microRNA‑572 functions as an oncogene and a potential biomarker for renal cell carcinoma prognosis

  • Authors:
    • Xiang Pan
    • Zuwei Li
    • Liwen Zhao
    • Jing Quan
    • Liang Zhou
    • Jinling Xu
    • Weiji Xu
    • Xin Guan
    • Hang Li
    • Shangqi Yang
    • Yaoting Gui
    • Yongqing Lai
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 17, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6649
  • Pages: 3092-3101
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the third most common urological malignancy in the USA and represents 2‑3% of all adult malignancies. Furthermore, the incidence of RCC has been progressively increasing over recent years. Although the morbidity of treatment has decreased with the use of multidisciplinary synthetic therapy, the prognosis of terminal cancer remains poor, with a 5‑year survival rate of 5‑10%. MicroRNAs (miRs) have been correlated with the regulation of 30‑60% of the protein­coding genes and act as oncogenes or anti‑oncogenes in RCC. Considering this research, miRNAs are likely to be the biomarkers for tumor diagnosis, prognosis and the targets for RCC management. In the present study, 42 formalin‑fixed paraffin‑embedded RCC samples were used. The expression of miR‑572 and the role of miR‑572 in RCC cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis was determined by performing reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, wound scratch assays, cell proliferation assays, Transwell assays and flow cytometry assays, respectively. Further experiments were conducted to clarify the correlation between miR‑572 expression and clinicopathological variables or overall survival. Furthermore, the expression levels of miR‑572 were evaluated for the prognosis value of patients with RCC. Upregulation of miR‑572 was observed in RCC tissues and RCC cell lines. miR‑572 promoted 786‑O and ACHN cell proliferation and mobility and inhibited early apoptosis. In Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, results of the univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that the patients with low miR‑572 expression had a significantly longer overall survival compared with the patients with high miR‑572 expression (univariate analysis, P=0.037; multivariate analysis, P=0.034). Results of the Kaplan‑Meier survival curves revealed that the patients with downregulated miR‑572 have a significantly longer overall survival compared with the patients with highly expressed miR‑572 (P=0.019). To conclude, the results of the present study suggest that tumor oncogene miR‑572 is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis for RCC.

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the third most common urological malignancy in the USA and represents 2–3% of all adult malignancies. Furthermore, the incidence rate has progressively increased, particularly in young patients and or those with high-grade disease (13). In 2017, ~63,990 cases were diagnosed with kidney and renal pelvis cancer and 14,400 cases were expected to succumb to disease in the USA alone (4). Various risk factors have been associated with RCC, including active and passive cigarette smoking, obesity, hypertension and absent fruit and vegetable consumption (5). Although the morbidity of treatment has decreased with the use of nephron-sparing surgery, laparoscopic and robotic surgery and minimally invasive procedures, and biologic response modifiers are applied to patients with metastatic RCC, the prognosis of terminal cancer remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 5–10% (6,7). Therefore, it's imperative to identify the clinical and molecular phenotype of occurrence and development of RCC in order to uncover novel targets for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of RCC.

MicroRNAs (miRs), which are small noncoding RNA molecules (21–25 bases in length), regulate the gene expression in a sequence-specific manner and promote the suppression of protein synthesis or mRNA degradation (8). The uniqueness of miRs is that one miR can regulate numerous protein-coding RNAs (9). In the human genome, miRs have been correlated with the regulation of 30–60% of protein-coding genes (10,11). Accumulating evidence has suggested that miRs, prominently those upregulated or downregulated in other types of malignancies, act as either oncogenes or anti-oncogenes, respectively, in RCC. For example, miR-367 exerts oncogenic effects in osteosarcoma and promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of tumor cells with the regulation of DOC-2/DAB2 interactive protein, which was consistent with the oncogenic role of miR-367 in RCC (12,13).

