Open Access

Comprehensive analysis of the lncRNA‑associated competing endogenous RNA network in breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Jing‑Jing Wang
    • Yue‑Qing Huang
    • Wei Song
    • Yi‑Fan Li
    • Han Wang
    • Wen‑Jie Wang
    • Min Huang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 15, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7374
  • Pages: 2572-2582
  • Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been confirmed to be potential prognostic markers in a variety of cancers and to interact with microRNAs (miRNAs) as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to regulate target gene expression. However, the role of lncRNA‑mediated ceRNAs in breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. In the present study, a ceRNA network was generated to explore their role in BC. The expression profiles of mRNAs, miRNAs and lncRNAs in 1,109 BC tissues and 113 normal breast tissues were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA). A total of 3,198 differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs, 150 differentially DEmiRNAs and 1,043 DElncRNAs were identified between BC and normal tissues. A lncRNA‑miRNA‑mRNA network associated with BC was successfully constructed based on the combined data obtained from RNA databases, and comprised 97 lncRNA nodes, 24 miRNA nodes and 74 mRNA nodes. The biological functions of the 74 DEmRNAs were further investigated by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. The results demonstrated that the DEmRNAs were significantly enriched in two GO biological process categories; the main biological process enriched term was ‘positive regulation of GTPase activity’. By KEGG analysis, four key enriched pathways were obtained, including the ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, the ‘Ras signaling pathway’, ‘prostate cancer’, and the ‘FoxO signaling pathway’. Kaplan‑Meier survival analysis revealed that six DElncRNAs (INC AC112721.1, LINC00536, MIR7‑3HG, ADAMTS9‑AS1, AL356479.1 and LINC00466), nine DEmRNAs (KPNA2, RACGAP1, SHCBP1, ZNF367, NTRK2, ORS1, PTGS2, RASGRP1 and SFRP1) and two DEmiRNAs (hsa‑miR‑301b and hsa‑miR‑204) had significant effects on overall survival in BC. The present results demonstrated the aberrant expression of INC AC112721.1, AL356479.1, LINC00466 and MIR7‑3HG in BC, indicating their potential prognostic role in patients with BC.

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among females and accounts for ~16% of all cancers (1). BC is a heterogeneous malignant tumor derived from breast tissue and is the main cause of cancer-associated mortality in females worldwide (2,3). Surgery and adjuvant therapy can effectively improve the prognosis of patients with BC; however, metastasis and recurrence can still occur (4,5). The development of BC is a complex process, involving genetic and epigenetic changes (6). Due to the heterogeneity of BC, clinical outcomes vary. The predictive value of current diagnostic and prognostic factors for BC is limited. Thus, it is essential to identify effective diagnostic markers, therapeutic targets and prognostic factors. Recently, competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) have been investigated in the process of tumorigenesis and cancer development (7,8). Salmena et al (7) proposed the ceRNA hypothesis in 2011, in which a complex post-transcriptional control network involving all types of RNA transcripts suppresses the functions of microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) via miRNA response elements.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of noncoding RNAs with a length >200 nucleotides (9); a lncRNA may function as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor to regulate the expression of target genes at various levels (10,11). Increasing evidence has demonstrated that lncRNAs serve an important role in several cellular processes (12,13). The predictive value of lncRNAs has been reported in multiple types of cancer, including lung cancer (14), gallbladder cancer (15), ovarian cancer (16), glioblastoma (17), gastric cancer (18), pancreatic cancer (19) and colorectal cancer (20). Abnormal expression of certain lncRNAs has been observed in BC, and it has been associated with diagnosis and prognosis of the disease (21). However, due to the limited number of tissue samples employed, the results of these studies in BC are inconsistent (22,23).

In the present study, the expression profiles of mRNAs, miRNAs and lncRNAs in BC and non-cancer tissues were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). An lncRNA-ceRNA network associated with BC was successfully constructed. In addition, functional enrichment analysis was conducted to investigate the potential mechanism. Survival analysis was also performed for the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their association with BC prognosis was explored. Differentially expressed RNAs (DERNAs) in the ceRNA network were analyzed to further investigate the development and prognosis of BC.

Materials and methods

Data acquisition and processing

RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and the corresponding clinical data of BC patients were obtained from the TCGA data portal (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/). The lncRNA, mRNA and miRNA sequence data were derived from Illumina HiSeq RNA Seq and Illumina HiSeq miRNA Seq platforms. A total of 1,109 BC tissues and 113 normal breast tissues were included in the present study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Gender was female; and ii) histopathology was confirmed as ductal or lobular disease. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Gender was male; and ii 2) histopathology was not confirmed as ductal and lobular disease. The present study was conducted in accordance with the publication guidelines provided by the TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/publications/publicationguidelines). Therefore, further approval from an ethics committee was not required.

Identification of DERNAs

Differentially expressed lncRNA (DElncRNA) and differentially expressed mRNA (DEmRNA) were defined and encoded based on the annotations from the Ensembl database (http://www.ensembl.org/index.html). To further analyze the data, the edgeR package in the R language 3.53 was used (http://bioconductor.org/packages/edgeR/), and the DElncRNA, DEmRNA and differentially expressed miRNA (DEmiRNA) were identified. A |log2 fold change (FC)| >1.5 and false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted to a P-value <0.01 were set as the thresholds. Volcano plots and heatmaps of the DERNAs were produced by using the gplots and heatmap packages in the R platform, respectively.

