MicroRNA‑336 directly targets Sox‑2 in osteosarcoma to inhibit tumorigenesis

  • Authors:
    • Yong Cao
    • Tianding Wu
    • Dongzhe Li
    • Jianzhong Hu
    • Hongbin Lu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 21, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.6493
  • Pages: 4217-4224
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Previous evidence has suggested that microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs), which belong to a class of non‑coding RNAs, shape cellular processes by regulating gene expression. Abnormal expression of miRNAs has been associated with tumorigenesis in multiple cancers. However, the function of miR‑336 in osteosarcoma (OS) remains unknown. The experimental procedures used in the present study included flow cytometry, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction, luciferase reporter assay, invasion assay, western blot analysis and in vivo implantation. The results of the present study demonstrated that miR‑336 may serve as a tumor suppressor in OS. Downregulation of miR‑336 was observed in human OS specimens as well as OS cell lines. In addition, a significant negative correlation between sex determining region Y‑box 2 (Sox‑2) expression and miR‑336 was demonstrated. miR‑336 was confirmed to target the 3'‑untranslated region of Sox‑2 to inhibit proliferation, migration and invasion of OS cells. Consistently, restoration of Sox‑2 expression counteracted the effect of miR‑336, and recovered the tumorigenic potential of OS cells. The present study established a novel association between miR‑336 and Sox‑2 in OS. This relationship between miR‑336 and Sox‑2 may lead to improved knowledge concerning OS progression and sheds light on potential novel therapeutic interventions for OS treatment.

Introduction

Cancer poses serious threat to life, and millions suffer from the incidence of various types of tumor. Osteosarcoma (OS) denotes a primary and epidemic type of bone malignancies (1). In OS, immature bone tissues are generated and normal bones are jeopardized (2). Long bones are more prone to the occurrence of OS, in particular the knees (3). OS is one of the most common tumors with an incidence rate of ~4 per million. In total, >50% of patients with OS are children and adolescents (aged <24) while ~25% of cases occur in mid-age (4). It has also been reported that males incur higher incidence rates than females (5). Due to long lasting developments in health care, the survival rates for OS patients have increased (1). However, poor diagnosis and prognosis reduces the survival rates of patients with OS, and the expected survival rates are always low (6). As a result, the identification of novel targets for therapeutic intervention to treat OS is required.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are a class of short length, noncoding RNAs that decrease gene expression by base pairing to the 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTR) (7,8). The pairing to the 3′-UTR can therefore either result in the degradation of target mRNAs or the inhibition of their translation (9). It has been demonstrated that miRNAs can occur either individually or as part of a cluster within the whole genome. Meanwhile, miRNAs also reside in coding and non-coding regions of genes (10). To date, >2,000 miRNAs have been identified, and these mediate >1/3 total mRNAs in the human genome (11). Numerous tumors are associated with aberrant mRNA expression, and diagnosis targeting miRNAs has been proven promising (12). Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms of miRNA regulation is important. miRNAs are positively or negatively associated with cancer progression, depending on the diversity in targets (13). For example, He et al (14) demonstrated that miR-34 inhibits OS development in a p53-dependent manner. Another report by Zhao et al (15) further demonstrated that miR-34a mediates tumor suppression via targeting CD44. In addition, miR-145 also inhibits OS via the downregulation of Rho associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (14). On the contrary, miR-20a promotes the metastasis of OS, with previous detailed mechanistic study suggesting that miR-20a exerts this function via targeting Fas expression (15). Meanwhile, miR-21 is also involved in the progression and metastasis of OS (16). However, the involvement of miR-336 in OS remains largely unknown.

In the present study, miR-336 was demonstrated to be decreased in OS tissues and inversely associated with sex determining region Y-box 2 (Sox-2) levels. Overexpression of miR-336 effectively inhibited the invasion and proliferation of OS cells via inducing apoptosis. Two selected cell lines, HOS and MG-63, were investigated further and it was demonstrated the inhibitory effect of miR-336 is reversed by overexpressing Sox-2, which was later confirmed to be a direct target of miR-336. These findings suggested novel functions for miR-336, and shed light on its potential as a target for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention in OS.