miR-572 is a type of miR that was recently confirmed to be involved in various types of cancer, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (14), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (15), ovarian cancer (16) and basal cell carcinoma (17). Results from a study by Wang et al (18) revealed that, compared with corresponding non-tumor controls, miR-572 was markedly elevated in the serum of patients with RCC. However, the expression and the function of miR-572 in RCC remains elusive. Thus, the present study was performed with the purpose of ascertaining the expression of miR-572 in RCC and corresponding normal tissues. Furthermore, the role of miR-572 in the proliferation, apoptosis and prognosis of RCC cell was further explored.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

RCC tissues (n=52) and corresponding non-cancerous renal tissues (n=52) from patients that were pathologically diagnosed with RCC and had received no therapy were collected from the Peking University Shenzhen Hospital between January 2016 and June 2017. (Guangdong, China). The corresponding non-cancerous renal tissues were collected >2 cm away from the visible tumor range. Written informed consent was obtained from every patient. All the patients were pathologically reviewed and diagnosed with RCC and had not received any chemoradiotherapy. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. The collected tissues were checked and classified by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Subsequently, the samples were immersed in RNAlater reagent (Qiagen GmbH, Inc., Hilden, Germany) for ~0.5 h and stored at −80°C. The clinical and pathological information of the patients is presented in Table I.

Table I.

Clinicopathological features in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Table I.

Clinicopathological features in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

CharacteristicsNumber of cases
Mean age range (years)52 (27–72)
Sexual distinction
  Male/female30/18
Histological type
  Clear cell/papillary39/9
pT-stage
  T1/T2/T3 + T427/19/2
Fuhrman grade
  I/II/III/IV15/22/8/3
AJCC clinical stages
  I/II/III+IV27/18/3

[i] pT, primary tumor; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens

The FFPE RCC samples obtained from the Department of Pathology of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital originated from patients with RCC who had undergone surgery at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital between January 2011 and January 2014. For fixation, all the tissue sample was fixated with 10% formalin concentration at 4°C for 48 h. For RNA extraction, ~10-µm-thick FFPE sections were used. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients, which are presented in Table II, were analyzed on the basis of the 2010 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (19). Total RNA of FFPE samples was extracted using an miRNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Inc.).

Table II.

Association between microRNA-572 expression levela and clinical information in FFPE renal cancer samples.

Table II.

Association between microRNA-572 expression levela and clinical information in FFPE renal cancer samples.

No. of patients (%)

VariableTotalHigh miR-572 expressionLow miR-572 expression P-valueb
Sex
  Male2614120.751
  Female16  7  9
Age (years)
  ≤603317161.000
  >60  9  4  5
Tumor size (cm)
  ≤4.017  6110.208
  >4.0251510
Tumor stage
  I+ II2712150.520
  III+IV15  9  6

a Cut-off point: median

b calculated using Fisher's Exact test or Pearson Chi-square test.

Cell culture and transfection

The cells used in the present study included human embryo kidney cells (293T; Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China) and RCC cell lines (786-O, ACHN and Caki-1; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The composition of the medium was as follows: 89% Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 0.5% antibiotics (100 µl/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin sulfates) and 0.5% glutamine. A total of 100 pmol miR-572 mimic, inhibitor, negative control (NC) and inhibitor negative control (all Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were transfected into RCC cells for 5 h using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequent experiments were performed 24–48 h following transfection. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to evaluate the transfected effect. The sequences were presented in Table III.

Table III.

Sequences of primers and miRs.

Table III.

Sequences of primers and miRs.