Construction of the ceRNA network

The miRcode (http://www.mircode.org/) database (24) was used to predict lncRNA-miRNA interactions, and the StarBase v2.0 (25) database (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/) was used to decode the miRNA sequences. In addition, miRNA-targeted mRNAs were retrieved from the miRDB (26), miRTarBase (27), and TargetScan (28) databases. Only the mRNAs recognized by all three databases were considered as candidate mRNAs and were then intersected with the DEmRNAs to determine the DEmRNAs that were targeted by the DEmiRNAs. Based on the DEmiRNA-DElncRNA and DEmiRNA-DEmRNA interactions, a coexpression network of DEGs was constructed, which was visualized using Cytoscape 3.6.1 (29). In addition, the cytoHubba plugin was used to evaluate the top 15 genes in the network based on closeness.

Functional enrichment analysis

To understand the underlying biological mechanisms of the DEmRNAs in the ceRNA crosstalk network, Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were conducted using the DAVID (database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery; http://david.ncifcrf.gov/) online tool (30) and cluster profiler, which is an R package for functional classification and enrichment of gene clusters using hypergeometric distribution. The GO plot package of R software was used to display the results of the GO and KEGG analyses. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were based on the threshold of P<0.05.

Survival analysis

The high expression and low expression groups were classified according to the median. Survival analysis was performed for the DERNAs in the ceRNA network using the ‘survival’ package in R to assess their prognostic value in patients with BC. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences between the groups. P<0.05 was considered as the threshold for significance in all analyses.

Results

DEmRNAs, DElncRNAs and DEmiRNAs in BC

Significant DEGs were identified in 1,109 BC and 113 adjacent non-cancer breast tissues using the ‘edgeR’ package in R software. A total of 3,198 DEmRNAs (1,996 upregulated and 1,202 downregulated), 1,043 DElncRNAs (814 upregulated and 229 downregulated), and 150 DEmiRNAs (114 upregulated and 36 downregulated) were identified with thresholds of |log2 fold change (FC)| >1.5 and adjusted P<0.01. The distribution of DEGs based on the two parameters, -log false discovery rate and logFC, was presented as a volcano plot (Fig. 1A). The heatmap demonstrated the expression data of all DEGs (Fig. 1B).

Construction of the ceRNA network

To investigate how lncRNAs mediate mRNA expression by integrating with miRNAs in BC, a lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA (ceRNA) network was generated and visualized using Cytoscape v3.6.1. A total of 405 pairs of interacting lncRNAs and miRNAs were identified using the Perl program 5.30.0 (http://www.perl.org/) (31), based on the 1,043 DElncRNAs. Based on 24 miRNAs, target mRNAs were identified using the miRTarBase, miRDB and TargetScan databases. Target genes that were included in all three datasets were selected. Finally, there were 74 DEmRNAs in the ceRNA network (Fig. 2). In total, 97 lncRNA nodes, 24 miRNA nodes and 74 mRNA nodes were identified as having differential expression profiles in the ceRNA network (Fig. 3A). Based on the plug-in cytoHubba in Cytoscape, the hub network was obtained through the existing network analysis and closeness scores (Fig. 3B). The results included six miRNAs, namely hsa-miR-204, hsa-miR-145, hsa-miR-122, hsa-miR-155, hsa-miR-182 and hsa-miR-183. The lncRNAs involved included LINC00461, AGAP11, LINC00466, LINC00261, MAGI2-AS3, TCL6, ADAMTS9-AS2, AL589642.1 and DLX6-AS1.

Functional analysis of DEmRNAs in the ceRNA network

Using GO and KEGG analysis, the biological functions of the 74 DEmRNAs were investigated. The results indicated that the DEmRNAs were enriched in two GO biological process categories (P<0.05; Fig. 4A). The main biological process GO term was ‘positive regulation of GTPase activity’. In addition, enriched GO terms based on the analysis of survival curves associated with KM-significant DEmRNAs were identified (Fig. 4B). The network included nine DEmRNAs, which were mainly enriched in ‘positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferation’.

From KEGG analysis, four main enriched pathways were determined (Table I and Fig. 5), including the ‘mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway’, the ‘Ras signaling pathway’, ‘prostate cancer’ and the ‘FoxO signaling pathway’. Among the four pathways, the ‘MAPK pathway’ and the ‘Ras pathway’ are associated with BC progression (3,30). In addition, ‘prostate cancer’ is linked to tumor-related pathways (32), whereas the ‘FoxO signaling pathway’ is associated with apoptosis, cell-cycle control and glucose metabolism (33).

Table I.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially enriched mRNAs.

Table I.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially enriched mRNAs.