Materials and methods

Cancer cell lines and human samples

A total of 6 OS cell lines, U-2 OS, SW-1353, ZK-58, HOS, Saos-2 and MG-63, were used in the present study. All were commercially purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, MA, USA). A control human fetal osteoblast (hFOB) cell line was also purchased from the ATCC. All cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Qiagen China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The RPMI-1640 medium was supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in humidified 5% CO2 at room temperature. The OS samples were obtained from surgical archives and were taken from patients registered at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Changsha, China) between May 2014 and July 2015. A total of 68 patients were included in this study (47–79 years; 38 male, 30 female). All patients provided informed, written consent. The protocols of experimental procedures using human specimens were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Changsha, China; approval no. 2014F0027).

MicroRNA-336 transfection

In the present study, a lentiviral system was used to ectopically overexpress miR-336 in the OS cell lines HOS and MG-63. The pcDNA3.1 plasmids containing miR-336 mimic (3′-AGUACGUCAAGGCUCA-5′) or negative control were synthesized by and purchased from Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The Sox-2 plasmid was synthesized by Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd and inserted into a pcDNA3.1 plasmid. An empty pcDNA3.1 vector served as the negative control. Viral transfection into OS cell lines HOS and MG-63 were performed using a Lipofectamine 2000 system (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Following transfection for 36 h, the culture medium was replenished with fresh medium. All plasmids were experimentally verified by sequencing.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was harvested from OS cell lines and human specimens with TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The cDNA (a total of 10 µg) generated by reverse transcription was obtained using the miScript II RT kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A well-established TaqMan microRNA RT-qPCR kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to monitor miR-336 expression. To quantify Sox-2 mRNA expression levels, the SYBR-Green PCR Master kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) was used. The thermocycling conditions used were as follows: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control. Reactions were performed with the ABI PRISM® 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol. Expression levels of miR-336 and Sox-2 were determined by the 2−ΔΔCq method (17). The experiments were performed with ≥3 replicates.

The primer sequences used were as follows: miR-336, forward 5′-GATGCGACGTGAGTAAG-3′ and reverse 5′-CTGAGCCGGGTCCGAGGT-3′; GAPDH, forward 5′-CTCGATTGCATCGACATATCGT-3′ and reverse 5′-ACGCTTCGCGATCGTGCGTGAT-3′; Sox-2, forward 5′-GCTACAATAGCTCACCCTGAT-3′ and reverse 5′-CAATCTCCTGCCTACGAGAG-3′.

Luciferase reporter assay

HOS and MG-63 cells were plated in a 96-well plate for 48 h (104 cells/well) in RPMI-1640 medium (Qiagen China Co., Ltd.) supplemented with 5% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The miR-336 and negative control plasmids were transfected with luciferase reporter plasmids into the indicated OS cells, using the aforementioned procedure. The 3′-UTR for Sox-2 with binding site for miR-336 (5′ UGAUACUAUUUGAGCUAUU3′) was cloned into the Xbal site downstream of the Renilla luciferase reporter plasmid phRL-TK (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) leading to wild-type Sox-2 luciferase plasmids (Sox-2 3′-UTR WT). The mutated Sox-2 3′-UTR (5′ UGAUACUAUUUGUUUGCAU 3′) was similarly integrated into phRL-TK to generate a mutant control plasmid (Sox-2 3′-UTR mut). The luciferase activities were monitored with a Dual-Luciferase reporter system (Promega Corporation) as relative luciferase units according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Matrigel invasion assay

The upper chamber of the Transwell plate was coated with Matrigel (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) overnight. HOS and MG-63 cells were resuspended 24 h following transfection and loaded into the upper chamber (104 cells/well) in RPMI-1640 medium. The lower chambers were supplemented with RPMI-1640 medium with additional 3% FBS. Following 24 h incubation, the upper chambers were removed and cells migrating into the lower chambers were fixed with 5% polytetrafluoroethylene (PFA) and stained with crystal violet. The Transwell assay results were assessed under a Leica fluorescent microscope (DM-IRB; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). A total of five fields were assessed and the experiments were performed in triplicate. Invasion was evaluated and normalized to the number of cells counted under control conditions.

