|
1
|
Prader A, Labhart A and Willi H: Ein
Syndrom von Adipositas, Kleinwuchs, Kryptorchismus und Oligophrenie
nach myotonieartigem Zustand im Neugeborenalter. Schweir Med Wschr.
86:1260–1261. 1956.
|
|
2
|
Oiglane-Shlik E, Zordania R, Varendi H,
Antson A, Mägi ML, Tasa G, Bartsch O, Talvik T and Ounap K: The
neonatal phenotype of Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet A.
140:1241–1244. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Hirsch HJ, Eldar-Geva T, Bennaroch F,
Pollak Y and Gross-Tsur V: Sexual dichotomy of gonadal function in
Prader-Willi syndrome from early infancy through the fourth decade.
Hum Reprod. 30:2587–2596. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Hartin SN, Hossain WA, Weisensel N and
Butler MG: Three siblings with Prader-Willi syndrome caused by
imprinting center microdeletions and review. Am J Med Genet A.
176:886–895. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Ramsden SC, Clayton-Smith J, Birch R and
Buiting K: Practice guidelines for the molecular analysis of
Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. BMC Med Genet. 11:702010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Horsthemke B and Wagstaff J: Mechanisms of
imprinting of the Prader-Willi/Angelman region. Am J Med Genet A
146A. 2041–2052. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Geysenbergh B, De Catte L and Vogels A:
Can fetal ultrasound result in prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi
syndrome? Genet Couns. 22:207–216. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Whittington JE, Butler JV and Holland AJ:
Pre-, peri- and postnatal complications in Prader-Willi syndrome in
a UK sample. Early Hum Dev. 84:331–336. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Bigi N, Faure JM, Coubes C, Puechberty J,
Lefort G, Sarda P and Blanchet P: Prader-Willi syndrome: Is there a
recognizable fetal phenotype? Prenat Diagn. 28:796–799. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Apgar V: A proposal for a new method of
evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg.
32:260–267. 1953. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Butterfield J and Covey MJ: Practical
epigram of the Apgar score. JAMA. 181:3531962. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Hussain Askree S, Hjelm LN, Ali Pervaiz M,
Adam M, Bean LJ, Hedge M and Coffee B: Allelic dropout can cause
false-positive results for Prader-Willi and Angelman syndrome
testing. J Mol Diagn. 13:108–112. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Kubota T, Das S, Christian SL, Baylin SB,
Herman JG and Ledbetter DH: Methylation-specific PCR simplifies
imprinting analysis. Nat Genet. 16:16–17. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Schroeder C, Sturm M, Dufke A,
Mau-Holzmann U, Eggermann T, Poths S, Riess O and Bonin M: UPDtool:
A tool for detection of iso- and heterodisomy in parent-child trios
using SNP microarrays. Bioinformatics. 29:1562–1564. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Zhang K, Liu S, Feng B, Yang Y, Zhang H,
Dong R, Liu Y and Gai Z: Clinical application of an innovative
multiplex-fluorescent-labeled STRs assay for Prader-Willi syndrome
and angelman syndrome. PLoS One. 11:e01478242016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Shaffer LG, Ledbetter DH and Lupski JR:
Molecular cytogenetics of contiguous gene syndromes: Mechanisms and
consequences of gene dosage imbalance. The metabolic and molecular
bases of inherited disease. Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS and
Valle D: New York: McGraw-Hill; pp. 1291–1324. 2001
|
|
17
|
Jin DK: Systematic review of the clinical
and genetic aspects of Prader-Willi syndrome. Korean J Pediatr.
54:55–63. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Cassidy SB and Driscoll DJ: Prader-Willi
syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 17:3–13. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Hou JW and Wang TR: Prader-Willi syndrome:
Clinical and molecular cytogenetic investigations. J Formos Med
Assoc. 95:474–479. 1996.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Kim HJ, Cho HJ, Jin DK, Kwon EK, Ki CS,
Kim JW and Kim SH: Genetic basis of Prader-Willi syndrome in Korea:
Less uniparental disomy than has been recognized? Clin Genet.
66:368–372. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Lin HY, Lin SP, Chuang CK, Chen MR, Yen
JL, Lee YJ, Huang CY, Tsai LP, Niu DM, Chao MC and Kuo PL: Genotype
and phenotype in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome in Taiwan.
Acta Paediatr. 96:902–905. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Cassidy SB, Forsythe M, Heeger S, Nicholls
RD, Schork N, Benn P and Schwartz S: Comparison of phenotype
between patients with Prader-Willi syndrome due to deletion 15q and
uniparental disomy 15. Am J Med Genet. 68:433–440. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Fridman C and Koiffmann CP: Origin of
uniparental disomy 15 in patients with Prader-Willi or Angelman
syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 94:249–253. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Kotzot D: Complex and segmental
uniparental disomy (UPD): Review and lessons from rare chromosomal
complements. J Med Genet. 38:497–507. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Ginsburg C, Fokstuen S and Schinzel A: The
contribution of uniparental disomy to congenital development
defects in children born to mothers at advanced childbearing age.