Pathway IDDescriptionGenes involvedCountP-valueAdjusted P-value (FDR)
hsa04010MAPK signaling pathwayTGFBR2, KIT, FGF2, PDGFD, FOS, NTRK2, FGFR3, RASGRP18<0.0010.014
hsa05215Prostate cancerFOXO1, ERG, CREB5, PDGFD, CCNE25<0.0010.014
hsa04014Ras signaling pathwayKIT, FGF2, RGL1, PDGFD, NTRK2, FGFR3, RASGRP17<0.0010.014
hsa04068FoxO signaling pathwayTGFBR2, FOXO1, GABARAPL1, S1PR1, CCNB15<0.0010.032
Survival-associated DERNAs in the ceRNA network

KM analysis was performed to investigate the association between DERNAs (DElncRNAs, DEmRNAs and DEmiRNAs) in the ceRNA network and the prognosis of patients with BC, thereby obtaining a prognostic signature for each DERNA.

In total, 6 out of the total 97 DElncRNAs were significantly associated with the rate of overall survival. Among them, three DElncRNAs (INC AC112721.1, LINC00536 and MIR7-3HG) were negatively associated with OS, while the other three (ADAMTS9-AS1, AL356479.1 and LINC00466) were positively associated with OS (Fig. 6A).

In addition, 9 out of the total 74 DEmRNAs were significantly associated with the rate of overall survival. Among them, four DEmRNAs [importin subunit α 2 (KPNA2), Rac GTPase-activating protein 1 (RACGAP1), Shc binding and spindle associated 1 (SHCBP1) and zinc finger protein 367 (ZNF367)] were negatively associated with OS, while the remaining five DEmRNAs [tropomyosin receptor kinase B (NTRK2), ORS1, prostaglandin-endoperoxidase synthase 2 (PTGS2), RAS guanyl-releasing protein 1 (RASGRP1) and secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1)] were positively associated with OS (Fig. 6B).

Finally, 2 out of the total 24 DEmiRNAs were significantly associated with the rate of OS. The results demonstrated that hsa-miR-301b was negatively associated with OS, while hsa-miR-204 was positively associated with OS (Fig. 6C).

Discussion

BC is a common gynecological malignancy; the incidence of this disease is increasing (3). Despite the combined use of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy, BC remains a major cause of cancer-associated mortality in females (34). To improve the clinical status of patients with BC, and develop additional methods for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of this disease, it is crucial to understand the regulatory mechanism underlying its occurrence and development. The study of prognostic markers associated with BC may aid early detection and individualized treatment.

Recently, research into the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network has attracted increasing attention. Non-coding (nc) RNAs include various forms of RNA, which are categorized into lncRNAs and short ncRNAs. As short-chain ncRNAs, miRNAs are ~22 nucleotides in length and bind to sequences with partial complementarity to RNA transcripts to act as negative regulators of target gene expression (35). lncRNAs are defined as transcripts >200 nucleotides in length with no protein-coding functions (36). Denzler et al (37) proposed the ‘competitive endogenous RNA’ hypothesis, suggesting that ceRNAs could regulate miRNAs. Salmena et al (7) reported that all types of RNAs can compete with each other for miRNAs, resulting in large-scale transcription crosstalk throughout the transcriptome.

Investigation into ceRNAs and ceRNA networks may provide insight into the processes underlying certain diseases and aid the development of novel therapeutic strategies. The imbalance in lncRNA expression is associated with tumorigenesis, metastasis and prognosis of various types of cancer (14,16,20,38), suggesting that lncRNAs may be potential biomarkers of cancer. In order to evaluate the systematic biological function of the DElncRNAs in the ceRNA network, the present study investigated the association between DElncRNAs and OS. To comprehensively understand how the lncRNA-associated ceRNA network affects BC, large-scale sequencing data of patients with BC were obtained for analysis from TCGA. DERNAs were detected and a lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network was constructed based on the prediction of associated tumor-specific biological processes. In total, 97 lncRNA, 22 miRNA and 74 mRNA nodes in the ceRNA networks were identified to be differentially expressed. In addition, the association between DElncRNAs and OS, and the biological role of DElncRNAs in ceRNA networks were investigated. In the present study, nine DEmRNAs (KPNA2, NTRK2, ORS1, PTGS2, RACGAP1, RASGRP1, SFRP1, SHCBP1 and ZNF367), six DElncRNAs (INC AC112721.1, ADAMTS9-AS1, AL356479.1, LINC00466, LINC00536 and MIR7-3HG), and two DEmiRNAs (hsa-miR-204, hsa-miR-301b) were associated with OS; thus, these DERNAs may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers of OS in patients with BC.

The regulation of miRNAs is a critical process associated with tumor-related pathways involved in oncogenesis and tumor progression (39). It has been reported that a higher grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma is correlated with a concomitant decrease in miR-204 expression (40,41). Ying et al (42) revealed that miR-204 suppresses the stem cell-associated phenotype, and the self-renewal and migration potentials of glioma cells by targeting SRY-box transcription factor 4 and the EPH receptor B2. Thus, loss of miR-204 expression enhances tumor migration. Shen et al (43) suggested that miR-204 regulates the biological behavior of BC cells by directly targeting forkhead box A1, acting as a tumor suppressor in BC. These reports are consistent with the current results, in which the increased expression of miR-204 was associated with improved overall survival in patients with BC. The current results also demonstrated that upregulated hsa-miR-301b was associated with poor survival in patients with BC. Fort et al (44) revealed that the miR-130b/301b cluster serves a protumorigenic role in prostate cancer.