Transwell migration assay

A similar protocol was performed as stated for the invasion assay, in the absence of Matrigel. The final concentration of cells was ~104 cells in each Transwell chamber. The lower chamber was loaded with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 5% FBS. Following incubation for 24 h, the cells were loaded into 5% PFA and stained with crystal violet.

Proliferation assay

The Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) was used to measure the proliferation of HOS and MG-63 cells. Following transfection for 36 h, as stated above, HOS and MG-63 cells were re-suspended and seeded into a 96-well plate (104 cells/well) for 120 h. 25 µl MTT solution was added into the culture with final concentration of 10 mg/ml for 4 h. The solution was shaken for 5 min, leading to complete solubilization. The proliferation was evaluated once a day, for a total of 5 days. Crystalline formazan was dissolved in 200 µl 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution for 24 h and the optical density at 490 nm was evaluated using the Spectramax M5 microplate monitor (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol.

Flow cytometry for apoptosis detection

HOS and MG-63 cells were loaded into a 12-well plate (104 cells/well, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and washed with cold PBS solution 48 h post transfection. The apoptosis of tumor cells was quantified using a double staining (Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate/propidium iodide) apoptosis detection toolkit (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA), following the manufacturer's protocol. A Becton Dickinson FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) cytometer was used to analyze the data. Samples were processed with CellQuest software version 3.3 (BD Biosciences).

Western blot

The human OS cell lines HOS and MG-63 were harvested using lysis buffer (15% glycerol and 3% NP-40) obtained from Qiagen China Co., Ltd. Samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g at 4°C for 20 min. The protein extracts (100 µg in each lane) were electrophorised using 10% SDS-PAGE and migrated to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules CA, USA). The blot was blocked with 4% fat-free milk for 1 h at 20°C. The membrane was coated with rabbit anti-PAX7 antibody (1:1,000; catalog no. AV32393; Qiagen China Co., Ltd.) and anti-GAPDH antibody (catalog no. G9545; Qiagen China Co., Ltd.) at 4°C overnight. The horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (mouse anti-human, 1:1,000; catalog no. SAB5201369; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) were then added and incubated at 20°C for 2 h. Immunoblot signals were visualized using an ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini-biomolecular imager (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). The blots were quantified automatically using ImageJ software version 1.48 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Tumor cell implantation

A total of 106 HOS or MG-63 cells expressing miR-336 or negative controls were injected submucosally into BALB/c nude mice. The animal research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. A total of 12 mice (4–6 weeks; average weight, 15.5 g; 6 male and 6 female) were used in the study. Mice were housed at 20–22°C, 55–60% humidity with a light/dark cycle of 10–12 h. Ad libitum access to food and water was provided. The tumor volume was measured each week for a total of 5 weeks (the tumor volume ranged from ~500 to 1,600 mm3 at 5 weeks). At the end of the implantation study, all mice were sacrificed by overdose of sodium pentobarbital (5%, 300 mg/kg via intraperitoneal injection; catalogue no. 1507002; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and Ki-67 immunostaining was performed. Briefly, tumor samples were fixed in formalin, parraffin-embedded and cut into 5 µm sections with a microtome. Following deparaffinization and rehydration, antigens were retrieved with 1x Cytomation target retrieval solution (DakoCytomation GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) in a decloaker chamber at 95°C for 15 min and then at 20°C for 10 min. Slides were then incubated with hydrogen peroxide for 2 min. Following rinsing twice with TBS-0.2% Tween 20, slides were then analyzed using the Ki-67 ELISA kit (catalog no. Ek-M21211; Huayun Biotech, Guangzhou, China Co., Ltd.).

