection in clinical and environment specimens.

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to use CPA technology to detect P. shigelloides in clinical and environmental specimens. The P. shigelloides hugA CPA method was 100-fold more sensitive than conventional PCR methods, detecting as little as 200 fg DNA per reaction. Several previous studies have also demonstrated that CPA has greater sensitivity than PCR for pathogen detection (17,29,3134). Thus, the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay is more appropriate than PCR for simple, rapid and sensitive detection of P. shigelloides.

To evaluate the practical application of the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay for detection of P. shigelloides in clinical samples, 100 specimens of clinical and environmental origins were analysed using conventional culture-based detection detection, PCR, and the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay. The P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay exhibited greater P. shigelloides detection capability than PCR, which was supported by several previous studies (17,29,3134). The conventional PCR method also led to false negative results that were detected by the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay; 3 stool specimens and 1 water sample were positive by culture and CPA, but PCR did not detect P. shigelloides in these samples. The reduced detection rate of PCR may be due to copy numbers of the P. shigelloides template that were less than the LoD, or the presence of PCR-specific inhibitors that may have affected the reaction sensitivity.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a CPA assay for the rapid detection of P. shigelloides. Compared with currently existing PCR methods, the P. shigelloides hugA CPA assay offers the advantages of improved sensitivity, rapidity, detection capability and ease of operation. In general, the CPA assay provides increased flexibility for clinical applications, and the isothermal amplification feature provides a potential method for the simple and rapid detection of P. shigelloides in basic clinical and field laboratories with limited resources.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Mega Project of Research on The Prevention and Control of HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis Infectious Diseases (grant nos. 2011ZX10004-001 and 2013ZX10004-101) from the Ministry of Science and Technology and the State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (grant no. 2015SKLID507).

References

1 

Garrity GM, Bell JA and Lilburn TG: Taxonomic outline of the procaryotes. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd edition. Release 4.0. http://141.150.157,2003.80/bergeysoutline/main.html

2 

Bodhidatta L, McDaniel P, Sornsakrin S, Srijan A, Serichantalergs O and Mason CJ: Case-control study of diarrheal disease etiology in a remote rural area in Western Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 83:1106–1109. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Krovacek K, Eriksson LM, González-Rey C, Rosinsky J and Ciznar I: Isolation, biochemical and serological characterisation of Plesiomonas shigelloides from freshwater in Northern Europe. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 23:45–51. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Reinhardt JF and George WL: Plesiomonas shigelloides-associated diarrhea. Jama. 253:3294–3295. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Aquilini E, Merino S, Regué M and Tomás JM: Genomic and proteomic studies on Plesiomonas shigelloides lipopolysaccharide core biosynthesis. J Bacteriol. 196:556–567. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