In the present study, increased expression of ADAMTS9-AS1, AL356479.1 and LINC00466 was positively associated with prognosis, while the reduced expression of the remaining three lncRNAs (INC AC112721.1, LINC00536 and MIR7-3HG) was associated with improved prognosis. As an antisense lncRNA, ADAMTS9-AS1 serves crucial roles in the progression and prognosis of carcinoma (45). ADAMTS9-AS1 was determined to be associated with the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer (46,47). Xing et al (48) suggested that ADAMTS9-AS1 may be a marker for predicting the prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. Li et al (49) reported that ADAMTS9-AS1 may be indispensable in the development of the ectoderm and epithelial cells, and can be effectively employed for determining the risk of esophageal cancer development. In addition, it was indicated that ADAMTS9-AS1 serves as a risk-predicting lncRNA in ovarian cancer (50). Analysis of BC data revealed ADAMTS9-AS1 and LINC00536 to be prognostic markers for BC (50). These previous findings were consistent with the results of the present study. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported the roles of AC112721.1, AL356479.1, LINC00466 and MIR7-3HG in cancer.

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that miRNAs serve an important role in cancer. In the ceRNA network, the present study reported that the upregulated expression of LINC00466 was associated with downregulation of hsa-miR-204 and hsa-miR-144; and MIR7-3HG was determined to downregulate hsa-miR-204 and hsa-miR-145. Several studies have reported that the levels of hsa-miR-204 were decreased in certain types of cancer, including gastric cancer (51) and lung cancer (52). Based on TCGA data of 1,077 BC tissue samples, Alhawaj et al (53) determined that miR-204-5p was markedly downregulated when compared with 104 normal tissue samples. Liu et al (54) demonstrated that trichostatin A and tamoxifen inhibited BC cell growth via miR-204 and estrogen receptor (ER) α-mediated suppression of the AKT/mTOR pathway, suggesting that miR-204 may be associated with tumor growth and with sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. The present study proposed the involvement of the LINC00466-hsa-miR-204-NTRK2 axis in BC. Thus, LINC00466 and MIR7-3HG may be crucial for the progression of tumors by interacting with hsa-miR-204. In addition, hsa-miR-144 and hsa-miR-145 exhibit inverse expression profiles in BC tissues (5557).

Combining the results of the hub networks based on analysis with the plug-in cytoHubba in Cytoscape, the present study determined that hsa-miR-155 and AGAP11 had a high degree of closeness, and exhibited significance from GO analysis. Hsa-miR-155 is a multifunctional small RNA located in chromosome 21, and is involved in a variety of biological and pathological processes (58). Volinia et al (59) reported that miRNAs served complex roles in tumors; network analysis indicated that the majority of miRNAs were linked to hsa-miR-155 within transgenic mice with miR-155-induced acute lymphocytic leukemia (59). Chuang et al (60) identified that the increased expression of hsa-miR-155-5p was a poor prognostic marker in acute myeloid leukemia. Braun et al (61) revealed that germline polymorphisms at AGAP11 were associated with stage-adjusted survival in ovarian cancer. In the current network, hsa-miR-155 was highly expressed, while AGAP11 was expressed at low levels, and may be a prognostic marker in BC. Additionally, 74 DEmRNAs were identified in the current ceRNA network. GO analysis revealed that the main enriched GO biological processes were ‘positive regulation of GTPase activity’, ‘positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade’ and ‘transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter’. Analysis of the enriched GO networks of the KM-significant DEmRNAs revealed that nine DEmRNAs were mainly enriched in ‘cytosol’ and ‘positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferation’. Among the nine DEmRNAs, upregulated RASGRP1 expression was demonstrated to be associated with favorable outcome in BC. As a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, RASGRP1 can sensitize Ras and ERK/MAPK cascades. Alterations in RASGRP1 expression have been associated with a variety of diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (62), hepatotoxicity (63), and cancer (64,65). Upregulated RASGRP1 expression correlates with improved clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer, and may induce a negative feedback loop to suppress proliferative epidermal growth factor receptor/son of sevenless homolog 1/Ras signaling (64). RASGRP1 may be a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (66). Wang et al (67) reported a positive correlation between RASGRP1 overexpression and survival in triple-negative breast cancer. Some studies have reported that RASGRP1 is associated with the acquired drug resistance of tumors (68,69). In addition, seven other genes identified in the present study (KPNA2, NTRK2, PTGS2, RACGAP1, SFRP1, SHCBP1 ZNF367) have been reported to be associated with the prognosis of tumors (7075).

Pathway analysis suggested that DEGs were mainly involved in the ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ and the ‘Ras signaling pathway’ in the present study. Additionally, the present results demonstrated that RASGRP1 was enriched in the ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ and the ‘Ras signaling pathway’. MAPKs are a class of serine/threonine protein kinases in cells, and the MAPK signaling pathway is present in most types of cells. MAPK signaling serves an important role in transducing extracellular signals into cells and their nuclei, and induces various cellular biological processes, including cell differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the MAPK signaling pathway is associated with the development of BC (7679). Yang et al (78) indicated that C-C motif chemokine ligand 28 has been associated with the proliferation and metastasis of BC via the MAPK-mediated anti-apoptotic and metastasis signaling pathways. The androgen receptor pathway is a potential target for the treatment of BC, and has been reported to exhibit crosstalk with the MAPK pathway (77). Previously, the MAPK signaling pathway was demonstrated to be involved in the development of drug resistance in tumors (78). Jia et al (79) reported that Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) could enhance the response of BC cells to tamoxifen by inhibiting the MAPK signaling pathway, indicating that targeting KLF4/MAPK signaling may be a potential therapeutic strategy for treating BC. RAS is one of the most commonly mutated genes linked to human cancer. Anticancer inhibitors targeting the RAS signaling pathway are potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancers; however, further investigation is required. The abnormal activation of the Ras/ERK pathway mediates the occurrence and invasiveness of BC, which is notably common in BC. Ras activation is a crucial determinant of the transmission and poor prognosis of ERα+/luminal BC (80,81).