Statistical analysis

All statistical results were analyzed by SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) using the Student's t-test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the significance of any correlation between variables. All experiments were performed in at least triplicate. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-336 mediates the regulation of Sox-2 in OS

As previously reported, Sox-2 expression levels are increased in OS cells (18). To confirm this, the expression level of Sox-2 protein was measured by western blot. The results revealed that, compared with hFOB cells, the expression of Sox-2 was visibly elevated in all OS cell lines (Fig. 1A). HOS and MG-63 cells were selected for further study because the Sox-2 levels were the highest (Fig. 1A). To further identify novel microRNAs involved in OS cell regulation, the online databases MIRDB (www.mirdb.org) (19), PicTar (pictar.mdc-berlin.de) and TargetScan (release 6.2, www.targetscan.org) (20) were used to predict the potential targets (Fig. 1B). miR-429 and miR-336 were predicted to be plausible candidates by means of overlapping results. miR-429 has been demonstrated to antagonize Sox-2 in colorectal cancer previously (21). However, few studies have identified the involvement of miR-336 in OS. Therefore, miR-336 was selected for further investigation. A significant negative correlation between miR-336 expression and Sox-2 mRNA expression levels in human OS samples was identified (R=−0.4996, P=0.0004; Fig. 1C). The negative correlation was also significant at the protein level of Sox-2 in human OS samples (R=−0.5845, P=0.0002; Fig. 1D). miR-336 expression levels were downregulated in human OS specimens compared with normal controls, whereas opposite expression patterns were observed in Sox-2 (Fig. 1C and D). A dual-luciferase reporter assay was also prepared with either wild type Sox-2 3′-UTR or a mutated miR-336 binding site (Fig. 1E). The results revealed that miR-336 significantly downregulated luciferase activities in both HOS and MG-63 cells transfected with wild type Sox-2 3′-UTR compared with the control (P<0.01; Fig. 1F and G, the control denotes HOS and MG-63 cells transfected with the empty pcDNA3.1 vector). However, miR-336 had no significant effect if HOS and MG-63 cells were transfected with plasmids containing mutated Sox-2 3′-UTR (Fig. 1F and G, respectively). These results suggested that miR-336 expression was downregulated in OS cells and was negatively correlated with Sox-2 expression.

Overexpressing miR-336 inhibits OS progression by inducing apoptosis

To further establish the functional link between Sox-2 and miR-336, miR-336 was ectopically overexpressed using an miR-336 mimic in HOS and MG-63 cells. The RT-qPCR results demonstrated that miR-336 expression was significantly increased in cells transfected with miR-336 mimic compared with cells transfected with the empty pcDNA3.1 control vector (P<0.01; Fig. 2A). The results of the 5 day MTT assay revealed that miR-336 significantly inhibited the viability of HOS and MG-63 cells at 3, 4 and 5 days compared with the cells transfected with the empty pcDNA3.1 control vector (P<0.05; Fig. 2B). Further investigation revealed that ectopic miR-336 expression significantly suppressed migration in HOS and MG-63 cells compared with the cells transfected with the empty pcDNA3.1 control vector (P<0.01; Fig. 2C). In addition, the invasive capacity was also reduced in HOS and MG-63 cells transfected with a miR-336 mimic compared with the cells transfected with the empty pcDNA3.1 control vector (P<0.01; Fig. 2D). The apoptosis rate of OS cells was also demonstrated to be affected by miR-336 overexpression: miR-336 overexpression increased the overall apoptosis rate in HOS and MG-63 cells compared with cells transfected with the empty pcDNA3.1 control vector (Fig. 2E). These results suggested that overexpression of miR-336 inhibited tumor progression, potentially through inducing apoptosis.

Restoring Sox-2 expression reverses the effect of miR-336 in OS cells

As miR-336 was confirmed to inhibit OS cell malignancy through targeting Sox-2, overexpression of Sox-2 was assessed to determine whether it would reverse the adverse phenotype of OS cells. HOS and MG-63 cells were transfected with miR-336 plasmids, miR-336 plasmids+pcDNA3.1 or miR-336+Sox-2. Transfection of the empty pcDNA3.1 vector was used as a control for the Sox-2 plasmid transfection group. Transfection with an empty pcDNA3.1 vector control with a miR-336 mimic did not affect the expression of Sox-2 with miR-336 precursor cotransfection (Fig. 3A). However, transfection with Sox-2 visibly increased intrinsic Sox-2 levels in HOS and MG-63 cells, even with miR-336 cotransfection, compared with the miR-336 and miR-336 + pcDNA3.1 groups (Fig. 3A). The quantification results revealed that Sox-2 transfection increased Sox-2 protein expression levels by ~5 fold compared with the miR-336 and miR-336 + pcDNA3.1 groups (P<0.01; Fig. 3B). The migration and invasion of OS cell lines when Sox-2 levels were restored was then investigated. The results revealed that Sox-2 induction significantly promoted migration in HOS and MG-63 cells compared with the miR-336 and miR-336 + pcDNA3.1 groups (P<0.01; Fig. 3C). The invasion of HOS and MG-63 cells transfected with Sox-2 plasmids was also significantly increased compared with the miR-336 and miR-336 + pcDNA3.1 groups (P<0.01; Fig. 3D). These results suggested that restoring Sox-2 expression counteracted the effect of miR-336 in OS cell lines.