González-Rey C, Svenson SB, Bravo L, Rosinsky J, Ciznar I and Krovacek K: Specific detection of Plesiomonas shigelloides isolated from aquatic environments, animals and human diarrhoeal cases by PCR based on 23S rRNA gene. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 29:107–113. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Chen X, Chen Y, Yang Q, Kong H, Yu F, Han D, Zheng S, Cui D and Li L: Plesiomonas shigelloides infection in Southeast China. PloS One. 8:e778772013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Schneider F, Lang N, Reibke R, Michaely HJ, Hiddemann W and Ostermann H: Plesiomonas shigelloides pneumonia. Med Mal Infect. 39:397–400. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Ozdemir O, Sari S, Terzioglu S and Zenciroglu A: Plesiomonas shigelloides sepsis and meningoencephalitis in a surviving neonate. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 43:344–346. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Auxiliadora-Martins M, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Viana JM, Teixeira GC, Nicolini EA, Cordeiro KS, Colozza G, Martinez R, Martins-Filho OA and Basile-Filho A: Septic shock caused by Plesiomonas shigelloides in a patient with sickle beta-zero thalassemia. Heart Lung. 39:335–339. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Chan SS, Ng KC, Lyon DJ, Cheung WL, Cheng AF and Rainer TH: Acute bacterial gastroenteritis: A study of adult patients with positive stool cultures treated in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 20:335–338. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Xia FQ, Liu PN and Zhou YH: Meningoencephalitis caused by Plesiomonas shigelloides in a Chinese neonate: Case report and literature review. Ital J Pediatr. 41:32015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Pence MA: The brief case: Wound infection with Plesiomonas shigelloides following a freshwater injury. J Clin Microbiol. 54:1180–1182. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Meng S, Xu J, Xiong Y and Ye C: Rapid and sensitive detection of Plesiomonas shigelloides by loop-mediated isothermal amplification of the hugA gene. PloS One. 7:e419782012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Mori Y and Notomi T: Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): A rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother. 15:62–69. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Parida M, Sannarangaiah S, Dash PK, Rao PV and Morita K: Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): A new generation of innovative gene amplification techniquperspectives in clinical diagnosis of infectious diseases. Rev Med Virol. 18:407–421. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wang Y, Wang Y, Ma A, Li D and Ye C: Rapid and sensitive detection of Listeria monocytogenes by cross-priming amplification of lmo0733 gene. FEMS Microbiol Lett. Oct 1–2014.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Yang HL, Huang J, Yang B, Liu F and Zhang QL: The establishment and application of isothermal cross-priming amplification techniques in detecting penaeid shrimp white spot syndrome virus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 59:200–206. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zhang F, Wang L, Fan K, Wu J and Ying Y: The detection of T-Nos, a genetic element present in GMOs, by cross-priming isothermal amplification with real-time fluorescence. Anal Bioanal Chem. 406:3069–3078. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Bai Z, Xie H, You Q, Pickerill S, Zhang Y, Li T, Geng J, Hu L, Shan H and Di B: Isothermal cross-priming amplification implementation study. Lett Appl Microbiol. 60:205–209. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Janda JM and Abbott SL: Expression of hemolytic activity by Plesiomonas shigelloides. J Clin Microbiol. 31:1206–1208. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Santos JA, González CJ, López TM, Otero A and García-López ML: Hemolytic and elastolytic activities influenced by iron in Plesiomonas shigelloides. J Food Prot. 62:1475–1477. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Villarreal DM, Phillips CL, Kelley AM, Villarreal S, Villaloboz A, Hernandez P, Olson JS and Henderson DP: Enhancement of recombinant hemoglobin production in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) containing the Plesiomonas shigelloides heme transport system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74:5854–5856. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Oldham AL, Wood TA and Henderson DP: Plesiomonas shigelloides hugZ encodes an iron-regulated heme binding protein required for heme iron utilization. Can J Microbiol. 54:97–102. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Herrera FC, Santos JA, Otero A and García-López ML: Occurrence of Plesiomonas shigelloides in displayed portions of saltwater fish determined by a PCR assay based on the hugA gene. Int J Food Microbiol. 108:233–238. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Wandersman C and Stojiljkovic I: Bacterial heme sources: The role of heme, hemoprotein receptors and hemophores. Curr Opin Microbiol. 3:215–220. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Xu G, Hu L, Zhong H, Wang H, Yusa S, Weiss TC, Romaniuk PJ, Pickerill S and You Q: Cross priming amplification: Mechanism and optimization for isothermal DNA amplification. Sci Rep. 2:2462012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Okon E, Bishburg E, Ugras S, Chan T and Wang H: Clostridium perfringens meningitis, Plesiomonas shigelloides sepsis: A lethal combination. Am J Case Rep. 14:70–72. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Wozniakowski G, Niczyporuk JS, Samorek-Salamonowicz E and Gaweł A: The development and evaluation of cross-priming amplification for the detection of avian reovirus. J Appl Microbiol. 118:528–536. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Fang R, Li X, Hu L, You Q, Li J, Wu J, Xu P, Zhong H, Luo Y, Mei J and Gao Q: Cross-priming amplification for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 47:845–847. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zhang H, Feng S, Zhao Y, Wang S and Lu X: Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica in milk powders by cross-priming amplification combined with immunoblotting analysis. Int J Food Microbiol. 214:77–82. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Zhang X, Du XJ, Guan C, Li P, Zheng WJ and Wang S: Detection of Vibrio cholerae by isothermal cross-priming amplification combined with nucleic acid detection strip analysis. Mol Cell Probes. 29:208–214. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Qiao B, Cui JY, Sun L, Yang S and Zhao YL: Cross-priming amplification targeting the coagulase gene for rapid detection of coagulase-positive Staphylococci. J Appl Microbiol. 119:188–195. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Ke Y, Wang Y, Wang Z, Du X, Huang L and Chen Z: Sensitive and rapid detection of blaNDM-1 in clinical samples by isothermal cross-priming amplification. J Microbiol Methods. 95:215–217. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2016
Volume 14 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Meng S, Wang Y, Wang Y and Ye C: Rapid and sensitive detection of Plesiomonas shigelloides by cross‑priming amplification of the hugA gene. Mol Med Rep 14: 5443-5450, 2016
APA
Meng, S., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Ye, C. (2016). Rapid and sensitive detection of Plesiomonas shigelloides by cross‑priming amplification of the hugA gene. Molecular Medicine Reports, 14, 5443-5450. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5937
MLA
Meng, S., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Ye, C."Rapid and sensitive detection of Plesiomonas shigelloides by cross‑priming amplification of the hugA gene". Molecular Medicine Reports 14.6 (2016): 5443-5450.
Chicago
Meng, S., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Ye, C."Rapid and sensitive detection of Plesiomonas shigelloides by cross‑priming amplification of the hugA gene". Molecular Medicine Reports 14, no. 6 (2016): 5443-5450. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5937