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report the aberrant expression of INC AC112721.1, AL356479.1, LINC00466 and MIR7-3HG in BC, indicating their potential prognostic value in BC. The present study proposed that LINC00466 and MIR7-3HG interact with hsa-miR-204, which may be involved in the development of BC; to the best of our knowledge, this has not been reported previously. Of note, further bioinformatics analysis of the ceRNA network in BC may aid future investigations. The current results determined that the genes associated with survival in BC were enriched in the ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, which has been reported to be associated with drug resistance. Our group aims to further investigate the pathology of BC via in vivo and in vitro experiments in the future.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Education for Health Foundation of Suzhou for Youth (grant nos. kjxw2018030 and kjxw2018032), the Science and Technology Project Foundation of Suzhou (grant no. SS201651), the Education Research Project Foundation of Nanjing Medical University (grant no. FZS-ZD-201701) and the Key Medical Disciplines in Jiangsu Province (grant no. ZDXKC2016007).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JJW, YQH and WS carried out data acquisition and processing, and were the major contributors in writing the manuscript. YFL and HW made contributions to data analysis, interpretation and figure editing. WJW and MH directed the whole study, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:9–29. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Wang Y, Zhou Y, Yang Z, Chen B, Huang W, Liu Y and Zhang Y: MiR-204/ZEB2 axis functions as key mediator for MALAT1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 39:10104283176909982017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Kroenke CH, Michael YL, Poole EM, Kwan ML, Nechuta S, Leas E, Caan BJ, Pierce J, Shu XO, Zheng Y and Chen WY: Postdiagnosis social networks and breast cancer mortality in the after breast cancer pooling project. Cancer. 123:1228–1237. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Luschin G and Habersack M: Oral information about side effects of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer patients at initial consultation and first follow-up visit: An online survey. Health Commun. 29:421–426. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Cheng Y, Tao L, Xu J, Li Q, Yu J, Jin Y, Chen Q, Xu Z, Zou Q and Liu X: CD44/cellular prion protein interact in multidrug resistant breast cancer cells and correlate with responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Mol Carcinog. 53:686–697. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bao L, Messer K, Schwab R, Harismendy O, Pu M, Crain B, Yost S, Frazer KA, Rana B, Hasteh F, et al: Mutational profiling can establish clonal or independent origin in synchronous bilateral breast and other tumors. PLoS One. 10:e01424872015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L and Pandolfi PP: A ceRNA hypothesis: The Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 146:353–358. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Rapicavoli NA, Qu K, Zhang J, Mikhail M, Laberge RM and Chang HY: A mammalian pseudogene lncRNA at the interface of inflammation and anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Elife. 2:e007622013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Mercer TR, Dinger ME and Mattick JS: Long non-coding RNAs: Insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 10:155–159. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Ponting CP, Oliver PL and Reik W: Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 136:629–641. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Anamaria N, Soumillon M, Warnefors M, Liechti A, Daish T, Zeller U, Baker JC, Grützner F and Kaessmann H: The evolution of lncRNA repertoires and expression patterns in tetrapods. Nature. 505:635–640. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Xue B and He L: An expanding universe of the non-coding genome in cancer biology. Carcinogenesis. 35:1209–1216. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Xie C, Yuan J, Li H, Li M, Zhao G, Bu D, Zhu W, Wu W, Chen R and Zhao Y: NONCODEv4: Exploring the world of long non-coding RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 42((Database Issue)): D98–D103. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kumar M.S..Armenteros-Monterroso E, East P, Chakravorty P, Matthews N, Winslow MM and Downward J: HMGA2 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to promote lung cancer progression. Nature. 505:212–217. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Wang C, Chen L, Yang Y, Zhang M and Wong G: Identification of bladder cancer prognostic biomarkers using an ageing gene-related competitive endogenous RNA network. Oncotarget. 8:111742–111753. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Zhou M, Wang X, Shi H, Cheng L, Wang Z, Zhao H, Yang L and Sun J: Characterization of long non-coding RNA-associated ceRNA network to reveal potential prognostic lncRNA biomarkers in human ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 7:12598–12611. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Chiu YC, Hsiao TH, Chen Y and Chuang EY: Parameter optimization for constructing competing endogenous RNA regulatory network in glioblastoma multiforme and other cancers. BMC Genomics. 16 (Suppl 4):S12015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Wu Q, Xiang S, Ma J, Hui P, Wang T, Meng W, Shi M and Wang Y: Long non-coding RNA CASC15 regulates gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration and epithelial mesenchymal transition by targeting CDKN1A and ZEB1. Mol Oncol. 12:799–813. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Yao K, Wang Q, Jia J and Zhao H: A competing endogenous RNA network identifies novel mRNA, miRNA and lncRNA markers for the prognosis of diabetic pancreatic cancer. Tumour Biol. 39:10104283177078822017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Shan Y, Ma J, Pan Y, Hu J, Liu B and Jia L: LncRNA SNHG7 sponges miR-216b to promote proliferation and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer through upregulating GALNT1. Cell Death Dis. 9:7222018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Paci P, Colombo T and Farina L: Computational analysis identifies a sponge interaction network between long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs in human breast cancer. BMC Syst Biol. 8:832014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Berger AC, Korkut A, Kanchi RS, Hegde AM, Lenoir W, Liu W, Liu Y, Fan H, Shen H, Ravikumar V, et al: A comprehensive pan-cancer molecular study of gynecologic and breast cancers. Cancer Cell. 33:690–705.e9. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zhao W, Luo J and Jiao S: Comprehensive characterization of cancer subtype associated long non-coding RNAs and their clinical implications. Sci Rep. 4:65912014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Jeggari A, Marks DS and Larsson E: miRcode: A map of putative microRNA target sites in the long non-coding transcriptome. Bioinformatics. 28:2062–2063. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH and Yang JH: StarBase v2.0: Decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42((Database Issue)): D92–D97. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Wong N and Wang X: miRDB: An online resource for microRNA target prediction and functional annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43((Database Issue)): D146–D152. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Chou CH, Shrestha S, Yang CD, Chang NW, Lin YL, Liao KW, Huang WC, Sun TH, Tu SJ, Lee WH, et al: MiRTarBase update 2018: A resource for experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 46:D296–D302. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Agarwal V, Bell GW, Nam JW and Bartel DP: Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife. 4:2015.doi: 10.7554/eLife.05005. View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B and Ideker T: Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13:2498–2504. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC and Lempicki RA: DAVID: Database for Annotation, visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 4:P32003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Aiex RM, Resende MGC and Ribeiro CC: TTT plots: A perl program to create time-to-target plots. Optimization Lett. 1:355–366. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Jia P, Liu Y and Zhao Z: Integrative pathway analysis of genome-wide association studies and gene expression data in prostate cancer. BMC Syst Biol. 6 (Suppl 3):S132012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Coomans de Brachène A and Demoulin JB: FOXO transcription factors in cancer development and therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 73:1159–1172. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Stagl JM, Bouchard LC, Lechner SC, Blomberg BB, Gudenkauf LM, Jutagir DR, Glück S, Derhagopian RP, Carver CS and Antoni MH: Long-term psychological benefits of cognitive-behavioral stress management for women with breast cancer: 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 121:1873–1881. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Haecker I and Renne R: HITS-CLIP and PAR-CLIP advance viral miRNA targetome analysis. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 24:101–116. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Wang K, Guo WX, Li N, Gao CF, Shi J, Tang YF, Shen F, Wu MC, Liu SR and Cheng SQ: Serum LncRNAs profiles serve as novel potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of HBV-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 10:e01449342015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Denzler R, Agarwal V, Stefano J, Bartel DP and Stoffel M: Assessing the ceRNA hypothesis with quantitative measurements of miRNA and target abundance. Mol Cell. 54:766–776. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Xia T, Liao Q, Jiang X, Shao Y, Xiao B, Xi Y and Guo J: Long noncoding RNA associated-competing endogenous RNAs in gastric cancer. Sci Rep. 4:60882014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Liu C, Liu R, Zhang D, Deng Q, Liu B, Chao HP, Rycaj K, Takata Y, Lin K, Lu Y, et al: MicroRNA-141 suppresses prostate cancer stem cells and metastasis by targeting a cohort of pro-metastasis genes. Nat Commun. 8:142702017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Mikhaylova O, Stratton Y, Hall D, Kellner E, Ehmer B, Drew AF, Gallo CA, Plas DR, Biesiada J, Meller J and Czyzyk-Krzeska MF: VHL-regulated MiR-204 suppresses tumor growth through inhibition of LC3B-mediated autophagy in renal clear cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 21:532–546. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Hall DP, Cost NG, Hegde S, Kellner E, Mikhaylova O, Stratton Y, Ehmer B, Abplanalp WA, Pandey R, Biesiada J, et al: TRPM3 and miR-204 establish a regulatory circuit that controls oncogenic autophagy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 26:738–753. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Ying Z, Li Y, Wu J, Zhu X, Yang Y, Tian H, Li W, Hu B, Cheng SY and Li M: Loss of miR-204 expression enhances glioma migration and stem cell-like phenotype. Cancer Res. 73:990–999. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Shen SQ, Huang LS, Xiao XL, Zhu XF, Xiong DD, Cao XM, Wei KL, Chen G and Feng ZB: miR-204 regulates the biological behavior of breast cancer MCF-7 cells by directly targeting FOXA1. Oncol Rep. 38:368–376. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Fort RS, Mathó C, Oliveira-Rizzo C, Garat B, Sotelo-Silveira JR and Duhagon MA: An integrated view of the role of miR-130b/301b miRNA cluster in prostate cancer. Exp Hematol Oncol. 7:102018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Yuan SX, Tao QF, Wang J, Yang F, Liu L, Wang LL, Zhang J, Yang Y, Liu H, Wang F, et al: Antisense long non-coding RNA PCNA-AS1 promotes tumor growth by regulating proliferating cell nuclear antigen in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 349:87–94. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Zhu N, Hou J, Wu Y, Liu J, Li G, Zhao W, Ma G, Chen B and Song Y: Integrated analysis of a competing endogenous RNA network reveals key lncRNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers for human bladder cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 97:e118872018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Xia Y, Liu Z, Yu W, Zhou S, Shao L, Song W and Liu M: The prognostic significance of long noncoding RNAs in bladder cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 13:e01986022018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Xing Y, Zhao Z, Zhu Y, Zhao L, Zhu A and Piao D: Comprehensive analysis of differential expression profiles of mRNAs and lncRNAs and identification of a 14-lncRNA prognostic signature for patients with colon adenocarcinoma. Oncol Rep. 39:2365–2375. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