The miR-336 suppresses tumor growth in vivo

The aforementioned results demonstrated the in vitro effect of miR-336 in OS cell lines. However, whether miR-336 has a similar tumor suppressive function in vivo remains unclear. HOS and MG-63 cells stably transfected with an miR-336 mimic or the empty pcDNA3.1 vector were subcutaneously injected into nude mice. All mice were sacrificed according to formal protocols 5 weeks following implantation, and the volume of solid tumors was measured. miR-336-transfected HOS and MG-63 cells transfection produced smaller solid tumors compared with empty pcDNA3.1 vector controls (Fig. 4A). The difference in tumor volume became significant as early as 3 weeks following implantation in mice injected with HOS and MG-63 cells compared with controls (P<0.05; Fig. 4B). Ki-67 staining, which is indicative of proliferation in cells, was also visibly decreased following transfection with an miR-336 mimic compared with empty pcDNA3.1 vector controls (Fig. 4C). The RT-qPCR results confirmed that miR-336 expression was significantly upregulated in these solid tumors resulting from HOS and MG-63 cells transfected with an miR-336 mimic compared with empty pcDNA3.1 vector controls (P<0.01 and P<0.01, respectively; Fig. 4D). Sox-2 levels were also significantly downregulated in solid tumors resulting from HOS and MG-63 cells transfected with an miR-336 mimic compared with empty pcDNA3.1 vector controls (P<0.01 and P<0.01, respectively; Fig. 4E). These results suggested that miR-336 functions as a tumor suppressor in vivo.

Discussion

Previous evidence suggests that dysregulation of miRNA function does not occur randomly (22). Multiple studies have established a link between miRNA profiles and tumorigenesis (23). miRNAs are involved in tumor progression in diverse ways, which potentially depend on the type and stages of tumors. Therefore, sophisticated knowledge of the physiological and pathological mechanisms of microRNAs may improve early diagnosis and therapies for diseases, including cancer.

In the present study, miR-336 was confirmed to function as tumor suppressor in OS cells. Few previous reports have focused on the function of miR-336 in OS tumors. A previous study demonstrated a link between miR-336 and breast cancer, where miR-336 was deregulated in cancerous tissues (24). A further report by Croset et al (23) revealed that serum miR-336 levels are significantly associated with tumor burden and procollagen I amino-terminal propeptide in advanced lung cancer. Sukata et al (24) also demonstrated a weak correlation between miR-336 expression and incidence of hepatocarcinoma. These reports implied that miR-336 may be involved in tumor progression, including in liver, lung and breast cancers. Truettner et al (25) also demonstrated that miR-336 may be involved in hypoxia induced responses in cortical pericytes through miRNA profiling, although the exact mechanism remains elusive. However, no previous studies exist regarding the involvement of miR-336 in osteosarcoma. The present study therefore denotes a novel representation concerning the functional involvement of miR-336 and has identified miR-336 as a novel tumor suppressor in OS. Whether miR-336 functions in a tumorigenic or tumor-suppressive manner in other types of cancer, together with the exact molecular mechanisms underlying this function, merit further investigation.