Primer/miRSequence
miR-572F: 5′-GTCCGCTCGGCGGTGGCCCA-3′
R:Universal primers (miScript SYBR-Green PCR kit)
U6F: 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′
R: 5′-ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′
miR-572F: 5′-GUCCGCUCGGCGGUGGCCCA-3′
mimicR: 5′-GGCCACCGCCGAGCGGACUU-3′
miR-572 inhibitor 5′-UGGGCCACCGCCGAGCGGAC-3′
NCF: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′
R: 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′
NC inhibitor 5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′

[i] F, forward; R, reverse; miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and RT-qPCR

Total RNA of tissues and cell lines (786-O, ACHN, Caki-1 and 293T) were extracted and purified with the using of TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and the RNeasy Maxi Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Inc.), respectively, according to the manufacturer's protocol. For improved experimental results, the extractive RNA samples were measured using a NanoDrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to ensure the concentration and the optical density ratio (260/280) of 1.8–2.0 were taken into account. Following this, the eligible RNAs were synthesized to cDNA with the miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen GmbH). qPCR reactions were performed to ascertain the expression levels of miR-572 using the Roche LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System with a miScript SYBR-Green PCR Kit (Qiagen GmbH) under the following conditions: 95°C for 1 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. RNU6B (U6) was used as internal reference for normalization. The primers used in the qPCR are indicated in Table III. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (20).

Wound healing assay

Assessment of the cell migratory aptitude was performed using the wound healing assay. In the assay, a 12-well plate was inoculated with 786-O and ACHN cells (~3×105 cells/each well) transfected with miR-572 mimic, inhibitor, NC or inhibitor NC (Shanghai GenePharma, Co., Ltd.). At 6 h post-transfection, a scratch was introduced using a sterile 200-µl pipette tip. Subsequently, the floating cells were washed away using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). At 0, 12 and 24 h, A Leica DMIRB inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) with a digital camera system (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to capture images of the scratches.

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

Assessment of the proliferation capacity of 786-O and ACHN cells was performed using the CCK-8 assay. A total of 5 pmol of miR-572 mimics, inhibitors, NC or inhibitor NC was transfected into the cells that had seeded for 24 h in 96-well plats with 4×103 cells/well. Following gene transfection, 10 µl CCK-8 (Everbright lnc., Sayreville, NJ, USA) was added to each well and incubated for 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. The optical density value of each well was calculated 1 h later with an ELISA microplate reader (model 680; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 490 nm.

Transwell assay

The Transwell assay was used to assess the migratory and invasive aptitude of ACNH and 786-O cells. According to the manufacturer's recommendation, Transwell chamber inserts (BD Biosciences, New York, NJ, USA) with Matrigel were used to determine cell migration, whereas the inserts without Matrigel were used to assay cell invasion. A total of 200 µl serum-free DMEM containing 2×104 transfected cells was added into the upper chamber of the inserts, whereas 500 µl DMEM with 10% FBS was added into the lower chamber of the inserts. Following 48 h of incubation, the cells migrated or invaded to the lower chamber of the inserts were stained with crystal violet at room temperature for 25 min, washed with PBS three times and counted using a microscope under the white light at a magnification of ×100 (Leica Microsystems GmbH), successively.

Flow cytometric assay

Assessment of cell apoptosis rates depended on flow cytometry assay. The cells plated in 6-well plates with ~3×105 cells/plate were transfected with 200 pmol of miR-572 mimics, miR-572 inhibitors, NC inhibitor or NC according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following incubated for 48 h, all cells were harvested, washed by cold PBS twice and re-suspended in 100 µl 1X binding buffer. Subsequently, the re-suspended cells were mixed with 5 µl propidium iodide (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 5 µl Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and cultured in darkness at room temperature for 15 min. Each tube was treated with 400 µl binding buffer. The apoptotic rates were measured using a flow cytometer (EPICS, Xl-4; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA). FlowJo software (version, X; FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA) was used for data analysis.