49 

Li Z, Yao Q, Zhao S, Wang Y, Li Y and Wang Z: Comprehensive analysis of differential co-expression patterns reveal transcriptional dysregulation mechanism and identify novel prognostic lncRNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 10:3095–3105. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Wang H, Fu Z, Dai C, Cao J, Liu X, Xu J, Lv M, Gu Y, Zhang J, Hua X, et al: LncRNAs expression profiling in normal ovary, benign ovarian cyst and malignant epithelial ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 6:389832016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Sonohara F, Inokawa Y, Hayashi M, Kodera Y and Nomoto S: Epigenetic modulation associated with carcinogenesis and prognosis of human gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 13:3363–3368. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Shi L, Zhang B, Sun X, Lu S, Liu Z, Liu Y, Li H, Wang L, Wang X and Zhao C: MiR-204 inhibits human NSCLC metastasis through suppression of NUAK1. Br J Cancer. 111:2316–2327. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Alhawaj R: Heme biosynthesis and metabolism are important contributors to the pathophysiology of chronic hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Dissertations & Theses-Gradworks, 2014. http://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=c770828df9516fbf2613928c9fbecb09&site=xueshu_se&hitarticle=1

54 

Liu J and Li Y: Trichostatin A and Tamoxifen inhibit breast cancer cell growth by miR-204 and ERα reducing AKT/mTOR pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 467:242–247. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Vivacqua A, De Marco P, Santolla MF, Cirillo F, Pellegrino M, Panno ML, Abonante S and Maggiolini M: Estrogenic gper signaling regulates mir144 expression in cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (cafs). Oncotarget. 6:16573–16587. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Liu SY, Li XY, Chen WQ, Hu H, Luo B, Shi YX, Wu TW, Li Y, Kong QZ, Lu HD and Lu ZX: Demethylation of the MIR145 promoter suppresses migration and invasion in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 8:61731–61741. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

57 

Muti P, Sacconi A, Hossain A, Donzelli S, Ben Moshe NB, Ganci F, Sieri S, Krogh V, Berrino F, Biagioni F, et al: Downregulation of microRNAs 145-3p and 145-5p is a long-term predictor of postmenopausal breast cancer risk: The ORDET prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 23:2471–2481. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Faraoni I, Antonetti FR, Cardone J and Bonmassar E: miR-155 gene: A typical multifunctional microRNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1792:497–505. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Volinia S, Galasso M, Costinean S, Tagliavini L, Gamberoni G, Drusco A, Marchesini J, Mascellani N, Sana ME, Abu Jarour R, et al: Reprogramming of miRNA networks in cancer and leukemia. Genome Res. 20:589–599. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Chuang MK, Chiu YC, Chou WC, Hou HA, Chuang EY and Tien HF: A 3-microRNA scoring system for prognostication in de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leukemia. 29:1051–1059. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Braun R, Finney R, Yan C, Chen QR, Hu Y, Edmonson M, Meerzaman D and Buetow K: Discovery analysis of TCGA data reveals association between germline genotype and survival in ovarian cancer patients. PLoS One. 8:e550372013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Yasuda S, Stevens RL, Terada T, Takeda M, Hashimoto T, Fukae J, Horita T, Kataoka H, Atsumi T and Koike T: Defective expression of Ras guanyl nucleotide-releasing protein 1 in a subset of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 179:4890–4900. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Horinouchi M, Yagi M, Imanishi H, Mori T, Yanai T, Hayakawa A, Takeshima Y, Hijioka M, Okamura N, Sakaeda T, et al: Association of genetic polymorphisms with hepatotoxicity in patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 27:344–354. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Depeille P, Henricks LM, van de Ven RA, Lemmens E, Wang CY, Matli M, Werb Z, Haigis KM, Donner D, Warren R and Roose JP: RasGRP1 opposes proliferative EGFR-SOS1-Ras signals and restricts intestinal epithelial cell growth. Nat Cell Biol. 17:804–815. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Sharma A, Fonseca LL, Rajani C, Yanagida JK, Endo Y, Cline JM, Stone JC, Ji J, Ramos JW and Lorenzo PS: Targeted deletion of RasGRP1 impairs skin tumorigenesis. Carcinogenesis. 35:1084–1091. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Zhang X, Zhuang H, Han F, Shao X, Liu Y, Ma X, Wang Z, Qiang Z and Li Y: Sp1-regulated transcription of RasGRP1 promotes HCC proliferation. Liver Int. 38:2006–2017. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Wang S, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Cai Q, Cai H, Guo X, Shi L, Wu J, Ye F, Qiu Q, Zheng Y, et al: Gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer in relation to survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 171:199–207. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Lauchle JO, Kim D, Le DT, Akagi K, Crone M, Krisman K, Warner K, Bonifas JM, Li Q, Coakley KM, et al: Response and resistance to MEK inhibition in leukaemias initiated by hyperactive Ras. Nature. 461:411–414. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Ding H, Peterson KL, Correia C, Koh B, Schneider PA, Nowakowski GS and Kaufmann SH: Histone deacetylase inhibitors interrupt HSP90 RASGRP1 and HSP90 CRAF interactions to upregulate BIM and circumvent drug resistance in lymphoma cells. Leukemia. 31:1593–1602. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Mortezavi A, Hermanns T, Seifert HH, Baumgartner MK, Provenzano M, Sulser T, Burger M, Montani M, Ikenberg K, Hofstädter F, et al: KPNA2 expression is an independent adverse predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res. 17:1111–1121. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Sengel-Turk CT, Hascicek C, Bakar F and Simsek E: Comparative evaluation of nimesulide-loaded nanoparticles for anticancer activity against breast cancer cells. Aaps PharmSciTech. 18:393–403. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Hass HG, Vogel U, Scheurlen M and Jobst J: Gene-expression Analysis identifies specific patterns of dysregulated molecular pathways and genetic subgroups of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 36:5087–5095. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