Sox-2 is an important transcription factor in cancer stem cells (25). Sox-2 has previously been demonstrated to maintain self-renewal in OS cells (26). Knocking down Sox-2 expression reduces the transforming capacity of OS cells (26). The tumorigenic potential and differentiation of OS cells is associated with Sox-2 gene expression and the colony formation ability of derived OS cell lines was diminished when Sox-2 was downregulated (26,27). The oncogenic potential of Sox-2 may function by antagonizing active Wnt signaling, although multiple potential mechanisms have been proposed (28,29). Sox-2 also behaves as an oncogene in other types of tumor, including squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocarcinoma and lung cancer (30,31). Notably, no activating mutations were identified in the Sox-2 gene through genomic study, further highlighting the importance of Sox-2 in tumorigenesis (26). Therefore, tumorigenesis may be significantly associated with Sox-2 in multiple tumors, including OS. Multiple miRNA regulators for Sox-2 have been previously reported (21,32,33). The present study adds a further layer of complexity in miRNA mediated regulation of OS, by demonstrating that miR-336 inhibited tumor progression by targeting Sox-2. Ectopic expression of miR-336 reduced the migratory and invasive potential of OS cell lines in vitro as well as the growth of solid tumors in vivo. Taken together, miR-336 serves as a novel tumor suppressor in OS and effectively downregulates Sox-2 expression.

Overall, the present study reports a novel function of miR-336, which was demonstrated to regulate the expression of the oncogenic factor Sox-2 in OS. Increasing miR-336 expression may abolish OS progression, while restoring Sox-2 expression may counteract the inhibitory effect of miR-336. This suggests that Sox-2 may be involved in miR-336 mediated regulation. The intricate relation between miR-336 and the Sox-2 signaling pathway merits further investigation to provide critical insights into its potential for diagnosis and micRNA-targeted therapeutic intervention in OS.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81171698, 81301542 and 81371956) and the Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduates (grant no. CX2015B060).

References

1 

Ottaviani G and Jaffe N: The epidemiology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 152:3–13. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Morrow JJ and Khanna C: Osteosarcoma genetics and epigenetics: Emerging biology and candidate therapies. Crit Rev Oncog. 20:173–197. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar :

3 

Admassi D: Osteosarcoma of medial cuniform bone. Ethiop Med J. 47:305–308. 2009.

4 

Miao J, Wu S, Peng Z, Tania M and Zhang C: MicroRNAs in osteosarcoma: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Tumour Biol. 34:2093–2098. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Osborne TS and Khanna C: A review of the association between osteosarcoma metastasis and protein translation. J Comp Pathol. 146:132–142. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :

6 

Akiyama T, Dass CR and Choong PF: Novel therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma targeting osteoclast differentiation, bone-resorbing activity, and apoptosis pathway. Mol Cancer Ther. 7:3461–3469. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Miska EA: How microRNAs control cell division, differentiation and death. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 15:563–568. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Cai Y, Yu X, Hu S and Yu J: A brief review on the mechanisms of miRNA regulation. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 7:147–154. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 136:215–233. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar :

10 

Feng B, Zhang K, Wang R and Chen L: Non-small-cell lung cancer and miRNAs: Novel biomarkers and promising tools for treatment. Clin Sci (Lond). 128:619–634. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

van Rooij E: The art of microRNA research. Circ Res. 108:219–234. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Liu X, Zhang J, Xie B, Li H, Shen J and Chen J: MicroRNA-200 family profile: A promising ancillary tool for accurate cancer diagnosis. Am J Ther. 23:e388–e397. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar :

13 

Oom AL, Humphries BA and Yang C: MicroRNAs: Novel players in cancer diagnosis and therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014:9594612014. View Article : Google Scholar :

14 

He C, Xiong J, Xu X, et al: Functional elucidation of MiR-34 in osteosarcoma cells and primary tumor samples. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 388:35–40. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Zhao H, Ma B, Wang Y, et al: miR-34a inhibits the metastasis of osteosarcoma cells by repressing the expression of CD44. Oncol Rep. 29:1027–1036. 2013.

