Silencing of Forkhead box D1 inhibits proliferation and migration in glioma cells

Introduction

Gliomas are the most malignant and common type of brain tumors (1). Despite considerable advances in surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy (temozolomide, TMZ), the prognosis for glioma has not significantly improved (2). With a median survival time of 12–15 months, fewer than 3% of glioma patients live longer than 5 years after diagnosis (3–5). Because of the restricted anatomical location and absence of metastases outside the central nervous system (CNS), targeted gene therapy may provide a promising strategy to treat gliomas (6). Therefore, identification of target genes that drive tumorigenicity is essential for developing targeted therapy for glioma (7–10). One promising family for gene targeting is the Forkhead-box (FOX) family. The FOX family consists of at least 43 transcription factors that regulate the expression of genes that support cell growth, proliferation and differentiation (11). Many FOX genes function as oncogenes. For example, FOXA1 is amplified and overexpressed in esophageal and lung adenocarcinomas (12). FOXO1 fused to PAX3 or PAX7 serve as prognostic indicators in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (13–15).

FOXD1 (also known as FREAC-4) is highly expressed in the kidney and controls cellularity in the renal capsule, a structure required for normal renal development (16–19). FOXD1 is also expressed in the brain and the retina and is necessary for normal development of the retina and optic chiasm (20,21). FOXD1 has also been implicated as an oncogene, as it promotes breast cancer proliferation and chemotherapeutic drug resistance by targeting p27 (22). However, the role of FOXD1 in tumorigenesis and progression, particularly in glioma, is still limited.

In the present study, we first revealed the role of FOXD1 in glioma tumorigenesis and progression. We found that FOXD1 expression is upregulated and directly correlated with the glioma grade. Using FOXD1-siRNA, we determined that silencing FOXD1 expression inhibits cell proliferation and migration. Our results suggest that FOXD1 may be a potential therapy target for patients with glioma.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and transfection

Human glioma cell lines U87 and U251 were cultured in DMEM (C11995500BT, Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, 10099-141, Gibco). Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) (25200072, Gibco) was used to detach the cells from the flask. The FOXD1-siRNA and negative control siRNA (NC-siRNA) were purchased from Santa-Cruz Biotechnology (sc-60649; sc-637007) and Sigma. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX reagent (13778150, Invitrogen) according to the protocol.

Glioma tumor specimens

All patients undergoing surgical treatment at the Hunan Cancer Hospital (Changsha, Hunan, China) for primary brain cancers between 2007 and 2013 were invited to participate in this institutional review board-approved study. Seventy patients diagnosed with low grade glioma (LGG, n=36) or high grade glioma (HGG, n=34) tumors were included in the study. Tissue samples were collected from glioma patient tumors. Normal brain tissue (n=20) was also obtained from patient with brain injury. The tissue samples were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after resection and stored at −80°C for future processing.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol. Two micrograms of RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNAs using the Primescript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio Inc., Japan). The PCR system was performed using SYBR Premix DimerEraser kit (Takara Bio Inc). The reactions were cycled 40 times [95°C, 30 sec, (95°C, 5 sec; 55°C, 30 sec; and 72°C, 30 sec)] with fluorescence measurements. A melting curve was performed at the end of amplification cycles to verify the specificity of the PCR products. Primers used for real-time PCR were as follows: FOXD1, F: AAGAACCCGCTGGTGAAG; R: GTCCAGTAGTTGCCCTTGC. GAPDH, F: GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT; R: TTGATTTTGGAGGGATCTCG. All of the determinations were performed in duplicate. The relative expression of FOXD1 mRNA was normalized to the expression level of GAPDH mRNA using the 2−∆Ct method.

Western blotting

Total cellular protein was extracted with RIPA. SDS-PAGE was performed with 50 µg total cellular proteins using 10% gradient Tris-glycine gels. Primary antibodies used included anti-FOXD1 (WH0002297M1, Sigma-Aldrich LLC, USA), and anti-GAPDH (G8795, Sigma-Aldrich LLC). The bound antibodies were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (RPN2232, GE Healthcare, UK) and quantified by densitometry using ChemiDoc XRS+ image analyzer (Bio-Rad, USA). Densitometric analyses of bands were adjusted with GAPDH as loading control. Triplicate experiments with triplicate samples were performed.

MTS assay

Cells were collected in the logarithmic phase of growth and seeded into 96-well culture plates (1,000 cells/well). The cells were incubated in 100 µl MTS reagent (1:9) for 1 h. The absorbance values were measured at 490 nm by the BioTek®Eon (Synergy™, HT, USA). In the absence of cells, background absorbance of the medium was subtracted. Each assay was performed in triplicate.

Colony formation assay

U251 cells were collected in the logarithmic phase of growth and seeded in triplicate into 6-well plates at a density of 1,000 cells/well. Cells were cultured for 12 days at 37°C in an incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained with Giemsa (C0121, Beyotime, China) for 20 min. After washing with PBS several times, the cells were photographed with a camera (Canon, Japan) and the cell colonies were counted.