73 

Buhmeida A, Merdad A, Al-Maghrabi J, Al-Thobaiti F, Ata M, Bugis A, Syrjänen K, Abuzenadah A, Chaudhary A, Gari M, et al: RASSF1A methylation is predictive of poor prognosis in female breast cancer in a background of overall low methylation frequency. Anticancer Res. 31:2975–2981. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

74 

Tao HC, Wang HX, Dai M, Gu CY, Wang Q, Han ZG and Cai B: Targeting SHCBP1 inhibits cell proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:5645–5650. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Li WX, He K, Tang L, Dai SX, Li GH, Lv WW, Guo YC, An SQ, Wu GY, Liu D and Huang JF: Comprehensive tissue-specific gene set enrichment analysis and transcription factor analysis of breast cancer by integrating 14 gene expression datasets. Oncotarget. 8:6775–6786. 2016.

76 

Yang XL, Liu KY, Lin FJ, Shi HM and Ou ZL: CCL28 promotes breast cancer growth and metastasis through MAPK-mediated cellular anti-apoptosis and pro-metastasis. Oncol Rep. 38:1393–1401. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

77 

Kono M, Fujii T, Lim B, Karuturi MS, Tripathy D and Ueno NT: Androgen receptor function and androgen receptor-targeted therapies in breast cancer: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 3:1266–1273. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

78 

Katayama K, Yoshioka S, Tsukahara S, Mitsuhashi J and Sugimoto Y: Inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway results in the down-regulation of P-glycoprotein. Mol Cancer Ther. 6:2092–2102. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

79 

Jia Y, Zhou J, Luo X, Chen M, Chen Y, Wang J, Xiong H, Ying X, Hu W, Zhao W, et al: KLF4 overcomes tamoxifen resistance by suppressing MAPK signaling pathway and predicts good prognosis in breast cancer. Cell Signal. 42:165–175. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

80 

Serini S and Calviello G: Modulation of Ras/ERK and phosphoinositide signaling by long-chain n-3 PUFA in breast cancer and their potential complementary role in combination with targeted drugs. Nutrients. 9:E1852017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

81 

Wright KL, Adams JR, Liu JC, Loch AJ, Wong RG, Jo CE, Beck LA, Santhanam DR, Weiss L, Mei X, et al: Ras signaling is a key determinant for metastatic dissemination and poor survival of luminal breast cancer patients. Cancer Res. 75:4960–4972. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2019
Volume 42 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang JJ, Huang YQ, Song W, Li YF, Wang H, Wang WJ and Huang M: Comprehensive analysis of the lncRNA‑associated competing endogenous RNA network in breast cancer. Oncol Rep 42: 2572-2582, 2019
APA
Wang, J., Huang, Y., Song, W., Li, Y., Wang, H., Wang, W., & Huang, M. (2019). Comprehensive analysis of the lncRNA‑associated competing endogenous RNA network in breast cancer. Oncology Reports, 42, 2572-2582. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7374
MLA
Wang, J., Huang, Y., Song, W., Li, Y., Wang, H., Wang, W., Huang, M."Comprehensive analysis of the lncRNA‑associated competing endogenous RNA network in breast cancer". Oncology Reports 42.6 (2019): 2572-2582.
Chicago
Wang, J., Huang, Y., Song, W., Li, Y., Wang, H., Wang, W., Huang, M."Comprehensive analysis of the lncRNA‑associated competing endogenous RNA network in breast cancer". Oncology Reports 42, no. 6 (2019): 2572-2582. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7374