Statistical analysis

All assays were repeated three times. All statistical analysis was executed with the use of SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Paired Student's t-test was applied to assess the significance of the differences between two groups of data in matched tumor and non-cancerous tissues. The significance between cell lines was analyzing using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post hoc test. Student's t-test was used the analysis of assays for characterizing phenotypes of cells. Analysis of the correlation between miR-572 expression and clinicopathological variables was performed using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's χ2 test. The univariate and multivariate levels between miR-572 expression and clinicopathological variables or survival were determined using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The survival curves were plotted with Kaplan-Meier curves. The log-rank test was applied to evaluate the differences between these curves. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Upregulation of miR-572 was observed in RCC tissues and cell lines

RT-qPCR was performed with 52 pairs of RCC tissues and corresponding non-cancerous renal tissues with the purpose of exploring the clinical association of miR-572 in RCC. As indicated in Fig. 1A, the relative expression levels of miR-572 in 52 paired tissues [log2(T/N)]) were demonstrated and a total of 39 RCC tissues exhibited upregulation of miR-572. Fig. 1B indicated the mean expression of miR-572 and the results suggested that miR-572 was significantly upregulated in RCC tissues (5.515±0.263) compared with corresponding non-cancerous renal tissues (1.000±0.179; P<0.001). The relative expression levels of miR-572 in RCC cell lines (786-O, Caki-1 and ACHN) and 293T cell lines were also assessed (Fig. 1C). The results indicated that the expression levels of miR-572 were significantly increased in RCC cell lines (786-O, 8.084±0.618, P<0.01; ACHN, 9.372±1.371, P<0.01; and Caki-1, 4.643±0.793, P<0.05) compared with 293T cells (1.000±0.265). These results indicated that miR-572 may be up regulated in RCC tissues and possibly functions as an oncogene in RCC.

Validation of cell transfection efficiency

As indicated in Fig. 1C, the expression of miR-572 in ACHN and 780-O was most different from 293T. Subsequently, ACHN and 780O cells were selected for analysis in further functional assays. Validation of the transfection efficiency of miR-572 mimic or inhibitor was assessed using RT-qPCR. The outcomes revealed that the expression levels of miR-572 in cells transfected with miR-572 mimic were 79.893 times higher (786-O cells, P<0.01) and 67.649 times higher (ACHN cells, P<0.01) compared with NC. The expression levels of miR-572 in cells transfected with miR-572 inhibitor exhibited the opposite effect and were 0.119 times higher (786-O cells, P<0.05) and 0.418 times higher (ACHN cells, P<0.05) compared with NC inhibitor (Fig. 1D).

miR-572 promotes cell proliferation

The role of miR-572 in cell proliferation was investigated using the CCK-8 assay. The outcomes indicated that the proliferation of 786-O significantly increased by 33.74% (P<0.01), 37.58% (P<0.01) and 24.72% (P<0.001) following transfection with miR-572 mimic compared with NC. However, proliferation was significantly decreased by 25.18% (P<0.05), 33.90% (P<0.001) and 10.01% (P<0.001) following transfection with miR-572 inhibitor compared with NC inhibitor at 24, 48 and 72 h (Fig. 2A and B). Similar outcomes were obtained for ACHN cells. Notably, the proliferation was significantly increased by 30.99% (P<0.01), 32.39% (P<0.001), 16.27% (P<0.001) but significantly decreased by 79.54% (P<0.01), 3.37% (P<0.01), 57.70% (P<0.001) at 24, 48 and 72 h following transfection with miR-572 mimic or inhibitor compared with the respective NC (Fig. 2C and D). These outcomes demonstrated that miR-572 may promote cell proliferation.