Wound healing assay

Cells (2×105 cells/well.) were seeded onto a 6-well plate overnight. The confluent monolayers were scratched using sterile pipette tips and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 3 times to remove detached cells. The cells were then transfected with siRNA for 36 h. Photographs of the wounded areas were obtained using a Leica DMI3000 B inverted microscope (Leica, German). The migration rate was calculated as the ratio of the width of the scratch that remained cell-free after migration to the initial average width of the scratch. The size of the wounded areas was quantified using ImageJ Version 1.41o software (National Institutes of Health).

Immunofluorescent staining

Glioma cells were seeded into 6-well plates and cultured with siRNA for 48 h. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, washed and stained with Hoechst 33258 (C0003, Beyotime) for 5 min. Cells were observed under a Leica DMI3000 B inverted microscope equipped with ebq100-04 (Leica, Germany).

Statistical analysis

SPSS16.0 software was used for general statistics analyses. Comparisons between two experimental groups were performed using Student's t-test. Survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test applied for comparison. All tests performed were two sided and the criterion for statistical significance was p<0.05.

Results

High FOXD1 expression in glioma

The expression pattern of FOXD1 was evaluated in 70 glioma tissues and 20 normal brain tissues using quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR). FOXD1 expression was significantly higher in glioma tissues (LGG, p=0.047; HGG, p=0.002) compared with normal brain samples. FOXD1 expression was also higher in high grade glioma compared with low grade glioma (p=0.001, Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the association between FOXD1 expression and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed in the present study. No significant association was observed between FOXD1 expression and patient age or gender (Table I). To further validate these results, we analyzed expression of FOXD1 in expression profiles (GSE4290 and GSE7696) acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database, and glioma datasets acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; http://cancergenome.nih.gov/). We found that expression of upregulated FOXD1 (>2-fold upregulated) expression was significantly higher in malignant gliomas compared to lower grade gliomas and non-tumor brain tissue and directly correlated with the glioma grade in GSE4290 dataset (Fig. 1B). Analysis of the GSE7696 data and TCGA revealed that FOXD1 have >2-fold upregulation at the transcription level and were greatly increased in malignant gliomas when compared to non-tumor brain tissue (Fig. 1C and D). These results suggest that increased FOXD1 expression correlates with glioma tumor grade.

Figure 1. High Foxd1 expression in glioma. (A) FOXD1 was upregulated and directly correlated with the glioma grade. Data analysis showed significant differences in GSE4290 (B), GSE7679 (C) and TCGA (D) between the glioma tissues and normal brain samples.

Table I. Correlation between FOXD1 expression and glioma clinicopathological features in 70 patients.

Table I.

Correlation between FOXD1 expression and glioma clinicopathological features in 70 patients.

			FOXD1 expression levels
Clinicopathological features	N %	High expression	Low expression	Ratio High/low	p-value
Gender
Male	48 (68.57)	14	35	0.4	0.092
Female	22 (31.43)	10	12	0.833
Age years
<45	44 (62.85)	13	31	0.419	0.056
≥45	26 (37.14)	11	15	0.733
Grade
Low (I+II)	36 (51.42)	6	30	0.2	0.002
High (III+IV)	34 (48.58)	18	16	1.125

Prognostic value of FOXD1 expression in gliomas

To determine the association between FOXD1 expression and clinical outcome, Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted for expression profiles (GSE4290 and GSE7696) and the TCGA data. The analysis showed no significant difference in outcome between patients with high FOXD1 expressing and low FOXD1 expressing gliomas for both gene expression profiles and the TCGA datasets (Fig. 2). The clinical outcome of those patients with high FOXD1 expression was observed to be better than those with a low FOXD1 expression. Even so, FOXD1 expression may not serve as a prognostic factor of glioma patients.

Figure 2. Prognostic value of FOXD1 expression in gliomas. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for patients with three data. There is no significant difference between the high FOXD1 expression and the low FOXD1 expression patients with glioma in GSE4412, GSE7696 and TCGA datasets.

SiRNA inhibits FOXD1 expression efficiently in human glioma cell lines

In order to investigate the role of FOXD1 in glioma, we knockdown expression of FOXD1 using a FOXD1-siRNA. Malignant human glioma cell lines U87 and U251 were treated with FOXD1-siRNA or NC-siRNA. Treatment with FOXD1-siRNA significantly reduced FOXD1 mRNA expression by ~80% and nearly depleted protein expression in U87 (Fig. 3A and C) and U251 (Fig. 3B and D) cells. Therefore, the present results demonstrated that a highly efficient knockdown of FOXD1 expression at the mRNA and protein levels was achieved after transfection.

Figure 3. SiRNA inhibits FOXD1 expression efficiently in human glioma cell lines. Treatment with FOXD1-siRNA led to an ~80% reduction in the expression of FOXD1 mRNA and evident depletion of the expression of FOXD1 protein in U87 (A and C); U251 (B and D). **P<0.01.

