Oncology Reports Special Issues

Colorectal cancer treatment empowered by new strategy and technology

Lead Editor:

    Mr Norikatsu Miyoshi
    Osaka University
    Japan

In recent years, the new strategy and technology are reported very effective, such as liquid biopsy (cfDNA/ctDNA), NGS, artificial intelligence, and minimally invasive surgery (robotic/laparoscopic surgery), in order to eliminate colorectal cancer. Here, we introduce and discuss these new strategy and technology for colorectal cancer, and the future.


Submission deadline: 02 June 2024

History of oncology: from ancient findings to systems oncology

Lead Editor:

    Dr Styliani Geronikolou
    BIOMED RES FOUND ACAD ATHENS
    Greece

This issue aims to provide a novel wide approach of oncology, covering history findings, evolutionary approach, all clinical aspects of the discipline (diagnosis, treatment, prognosis), prevention and epidemiology. Cancer is a known disease since antiquity, while recent evolutionary and systems approaches provide new insight to the natural history and/or diagnostic and therapeutic schemes.


Submission deadline: 30 June 2024

Importance of early diagnosis in gynecological cancer

Lead Editor:

    Dr Roberto Montera
    Campus bio medico of Rome
    Italy

The availability of screening modalities and improvements in prevention have reduced the risk of developing some cancers over the last few decades. Methods for optimal screening of gynecologic cancers are still being investigated. Cervical cancer is the only gynecologic malignancy for which a screening modality is widely accepted and recommended to all women. The primary care practitioner plays a valuable role in performing regular Pap smears and pelvic examinations. Annual screening of cervical cells has been shown to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer by 78% Although routine screening for asymptomatic women for ovarian and endometrial cancer cannot be recommended at this time, vaginal ultrasound is a valuable tool for the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding and ovarian masses. Endometrial carcinoma is associated with a good prognosis because patients tend to present with early disease. Mass screening is therefore unlikely to be of benefit. High-risk populations may benefit from screening, but no prospective studies have demonstrated a benefit in any population. Infact, for these tomours, despite enormous progress in treatment, not the same progress in diagnosis effort, there is no proof that routine screening with serum markers, sonography, or pelvic examinations decreases mortality. Timeliness is one of the fundamental yet understudied quality metrics of cancer care. Future studies are warranted to explore the prognostic implications and the reasons for delays within specific cancer types.


Submission deadline: 30 June 2024

Journal Cover

April-2024
Volume 51 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN: 1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Full Size Image