miR-572 promotes cell mobility

Assessment of the role of miR-572 of cell mobility was performed using wound healing assays and Transwell assays (Figs. 3 and 4). In the wound healing assay (Fig. 3A), 786-O and ACHN cells transfected with miR-572 mimic exhibited significantly increased migration compared with NC (Fig. 3B and C; 786-O, 1.862±0.096 vs. 1.000±0.092, P<0.01; ACHN, 1.589±0.038 vs. 1.000±0.038, P<0.01), whereas transfection with miR-572 inhibitor had an opposite result when compared with NC (Fig. 3B and C; 786-O, 0.756±0.052 vs. 1.000±0.079, P<0.05; ACHN, 0.609±0.034 vs. 1.000±0.051, P<0.05). In the Transwell assay (Fig. 4A), the number of relative migratory 786-O and ACHN cells per field was significantly increased following treatment with miR-572 mimic (Fig. 4C; 786-O, 1.717±0.053 vs. 1.000±0.046, P<0.01; Fig. 4E; ACHN, 1.642±0.064 vs. 1.000±0.060, P<0.001). However, the number of migratory cells was significantly decreased following treatment with miR-572 inhibitor (Fig. 4C and E, respectively; 786-O, 0.656±0.060 vs. 1.000±0.079, P<0.05; and ACHN, 0.609±0.070 vs. 1.000±0.062, P<0.05). Notably, elevated levels of miR-572 significantly promoted cell invasion compared with the NC (Fig. 4B; 786-O, 1.626±0.048 vs. 1.000±0.133, P<0.05; Fig. 4D; ACHN, 1.667±0.043 vs. 1.000±0.074, P<0.01), whereas these effects were significantly reversed by miR-572 inhibitor when compared with NC inhibitor (Fig. 4B, 786-O, 0.680±0.065 vs. 1.000±0.043, P<0.05; Fig. 4D; ACHN, 0.635±0.091 vs. 1.000±0.047, P<0.01). These outcomes demonstrated that miR-572 may promote cell mobility.

miR-572 inhibits early apoptosis in cells

Assessment of cell apoptosis was performed using flow cytometry. Elevated levels of miR-572 significantly inhibited cell early apoptosis compared with NC (786-O, 4.73±0.635% vs. 10.17±0.404%, P<0.001; ACHN, 4.52±0.800% vs. 10.22±0.595%, P<0.01), whereas these effects could be significantly reversed by miR-572 inhibitor (786-O, 18.87±0.862% vs. 10.26±0.530%, P<0.001; ACHN, 10.30±0.367% vs. 18.96±0.306%, P<0.001; Fig. 5). These outcomes demonstrated that miR-572 may inhibit early apoptosis in cells.

miR-572 serves as a potential independent prognostic marker for RCC

The association between the expression levels of miR-572 and clinicopathological variables or overall survival was analyzed with the FFPE renal cancer samples. As presented in Table II, no significant difference was observed between miR-572 expression level and sex, age, tumor size and tumor stage. However, univariate analysis (Fig. 6A) suggested that the expression level of miR-572 was inversely correlated with overall survival (HR=0.195, 95% CI=0.042–0.903, P=0.037; Table IV). Similar outcomes were indicated in the survival curves of Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (Fig. 6B), which suggested that the patients with low miR-572 expression levels had a significantly increased overall survival after adjusting for sex, age, tumor size and tumor stage in the multivariate analysis (HR=0.174, 95% CI=0.034–0.878, P=0.034; Table IV). Furthermore, data of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that the patients with low expression of miR-572 had a significantly longer overall survival (P=0.019, Fig. 6C). These outcomes demonstrated that miR-572 may serve as a potential independent prognostic marker for RCC.

Table IV.

miR-572 expression and patients' survival.

Table IV.

miR-572 expression and patients' survival.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis


VariableHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Sex (female vs. male)2.037 (0.537–7.720)0.2954.672 (0.830–26.287)0.080
Age (≤60 vs. >60 years)0.760 (0.164–3.519)0.7262.054 (0.301–14.012)0.462
Tumor size (≤4.0 vs. >4.0 cm)8.458 (1.081–66.188)0.04210.184 (1.213–85.507)0.033
Tumor stage (I+II vs. III+IV)1.014 (0.296–3.473)0.9820.415 (0.112–1.533)0.187
miR-572 (low vs. high expression)0.195 (0.042–0.903)0.0370.174 (0.034–0.878)0.034

[i] HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; miR-572, microRNA-572.