Knockdown of FOXD1 suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in glioma cells

To investigate the effect of FOXD1 silencing on glioma cell proliferation, U87 and U251 cells transfected with FOXD1-siRNA or NC-siRNA were analyzed by MTS assay. Proliferation of U87 cells treated with FOXD1-siRNA began to decrease 72 h after treatment. On day 4, proliferation of cells treated with FOXD1-siRNA was significantly reduced compared to those treated with NC-siRNA or non-treated cells (p<0.001; Fig. 4A). These results are consistent with U251 cells (p<0.001; Fig. 4B). Moreover, no difference was seen between NC-siRNA treated cells and Mock cells. The relatively long-term effects of FOXD1 knockdown on glioma cell proliferation were also examined using a colony formation assay. As shown in Fig. 4C and D, silencing of FOXD1 expression in U251 cells substantially reduced colony formation (p<0.001).

Figure 4. Knockdown of FOXD1 suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in glioma cells. (A and B) MTS assay. Compared to that of Mock and NC-siRNA groups, the absorbance value in FOXD1-siRNA group was remarkably reduced in U87, U251. (C and D) Colony formation assay. Silencing of FOXD1 expression in U251 cells resulted in a substantial reduction in colony formation as compared to Mock or NC-siRNA. (E) Immunofluorescent staining. Apoptotic bodies containing nuclear fragments were generated in transfected FOXD1-siRNA group. ***P<0.001.

In addition to unlimited proliferation and elevated clonogenic capacity, evading apoptosis is also essential for tumor initiation and development. To determine whether the reduction in cell number following FOXD1 knockdown is due in part to cell apoptosis, we treated U251 cells with FOXD1-siRNA or NC-siRNA and stained them with Hoechst 33258 to evaluate cell viability. Apoptotic bodies containing nuclear fragments were generated in transfected FOXD1-siRNA group (Fig. 4E), suggesting that FOXD1 knockdown may induce cell apoptosis in glioma cells.

Silencing effect of FOXD1 on migration in U251 cells

We investigated the effect of FOXD1 silencing on cell migration. FOXD1 knockdown markedly reduced glioma cell migration 36 h after transfection with the FOXD1-siRNA (Fig. 5A). Migration rates were significantly lower for FOXD1-siRNA treated cells compared to non-treated and NC-siRNA treated cells (p=0.002) (Fig. 5B). No significant differences were found between Mock and NC-siRNA treated cells. These results suggest that FOXD1 contributes to glioma cell migration.

Figure 5. Silencing effect of FOXD1 on migration in U251 cells. (A) Scratch-wound assay. The silencing effect of FOXD1 markedly reduced glioma cell migration. (B) Migration rates were significantly lower for FOXD1-siRNA treated cells compared to non-treated and NC-siRNA treated cells.**P<0.01.

Discussion

Despite advances in standard treatments of glioma, little progress has been made in patient outcome. This is due in part to the non-specific nature of these treatments. Thus, alternative therapies that specifically target tumor-specific genes may provide a promising alternative treatment to the current standards of care. This study identified FOXD1 as a potential target for the development of tumor targeted therapies.

We show that FOXD1 is upregulated in glioma tissues compared to normal brain tissues and that silencing FOXD1 expression inhibits glioma cell proliferation and migration rates. Blocking FOXD1 expression also generated apoptotic bodies containing nuclear fragments suggesting that FOXD1 promotes cell death. Taken together, the results suggest that FOXD1 functions as an oncogene in glioma.

Forkhead box (FOX) proteins, an evolutionarily conserved family of transcriptional regulators, mediate a wide range of biological processes, such as proliferation, metabolism, differentiation, apoptosis, and migration (23–27), and take part in the onset and progression of tumors (28). Some studies show that FOXD1 is related to organization development (19,29), cell reprogramming (30), cell differentiation (31). These results are consistent with previous studies that have shown that FOX transcription factors promote cancer cell migration and proliferation.

Our study also parallels the previous studies that found FOXD1 promotes cell growth. In 2015, Zhao et al (22) showed that FOXD1 promotes the cell cycle progression by inducing G1→S transition, suggesting that FOXD1 induces G1→S transition by down-regulation of p27 expression. Further investigation into the mechanisms underlying FOXD1 is needed to determine how FOXD1 supports cell proliferation and other oncogenic activities in glioma.

In order to confirm the relationship between FOXD1 and its prognosis, we collected the datasets GSE4412, GSE7696 and TCGA. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in GSE4412 or GSE7696 between the high FOXD1 expression and low FOXD1 expression groups in patients with glioma, and it is the same as in TCGA data. FOXD1 expression may not serve as a prognostic factor of glioma patients.

In conclusion, our results show that FOXD1 expression is highly expressed in malignant gliomas and directly correlates with glioma grade. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed FOXD1 expression may not serve as a prognostic factor of glioma patients. However, reduced expression of FOXD1 inhibits glioma cell proliferation, cell survival and migration. These findings implicate FOXD1 as an oncogene in glioma that could potentially serve as a therapeutic target for glioma treatment.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National High-tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) (2012AA02A517), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81373490, 81573508, 81573463), and Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan of China (2015TP1043), and Open Foundation of Innovative Platform in University of Hunan Province of China (2015–14).

References