16 

Ziyan W, Shuhua Y, Xiufang W and Xiaoyun L: MicroRNA-21 is involved in osteosarcoma cell invasion and migration. Med Oncol. 28:1469–1474. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Yang C, Hou C, Zhang H, Wang D, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Xu X, Bi Z and Geng S: miR-126 functions as a tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma by targeting Sox2. Int J Mol Sci. 15:423–437. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

19 

Wong N and Wang X: miRDB: An online resource for microRNA target prediction and functional annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:D146–D152. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Lewis BP, Burge CB and Bartel DP: Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 120:15–20. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Li J, Du L, Yang Y, Wang C, Liu H, Wang L, Zhang X, Li W, Zheng G and Dong Z: MiR-429 is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer and exerts its anti-apoptotic function by targeting SOX2. Cancer Lett. 329:84–90. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Leonardo TR, Schultheisz HL, Loring JF and Laurent LC: The functions of microRNAs in pluripotency and reprogramming. Nat Cell Biol. 14:1114–1121. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Croset M, Santini D, Iuliani M, et al: MicroRNAs and bone metastasis: a new challenge. Molecules. 19:10115–10128. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Sukata T, Sumida K, Kushida M, et al: Circulating microRNAs, possible indicators of progress of rat hepatocarcinogenesis from early stages. Toxicol Lett. 200:46–52. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Truettner JS, Katyshev V, Esen-Bilgin N, Dietrich WD and Dore-Duffy P: Hypoxia alters MicroRNA expression in rat cortical pericytes. Microrna. 2:32–44. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

26 

Basu-Roy U, Seo E, Ramanathapuram L, Rapp TB, Perry JA, Orkin SH, Mansukhani A and Basilico C: Sox2 maintains self renewal of tumor-initiating cells in osteosarcomas. Oncogene. 31:2270–2282. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Basu-Roy U, Ambrosetti D, Favaro R, Nicolis SK, Mansukhani A and Basilico C: The transcription factor Sox2 is required for osteoblast self-renewal. Cell Death Differ. 17:1345–1353. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar :

28 

Mansukhani A, Ambrosetti D, Holmes G, Cornivelli L and Basilico C: Sox2 induction by FGF and FGFR2 activating mutations inhibits Wnt signaling and osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Biol. 168:1065–1076. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar :

29 

Zhang Y, Yeh LK, Zhang S, Call M, Yuan Y, Yasunaga M, Kao WW and Liu CY: Wnt/β-catenin signaling modulates corneal epithelium stratification via inhibition of Bmp4 during mouse development. Development. 142:3383–3393. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar :

30 

Bass AJ, Watanabe H, Mermel CH, Yu S, Perner S, Verhaak RG, Kim SY, Wardwell L, Tamayo P, Gat-Viks I, et al: SOX2 is an amplified lineage-survival oncogene in lung and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Nat Genet. 41:1238–1242. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar :

31 

Sun C, Sun L, Li Y, Kang X, Zhang S and Liu Y: Sox2 expression predicts poor survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients and it promotes liver cancer cell invasion by activating Slug. Med Oncol. 30:5032013. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Deng Z, Du WW, Fang L, Shan SW, Qian J, Lin J, Qian W, Ma J, Rutnam ZJ and Yang BB: The intermediate filament vimentin mediates microRNA miR-378 function in cellular self-renewal by regulating the expression of the Sox2 transcription factor. J Biol Chem. 288:319–331. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Zhang Y, Eades G, Yao Y, Li Q and Zhou Q: Estrogen receptor α signaling regulates breast tumor-initiating cells by down-regulating miR-140 which targets the transcription factor SOX2. J Biol Chem. 287:41514–41522. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2017
Volume 15 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Cao Y, Wu T, Li D, Hu J and Lu H: MicroRNA‑336 directly targets Sox‑2 in osteosarcoma to inhibit tumorigenesis. Mol Med Rep 15: 4217-4224, 2017
APA
Cao, Y., Wu, T., Li, D., Hu, J., & Lu, H. (2017). MicroRNA‑336 directly targets Sox‑2 in osteosarcoma to inhibit tumorigenesis. Molecular Medicine Reports, 15, 4217-4224. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.6493
MLA
Cao, Y., Wu, T., Li, D., Hu, J., Lu, H."MicroRNA‑336 directly targets Sox‑2 in osteosarcoma to inhibit tumorigenesis". Molecular Medicine Reports 15.6 (2017): 4217-4224.
Chicago
Cao, Y., Wu, T., Li, D., Hu, J., Lu, H."MicroRNA‑336 directly targets Sox‑2 in osteosarcoma to inhibit tumorigenesis". Molecular Medicine Reports 15, no. 6 (2017): 4217-4224. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.6493