Discussion

RCC, which accounts for the 7th and the 9th most common malignancy in men and women worldwide, respectively, gives rise to ~20,9000 new cases and 102,000 fatalities every year (5,21). There is a general consent that modulation of miR expression serves a momentous role in oncogene and anti-oncogene proteins by mediating their effects (22). miRs have been indicated to be implicated in numerous biological processes, including proliferation, apoptosis, metabolic reprogramming and pluripotency (23). In recent years, an increasing number of tumor signaling pathways that interact with miRs were revealed to be associated with RCC, including the HIF-1 signaling pathway, mTOR signaling pathway and c-MET signaling pathway (24). Results from Dey et al (25) demonstrated that miR-21 functions as an oncogene in RCC and overexpression of miR-21 increases tumor cell proliferation and invasion via Akt/TORC1 signaling. Another study revealed that the oncomir miR-23b promotes kidney tumor growth by inhibiting proline oxidase, which functions as a mitochondrial tumor suppressor by decreasing hypoxia-inducible factor signaling (26).

Accumulating evidence has suggested that miRs serve an irreplaceable role in the genesis and development of RCC. For example, tumor suppressor miR-338-3p suppresses the expression of ALK5 in RCC, which results in the inhibition of cell invasion (27). Furthermore, miR-766-3p, mediated by DNA-methylation, attenuates the proliferation ability of RCC and overexpression of miR-766-3p is associated with clinical stage and poor survival (28). Circulating miR-572 has been demonstrated to be significantly increased in RCC by TaqMan Low Density Array and RT-qPCR analysis in a previous study (18). However, the expression and roles of miR-572 in RCC tissues and cell lines remain unclear.

In the present study, results of RT-qPCR suggested that the expression of miR-572 in RCC tissues and 786-O and ACHN cells was significantly increased compared with that in corresponding non-cancerous renal tissues and 293T cells, respectively. These result are in accordance with the expression levels of miR-572 determined in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (15), ovarian cancer (16) and human neuroblastoma (29). Further experiments with wound healing assays, CCK-8 assays, Transwell assays and flow cytometric assays suggested that overexpression of miR-572 results in a positive effect on RCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion and inhibition of early apoptosis, respectively. Notably, opposite effects were observed in the case of suppressing the expression of miR-572, suggesting that miR-572 functions as an oncogene in RCC. Further prognostic analysis demonstrated that patients with downregulated miR-572 had a significantly longer overall survival, suggesting miR-572 may be a promising independent prognostic marker for RCC.

The molecular mechanisms concerning miR-572 in mediating the genesis and development of tumors are well documented in numerous types of cancer and diseases. Results from Yu et al (30) provided evidence that miRNA-572 accelerates the recovery of early post-operative cognitive dysfunction by means of inhibiting neural cell adhesion molecule1. In human ovarian cancer, miR-572 was revealed to be upregulated in cancer tissues as well as cell lines, which was associated with poor prognosis (31). Furthermore, miRNA-572 was indicated to directly inhibit SOCS1 and p21, which promoted the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells (31). In another study concerning ovarian cancer, suppression of PPP2R2C expression made miR-572 conducive to tumor cell proliferation, which suggests that miR-572 may be a target for treating ovarian cancer (16). Similarly, Yan et al (15) demonstrated that overexpression of miR-572 and downregulation of PPP2R2C had the same effect on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (accelerated nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation and invasion). Furthermore, this study indicated that miR-572 binds to the 3′-untranslated region of PPP2R2C, leading to the inhibition of its expression, which suggests that miR-572 exerts its functions by downregulating PPP2R2C.

The molecular mechanism mediated by miR-572 in RCC will be explored in our future study. To understand the molecular mechanism of miR-572 in RCC, two databases (targetScan and miRWalk) will be used and three genes (PPP2R2C, CIB2 and BAG1) will be selected as potential targets that are regulated by miR-572.