Am J Med Genet. 95:454–460. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Morichon-Delvallez N, Mussat P, Dumez Y
and Vekemans M: Trisomy 15 in chorionic villi and Prader-Willi
syndrome at birth. Prenat Diagn. 13:307–308. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Christian SL, Smith AC, Macha M, Black SH,
Elder FF, Johnson JM, Resta RG, Surti U, Suslak L, Verp MS and
Ledbetter DH: Prenatal diagnosis of uniparental disomy 15 following
trisomy 15 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn. 16:323–332. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Roberts E, Stevenson K, Cole T, Redford DH
and Davison EV: Prospective prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi
syndrome due to maternal disomy for chromosome 15 following
trisomic zygote rescue. Prenat Diagn. 17:780–783. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Hiroi H, Kozuma S, Hayashi N, Unno N,
Fujii T, Tsutsumi O, Okai T and Taketani Y: A fetus with
Prader-Willi syndrome showing normal diurnal rhythm and abnormal
ultradian rhythm on heart rate monitoring. Fetal Diagn Ther.
15:304–307. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Fong BF and De Vries JI: Obstetric aspects
of the Prader-Willi syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
21:389–392. 2003. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
L'Herminé AC, Aboura A, Brisset S, Cuisset
L, Castaigne V, Labrune P, Frydman R and Tachdjian G: Fetal
phenotype of Prader-Willi syndrome due to maternal disomy for
chromosome 15. Prenat Diagn. 23:938–943. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Haugen G, Rønnestad A and Kroken M:
Variations in fetal phenotype in Prader-Willi syndrome. Prenat
Diagn. 29:2942009. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Akiba Y, Ono M, Shirahashi M, Noda S,
Nishijima S, Amagata T, Kusano R, Fuke T, Hayashida S, Ikeda T, et
al: Polyhydramnios associated with Prader-Willi syndrome. J Obstet
Gynaecol. 35:752–753. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Insoft RM, Hurvitz J, Estrella E and
Krishnamoorthy KS: Prader-Willi syndrome associated with fetal
goiter: A case report. Am J Perinatol. 16:29–31. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Le Bris-Quillevere MJ, Riviere D,
Pluchon-Riviere E, Chabaud JJ, Parent P, Volant A and Boog G:
Prenatal diagnosis of del(15)(q11q13). Prenat Diagn. 10:405–411.
1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Bar C, Diene G, Molinas C, Bieth E, Casper
C and Tauber M: Early diagnosis and care is achieved but should be
improved in infants with Prader-Willi syndrome. Orphanet J Rare
Dis. 12:1182017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Liehr T, Brude E, Gillessen-Kaesbach G,
König R, Mrasek K, von Eggeling F and Starke H: Prader-Willi
syndrome with a karyotype 47,XY,+min(15)(pter->q11.1:) and
maternal UPD 15-case report plus review of similar cases. Eur J Med
Genet. 48:175–181. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Slater HR, Vaux C, Pertile M, Burgess T
and Petrovic V: Prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome using
PW71 methylation analysis-uniparental disomy and the significance
of residual trisomy 15. Prenat Diagn. 17:109–113. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Milunsky JM, Wyandt HE, Huang XL, Kang XZ,
Elias ER and Milunsky A: Trisomy 15 mosaicism and uniparental
disomy (UPD) in a liveborn infant. Am J Med Genet. 61:269–273.
1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Cassidy SB, Lai LW, Erickson RP, Magnuson
L, Thomas E, Gendron R and Herrmann J: Trisomy 15 with loss of the
paternal 15 as a cause of Prader-Willi syndrome due to maternal
disomy. Am J Hum Genet. 51:701–708. 1992.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Purvis-Smith SG, Saville T, Manass S, Yip
MY, Lam-Po-Tang PR, Duffy B, Johnston H, Leigh D and McDonald B:
Uniparental disomy 15 resulting from “correction” of an initial
trisomy 15. Am J Hum Genet. 50:1348–1350. 1992.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Driscoll DJ, Miller JL, Schwartz S, et al:
Prader-Willi Syndrome. 1998 Oct 6 (Updated 2017 Dec 14). Adam MP,
Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al: GeneReviews® [Internet]
Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2018,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1330/
|
|
43
|
Glenn CC, Driscoll DJ, Yang TP and
Nicholls RD: Genomic imprinting: Potential function and mechanisms
revealed by the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. Mol Hum
Reprod. 3:321–332. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker
LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, Church DM, Crolla JA, Eichler EE, et
al: Consensus statement: Chromosomal microarray is a first-tier
clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental
disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 86:749–764.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK,
Quintero-Rivera F and South ST; Working Group of the American
College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee,
: American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for
interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy
number variants. Genet Med. 13:680–685. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
46
|
Hanemaaijer NM, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van der
Vries G, Dijkhuizen T, Hordijk R, van Essen AJ, Veenstra-Knol HE,
Kerstjens-Frederikse WS, Herkert JC, Gerkes EH, et al: Practical
guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by
high-resolution array in routine diagnostics. Eur J Hum Genet.
20:161–165. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
South ST, Lee C, Lamb AN, Higgins AW and
Kearney HM; Working Group for the American College of Medical
Genetics and Genomics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee, :
ACMG Standards and Guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic
microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications:
Revision 2013. Genet Med. 15:901–909. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
48
|
Tucker T, Schlade-Bartusiak K, Eydoux P,
Nelson TN and Brown L: Uniparental disomy: Can SNP array data be
used for diagnosis? Genet Med. 14:753–756. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