In conclusion, upregulation of miR-572 was indicated in RCC tissues and cell lines. Further experiments revealed that overexpression of miR-572 results in a positive effect on the proliferation, migration and invasion of cells and inhibition of early apoptosis, which suggests that miR-572 acts as oncogene in RCC. Further prognostic analysis demonstrated that patients with downregulated miR-572 expression have a significantly reduced overall survival, which suggests that miR-572 may be a promising independent prognostic marker for RCC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Science and Technology Development Fund Project of Shenzhen (grant no. JCYJ20170307111334308), Clinical Research Project of Shenzhen Health Commission (grant no. SZLY2018023) and the Fund of ‘San-ming’ Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (grant no. SZSM201612066).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

XP and ZL performed experimental work (RT-qPCR, wound scratch assay, cell proliferatin assay, Transwell assay and flow cytometry assay) and aided in writing the manuscript. LiwZ collected tissue samples. JQ, LiaZ and JX designed the study, coordinated the molecular biology experiment and assisted in writing the manuscript. WX, XG and HL designed the study and observed the patients. SY designed the study, recruited patients and examined controls. YG extracted the total RNA from the FFPE samples. YL collected tissue samples and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Shenzhen, China).

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for publication of data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Petrozza V, Pastore AL, Palleschi G, Tito C, Porta N, Ricci S, Marigliano C, Costantini M, Simone G, Di Carlo A, et al: Secreted miR-210-3p as non-invasive biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 8:69551–69558. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 63:11–30. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

King SC, Pollack LA, Li J, King JB and Master VA: Continued increase in incidence of renal cell carcinoma, especially in young patients and high grade disease: United States 2001 to 2010. J Urol. 191:1665–1670. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:7–30. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Rini BI, Campbell SC and Escudier B: Renal cell carcinoma. Lancet. 373:1119–1132. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Patel C, Ahmed A and Ellsworth P: Renal cell carcinoma: A reappraisal. Urol Nurs. 32:182–190; quiz 191. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Hadoux J, Vignot S and De La Motte Rouge T: Renal cell carcinoma: Focus on safety and efficacy of temsirolimus. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 4:143–154. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Homami A and Ghazi F: MicroRNAs as biomarkers associated with bladder cancer. Med J Islamic Repub Iran. 30:4752016.

9 

Enokida H, Yoshino H, Matsushita R and Nakagawa M: The role of microRNAs in bladder cancer. Investig Clin Urol. 1 Suppl 57:S60–S76. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN and Sonenberg N: Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: Are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 9:102–114. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Hobert O: Gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs. Science. 319:1785–1786. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Ding D, Zhang Y, Wen L, Fu J, Bai X, Fan Y, Lin Y, Dai H, Li Q, Zhang Y, et al: MiR-367 regulates cell proliferation and metastasis by targeting metastasis-associated protein 3 (MTA3) in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 8:63084–63095. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Cai W, Jiang H, Yu Y, Xu Y, Zuo W, Wang S and Su Z: miR−367 regulation of DOC-2/DAB2 interactive protein promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of osteosarcoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 95:120–128. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zhu DX, Zhu W, Fang C, Fan L, Zou ZJ, Wang YH, Liu P, Hong M, Miao KR, Liu P, et al: miR-181a/b significantly enhances drug sensitivity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells via targeting multiple anti-apoptosis genes. Carcinogenesis. 33:1294–1301. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Yan L, Cai K, Liang J, Liu H, Liu Y and Gui J: Interaction between miR-572 and PPP2R2C, and their effects on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells. Biochem Cell Biol. 95:578–584. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Wu AH, Huang YL, Zhang LZ, Tian G, Liao QZ and Chen SL: MiR-572 prompted cell proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells by suppressing PPP2R2C expression. Biomed Pharmacother. 77:92–97. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Sand M, Skrygan M, Sand D, Georgas D, Hahn SA, Gambichler T, Altmeyer P and Bechara FG: Expression of microRNAs in basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 167:847–855. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Wang L, Tian H, Yuan J, Wu H, Wu J and Zhu X: CONSORT: Sam68 is directly regulated by MiR-204 and promotes the self-renewal potential of breast cancer cells by activating the wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Medicine. 94:e22282015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Edge SB and Compton CC: The American Joint Committee on Cancer: The 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann surg Oncol. 17:1471–1474. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ, Russell MW and Charbonneau C: Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A literature review. Cancer Treat Rev. 34:193–205. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Kong YW, Ferland-McCollough D, Jackson TJ and Bushell M: microRNAs in cancer management. Lancet Oncol. 13:e249–258. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hatziapostolou M, Polytarchou C and Iliopoulos D: miRNAs link metabolic reprogramming to oncogenesis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 24:361–373. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Sellitti DF and Doi SQ: MicroRNAs in renal cell carcinoma. Microrna. 4:26–35. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Dey N, Das F, Ghosh-Choudhury N, Mandal CC, Parekh DJ, Block K, Kasinath BS, Abboud HE and Choudhury GG: microRNA-21 governs TORC1 activation in renal cancer cell proliferation and invasion. PLoS One. 7:e373662012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Liu W, Zabirnyk O, Wang H, Shiao YH, Nickerson ML, Khalil S, Anderson LM, Perantoni AO and Phang JM: miR-23b* targets proline oxidase, a novel tumor suppressor protein in renal cancer. Oncogene. 29:4914–4924. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Zhang X, Wang C, Li H, Niu X, Liu X, Pei D, Guo X, Xu X and Li Y: miR-338-3p inhibits the invasion of renal cell carcinoma by downregulation of ALK5. Oncotarget. 8:64106–64113. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Chen C, Xue S, Zhang J, Chen W, Gong D, Zheng J, Ma J, Xue W, Chen Y, Zhai W, et al: DNA-methylation-mediated repression of miR-766-3p promotes cell proliferation via targeting SF2 expression in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 141:1867–1878. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Mundalil Vasu M, Anitha A, Takahashi T, Thanseem I, Iwata K, Asakawa T and Suzuki K: Fluoxetine increases the expression of miR-572 and miR-663a in human neuroblastoma cell lines. PLoS One. 11:e01644252016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Yu X, Liu S, Li J, Fan X, Chen Y, Bi X, Liu S and Deng X: MicroRNA-572 improves early post-operative cognitive dysfunction by down-regulating neural cell adhesion molecule 1. PLoS One. 10:e01185112015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zhang X, Liu J, Zang D, Wu S, Liu A, Zhu J, Wu G, Li J and Jiang L: Upregulation of miR-572 transcriptionally suppresses SOCS1 and p21 and contributes to human ovarian cancer progression. Oncotarget. 6:15180–15193. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2018
Volume 40 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Pan X, Li Z, Zhao L, Quan J, Zhou L, Xu J, Xu W, Guan X, Li H, Yang S, Yang S, et al: microRNA‑572 functions as an oncogene and a potential biomarker for renal cell carcinoma prognosis. Oncol Rep 40: 3092-3101, 2018
APA
Pan, X., Li, Z., Zhao, L., Quan, J., Zhou, L., Xu, J. ... Lai, Y. (2018). microRNA‑572 functions as an oncogene and a potential biomarker for renal cell carcinoma prognosis. Oncology Reports, 40, 3092-3101. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6649
MLA
Pan, X., Li, Z., Zhao, L., Quan, J., Zhou, L., Xu, J., Xu, W., Guan, X., Li, H., Yang, S., Gui, Y., Lai, Y."microRNA‑572 functions as an oncogene and a potential biomarker for renal cell carcinoma prognosis". Oncology Reports 40.5 (2018): 3092-3101.
Chicago
Pan, X., Li, Z., Zhao, L., Quan, J., Zhou, L., Xu, J., Xu, W., Guan, X., Li, H., Yang, S., Gui, Y., Lai, Y."microRNA‑572 functions as an oncogene and a potential biomarker for renal cell carcinoma prognosis". Oncology Reports 40, no. 5 (2018): 3092-3101. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6649